ana translation

126 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES.
[3 JOH. 10-12
the five inferior ones above noted, that is, of all the five oldest, and
eight of the twelve later (eighteen in all being here available). In
this case Arab, agrees with the older text, and with Harkl. The
Harkl. translator notes that (frXvapwv was an unusual word, and perhaps
betrays his consciousness that his rendering of it is hardly adequate,
by inserting it in Gr. characters on his marg. The Latin of Etzel
("facit in nos"), of Pococke (" facit nobis"), and of the Polyglots
(" tractat nos"), alike show the difficulty they felt in dealing with their
Syriac text, ^A 'plCO .
Ib.
For Ol^ *QlD (impersonal, third pers. preter.) the ptcp.
- en
(agreeing with the subject) is more usual, and is read here by some
codices. See Pococke's note in loc., and cp.
Mt. vi. 34. Harkl. supports
our text as printed supr.,
and a parallel for it is to be found in Syr.-
Hxp. (Prov. xxx. 15).
The various points and other marks attached
to the word in many of our copies (see footnote in loc., p. 29 supr.) show
that it was a difficulty to the scribes.
Ib. Philox. (all texts) writes \^oVr>% . V ]1 T^V
7riSe;(o/AeVovs,
with C and some mss, and supported by some Latin.
Harkl. follows
the other MSS and most mss, and the best Latin, which give TOUS
ftovXofjLwovs ( v
>0 . J .QJOL1) ;
but in marg. a inserts ^>\noV>> as
alternative, whether deriving it from Philox., or from a Greek exemplar,
is doubtful.
11. All editions of Philox. prefix O (= KCU) to o
t
ov* Q01
( = 6 KaKOTroiaiv) ;
but codd. 1, 19 omit the copulative, as does Harkl.,
agreeing with all Greek MSS (except L)and many mss. Our other codices
insert it, except 18, which instead of it subjoins ^j ( = &0 to OO1,
thus agreeing with L and many mss which write 6 Se Ka/coTr.) ;
and so
also Arab, and Etzel. No Greek reads KOL 6 K. As the prefix O does
not usually or properly represent 8e, and as ^i> (the proper equivalent
of Se)
is so weakly attested, I prefer to follow 1,
19, as in text supr.
12. Nearly all our codices, Arab., Etzel, and all editions, read
IZplj dllV)O before *|j;J OliSoo, as if the Greek were KCU VTT av-njs
TT}S eKKXrjaias /cat VTT avrfjs T^S a\r)0ias, which is substantially the reading
of C and of the Armenian version. Cod. 1 (alone) omits (2,1) OlllVoo
altogether. Cod. 14, on the other hand,
inserts it and omits OUloo
p^s? (which seems to have been originally the reading of A). But 1