DEVELOPMENT
The pdf-version - Eesti Koostöö Kogu
The pdf-version - Eesti Koostöö Kogu
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.9<br />
Estonia’s peacefulness and security<br />
in an unstable world<br />
Marju Lauristin, Juhan Kivirähk<br />
2.9.1<br />
Components and country comparisons<br />
of the Global Peace Index<br />
The following factors were taken into consideration when<br />
compiling the Global Peace Index: the militarism of the<br />
countries, defensive capability, level of crime and violent<br />
conflicts, access to weapons in the population and<br />
the level of the country’s armament, risk of terrorism<br />
and foreign aggression, participation in peacekeeping<br />
missions, number of casualties in foreign conflicts. The<br />
23 statistical indicators related to militarism, the risk of<br />
conflict, and instability; which reflect the security of a<br />
state, are recalculated into a 5-point scale and a general<br />
score for the peace index is computed on a 5-point scale<br />
based thereon. As background indicators, the Global<br />
Peace Index report also includes all the most important<br />
indicators for economic, human and democracy development,<br />
which enable the security of each country to be<br />
juxtaposed with its general level of development.<br />
Based on the general Global Peace Index (GPI) score,<br />
the countries under examination are divided into five quintiles.<br />
In 2012, 158 countries were examined, slightly fewer<br />
than in previous years. The top ten secure states include<br />
the following: from Europe the Nordic countries, Austria,<br />
Ireland, Switzerland and the post-Communist countries of<br />
Slovenia and the Czech Republic; and Canada, New Zealand<br />
and Japan of the non-European countries. The states<br />
with the highest peace ratings in the index are also among<br />
the best based on the indicators for democracy, human and<br />
economic development, and they are relatively corruption<br />
free. Based on the GPI, Estonia is in 41 st place; a sharp<br />
What affects Estonia’s position in the<br />
security ranking of the world states?<br />
Positively:<br />
lack of domestic violent<br />
conflict;<br />
lack of political terror;<br />
participation in peacekeeping<br />
missions;<br />
training;<br />
lack of illegal weapons export;<br />
lack of refugees from country;<br />
improving domestic security.<br />
Negatively:<br />
level of perceived criminality<br />
in society;<br />
number of violent deaths and<br />
homicides;<br />
number of prisoners;<br />
demonstrations that have<br />
become violent;<br />
military capability;<br />
large percentage of defence<br />
expenditures per GDP, which<br />
reflects a feeling of military<br />
threat;<br />
insecure relations with neighbouring<br />
states.<br />
decline occurred after 2007 (see Table 2.9.1). Estonia’s<br />
41 st rank puts us in the second quintile, at the same level<br />
with France and the South Korea. All the new EU Member<br />
States, except for Latvia and Lithuania, placed ahead of<br />
Estonia. Of the European Union Member States, Greece<br />
is in the worst position. Russia is among the least secure<br />
states in the world, along with Pakistan, India, North of<br />
Korea, Israel and Iraq.<br />
As we can see from the table, all reference states<br />
selected for comparison in this report besides the South<br />
Korea, and Estonia itself, are in the first quintile of the<br />
peace index, whereas seven of them are in the top ten.<br />
Of the background traits, the following are important:<br />
the free flow of information, stable and functioning rule of<br />
law, relatively successful fight against corruption, relatively<br />
favourable business environment, and high education level.<br />
Of the background traits, Estonia’s security has been<br />
damaged the most by the following: its limited success<br />
with integration, which is interpreted as a risk of ethnic<br />
conflict; tense relations with Russia; and the limited<br />
cohesion of the society, which is expressed by inequitable<br />
access to resources.<br />
2.9.2<br />
External security<br />
The indicators that reflect external security comprise 40%<br />
of the Global Peace Index. These include the following:<br />
the state’s level of military spending; number of armed<br />
services personnel per 100,000 inhabitants, the state’s<br />
financial appropriations for participation in peacekeeping<br />
missions; number of heavy weapons per 100,000<br />
inhabitants; export of conventional weapons per 100,000<br />
inhabitants; evaluation of the state’s military capability;<br />
number of refugees and displaced persons as percentage<br />
of population; assessment of the relations with neighbouring<br />
states; participation in internal and external conflicts;<br />
and the number of deaths due to external wars.<br />
The Bonn International Centre for Conversion<br />
(BICC) regularly compiles a Global Militarisation Index.<br />
Based thereon, the world’s most militarised state is Israel,<br />
and of the Baltic states, Estonia. Based on the data collected<br />
by the BICC in 2011, in the Militarisation Index, is<br />
positioned at 35 th place right after Iran (34 th place). One<br />
of the fundamental indicators of this index is defence<br />
spending as a percentage of GDP. For instance, according<br />
to this index, Latvia places 94 th in the world and Lithuania<br />
places 60 th , after Georgia. Based on defence spending,<br />
Finland is the 27 th state in the world. The top ten are comprised<br />
of Israel, Singapore, Syria, Russia, Jordan, Cyprus,<br />
Kuwait, Azerbaijan, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia.<br />
100<br />
Estonian Human Development Report 2012/2013