23.09.2015 Views

Estonian Human Development Report

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 6.3.8. Percentage of social protection costs<br />

in European Union countries in 2005, % of GDP<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Sweden<br />

France<br />

Denmark<br />

Germany<br />

Belgium<br />

Austria<br />

United Kingdom<br />

The Netherlands<br />

Finland<br />

Italy<br />

Greece<br />

Slovenia<br />

Luxembourg<br />

Hungary<br />

Spain<br />

Poland<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Malta<br />

Cyprus<br />

Ireland<br />

Slovakia<br />

Lithuania<br />

ESTONIA<br />

Latvia<br />

Source: Statistics Estonia.<br />

average pension was 33% of average wages, and this ratio<br />

has decreased since wages have increased faster than pensions<br />

(Statistics… 2008, p. 162).<br />

The sufficiency of resources for social insurance are<br />

guaranteed by the social tax rate (more exactly the pension<br />

insurance portion), the number of those covered by<br />

social insurance, employment, and workers’ wages. The<br />

disbursement conditions (incl. indexing), the number of<br />

pensioners and the retirement age that affects the latter<br />

are all important from the standpoint of the system’s disbursements<br />

and the size of pensions.<br />

In Estonia, a three-pillar pension system is in use,<br />

in which pillar I is solidarity-based, which means that<br />

today’s pensions are financed by today’s social taxes;<br />

pillar II is pre-financed in principle by social tax, the<br />

resources are invested and the payments depend on both<br />

the deposits and the success of the investments; and pillar<br />

III is pre-financed and financed by voluntary contributions.<br />

Although the pre-financing system makes<br />

it possible to use money and capital market opportunities<br />

to finance the pension system, this method does not<br />

resolve the problems that develop as a result of the ageing<br />

of the population or other reasons. This method is a<br />

means of spreading risks, which improves the possibilities<br />

for balancing the system.<br />

Decisions regarding the pension system have diverse<br />

correlations with economic policies. Firstly, the average<br />

pension and its trend compared to the average wage and<br />

inflation is a politically sensitive issue, because it can be<br />

used as a basis for drawing conclusions about the government’s<br />

attitude toward a population group that constitutes<br />

a large portion of the electorate. Secondly, all decisions<br />

affecting the financial balance of the pension system have<br />

a great impact on the economy as a whole. In case of a<br />

shortage of financial resources, revenues can be increased<br />

by increasing social tax, while one possibility for reducing<br />

disbursements is to increase the retirement age, which<br />

decreases the number of pensioners. Taking into account<br />

the large percentage of the social tax in the general tax burden<br />

and the relatively short life expectancy, implementing<br />

either decision is political almost impossible. At the same<br />

time, this field will not be left untouched by the deepening<br />

of the financial and economic crisis.<br />

Viewed from the economic demand side, however,<br />

pension system disbursements are actually earned back<br />

because the majority of them are spent on consumption,<br />

where primarily domestic products and services (food<br />

products, utilities and transport costs) are consumed.<br />

Subsequently, we will compare Estonia’s social protection<br />

costs with the corresponding data from the European<br />

Union (see Figure 6.3.8.), where this includes all the<br />

resources that are allocated for the purpose of easing the<br />

ability of individuals or households to cope in case of a<br />

partial or total loss of income. In this comparison, Estonia’s<br />

indicator is next to last, ahead only of Latvia, and<br />

lagging significantly behind the European Union average.<br />

In the European Union, social benefits constituted<br />

26.2% of GDP on average, while it was only 12.3% in<br />

Estonia. We can see a trend in social protection, whereby<br />

the percentage of GDP corresponds to the level of GDP,<br />

i.e. countries with higher standards of living also have<br />

comparatively better social protection. The comparative<br />

levels of social protection in the “new” European Union<br />

member states rank below the corresponding European<br />

Union average. However, Estonia and Latvia also significantly<br />

lag behind the other Central and East European<br />

countries. As we saw above, economic growth in Estonia<br />

has not been accompanied by an increase in social<br />

protection as percentage of GDP, rather a slight decline.<br />

Therefore, if the <strong>Estonian</strong> economic situation worsens,<br />

one can predict significant coping risks in an estimable<br />

part of the population.<br />

Implementation of polices<br />

through governance<br />

On studying the modest level of Estonia’s social sphere<br />

compared to other European countries, a question arises<br />

about the governance of these fields and the actions of<br />

public authority. The broader understanding of governance<br />

connects this activity not only to the national and<br />

local governments that must base their activities on public<br />

interest, but to other bodies that should protect the general<br />

interests of other stakeholders in the private sectors<br />

(e.g. owners and workers). Governance includes executive<br />

agencies, representative bodies, as well as enforcement<br />

and monitoring systems and informal regulators.<br />

An important part of governance is related to the realization<br />

of power, in either the public interest or in the case<br />

of companies, in the owners’ interest (European Commission<br />

(2005a), Jessop (2002), Kaufmann (2003), Michalski<br />

et al (2001)).<br />

The description of various aspects of governance is<br />

based on an approach that, on the one hand, divides governance<br />

into public and private spheres, while on the<br />

other hand, into supportive, regulatory, and compensatory<br />

measures (Gereffi, Humphrey and Sturgeon, 2003)<br />

(see Table 6.3.1.).<br />

The policies related to the social sphere can be<br />

divided into supportive, regulatory and compensatory<br />

models. The first create conditions for the realization<br />

of the abilities, individuals and companies; the second<br />

establish certain standards, for instance, in the field of<br />

health care; the third are based on redistribution and<br />

create resources and services for the population. The<br />

primary emphasis of this redistribution is that, while<br />

economic activity is related mostly to private ownership,<br />

| 136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!