CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY & DELIVERING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
conserving biodiversity & delivering ecosystem services
conserving biodiversity & delivering ecosystem services
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The pressures on Important<br />
Bird Areas are affecting their<br />
ability to continue delivering<br />
ecosystem services. Some<br />
services, such as recreation<br />
and tourism, are being<br />
delivered well, but others are<br />
not, or are in decline.<br />
<br />
In 2011, an assessment of the status of Nepal’s Important Bird Areas (IBAs) showed that nearly<br />
half of them (13) are considered to be in a very unfavourable condition, three more than in<br />
2004, meaning that less that 40% of the area of key habitats or populations of key bird species<br />
remain. Furthermore, it is clear that some threats are worsening, with nearly three-quarters of<br />
IBAs believed to be subject to high or very high pressures owing to human activities. However,<br />
positive responses are increasing too, with the majority of IBAs receiving some protection,<br />
management or conservation action compared with fewer than two-thirds in 2004 (see figure<br />
and p.34 for information on monitoring IBAs).<br />
The protected IBAs have, in general, lower pressures and better responses than the<br />
unprotected sites, as assessed in both 2004 and 2011. However, despite increasing responses<br />
through conservation actions, the state of birds and habitats at both protected and<br />
unprotected IBAs has not improved.<br />
The state of IBAs, pressures upon them, and responses in place in 2004 and 2011<br />
Status<br />
2004<br />
Pressures<br />
2004<br />
Status<br />
2011<br />
Pressures<br />
2011<br />
Responses<br />
2004<br />
Responses<br />
2011<br />
SOURCE Analysis of data held in BirdLife’s World Bird Database (2012).