23.09.2015 Views

Estonian Human Development Report

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ence of social contacts, including relationships with children<br />

and grandchildren (Farquhar 1995). The increase in<br />

social risks and insecurity caused by the changes in <strong>Estonian</strong><br />

society at the beginning of the 1990s (Kutsar 1997)<br />

increased the importance of the help and support received<br />

through family connections and informal networks as a<br />

means of maintaining one’s quality of life. Yet it is safe<br />

to assume that there was a shortage of resources that<br />

could be used to aid each other. In 1994, 32% of people<br />

received help in housework from their adult children and<br />

28% of parents provided help to their adult children. Ten<br />

years later, the share of people receiving help has grown<br />

to 53%, while 39% of parents help their adult children<br />

with child care or housework. Hence, there has been an<br />

increase in the provision of inter-generation support. On<br />

the one hand, this tendency may represent a strengthening<br />

of ties between generations and/or reflect the insufficiency<br />

of social services which has brought about an<br />

increase in informal help. For example, the role of grandparents<br />

in child care is relatively large: in 2004, a third of<br />

the respondents said that their children’s babysitters were<br />

usually the grandparents, while in the case of a fourth of<br />

the respondents, one of the parents themselves stayed at<br />

home (ESS 2004). Although the availability of child care<br />

services has improved recently, the grandparents remain,<br />

in all likelihood, an important resource in the day-to-day<br />

organization of family life. However, the expectations of<br />

<strong>Estonian</strong> residents regarding support from the family are<br />

lower in comparison to other European countries, resembling<br />

the corresponding indicators for Denmark, France<br />

and Finland (Olagnero et al. 2008).<br />

Communication networks. In addition to family, an<br />

individual’s support network comprises their friends,<br />

neighbours and co-workers. Compared to the end of the<br />

1990s, the frequency of communication between people<br />

had increased somewhat by 2006: the share of respondents<br />

who saw their friends once a week increased from<br />

60% in 1999 to 77% in 2006. The activeness in communicating<br />

with friends is dependent on age – younger people<br />

have more contacts with friends than older people. Furthermore,<br />

Estonia’s Russian-speaking population tends<br />

to communicate with friends more frequently than the<br />

<strong>Estonian</strong> population (46% of Russians and 37% of <strong>Estonian</strong>s<br />

communicate with friends at least several times a<br />

week or more frequently). People are generally satisfied<br />

with their relationships (in 2008, only 5% of the respondents<br />

reported that they were dissatisfied with their relationships<br />

with friends and people close to them). About<br />

a half of the <strong>Estonian</strong>s and a third of the Russian-speaking<br />

population are completely satisfied with their relationships.<br />

Compared to <strong>Estonian</strong>s, a higher percentage of non-<br />

<strong>Estonian</strong>s agree with the statement that people are more<br />

likely to care about themselves than try to help others. The<br />

level of trust in others is also lower in the case of non-<strong>Estonian</strong>s.<br />

Interpersonal trust is not dependent on age or gender,<br />

but a higher tendency to express trust is exhibited by<br />

people with a higher education.<br />

Participation in social life. In 2008, more than 85% of<br />

the population belonged to citizens’ associations, societies<br />

and clubs – a significant increase from the mid-1990s<br />

when just 31% of the population belonged to an association.<br />

This growth has mainly been the result of the increase in<br />

the memberships of housing and consumers’ cooperatives.<br />

In 2008, 46% of the respondents were engaged in other<br />

Figure 3.2.5. Difference between average trust and<br />

the average opinion of a given group by year<br />

Police<br />

Legal system<br />

The Riigikogu<br />

Higher<br />

education<br />

Russianspeaking<br />

population<br />

<strong>Estonian</strong>speaking<br />

population<br />

Higher<br />

education<br />

Russianspeaking<br />

population<br />

<strong>Estonian</strong>speaking<br />

population<br />

Higher<br />

education<br />

Russianspeaking<br />

population<br />

<strong>Estonian</strong>speaking<br />

population<br />

-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6<br />

2008 2006 2004<br />

Source: European Social Surveys, 2004 and 2006; Integration of <strong>Estonian</strong><br />

Society: Monitoring 2008.<br />

forms of co-operation. Despite the increase in participation<br />

in social life, the level of participation in Estonia still lags<br />

behind the corresponding indicators for Western European<br />

countries, but is higher than those of Latvia and Lithuania<br />

(Olagnero et al. 2008). Active participation in local events<br />

or the organization thereof is much more common outside<br />

Tallinn and North-Eastern Estonia. Younger people with<br />

a higher education and a larger salary tend to participate<br />

in organizations and citizens’ associations more actively.<br />

Charity organizations have the lowest rate of participation<br />

(approximately 20% of Estonia’s population in 2006).<br />

Relationship between the individual<br />

and society<br />

Feeling of security. Since the beginning of the 1990s, the<br />

sense of security has grown in <strong>Estonian</strong> society. In 1994,<br />

43% of people were not afraid of being attacked in the<br />

street; by 1999 the figure had grown by eight percentage<br />

points and reached 60% by 2006. However, there are<br />

certain differences: in 2008, 86% of <strong>Estonian</strong>s were completely<br />

or relatively satisfied with their personal security,<br />

but only 63% of the Russian-speaking population reported<br />

similar confidence in their security. There are also considerable<br />

differences in this regard between residents of rural<br />

areas and cities. While 15% of city-dwellers are completely<br />

satisfied with their security, the satisfaction rate is twice as<br />

high among people living in rural areas.<br />

Interest in politics. People’s connectedness with the<br />

state can be viewed through how much they are interested<br />

in the politics and care about the well-being of the state.<br />

Compared to 1994, the number of people who are very<br />

interested in politics has tripled as of 2008 (growing from<br />

5% to 17%) and there has also been an increase in the percentage<br />

of people “rather interested” in politics (from 35%<br />

to 52%). Interest in politics is highest among people with<br />

a higher education and nearly a quarter of the population<br />

aged between 60 and 75 state that they are very interested<br />

in politics. A comparison of the Russian-speaking<br />

and <strong>Estonian</strong>-speaking populations reveals that non-<strong>Estonian</strong>s<br />

are generally somewhat more interested in politics,<br />

61 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!