22.09.2015 Views

Association

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 2. Theoretical background<br />

III. The inelastic mean free path A critical parameter for the probing depth in any photoemission<br />

experiment is the inelastic mean-free path (IMFP) λ of hot electrons in a solid.<br />

Calculated curves of λ versus E kin are depicted in Fig. 2.18. The similarity in the slope for<br />

many elemental solids justifies the use of the term “universal” curve. We recognize that with<br />

energies of 10 keV IMFPs of up to 200 Å can be reached.<br />

<br />

<br />

Figure 2.18.: Universal curve of photoelectron<br />

emission in solids. The inelastic<br />

mean free path (IMFP) λ is the key parameter<br />

to describe inelastic scattering<br />

<br />

<br />

of photoelectrons in solids.<br />

Extending the escape depth of the<br />

photoelectrons up to several tens of<br />

nanometers (with λ ∝ Ekin 0.78 ), 85 the<br />

<br />

HAXPES regime is perfectly suited to<br />

investigate the electronic properties of<br />

buried interfaces or bulk properties.<br />

This recent calculation of IMFPs is<br />

from Tanuma et al. (2011). 84<br />

<br />

<br />

It is evident that, in reality, the IMFP curves can be very different depending on the physical<br />

properties of an individual material. Density, dielectric function and band gap of the solid as<br />

well as the elastic scattering can also alter the trajectory of a photoexcited electron. If these<br />

effects are included into λ, one obtains the effective attenuation length (EAL). One can then<br />

express a mean escape depth down to which unscattered photoelectrons can be expected as<br />

λ ∗ = λ EAL (E kin )· cosα, (2.26)<br />

where λ EAL denotes the experimentally determined effective attenuation length, 80 and α the<br />

off-normal exit angle of the photoelectron.<br />

As evident from eq. (2.26), the bulk-vs-surface sensitivity of the photoemission measurement<br />

can be controlled the kinetic energy or by varying the photoelectron’s off-normal exit angle<br />

α. The behavior is determined by cosine, which gives e. g. a halving of the mean escape<br />

depth at λ ∗ (60 ◦ )=1/2λ ∗ (0 ◦ ). This phenomenon is extremely useful, since simply by tilting<br />

the sample one can obtain depth-resolved information, 86 which we apply for chemical depth<br />

profiles of EuO/Si in Ch. 5. Most intuitive for depth-selective measurements, however, is<br />

the information depth ID, from which 95% of the detected photoelectrons originate. This<br />

definition coincides, in practice, with the detection limit for chemical species in buried layers<br />

(see Ch. 5.1), and equals approximately ID 95% ≈ 3λ ∗ .<br />

Concluding, hard X-ray excitation offers the advantage of a largely tunable probing depth up<br />

to tens of nanometers, thus allowing to investigate buried layers and functional interfaces.<br />

Minor drawbacks are reduced photoemission cross-sections and Debye-Waller factors. Those,<br />

however, can be compensated by nowadays highly brilliant hard X-ray radiation sources, as<br />

introduced in Ch. 3.4.3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!