ana translation

120 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES.
[2 Jon. 7-10
7. For (2) (= Ul) of Philox. (preter.), Harkl. writes U') = ]Z1 (pres.),
9 T- T* O
an example of the care of the latter version to follow the Gr. accurately
;
which in this instance has been happily exercised, so as to
represent the tp^o/jitvov (not eXyXvOora) of the Gr. It may
be that
Philox. intended the same, but if so his copyists, by misplacing the
point, have done him injustice.
Ib. Notwithstanding the plural form of ^ajQ^D |J> [jQJOl] *^'l
( = 01 ny 6/xoAoyowres) preceding, Philox. and Harkl. both (with the Gr.)
read the last clause of the verse in the singular (p.a\^V) oZu") |jOl
JQjL^JfO
= euros ccrriv 6 TrXavos KCU 6 avrLXp.).
But a few late copies
of Philox. (13, 18 (corr.), 19) read the former words in sing., while Harkl.
(niarg. of a) reads the latter in plur. Both are obviously editors'
grammatical corrections. Neither has any Gr. support ;
but the latter
is countenanced by two Old Lat. authorities,
citation by Lucifer Calar. (217).
the Speculum (8),
and a
8. In this verse, as read by B and some mss and in the Lat. of
Lucif. C., there is a grammatical defect in the change
from second
pers. (Iva /AT) aTroAeo-^re, = O rOoZ (J>)
to the first (eipycura/AC&x).
Both
Philox. and Harkl. avoid this, following N A and others which read
dpydvavOe = .
( oA*x^k)) Harkl.
; (a), however, inserts in marg. the
variant ^!M.^> (= eipycura/xefla).
Note that, whereas both versions here make **\2} = e/3yao/xat,
both use ;V* for epyao//,ai, 3 Joh. 5 (where
alone it recurs in these
Epp.), a remarkable agreement in variation of rendering, from a
familiar to an unusual one (see Note infr. on 3 Joh. 5).
9. After the second ev ry StSa^y, Philox. expresses avrov by adding
the pronominal suffix (OIl^No i*~)).
Harkl. to like effect, but (as usual)
by adding the separate pron. OlXjj, which, however, he marks with # .
This mark can only be taken as referring to Philox., for no Gr. or
other authority supports avrov (though some supply X/HOTOI)).
10. The rendering of -^aipuv in both versions by w r *j is not after
the usage of Pesh., which keeps to the Semitic ^O\. In Harkl.,
however, we have for ^aipciv (as salutation) the literal
| r V)\ (Act.
xv. 23, xxiii. 26 ;
Jac. i.
1).
Ib. The footnote on ^ ** r
**O (p.
25 supr.) is incorrect; it ought
to be as follows :