Association
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
30 2. Theoretical background<br />
must distinguish between the different polarizations q of the light, with q = M ′ − M. Therefore,<br />
we choose the basis |J, M〉 including the magnetic quantum number, and the final states<br />
|J ′ ,M ′ 〉, using the electric dipole operator P q . A summation over all light polarization q yields<br />
the total photoemission intensity as<br />
∑ ∑<br />
σ JJ′ ∝ σq JJ′ =<br />
q<br />
q<br />
∣<br />
∣〈<br />
J ′ ,M ∣ ′ ∣<br />
∣ Pq<br />
∣∣J,<br />
〉∣ ∣∣∣ 2<br />
M , (2.29)<br />
where P q denotes the q component of the electric dipole moment P q = √ 4/3π r ·Y q l (θ,ϕ),<br />
expressed by the spherical harmonics Y q l (θ,ϕ).<br />
We focus on transitions with ΔM = −q = ±1 according to the angular momentum q of the<br />
circularly polarized light. The transition probability σ JJ′ can be divided into two factors<br />
which can be treated separately: (i) the line strength S JJ ′ for every allowed transition J → J ′ ,<br />
and (ii) the algebra of angular momenta which includes the change of M due to q and the<br />
dipole selection rules. Applying the Wigner-Eckart theorem yields<br />
σ JJ′<br />
q<br />
(2.29)<br />
=<br />
=<br />
〈 ∣ J ′ ,M ∣ ′ ∣ 〉∣ ∣ ∣∣J, ∣∣∣ 2<br />
Pq M 〈 ∣ ∣ J ′ ∣ 〉∣ ∣ P ∣∣J ∣∣∣ 2<br />
·<br />
}{{}<br />
S JJ ′<br />
(<br />
J 1 J<br />
′<br />
−M q M ′ ) 2<br />
.<br />
}{{}<br />
3j-symbol<br />
(2.30)<br />
The 3j-symbol vanishes for q = M ′ −M = 0, which means, that the key prerequisite in order to<br />
obtain an MCD is the transfer of the angular momentum of circularly polarized light onto the<br />
final state M ′ . The line strength S JJ ′ shows only a non-vanishing MCD difference spectrum,<br />
if the different sub-levels for every M are unequally populated.<br />
The MCD spectrum is defined as<br />
∑ (<br />
JJ<br />
I MCD = σ ′<br />
q=−1 − )<br />
σJJ′ q=+1<br />
J ′<br />
∝ 〈 M 〉 k B T , (2.31)<br />
whereas 〈M〉 kB T is the Boltzmann average (at temperature T ) which is proportional to the<br />
macroscopic magnetization |M(T )|. In this approximation, the MCD spectrum I MCD is a<br />
measure for the macroscopic magnetization.<br />
Example of an MCD spectrum by core-level photoemission<br />
We discuss the MCD in Fe 2p core-level photoemission, which was initially experimentally<br />
observed by Baumgarten et al. (1990) prior to the development of the MCD theory. 108 In Fe<br />
2p, the spin–orbit interaction is dominant. Hence, a good approximation is the use of |j, m j 〉<br />
spin–orbit final states as a basis. 106 Then, the MCD spectrum can be described by<br />
∑ (<br />
I MCD (j, m j )= σ<br />
l ′ s ′<br />
q=−1 − s<br />
q=+1) ′<br />
σl′ . (2.32)<br />
l ′ s ′<br />
Here, l ′ and s ′ denote the final state angular and spin momenta of the photo-ionized p 5 shell.<br />
The sum in eq. 2.32 runs over the six spin–orbit lines as indicated in Tab. 2.1. Radial matrix