23.09.2015 Views

Estonian Human Development Report

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 3.2.2. Financial means of households, 2008 (%)<br />

Travel<br />

Furnishing and/or repairing one’s dwelling<br />

Entertainment, e.g. theatre, concerts,<br />

hobbies, e.g. sports, photography, etc.<br />

Buying clothes<br />

Medicine, taking care of one’s health<br />

10.9 29.6 44.7 14.8<br />

17.1 37.8 36.1 9.0<br />

28.7 37.5 23.8 10.0<br />

45.2 39.7 12.2 2.9<br />

58.6 27.5 6.2 7.7<br />

Housing costs, heating, water, etc.<br />

79.7 17.1<br />

1.9 1.3<br />

Eating adequately<br />

77.9 18.7 3.4<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

Usually enough<br />

Sometimes enough, sometimes not<br />

Source: Integration of <strong>Estonian</strong> Society: Monitoring 2008<br />

Not enough, have been forced to do without<br />

Do not need it, do not spend money on it<br />

Compared to the earlier period, however, the financial<br />

means of the <strong>Estonian</strong> population have improved considerably.<br />

For example, in 1994 a quarter of the respondents had<br />

to give up eating meat and fish products more than once<br />

a week (see Einasto 2002:105), while in 1999 the same was<br />

true for 12.9% and in 2006 for 10% of the respondents.<br />

To conclude, there have been no great changes in the<br />

structure of consumption opportunities in recent years.<br />

During the early 1990s’ shortage economy, the quality of<br />

life depended, to a great extent, on the availability of primary<br />

goods and the ability to satisfy basic needs, while<br />

nowadays the opportunity to spend one’s vacation away<br />

from home can be considered an important indicator of<br />

quality of life. In 2006, 33% of the respondents were able to<br />

afford a week-long vacation away from home without any<br />

problems, in comparison with 19% in 1999.<br />

Employment<br />

A satisfying job and job security play a significant role in<br />

one’s quality of life. According to labour market statistics,<br />

the employment rate has grown in the 2000s, and unemployment<br />

has dropped from 13.6% in 2000 to 4.7% in 2007.<br />

Through the years, men aged 15–24, non-citizens, the residents<br />

of Ida-Viru county and rural regions in South-Eastern<br />

Estonia have been at the highest risk of unemployment<br />

(see Kasearu & Trumm 2008). As a result of the economic<br />

recession, the unemployment rate has grown again during<br />

the past year (according to Statistics Estonia, the number<br />

of people who have been unemployed less than 6 months<br />

grew from 12,400 to 20,000 during the second quarter of<br />

2008) and it appears likely that the deterioration of the<br />

labour market situation may worsen people’s work-related<br />

quality of life.<br />

Job security. In addition to the unemployment rate, it<br />

is important to look at subjective perceptions of the labour<br />

market situation. Similar to the drop in unemployment,<br />

there has been a decrease in the level of concern regarding<br />

job loss. In 1994, half of the respondents were not concerned<br />

about losing their jobs; in 2006, more than three<br />

quarters of the respondents were certain that they would<br />

not lose their jobs (Figure 3.2.3.). This means that job<br />

security has increased significantly during the monitored<br />

period and the differences between social groups have<br />

Figure 3.2.3. Percentage of respondents who are<br />

not afraid of losing their jobs<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

60<br />

69.4<br />

79.6<br />

56.8<br />

48.6<br />

15–24 25–49 50–64<br />

Age<br />

1994 1999<br />

85.2<br />

2006<br />

56.4<br />

51.2<br />

81.2<br />

Source: <strong>Estonian</strong> living conditions studies, 1994 and 1999; European Social<br />

Survey 2006.<br />

grown smaller. According to the Integration of <strong>Estonian</strong><br />

Society: Monitoring 2008, 41% of <strong>Estonian</strong>s and 29% of<br />

non-<strong>Estonian</strong>s were certain that they could find a suitable<br />

job in Estonia if necessary. However, the current economic<br />

downturn will probably diminish the general sense<br />

of job security.<br />

Job satisfaction. Low pay, working at night (Tausig &<br />

Fenwick 2001), overtime (Crompton and Lyonette 2006;<br />

Dex and Bond 2005; Grzywacz and Marks 2000; Voyandoff<br />

2004) and the accompanying problems related to reconciling<br />

work and family life may decrease job satisfaction and<br />

quality of life. In 2008, 72% of the population were satisfied<br />

with their jobs, and 23% of the population expressed high<br />

satisfaction with their jobs. Job satisfaction is closely connected<br />

to the improvement of professional knowledge and<br />

skills: 55% of people who participated in self-education programs<br />

during the last six months are completely satisfied<br />

with their jobs. Meanwhile, half of the people who have not<br />

taken part in any training/schooling programs during the<br />

last ten years are very dissatisfied with their jobs.<br />

However, the relatively high level of job satisfaction is<br />

eclipsed, by the large difference in opinions among different<br />

social groups. Job satisfaction is higher in the case of<br />

people with higher income (80%, while the job satisfac-<br />

59 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!