22.09.2015 Views

Association

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.5. Magnetic circular dichroism in core-level photoemission 29<br />

2.5. Magnetic circular dichroism in core-level photoemission<br />

Dichroism is derived from Greek and means the “effect of two colors”, originally used for<br />

natural materials showing two colors due to surface effects. The magnetic circular dichroism<br />

(MCD) uses circularly polarized light for excitation and is caused by a directional symmetry<br />

breaking. This can be a magnetic order in the solid. In contrast to itinerant ferromagnets<br />

(e. g. Fe), the “magnetic” open shell in EuO is localized and treated as a core-level in terms<br />

of photoemission spectroscopy. The well-understood core-level photoemission and the completely<br />

available MCD theory render the MCD effect in Eu core-level photoemission an ideal<br />

tool for investigations of tunable effects on the magnetic interaction in EuO thin films: biaxial<br />

strain, stoichiometry, etc. By using hard X-ray photoemission, the MCD effect can be<br />

analyzed at a selected information depth down to 20 nm, thus providing insight into buried<br />

magnetic layers and interfaces.<br />

In this section, we first introduce the basic theory of MCD in photoemission. We proceed<br />

with a simple example: MCD in 2p core-level photoemission. Finally, coupling schemes of<br />

the angular momenta of the Eu photoemission final states are discussed, as a first step for a<br />

future determination of the line strengths in MCD of Eu core-level photoemission spectra.<br />

2.5.1. Atomic multiplet theory including MCD<br />

In order to understand the MCD effect in photoemission, we need to analyze the photoemission<br />

process excited by circularly polarized light, thus including the magnetic quantum<br />

number M. During the photoemission process, an electron from a core-level with w electrons<br />

of orbital momentum l is excited into a free electron state |ɛl ′ 〉 with an orbital momentum l ′<br />

and energy ɛ. Finally, w − 1 electrons are left in the final state configuration |l w−1 〉:<br />

∣<br />

∣l w〉 ΔJ,ΔM<br />

−→ ∣ ∣l w−1 ; ɛl ′〉 . (2.27)<br />

}{{} }{{}<br />

|J,M〉<br />

|J ′ ,M ′ 〉<br />

The final states |J ′ ,M ′ 〉 emerge via the dipole selection rules, according to:<br />

ΔJ =0, ±1 ΔM =0, ±1. (2.28)<br />

The photoemission spectrum is composed of the core final states |l w−1 〉 and transferred to<br />

the detector by the photoelectron |ɛl ′ 〉. In order to quantify the MCD effect, a theoretical<br />

prediction of photoemission line strengths is desirable. A formal description of the MCD in<br />

core-level photoemission considers two interactions, 104 (i) intra-atomic exchange coupling,<br />

which connects core-level spins with the magnetically aligned spins of an open shell, and (ii)<br />

the spin–orbit interaction, which couples the orbital “magnetic” momentum of the circularly<br />

polarized photon to the system of magnetically aligned spins of the sample. We discuss<br />

the analytical derivation, as published in Starke (2000), 105,106 in a shortened form in the<br />

following.<br />

First, the total photoemission intensity is described by Fermi’s golden rule, similar to corelevel<br />

photoemission with unpolarized light (Ch. 2.4). However, for an MCD experiment, we<br />

Herein, ΔJ = 0 is only possible if J 0, due to the enforced momentum change of the photohole l w−1 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!