ana translation

134 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES. [JUDE 12-15
capable ; for though the Lexx. do not record it as thus used in peal,
we find fcOLAco] (ethpa.) = avtarTrdo-O-r] (Act. xi. 10, Pesh.) ;
also the
ptcp. apJi.
*QQSo = dvao-Trao-et (Lc. xiv. 5, Pesh. and Harkl.), and the
fut. apJi.
kQCQJ = avao-Trdo-rj (Dan. vi. [vii.] 19, Syr.-Hxp.). Harkl.
here, while with Philox. he avoids JQlZ) , yet
in his similar periphrasis the better-chosen
belongs to the Syro-Hexaplar vocabulary,
instead of n^ro uses
Qm^ZZ] (m!lZ = eKTt'XAo>,
see Tlies. S., s.v.).
13. Here, on the contrary, for eTra^pt'^oi/ra (a rare verb) Syriac
offers no equivalent. Both versions alike expand it into Si [Harkl.,
OLTT J O.pOV OLVTWV ^ttlKVUVTO..
Ib. For PQAJ^J p.4^1 = 6 o (= e/3So/x,os)] Philox. here, and always, expresses the
ordinal number (as Pesh. does) by the cardinal with prefix >, which is
the idiomatic usage. But Harkl. here employs the later adjectival form,
vo
]. and similarly writes j,.l.iJLDZ for oyooov (2 Pet. ii. 5, where
Philox. has ta.lV.oZ>), and so elsewhere in places where the ordinal
denotes second, third, &c., in a series. But in the two remaining
instances where an ordinal (Seurepos) occurs in these Epp. (2 Pet. iii. 1 ;
Jud. 5) merely meaning second, or secondly, as opposed to first, Harkl.
with Philox., renders by ^aZj'Zj. Cp. on this point (e.g.) the Pesh. and
Harkl. renderings of Mt. xxii. 26, and of Joh. xxi. 14 17.
14, 15.
In these two verses our version exhibits three remarkable
agreements with readings in which N is singular or nearly so among
Gr. authorities.
(a) In 14, it represents ei/ pvpido-w dyiW (for eV dyuus
/xvptacriv)
but ft, &G., add dyycXwj (6)
In 15, Traorav $vyr) v i
for
Trai/Tas TOVS dcre/^ets ; (c) In 15, after Ipywv, it omits d