22.09.2015 Views

Association

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30 2. Theoretical background<br />

must distinguish between the different polarizations q of the light, with q = M ′ − M. Therefore,<br />

we choose the basis |J, M〉 including the magnetic quantum number, and the final states<br />

|J ′ ,M ′ 〉, using the electric dipole operator P q . A summation over all light polarization q yields<br />

the total photoemission intensity as<br />

∑ ∑<br />

σ JJ′ ∝ σq JJ′ =<br />

q<br />

q<br />

∣<br />

∣〈<br />

J ′ ,M ∣ ′ ∣<br />

∣ Pq<br />

∣∣J,<br />

〉∣ ∣∣∣ 2<br />

M , (2.29)<br />

where P q denotes the q component of the electric dipole moment P q = √ 4/3π r ·Y q l (θ,ϕ),<br />

expressed by the spherical harmonics Y q l (θ,ϕ).<br />

We focus on transitions with ΔM = −q = ±1 according to the angular momentum q of the<br />

circularly polarized light. The transition probability σ JJ′ can be divided into two factors<br />

which can be treated separately: (i) the line strength S JJ ′ for every allowed transition J → J ′ ,<br />

and (ii) the algebra of angular momenta which includes the change of M due to q and the<br />

dipole selection rules. Applying the Wigner-Eckart theorem yields<br />

σ JJ′<br />

q<br />

(2.29)<br />

=<br />

=<br />

〈 ∣ J ′ ,M ∣ ′ ∣ 〉∣ ∣ ∣∣J, ∣∣∣ 2<br />

Pq M 〈 ∣ ∣ J ′ ∣ 〉∣ ∣ P ∣∣J ∣∣∣ 2<br />

·<br />

}{{}<br />

S JJ ′<br />

(<br />

J 1 J<br />

′<br />

−M q M ′ ) 2<br />

.<br />

}{{}<br />

3j-symbol<br />

(2.30)<br />

The 3j-symbol vanishes for q = M ′ −M = 0, which means, that the key prerequisite in order to<br />

obtain an MCD is the transfer of the angular momentum of circularly polarized light onto the<br />

final state M ′ . The line strength S JJ ′ shows only a non-vanishing MCD difference spectrum,<br />

if the different sub-levels for every M are unequally populated.<br />

The MCD spectrum is defined as<br />

∑ (<br />

JJ<br />

I MCD = σ ′<br />

q=−1 − )<br />

σJJ′ q=+1<br />

J ′<br />

∝ 〈 M 〉 k B T , (2.31)<br />

whereas 〈M〉 kB T is the Boltzmann average (at temperature T ) which is proportional to the<br />

macroscopic magnetization |M(T )|. In this approximation, the MCD spectrum I MCD is a<br />

measure for the macroscopic magnetization.<br />

Example of an MCD spectrum by core-level photoemission<br />

We discuss the MCD in Fe 2p core-level photoemission, which was initially experimentally<br />

observed by Baumgarten et al. (1990) prior to the development of the MCD theory. 108 In Fe<br />

2p, the spin–orbit interaction is dominant. Hence, a good approximation is the use of |j, m j 〉<br />

spin–orbit final states as a basis. 106 Then, the MCD spectrum can be described by<br />

∑ (<br />

I MCD (j, m j )= σ<br />

l ′ s ′<br />

q=−1 − s<br />

q=+1) ′<br />

σl′ . (2.32)<br />

l ′ s ′<br />

Here, l ′ and s ′ denote the final state angular and spin momenta of the photo-ionized p 5 shell.<br />

The sum in eq. 2.32 runs over the six spin–orbit lines as indicated in Tab. 2.1. Radial matrix

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!