23.09.2015 Views

Estonian Human Development Report

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

Estonian Human Development Report - Eesti Koostöö Kogu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 5.4.1. Who and what are the foremost<br />

influences in shaping the lifestyles of children and<br />

young people? 1 – “no influence at all”; 2 – “some<br />

influence”; 3 – “significant influence”)<br />

Influencing factor<br />

Mean<br />

value<br />

Percentage of respondents<br />

who answered<br />

“significant influence”<br />

Peers 2.89 91<br />

Internet environments 2.64 68<br />

Parents 2.64 67<br />

School 2.63 67<br />

Films 2.53 58<br />

Music 2.36 44<br />

Television, magazines, newspapers 2.34 43<br />

Sports and hobbies 2.34 42<br />

Grandparents 2.02 20<br />

Books 1.82 12<br />

Source: Mina. Maailm. Meedia 2008<br />

Figure 5.4.1. Sources of information affecting young people’s<br />

shopping decisions (mean values on a scale ranging<br />

from 1 – “not important at all” to 5 – “very important”)<br />

Family members<br />

Friends<br />

School<br />

TV shows and films<br />

Websites<br />

Magazines<br />

Chat rooms and forums<br />

Shop display windows<br />

Newspaper articles<br />

TV advertisements<br />

Decision is made upon making<br />

the purchase<br />

Internet advertisements<br />

Advertising pamphlets, fliers<br />

Source: Noorte elustiil 2007<br />

2.1<br />

2.0<br />

2.0<br />

2.2<br />

1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0<br />

may see exciting opportunities in the anonymity, privacy, and<br />

playfulness of the Internet and might also enjoy its potential<br />

for a little deception, adults view these phenomena primarily<br />

as threats to the safety of children. It is in the interests of<br />

producers and banks to provide children with various online<br />

services, but proponents of critical social theory often see this<br />

as the exploitation of children for commercial purposes or<br />

even as the corruption of the innocence of childhood (for an<br />

overview of this approach, see Livingstone 2003).<br />

In general, both media researchers and producers, legislators<br />

and the public at large consider pornography, content<br />

that is violent, racist, or encourages hate or self-harm,<br />

improper or potentially harmful contacts with strangers,<br />

interference with privacy, abuse of personal data, and the<br />

cyber-bullying between children and young people to be<br />

the risks that threaten the safety of children in the new<br />

media environment. Entertainment, access to information,<br />

educational resources, communication, networking,<br />

creativity, playing, and participation in civic society<br />

are seen as the foremost positive opportunities (Hasebrink<br />

et al. 2008: 24–25). The studies conducted so far (Livingstone<br />

& Bober 2004) have revealed a connection that highlights<br />

a serious dilemma: there is a strong positive correlation<br />

between children’s use of online opportunities and the<br />

risks they encounter, i.e. an increase in opportunities tends<br />

2.7<br />

2.7<br />

2.7<br />

3.1<br />

3.1<br />

3.4<br />

3.6<br />

4.5<br />

4.5<br />

to increase the risks, while a lower risk level results in a lack<br />

of opportunities. Unfortunately, it is not clear how we could<br />

increase the opportunities while reducing the risks.<br />

The world of consumption also provides children and<br />

young people with many opportunities for self-fulfilment<br />

and finding their identity, although the development of<br />

consumer education and competence in Estonia has begun<br />

only recently. As a result, the parents of children and youth<br />

feel the tensions generated by the consumer society, be they<br />

related to the lack of resources or the confusing abundance<br />

of options, but do not know how to handle them. Young<br />

people themselves admit that being “cool” is defined largely<br />

through clothes, accessories, and appearance. This model of<br />

interpretation often leads to bullying at school.<br />

This subchapter focuses on three main topics: the lifestyles,<br />

consumption preferences and attitudes of young people<br />

viewed in connection with aspects of consumer competence;<br />

the Internet use of <strong>Estonian</strong> children and youth, its<br />

dynamics and peculiarities in the European context; and<br />

the attitudes and beliefs held by the younger generation<br />

with regard to the consumer and information society.<br />

Young people’s lifestyles, consumption<br />

preferences and attitudes<br />

The influence of the commercial environment and marketing<br />

communication in shaping the lifestyles of children<br />

and young people is constantly increasing, often<br />

reaching the youth through the semantic fields they share<br />

with their peers. In our definition of the term “lifestyle”<br />

we mainly proceed from Mike Featherstone’s (2007) position,<br />

according to which a lifestyle means the expression<br />

of individuality through consuming goods and services<br />

that hold some symbolic value as well as through social<br />

practices. A lifestyle comprises a wide variety of behaviour<br />

and consumption practices aimed at expressing oneself<br />

and constructing one’s identity and relationships. Due<br />

to the fact that lifestyles include both an individual and a<br />

social dimension, generally we cannot speak about a certain<br />

lifestyle that <strong>Estonian</strong> residents have in common, but<br />

must rather recognize the plurality of lifestyles.<br />

The data of the 2008 Mina. Maailm. Meedia population<br />

survey indicates that <strong>Estonian</strong> residents consider peers to<br />

have the most influence on shaping the lifestyles of today’s<br />

young people. Internet environments, parents and school follow<br />

peers in the list of most important influences at an almost<br />

equal level. A comparison of age groups reveals a statistically<br />

significant difference in terms of assessing the importance of<br />

sports and hobbies. Namely, 60% of people aged 15–19 consider<br />

sports and hobbies to be important aspects in shaping<br />

their lifestyles; however, only 37% of people aged 45–54<br />

attribute equal importance to this field. It was also relatively<br />

surprising that older generations thought the Internet to be a<br />

much bigger influence on young people’s lifestyles than the<br />

youth themselves: among people aged 15–19, 52% considered<br />

the Internet to be a significant influence, while more than<br />

70% of respondents over 45 thought the same.<br />

The student survey Noorte elustiil 2007 (Youth Lifestyles<br />

2007) provides us with an overview of the opinions<br />

of preteens and teenagers on various aspects related<br />

to lifestyles and consumption. We have observed school<br />

pupils aged 11–14 from Tallinn and Tartu (N=202, including<br />

102 boys and 100 girls). The initial analysis of the data<br />

was performed by Laura Järve in the course of her Bach-<br />

| 116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!