23.09.2015 Views

DEVELOPMENT

The pdf-version - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

The pdf-version - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

foreign countries are also included as part of this capital.<br />

This figure is also influenced by that fact that Singapore<br />

is a city-state, which lacks natural resources. The breakdown<br />

of capital in Estonia was relatively similar to the<br />

other states, and intangible capital predominated, reaching<br />

75.9%. The capital structure in Estonia was similar to the<br />

wealthy states, but the volume of capital was lower. 10<br />

Various capital forms the basis for future income. To<br />

a considerable degree, the capital structure, as a whole, is<br />

shaped by the structure of the economy, although, at the<br />

same time, the use of various types of assets is affected<br />

by the demand for the products that are produced with<br />

the help of these assets. For instance, a precondition for<br />

the existence of forest resources is the production of timber<br />

products, but the sales volumes of timber products<br />

is influenced by the demand for them, which in turn, is<br />

dependent on people’s incomes, as well as the existence<br />

and cost of replacement goods made of other materials<br />

used for the same purpose. Therefore, in this approach,<br />

the presumed volume of timber products impacts the<br />

value of the forest resources.<br />

4.2.2<br />

Growth potential<br />

The concept of genuine savings is very important for<br />

assessing the possible impact of the changes, which have<br />

taken place in the production potential of the various<br />

states during some time period, on future GDP production<br />

and the standard of living. By using this concept,<br />

an attempt is made to combine the changes that have<br />

occurred in capital with the changes in other types of<br />

assets. Some are positive, for example, the education level<br />

increases as a result of the expenditures made in education.<br />

Others are primarily negative, such as the depletion<br />

of sub-soil assets. However, finding and exploiting new<br />

sub-soil assets increases natural capital.<br />

The various components of genuine savings are<br />

computed as follows:<br />

• total savings is the available national income, minus<br />

public and private consumption, plus international<br />

transfers (transfers to foreign countries increase total<br />

savings, and transfers from foreign countries reduce<br />

total savings);<br />

• net savings is total savings minus depreciation;<br />

• net savings plus current education expenditures, mi -<br />

nus investments into structures and equipment, equals<br />

net savings plus investments in human capital;<br />

• net saving plus investments in human capital, minus<br />

the depletion of natural capital, minus damage to the<br />

environment from pollution, equals genuine savings.<br />

In the case of natural capital, if the size of the capital<br />

remains the same, its depletion results in negative savings.<br />

The assessment of the value of natural capital is based<br />

on the volume of sub-soil assets that are extracted, the<br />

Table 4.2.3<br />

Total and net savings as a percentage of national income<br />

in 2008 (%)<br />

State<br />

Gross national<br />

savings<br />

Consumption<br />

of fixed capital<br />

Net national<br />

savings<br />

Education<br />

expenditures<br />

Savings related<br />

to produced<br />

capital and<br />

human capital<br />

Austria 27.2 14.3 12.9 5.3 18.2<br />

Estonia 20.1 13.5 6.6 4.6 11.2<br />

Netherlands 10.3 13.9 -3.6 4.8 1.2<br />

Ireland 19.7 17.1 2.5 5.2 7.7<br />

Israel 19.8 13.5 6.3 5.9 12.2<br />

Canada 23.4 14.0 9.4 4.8 14.2<br />

South Korea 30.5 12.6 17.9 3.9 21.8<br />

Lithuania 15.2 12.7 2.5 4.6 7.1<br />

Latvia 22.3 12.6 9.6 5.6 15.2<br />

Singapore 47.0 14.1 32.9 2.7 35.6<br />

Slovenia 27.0 13.6 13.4 5.3 18.7<br />

Finland 24.8 14.1 10.7 5.6 16.3<br />

Denmark 23.6 14.2 9.4 7.4 16.8<br />

Czech Republic 24.2 13.8 10.4 4.4 14.8<br />

Chile 24.2 12.9 11.4 3.6 15.0<br />

Hungary 15.9 15.1 0.8 5.3 6.1<br />

Uruguay 18.2 11.9 6.3 2.6 8.9<br />

Source: The Changing Wealth of Nations. Measuring Sustainable<br />

Development in the New Millennium 2011, 186–195<br />

global market price and resource rent rate. The theory<br />

recommends that the marginal cost be used to calculate<br />

the resource rent, but since data on the former is not generally<br />

available, the average cost indicator is used. The<br />

same approach is used for primary energy sources like<br />

petroleum, coal and natural gas.<br />

In the case of forests, the net saving is positive, if the<br />

natural growth exceeds the harvest, and in the opposite<br />

case, if the harvest is greater than the natural growth, the<br />

net saving is negative. In the latter case, the negative net<br />

saving is equal to the difference between the harvest and<br />

natural growth, multiplied by the price of roundwood and<br />

the resource rent product.<br />

Carbon emissions are treated as negative savings.<br />

The determination of their extent is based on carbon<br />

dioxide emissions, the percentage of carbon in the carbon<br />

dioxide, and a price of $20 per ton of carbon. The<br />

problem with assessing the damage caused by carbon<br />

emissions is that the cost of the permanent social damage<br />

that is caused may be significantly higher than the market<br />

or estimated price of carbon.<br />

In the case of hazardous substances, the theory<br />

recommends that the assessment be based on the willingness<br />

to pay for the prevention of death and serious<br />

health damage. The practical calculations are based on<br />

the number of estimated years of life that are lost, and the<br />

value of the years, based on average wages.<br />

10 In the World Bank report, complete data on the various types of capital in Estonia existed for 2000. In 2005, several important indicators were<br />

missing, and to ensure comparability with other states in the study, many of the indicators for Estonia were derived from price and volume indices.<br />

162<br />

Estonian Human Development Report 2012/2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!