ana translation

130 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES. [JuDE 4-7
retaining the copulative ;
also Arab., as well as Harkl. But all the rest,
and Etzel, omit ;
as also the Polyglots and all editions, except Lee's.*
5.
On /3ov\ofjLii,
rendered )o., see Note supr.
on 2 Joh. 12.
Ib. Of the rival readings, -n-avra and TOVTO, Philox. ignores the latter ;
and most codices, with Arab, and Etzel, read ^Q^.lO
( = [{yxas]
unsupported otherwise. But 1, 2, with Hark]., write
(= Trai/ra),
which agrees with the best Gr. authorities (see notef
on Gr. text, p. 78 supr.).
Note that though 1, 2, and Harkl, read
rn\*">
.oAj|
* \ * fJD, they represent etSoras TraVra, without v/xas,
whereas the .QQ^O t oAj] ^--^r P
the latter reading, that represents v
6. Here both versions concur in the misrendering of at'Stots by
^Li,-! U (= ayvojo-rois), as if formed from etSeW, ola, and not from
dei. (So, too, Arab, represents aopdYois.) Into this mistake Harkl. has
been led by following Philox. ;
for in the only place where the word
recurs in N.T. (Rom. i. 20) he renders it rightly by tooASo (Pesh.
SoVvVy*) A like etymology is cited, from one authority, in Steph.
Tliesaur. (London, 1819), cuSios, Trapa TO eiSw, TO /?Ae7ra>; and, from
another, an equally erroneous guess, uiStos, Trapa TO ea;. This latter,
in the original Thesaur. (1572) is ascribed to Eustathius, and explained,
6 fjiri i'ojv, dAXa
7. Before ^>fy> [or
^>
,
in
^] ( = Trpd/cetvTat), three of our copies,
13, 19, 20, which elsewhere show signs of correction after Harkl.,
follow it in interpolating {u> **> (
= Te(f>pa, cp. T