Estonian Human Development Report
Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu
Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
pared to master’s studies. The share of the humanities has<br />
almost doubled (compared to master’s studies), while the<br />
engineering field have remained the same, and all other<br />
specialties have declined, including the health field. Actually,<br />
the number of doctoral degree awarded is the highest<br />
in the natural science field: almost a third of all those<br />
who have been awarded doctoral degrees during the last<br />
eight years have done so in the field of natural sciences. On<br />
the other hand, in the engineering sciences the number<br />
of doctoral degrees has declined in comparison to the<br />
number of students. Doctoral studies have also been effective<br />
in the health field, where more than an eighth of all<br />
doctoral degrees were awarded. Since the number of those<br />
being awarded doctoral degrees in Estonia is quite small, it<br />
is not possible to track the dynamics by speciality.<br />
Do the specialities of those acquiring higher education<br />
correspond to Estonia’s needs? Unfortunately they<br />
do not. Although more young people than ever are currently<br />
studying at higher education schools in Estonia, the<br />
number of students majoring in technical subjects – on<br />
average a sixth of all students – is insufficient for the innovative<br />
development of the economy. Obviously, the roots<br />
lie in the specialization choices made in secondary school<br />
– since scientific subjects, including mathematics, are not<br />
popular, insufficient competence in these subjects closes<br />
the door for talented students to continue their studies in<br />
these fields. However, there is no sense blaming the young<br />
people, who mostly finance their own studies in the “soft”<br />
specialities – higher education in these subjects is also useful<br />
for the development of the students and the society as a<br />
whole. It must be recognized that the abilities and propensity<br />
of all secondary school graduates is not suited to the<br />
acquisition of engineering and scientific specialities.<br />
As far as scientific education is concerned, there continues<br />
to be serious problems with the effectiveness of<br />
doctoral studies. This is demonstrated by the ratio of those<br />
who have studied in doctoral programs in 2000–2003 and<br />
those who defended their doctoral theses in 2004–2007:<br />
5,194:570 = 9.1, i.e. on average every ninth student was<br />
awarded their doctoral degree during the normal period.<br />
The meagre productivity of doctoral studies is harmful<br />
to the sustainability of science and of higher education<br />
itself. On the whole, it also hinders the development<br />
of the entire country in its aspiration to become a knowledge-based<br />
society. It would be natural that, similar to the<br />
United States, Japan and the countries at the top of the<br />
European economies, we would start to have more people<br />
with doctoral degrees among Estonia’s top civil servants,<br />
as well as among company managers and top specialists.<br />
References<br />
1. Barber, M. & Mourshed, M. (2007) How the World’s Best-Performing<br />
School Systems Come Out On Top (Understanding<br />
and using the OECD comparative PISA study of learning success.)<br />
McKinsey & Company.<br />
2. Ministry of Education and Research (2007). Rahvusvaheliste<br />
haridusalaste uuringute tutvustus – PISA. http://www.ekk.edu.<br />
ee/valdkonnad/uldharidusvalishindamine/pisa<br />
3. OECD (2005). First Results from PISA 2003. Executive Summary.<br />
4. OECD (2005). School Factors related to Quality and Equity.<br />
Results from PISA 2000.<br />
5. OECD (2006) Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical<br />
Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006<br />
Figure 1.3.4. Representation of various specialties<br />
(%) at higher education levels (2000–2007 levels)<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0 <strong>Human</strong>ities,<br />
Arts<br />
Social &<br />
Behavioural<br />
Sciences<br />
Natural<br />
Sciences Engineering<br />
Health<br />
Other<br />
* Includes bachelor’s, diploma and applied higher education levels<br />
Source: SE<br />
The career study of those with doctoral degrees (<strong>Estonian</strong><br />
Study, 2008) proved that the most successful were the students<br />
in strong schools with intensive foreign relations<br />
– most specialized in natural sciences and the humanities.<br />
In many fields a generation of younger scientists is<br />
developing who, unlike their older colleagues, are more<br />
strongly oriented towards international cooperation and<br />
collective research and who prefer to publish their work<br />
in high-quality publications. Unfortunately, there are few<br />
such strong scientific schools in the field of engineering,<br />
including information technology, which should be one of<br />
Estonia’s main priorities.<br />
6. OECD (2007) PISA 2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s<br />
World.<br />
7. The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study<br />
TIMSS 2003 (2006). Compiler K. Mere. Ministry of Education<br />
and Research.<br />
8. http://www.undp.org/publications/annualreport2008/<br />
9. Statistics Estonia website, http://pub.stat.ee/px-web.2001/Database/Sotsiaalelu/databasetree.asp<br />
10. <strong>Estonian</strong> Survey on Careers of Doctorate Holders. Transition<br />
Facility 2005, Agreement number 19100.2006.002-2006.640,<br />
Final <strong>Report</strong>. Statistics Estonia 2008<br />
Achieved<br />
doctoral<br />
degrees<br />
Doctoral<br />
studies<br />
Master’s<br />
studies<br />
First-level<br />
higher education*<br />
Figure 1.3.5. The number of students studying on<br />
different levels of higher education and defending<br />
their doctoral theses in different years compared to<br />
the average level for the period (%)<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
Source: SE<br />
First-level<br />
higher education<br />
Master’s<br />
studies<br />
Doctoral<br />
studies<br />
Defending<br />
one’s<br />
doctoral<br />
thesis<br />
25 |