ana translation

JUDE 12]
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES. 133
Ib. For v
V>AaSD = o-TnAaSes (in both versions) cp. 2 Pet. ii. 13,
where both make |V>Af*>Vf>
= o-TrtXof, a small but significant coincidence,
in the change from noun to participle, especially as the employment
as here of a participle to represent a noun is strange.
Ib. The agreement again of both versions in here representing the
rare verb o-weua>xoi'/xi/oi by ^g>^AVn is made doubly notable by
the fact that both render the same verb otherwise (by ^Q12)ASD)
in
the parallel passage of 2 Pet. (ii. 13, see Syr. text, p. 16 supr.). It
occurs nowhere else (and the simple eiiw^ov/xat not at all) in N.T. In
Pesh. N.T., neither verb is found; in Harkl., only Ol gr )Z|, once
(1 Tim. v. 6, where it = o-TraraAo)). Here, as in 2 Pet., both versions
fail to represent the wv- of the compound verb. And even the v/xou/
after dyaTrai? here, and similarly the v/juv after crvvevw^ovfjievoi in
2 Pet. (both of which Harkl. represents and thus suggests
disappear in the rendering of Philox., which replaces vpuv by
here, and in 2 Pet. omits v/juv.
Both also connect awtvcu^. here with
o-7riA.tt8e?, and make d^o/Jw? qualify Trot/xatVovres (see Dr. Mayor's
note, p. 41).
Ib. For 6ivo7r ooVor>r>
periphrasis
.OOU'^Ql, = dvafidvra (lit.,
/ecu &vt@T}