23.09.2015 Views

Assessment of Cooperatives in the Poultry Industry - 2013.pdf - Seda

Assessment of Cooperatives in the Poultry Industry - 2013.pdf - Seda

Assessment of Cooperatives in the Poultry Industry - 2013.pdf - Seda

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Research Report: Address<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Needs, Opportunities and Challenges <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cooperatives</strong><br />

and Collectively Owned Enterprises <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Poultry</strong> and Related Industries<br />

<strong>Cooperatives</strong> also perceive <strong>the</strong>ir skills <strong>in</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g employees/staff issues as relatively high. A total<br />

<strong>of</strong> 79% <strong>of</strong> respondents rated <strong>the</strong>se skills as very good or good. This may <strong>in</strong>dicate that amongst <strong>the</strong>se<br />

cooperatives <strong>the</strong>re is not a high level <strong>of</strong> conflict among members. It could also be <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

low numbers <strong>of</strong> staff. With most cooperatives hav<strong>in</strong>g only one or two staff members, if any, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

not a lot <strong>of</strong> potential for staff issues. Also, with so few staff members it is easy for staff to<br />

communicate with cooperative members.<br />

Table 4-3: <strong>Cooperatives</strong>’ Skills Rat<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

cooperative<br />

Manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

employees/ staff<br />

issues<br />

Very poor Poor Average Good Very good Total<br />

11% 11% 21% 43% 14% 100%<br />

0% 4% 18% 61% 18% 100%<br />

Book<br />

keep<strong>in</strong>g/budget<strong>in</strong>g<br />

18% 25% 21% 29% 7% 100%<br />

Manag<strong>in</strong>g credit 11% 32% 21% 26% 11% 100%<br />

Market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

cooperatives<br />

products/services<br />

Apply<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

tenders<br />

7% 25% 21% 43% 4% 100%<br />

84% 5% 0% 11% 0% 100%<br />

Computer literacy 43% 25% 11% 21% 0% 100%<br />

Manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

suppliers<br />

Technical skills<br />

related to <strong>the</strong><br />

cooperative’s<br />

product/service<br />

Manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

customers<br />

Negotiat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

discounts for bulk<br />

buy<strong>in</strong>g<br />

0% 7% 11% 63% 19% 100%<br />

0% 21% 18% 36% 25% 100%<br />

4% 0% 18% 61% 18% 100%<br />

22% 4% 15% 48% 11% 100%<br />

Product pric<strong>in</strong>g 11% 7% 11% 64% 7% 100%<br />

Source: Urban-Econ Survey, 2013<br />

The table above (4-3) provides <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to how cooperatives rate <strong>the</strong>ir own skills. Vary<strong>in</strong>g levels <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge understand<strong>in</strong>g can be atta<strong>in</strong>ed as skills develop. A cognitive barrier which makes a<br />

person believe that <strong>the</strong>y understand someth<strong>in</strong>g to a greater degree than is <strong>the</strong> case <strong>in</strong> reality is<br />

called an illusion <strong>of</strong> explanatory depth.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> above Table <strong>the</strong>re may be a problem that many cooperatives are under <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

illusion <strong>of</strong> explanatory depth. This would result <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m rat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves more highly <strong>in</strong> skills than<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are <strong>in</strong> reality. For example, 63% <strong>of</strong> cooperatives reported that <strong>the</strong>y were ‘good’ at manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

suppliers. However, <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> cooperatives reported be<strong>in</strong>g constra<strong>in</strong>ed by high feed costs and<br />

47 | P a g e U r b a n - E c o n : D e v e l o p m e n t E c o n o m i s t s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!