23.09.2015 Views

Estonian Human Development Report

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 3.2.4. Difference in the job satisfaction of<br />

socio-demographic groups compared to the average<br />

level of job satisfaction<br />

Income lower<br />

than median<br />

Higher<br />

education<br />

Secondary<br />

education<br />

Basic<br />

education<br />

Social relations are the means of satisfying an individual’s<br />

need of belonging as well as the need for approval and<br />

security, and thus significantly affect a person’s individual<br />

quality of life. Paugam and Russel (2000) distinguish<br />

three types of social relations: relations within a family<br />

or household, relations with friends, neighbours and coworkers,<br />

relations with social organizations and institutions<br />

(social participation). These spheres of social relations<br />

may reinforce each other, but the domination of one<br />

sphere may decrease an individual’s involvement in others.<br />

The significance of different spheres of social relations<br />

varies in different societies. A study by Olagnero et<br />

al. (2008) shows that among European countries, Estonia<br />

represents the Scandinavian model, where support from<br />

the family is less important than extra-familial support<br />

networks. Despite this, the importance of family in one’s<br />

quality of life should not be underestimated.<br />

Family life. Family plays an important role in shaping a<br />

person’s individual quality of life (Jeffers and Dobos 1995).<br />

The primary role of the family is to provide social support,<br />

help and a feeling of security. However, the importance of<br />

family as an influence on a person’s quality of life is constantly<br />

changing, depending on the stage they have reached<br />

in their life (Kohler et al. 2005). According to the Integration<br />

of <strong>Estonian</strong> Society: Monitoring 2008, 45% of the respondents<br />

were relatively satisfied and 35% completely satisfied<br />

with their family life. As expected, the level of satisfaction is<br />

higher among people who have both a spouse/partner and<br />

children (87%) than among people who live alone or are single<br />

parents (66% and 70%, respectively).<br />

It can be assumed that family life, including doing<br />

housework and raising children, has a different effect<br />

on men’s and women’s quality of life. Although in Estonia<br />

women do a larger share of housework and contribute<br />

more to raising children than men (Telpt 2008), this<br />

difference cannot be equated with a greater dissatisfaction<br />

with family life on the part of women, since dissatisfaction<br />

usually arises from discrepancies between conditioned<br />

attitudes and actual behaviour. If the greater<br />

involvement is seen as inequality, dissatisfaction increases<br />

(Lyonette et al. 2007) and may be expressed as a lower level<br />

of satisfaction with life in general. According to the 2004<br />

European Social Survey, nearly a third of the respondents<br />

experienced disagreements related to the sharing of<br />

housework at least once a month and the frequency of disagreements<br />

was higher in the case of younger couples and<br />

families with children. One fourth of the couples reported<br />

having disagreements related to financial matters, with<br />

money being the cause of dissension even more frequently<br />

among younger couples (a third of respondents under 40<br />

had finance-related disagreements with their partners at<br />

least once a month).<br />

In addition to their state of health, the quality of<br />

life of older people is affected significantly by the exist-<br />

Russianspeaking<br />

population<br />

<strong>Estonian</strong>speaking<br />

population<br />

60–75<br />

40–59<br />

25–39<br />

15–24<br />

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10<br />

Source: European Social Survey 2006<br />

tion level for people with lower incomes is 60%) and job<br />

satisfaction is also much higher in the case of <strong>Estonian</strong>s<br />

compared to the Russian-speaking population (80% and<br />

54%, respectively). Also, compared to younger and older<br />

age groups, people aged 25–39 report above average job<br />

satisfaction (Figure 3.2.4.). The higher levels of education<br />

increase job satisfaction: more than three quarters<br />

of people with a higher education are satisfied with their<br />

jobs, compared to 65% among people with a basic education.<br />

Job satisfaction among people with a higher education<br />

may derive from their employment in management<br />

positions. For example, it is apparent that people who feel<br />

that the success of the organization depends on them and<br />

their work are more satisfied with their jobs. Comparisons<br />

of people with different employment relationships reveal<br />

that 97% of employers and 72% of salaried employees and<br />

self-employed individuals are satisfied with their jobs.<br />

Reconciling work and family life. As one of the most<br />

important areas of life, work is connected to all other<br />

spheres of life and its impact on the quality of life is not limited<br />

to just job security and satisfaction. The effect of work<br />

and working on family life is especially important – finding<br />

the balance between work and family life, the transfer<br />

of work-related problems into family life, etc. According to<br />

the 2006 European Social Survey, people with higher levels<br />

of education and people with higher income employed<br />

in management positions face the most problems related to<br />

reconciling their work and family lives. More than half of<br />

the respondents with a higher education believe that their<br />

families are disturbed by their strenuous work, while one<br />

third tend to worry about work-related problems at home<br />

and also find that they do not have enough time to devote to<br />

their partner and their family. Large workloads reduce the<br />

amount of free time and opportunities to engage in activities<br />

that provide enjoyment. Therefore, working in a higher<br />

position has both a positive and a negative effect on one’s<br />

quality of life. Compared to women, men are more prone to<br />

working overtime, during weekends or in the evenings and<br />

at night. At the same time, studies do not indicate any tendency<br />

among men to worry more frequently than women<br />

about work-related problems or time devoted to their family<br />

and partner. This means that while men are more likely to<br />

work irregular hours, they do not feel a higher level of stress<br />

with regard to reconciling work and family life.<br />

Social relations<br />

| 60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!