Association
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
54 3. Experimental details<br />
Fig. 3.19a,<br />
I rl (c,d,λ)=e −<br />
I sub (c,d,λ)=e −<br />
∫<br />
d d+c<br />
λcap cosα<br />
e −<br />
d<br />
∫ ∞<br />
d+c<br />
λcap cosα<br />
e −<br />
d+c<br />
x<br />
λ rl cosα<br />
dz, and (3.13)<br />
x<br />
λ sub cosα<br />
dz. (3.14)<br />
In the next step, we express the fraction of spectral contribution of the reaction layer f rl with<br />
respect to the bulk intensity. Here, the measured intensities I have to be normalized by λ and<br />
the density n of contributing atoms in the particular layer,<br />
I rl (c,d,λ) calc meas<br />
= f<br />
I sub (c,d,λ) rl = I rl<br />
· λsubnsub<br />
. (3.15)<br />
I sub λ rl n rl<br />
This equation (3.15) contains the thickness of the buried reaction layer c. Because it is not<br />
analytically solvable, a Taylor expansion of c to the 2nd order is applied which lets c be<br />
expressed as<br />
λ<br />
λ rl λ cap ∗λ sub cosα<br />
e rl cosα<br />
λ sub cosα √ λ rl λ cap ∗<br />
c =<br />
+<br />
·<br />
λ sub λ cap ∗ − 2λ sub λ rl − 2λ rl λ cap ∗ λ sub λ cap ∗ − 2λ sub λ rl − 2λ rl λ cap ∗<br />
d<br />
d<br />
λ<br />
√2f rl λ cap ∗λ sub e rl cosα λ<br />
− 4f rl λ rl λ sub e rl cosα λ<br />
− 4f rl λ rl λ cap ∗e rl cosα λ<br />
− λ rl λ cap ∗e sub cosα<br />
( )<br />
d<br />
d 2<br />
.<br />
λ<br />
−e sub cosα λ<br />
e rl cosα<br />
d<br />
d<br />
d<br />
(3.16)<br />
In order to determine the thickness of possible reaction layers of EuO on a silicon surface<br />
(SiO x or EuSi 2 ), this expression is applied to Si 1s or Si 2p HAXPES spectra of EuO/Si heterostructures<br />
investigated in this work.<br />
A consistent chemical characterization of the reaction layer at the functional EuO/Si interface<br />
can be achieved by the additional evaluation of HAXPES spectra from the magnetic oxide<br />
layer in direct contact with the Si substrate. Here, the photoelectrons from the bottom layer<br />
in the EuO oxide (ox) layer carry information about the electronic structure of a possible<br />
reaction layer (rl). Hence, the HAXPES intensities are modeled according to Fig. 3.19b as<br />
I rl (a,b,c,λ)=e −<br />
I ox (a,b,λ)=e −<br />
∫<br />
a+b a+b+c<br />
λ cap ∗ cosα<br />
e − x<br />
a+b<br />
∫<br />
a a+b<br />
λcap cosα<br />
e − x<br />
a<br />
λ rl cosα<br />
dz, and (3.17)<br />
λox cosα<br />
dz. (3.18)<br />
The measured photoelectron spectra have to be normalized (similar to eq. (3.15)), and this<br />
fraction is compared with the modeled fraction, so that I rl(a,b,c,λ) calc meas<br />
= f<br />
I ox (a,b,λ) rl = I rl<br />
I · λoxn ox<br />
ox λ rl n<br />
can be<br />
rl<br />
solved analytically to extract the thickness c of the reaction layer as<br />
⎛<br />
⎞<br />
c = −λ rl ln⎜⎝ f λ ox<br />
rl e − aλox+aλcap+bλcap<br />
λcapλox cosα<br />
+ e − (a+b)(λ cap ∗ +λ rl)<br />
λ rl λ cap ∗ cosα<br />
λ<br />
− f ox<br />
λ rl e − a(λox+λcap)<br />
λcapλox cosα<br />
rl λ rl<br />
⎟⎠ · cosα<br />
(3.19)<br />
+ aλ rl + bλ rl + aλ cap ∗ + bλ cap ∗<br />
.<br />
−λ cap ∗