23.09.2015 Views

Estonian Human Development Report

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

lic health services, but excludes the activities related to<br />

other sectors.<br />

Parallel to the nominal increase in Estonia’s GDP, the<br />

amount of money involved in the health care system practically<br />

doubled during the first six years of the 21 st century<br />

Most of the funds were invested in medical services<br />

and pharmaceuticals, with the relative importance of the<br />

former falling and the latter rising somewhat during the<br />

six years. With regard to medical services, it is important<br />

to note that although care was added as a separate<br />

item during the period, this had no significant effect on<br />

the total relative importance of different treatment-related<br />

services. Prevention costs increased substantially, from<br />

1.8% to 2.5%, reflecting not only the massive increase in<br />

HIV prevention, but also the implementation of largescale<br />

national public health programs (see below).<br />

Availability of health services<br />

As of the end of 2008, 1,281,718 <strong>Estonian</strong> residents or 95.4%<br />

of the entire population were insured by the <strong>Estonian</strong><br />

Health Insurance Fund. A year earlier, the corresponding<br />

indicators were 1,287,765 and 96.0%. Of all residents with<br />

health insurance, 51% contributed to the accumulation of<br />

medical treatment funds through social tax in 2008, compared<br />

to 52% in 2007.<br />

Medical services<br />

Of all medical services, most people encounter first contact<br />

care which should guarantee professional support<br />

in both monitoring an individual’s health from birth to<br />

death as well as intervening quickly in the case of illnesses<br />

that do not require immediate hospitalization.<br />

Figure 2.6.3. shows that the number of doctor’s<br />

appointments has ranged around 7 million visits per<br />

year and that most of the appointments are made with<br />

family physicians following the implementation of family<br />

physician care. According to the 2008 Health Insurance<br />

Fund survey, 69% of people who visited their family<br />

physicians during the past 12 months were able to get<br />

an appointment within 2 days and 34% on the same day<br />

that they required first contact care. Meanwhile, 10% of<br />

the respondents encountered problems or impediments<br />

with regard to meeting their family physicians (<strong>Estonian</strong><br />

Health Insurance Fund/Ministry of Social Affairs,<br />

2008).<br />

The family physician care network mostly covers the<br />

entire country and generally guarantees the accessibility<br />

of first contact care in all locations. The most significant<br />

problems related to accessibility are connected to the limited<br />

choice of first contact care services, where the needs<br />

and expectations of the population and the health care<br />

system are not met. These include the lack of qualified<br />

health care professionals in peripheral areas; the uneven<br />

and inadequate accessibility of services that essentially<br />

constitute first contact care (home nursing care, physiotherapy);<br />

the insufficient accessibility of general medical<br />

care outside the working hours of family physicians; the<br />

lack of accessibility of services for people without health<br />

insurance; and the insufficient availability of non-emergency<br />

transportation services (First Contact Care <strong>Development</strong><br />

Plan, 2008).<br />

Emergency medical care service, which is also included<br />

among individual first contact care services, is used<br />

Figure 2.6.2. Avoidable (through treatment<br />

and prevention) mortality of total mortality (%),<br />

2000–2001, in chosen EU member states<br />

Hungary<br />

Czech<br />

Republic<br />

Latvia<br />

Estonia<br />

United<br />

Kingdom<br />

Austria<br />

Ireland<br />

Lithuania<br />

Poland<br />

Finland<br />

Germany<br />

Italy<br />

Slovenia<br />

Sweden<br />

Spain<br />

Portugal<br />

The<br />

Netherlands<br />

France<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />

Source: Nolte & McKee 2004<br />

Table 2.6.1. Breakdown of most important health<br />

care costs by function (millions of kroons)<br />

Function 2000 2006 2000 2006<br />

Medical services 3003.8 5496.1 58% 53%<br />

Rehabilitation 58.7 118.8 1.1% 1.1%<br />

Long-term care 0.3 369.7 0.0% 3.5%<br />

Health care support services (including<br />

emergency care)<br />

Medical products for ambulatory<br />

patients (including pharmaceuticals)<br />

Source: Ministry of Social Affairs 2007<br />

367.9 923.1 7.1% 8.8%<br />

1282.5 2877.0 25% 28%<br />

Prevention and public health care 90.9 265.7 1.8% 2.5%<br />

Administration of health care and<br />

health insurance<br />

231.4 284.6 4.5% 2.7%<br />

Capital expenditure 110.0 105.7 2.1% 1.0%<br />

Total 5145.5 10 440.9 100% 100%<br />

Figure 2.6.3. Provision of family physician and<br />

specialized medical care services in 2001–2007<br />

9 000 000<br />

8 000 000<br />

7 000 000<br />

6 000 000<br />

5 000 000<br />

4 000 000<br />

3 000 000<br />

2 000 000<br />

1 000 000<br />

Medical specialists’ appointments<br />

Family physicians’ appointments<br />

0<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

Source: annual reports of the <strong>Estonian</strong> Health Insurance Fund in 2002–2007<br />

45 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!