23.09.2015 Views

DEVELOPMENT

The pdf-version - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

The pdf-version - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 3.5.4<br />

Greenhouse gas emissions in Estonia, 1995–2010, 1,000 tonnes CO 2<br />

eq<br />

Other Wastes Agriculture Industrial processes Transport Manufacturing industry and construction Power industry<br />

22,500<br />

22,500<br />

20,000<br />

20,000<br />

17,500<br />

17,500<br />

15,000<br />

15,000<br />

12,500<br />

12,500<br />

10,000<br />

10,000<br />

7,500<br />

7,500<br />

5,000<br />

5,000<br />

2,500<br />

2,500<br />

0<br />

0<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2008<br />

2010<br />

Source: Eurostat/EEA<br />

The largest part of Estonia’s Ecological Footprint<br />

is comprised of the Carbon Footprint and forestry<br />

(Figure 3.5.2). Somewhat surprising is the change in<br />

the Footprint related to forest and lumber products,<br />

between 2000 and 2005, which partially coincides with<br />

the period of the largest logging volumes and exports,<br />

but which, considering the Ecological Footprint methodology,<br />

should reflect final domestic consumption.<br />

Estonia’s very large Carbon Footprint is caused primarily<br />

by the power industry, which is based on oil<br />

shale and the large consumption of natural resources<br />

related thereto. Therefore, below, we will take a closer<br />

look at Estonia’s greenhouse gas emissions, its Carbon<br />

Footprint, the energy intensity of the economy and<br />

resource productivity. There are few surveys of the specific<br />

areas of consumption that increase the Ecological<br />

Footprint, and the latest data on Estonia is for 2004,<br />

and available from the One Planet Economy Network<br />

database (2011). Based thereon, the greatest consumption<br />

occurs in the following sectors: food (including,<br />

especially meat, milk, fish), housing (electricity and<br />

heating), goods (forestry products, chemical products)<br />

and transport (Figure 3.5.3).<br />

3.5.3<br />

Greenhouse gas emissions and<br />

the Carbon Footprint<br />

As far as greenhouse gas emissions are concerned,<br />

compared to the levels agreed upon in the Kyoto<br />

Protocol, Estonia’s greenhouse gas emissions are currently<br />

significantly smaller than in 1990 (40% less),<br />

although the main reduction took place between<br />

1991 and 1994, immediately after the collapse of the<br />

Soviet Union and the industry and agriculture related<br />

to it. However, in 2010, Estonia was still among the<br />

20 countries producing the most greenhouse gases<br />

per capita in the world (World Development Indicators<br />

2012). As Figure 3.5.4 shows, most of Estonia’s<br />

greenhouse gas emissions are caused by the power<br />

industry, which is based on the use of oil shale, but<br />

an increasingly large part comes from transportation.<br />

According to the Säästva transpordi raport (Sustainable<br />

Transport Report), people are not widely aware of the<br />

energy conservation potential of transport, primarily<br />

related to passenger cars (Jüssi et al., 2010).<br />

Currently Estonian, EU and the UN databases<br />

report on the CO 2 emissions emitted into the air on the<br />

country’s territory, in the last few years, attention has<br />

increasingly been directed toward the indirect “export”<br />

and “import” of CO 2 emissions through international<br />

commerce. This means that, if Estonia exports some of<br />

the electricity it produces using oil shale, then the CO 2<br />

footprint that results from this power production will be<br />

recorded as the CO 2 footprint of the population in the<br />

consuming countries, not as the CO 2 footprint of Estonia’s<br />

population. At the same time, access to the data needed<br />

to compute an indicator that includes the global trade<br />

balance is a time-consuming process – the last available<br />

data is for 2004 and, unfortunately, there is no possibility<br />

to analyse the present trend of the changes taking place<br />

(Figures 3.5.5 and 3.5.6).<br />

142<br />

Estonian Human Development Report 2012/2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!