Estonian Human Development Report
Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu
Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
In Europe as a whole, the differences between ethnic<br />
majority and minority groups by generations are noticeably<br />
smaller than in Estonia. The differences in the assessments<br />
of the ethnic majority and minority groups do not<br />
decrease as the generations grow younger. Therefore it cannot<br />
be said that the attitudes and evaluations of minorities<br />
will “naturally” become more optimistic with a change in<br />
generations.<br />
Factors forming general<br />
satisfaction by country<br />
As described above, the measurement-evaluation of the<br />
quality of the life and life satisfaction is based on many different<br />
factors. Data from the European Social Survey primarily<br />
enables general satisfaction and feelings of happiness<br />
to be analyzed (Questions: How satisfied are you with<br />
your life in general? How happy are you?); as well as more<br />
as one’s satisfaction with personal material wellbeing specifically<br />
(How satisfied are you with your work / standard of<br />
living?). In addition, one can analyze people’s level of satisfaction<br />
with the performance of the state (How satisfied<br />
are you with the country’s economic situation / the functioning<br />
of democracy in the country / the country’s government?).<br />
Table 4.2.1. provides an overview of the analysis of<br />
ethnic majority and minority groups according to these<br />
dimensions. From the table, it appears that in the majority<br />
of countries, the evaluations given by members of ethnic<br />
minority groups for feelings of happiness, material wellbeing<br />
as well as the performance of the state are all relatively<br />
similar. At the same time, for instance, the ethnic minorities<br />
in the United Kingdom were relatively satisfied on a<br />
personal level, but relatively dissatisfied with the performance<br />
of the state. Therefore successfully coping individually<br />
does not guarantee the satisfaction of the minority<br />
with the country’s minority policies. Apparently, certain<br />
collective expectations and the minority’s ambitions to<br />
achieve greater political influence play a role here.<br />
Based on individual evaluation components, Estonia’s<br />
ethnic minorities are located in the bottom third of the<br />
country rankings. The relatively more positive evaluation<br />
of the material situation is apparently based on the growth<br />
of income and improvement in the material situation of<br />
Estonia’s Russian-speaking population, especially among<br />
<strong>Estonian</strong> citizens (Kasearu & Trumm 2008). At the same<br />
time, the lower satisfaction of the ethnic minorities with<br />
the performance of the state is also characteristic of Estonia,<br />
which after the events of April 2007 has decreased<br />
even further – the most recent studies point to the fact that<br />
distrust and pessimism regarding the state have increased<br />
among Estonia’s Russian-speaking population, especially<br />
during the last few years (see, for instance, Integration<br />
of <strong>Estonian</strong> Society: Monitoring 2008). Analysis by various<br />
age groups shows that while in a generational comparison<br />
differences in personal satisfaction are relatively<br />
unchanged, the dissatisfaction regarding the performance<br />
of the state is even greater among the younger generation<br />
than among the older generation.<br />
The second section of Table 4.2.1. shows the relationships<br />
between various individual evaluations and the<br />
aggregate satisfaction evaluation. The strength of the association<br />
is indicated by the correlation coefficient (maximum<br />
value of 1 shows total association between the variables,<br />
a value of 0 shows the total lack of association).<br />
Figure 4.2.2. Life satisfaction of majority and minority<br />
groups by age group in Estonia and Europe (high<br />
general satisfaction percentages)<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
31<br />
47<br />
37<br />
61 63<br />
15–29 30–49 50–75<br />
Source: European Social Survey 2006<br />
38<br />
55<br />
33<br />
European minority<br />
<strong>Estonian</strong> minority<br />
European majority<br />
<strong>Estonian</strong> majority<br />
From an analysis of these relationships, it appears that the<br />
aggregate life satisfaction evaluation for ethnic minorities<br />
depends primarily on satisfaction with the performance of<br />
the state (the strongest average correlation or association<br />
between the two variables of .77). In some of the transition<br />
countries (Romania, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, and<br />
Russia), as well as in the so-called European welfare states<br />
(Finland, Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, the United<br />
Kingdom, Austria, Netherlands, Germany and France),<br />
the country’s capability or incapability to regulate the economic<br />
situation and to guarantee the performance of the<br />
government and democracy are often given as the reasons<br />
for life satisfaction/dissatisfaction. Although in Estonia<br />
the evaluation of the state also affects the aggregate satisfaction<br />
evaluation, the extent of this association is even<br />
somewhat weaker than the European average. Thus we can<br />
conclude that as the economic situation and democracy<br />
improve, the minorities’ expectations regarding the performance<br />
of the state also increase. Therefore, as a rule,<br />
personal material satisfaction is slightly less important in<br />
the formation of general life satisfaction than satisfaction<br />
with the performance of the state. Only in two countries –<br />
Sweden and Spain – does personal material wellbeing play<br />
a more significant role in the formation of general satisfaction.<br />
Since these countries have relatively high unemployment<br />
rates among ethnic minorities, work satisfaction<br />
(and its existence) at a personal level is an important indicator<br />
for the formation of life satisfaction.<br />
The satisfaction of ethnic minorities regarding the<br />
performance of the state, as well as personal feelings of<br />
happiness, affect people’s own interest in politics and<br />
their trust in institutions (in Estonia this association is<br />
statistically even stronger then in Europe on average). In<br />
other countries with relatively large minorities, such as<br />
the United Kingdom and Romania, a significant association<br />
appeared between political interest and personal<br />
material satisfaction, while in Estonia the background<br />
for the political interest of minorities is comprised of ideological-psychological<br />
considerations rather than socioeconomic<br />
ones. In a similar manner to Estonia, minority<br />
groups are significantly less interested in politics in<br />
Denmark, for example, and therefore a greater role in the<br />
political interest of minorities may be played by circumstances<br />
related to the specific political landscape, such<br />
as the politicization of various socio-economic issues,<br />
the structure of political parties (for instance, in Esto-<br />
22<br />
38<br />
20<br />
38<br />
83 |