Assessment of Cooperatives in the Poultry Industry - 2013.pdf - Seda
Assessment of Cooperatives in the Poultry Industry - 2013.pdf - Seda
Assessment of Cooperatives in the Poultry Industry - 2013.pdf - Seda
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Research Report: Address<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Needs, Opportunities and Challenges <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cooperatives</strong><br />
and Collectively Owned Enterprises <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Poultry</strong> and Related Industries<br />
4.1.1.<br />
Survey Methodology<br />
The cooperative survey was conducted telephonically and used to <strong>in</strong>terview cooperatives<br />
nationwide.<br />
In order to conduct <strong>the</strong> survey, a database <strong>of</strong> cooperatives was compiled. The database was created<br />
from three separate cooperative databases provided by:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
SEDA<br />
<strong>the</strong> Dti Cooperative Incentive Scheme (CIS) survey<br />
an abattoir <strong>in</strong> KZN<br />
After narrow<strong>in</strong>g down <strong>the</strong> list to <strong>in</strong>clude only cooperatives that operate along <strong>the</strong> poultry value<br />
cha<strong>in</strong>, a total <strong>of</strong> 72 cooperatives were identified.<br />
A sample <strong>of</strong> 28 operational<br />
cooperatives were surveyed. This<br />
represents a survey participation<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> 39%.<br />
Attempts were made to survey all 72 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
cooperatives. However, many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poultry<br />
cooperatives were ei<strong>the</strong>r no longer operational or were<br />
not contactable. This resulted <strong>in</strong> a survey sample <strong>of</strong> 28<br />
operational cooperatives. This represents a survey<br />
participation rate <strong>of</strong> 39%.<br />
The 28 cooperatives identified were surveyed telephonically <strong>in</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r English or <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir home<br />
language, where necessary. The questionnaire utilised <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> survey is provided <strong>in</strong> Annexure A.<br />
In addition to <strong>the</strong> above surveys, a fur<strong>the</strong>r 12 non-operational<br />
cooperatives were telephonically <strong>in</strong>terviewed regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> reasons for<br />
<strong>the</strong> failure/closure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir cooperative. Thus, a total <strong>of</strong> 40 cooperatives<br />
were <strong>in</strong>terviewed. The survey results below <strong>in</strong>clude only <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> operational cooperative. A separate section (see Section 4.2.3 below)<br />
is dedicated to highlight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> key issues emphasised by nonoperational<br />
cooperatives.<br />
An additional seven<br />
non-operational<br />
cooperatives were<br />
<strong>in</strong>terviewed<br />
4.1.2.<br />
Survey Results<br />
This sub-section provides a summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> responses to <strong>the</strong> cooperative survey and <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation such as membership, f<strong>in</strong>ancial concerns, suppliers, customers, support and challenges.<br />
From <strong>the</strong>se results, conclusions are drawn on <strong>the</strong> key challenges and opportunities for cooperatives<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> poultry <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
The data presented below is compiled from <strong>the</strong> responses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 28 operational cooperatives<br />
surveyed and does not <strong>in</strong>clude data from <strong>the</strong> 12 non-operational cooperatives <strong>in</strong>terviewed.<br />
36 | P a g e U r b a n - E c o n : D e v e l o p m e n t E c o n o m i s t s