23.09.2015 Views

Estonian Human Development Report

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pared to master’s studies. The share of the humanities has<br />

almost doubled (compared to master’s studies), while the<br />

engineering field have remained the same, and all other<br />

specialties have declined, including the health field. Actually,<br />

the number of doctoral degree awarded is the highest<br />

in the natural science field: almost a third of all those<br />

who have been awarded doctoral degrees during the last<br />

eight years have done so in the field of natural sciences. On<br />

the other hand, in the engineering sciences the number<br />

of doctoral degrees has declined in comparison to the<br />

number of students. Doctoral studies have also been effective<br />

in the health field, where more than an eighth of all<br />

doctoral degrees were awarded. Since the number of those<br />

being awarded doctoral degrees in Estonia is quite small, it<br />

is not possible to track the dynamics by speciality.<br />

Do the specialities of those acquiring higher education<br />

correspond to Estonia’s needs? Unfortunately they<br />

do not. Although more young people than ever are currently<br />

studying at higher education schools in Estonia, the<br />

number of students majoring in technical subjects – on<br />

average a sixth of all students – is insufficient for the innovative<br />

development of the economy. Obviously, the roots<br />

lie in the specialization choices made in secondary school<br />

– since scientific subjects, including mathematics, are not<br />

popular, insufficient competence in these subjects closes<br />

the door for talented students to continue their studies in<br />

these fields. However, there is no sense blaming the young<br />

people, who mostly finance their own studies in the “soft”<br />

specialities – higher education in these subjects is also useful<br />

for the development of the students and the society as a<br />

whole. It must be recognized that the abilities and propensity<br />

of all secondary school graduates is not suited to the<br />

acquisition of engineering and scientific specialities.<br />

As far as scientific education is concerned, there continues<br />

to be serious problems with the effectiveness of<br />

doctoral studies. This is demonstrated by the ratio of those<br />

who have studied in doctoral programs in 2000–2003 and<br />

those who defended their doctoral theses in 2004–2007:<br />

5,194:570 = 9.1, i.e. on average every ninth student was<br />

awarded their doctoral degree during the normal period.<br />

The meagre productivity of doctoral studies is harmful<br />

to the sustainability of science and of higher education<br />

itself. On the whole, it also hinders the development<br />

of the entire country in its aspiration to become a knowledge-based<br />

society. It would be natural that, similar to the<br />

United States, Japan and the countries at the top of the<br />

European economies, we would start to have more people<br />

with doctoral degrees among Estonia’s top civil servants,<br />

as well as among company managers and top specialists.<br />

References<br />

1. Barber, M. & Mourshed, M. (2007) How the World’s Best-Performing<br />

School Systems Come Out On Top (Understanding<br />

and using the OECD comparative PISA study of learning success.)<br />

McKinsey & Company.<br />

2. Ministry of Education and Research (2007). Rahvusvaheliste<br />

haridusalaste uuringute tutvustus – PISA. http://www.ekk.edu.<br />

ee/valdkonnad/uldharidusvalishindamine/pisa<br />

3. OECD (2005). First Results from PISA 2003. Executive Summary.<br />

4. OECD (2005). School Factors related to Quality and Equity.<br />

Results from PISA 2000.<br />

5. OECD (2006) Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical<br />

Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006<br />

Figure 1.3.4. Representation of various specialties<br />

(%) at higher education levels (2000–2007 levels)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0 <strong>Human</strong>ities,<br />

Arts<br />

Social &<br />

Behavioural<br />

Sciences<br />

Natural<br />

Sciences Engineering<br />

Health<br />

Other<br />

* Includes bachelor’s, diploma and applied higher education levels<br />

Source: SE<br />

The career study of those with doctoral degrees (<strong>Estonian</strong><br />

Study, 2008) proved that the most successful were the students<br />

in strong schools with intensive foreign relations<br />

– most specialized in natural sciences and the humanities.<br />

In many fields a generation of younger scientists is<br />

developing who, unlike their older colleagues, are more<br />

strongly oriented towards international cooperation and<br />

collective research and who prefer to publish their work<br />

in high-quality publications. Unfortunately, there are few<br />

such strong scientific schools in the field of engineering,<br />

including information technology, which should be one of<br />

Estonia’s main priorities.<br />

6. OECD (2007) PISA 2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s<br />

World.<br />

7. The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study<br />

TIMSS 2003 (2006). Compiler K. Mere. Ministry of Education<br />

and Research.<br />

8. http://www.undp.org/publications/annualreport2008/<br />

9. Statistics Estonia website, http://pub.stat.ee/px-web.2001/Database/Sotsiaalelu/databasetree.asp<br />

10. <strong>Estonian</strong> Survey on Careers of Doctorate Holders. Transition<br />

Facility 2005, Agreement number 19100.2006.002-2006.640,<br />

Final <strong>Report</strong>. Statistics Estonia 2008<br />

Achieved<br />

doctoral<br />

degrees<br />

Doctoral<br />

studies<br />

Master’s<br />

studies<br />

First-level<br />

higher education*<br />

Figure 1.3.5. The number of students studying on<br />

different levels of higher education and defending<br />

their doctoral theses in different years compared to<br />

the average level for the period (%)<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

Source: SE<br />

First-level<br />

higher education<br />

Master’s<br />

studies<br />

Doctoral<br />

studies<br />

Defending<br />

one’s<br />

doctoral<br />

thesis<br />

25 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!