Association
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
28 2. Theoretical background<br />
III. The inelastic mean free path A critical parameter for the probing depth in any photoemission<br />
experiment is the inelastic mean-free path (IMFP) λ of hot electrons in a solid.<br />
Calculated curves of λ versus E kin are depicted in Fig. 2.18. The similarity in the slope for<br />
many elemental solids justifies the use of the term “universal” curve. We recognize that with<br />
energies of 10 keV IMFPs of up to 200 Å can be reached.<br />
<br />
<br />
Figure 2.18.: Universal curve of photoelectron<br />
emission in solids. The inelastic<br />
mean free path (IMFP) λ is the key parameter<br />
to describe inelastic scattering<br />
<br />
<br />
of photoelectrons in solids.<br />
Extending the escape depth of the<br />
photoelectrons up to several tens of<br />
nanometers (with λ ∝ Ekin 0.78 ), 85 the<br />
<br />
HAXPES regime is perfectly suited to<br />
investigate the electronic properties of<br />
buried interfaces or bulk properties.<br />
This recent calculation of IMFPs is<br />
from Tanuma et al. (2011). 84<br />
<br />
<br />
It is evident that, in reality, the IMFP curves can be very different depending on the physical<br />
properties of an individual material. Density, dielectric function and band gap of the solid as<br />
well as the elastic scattering can also alter the trajectory of a photoexcited electron. If these<br />
effects are included into λ, one obtains the effective attenuation length (EAL). One can then<br />
express a mean escape depth down to which unscattered photoelectrons can be expected as<br />
λ ∗ = λ EAL (E kin )· cosα, (2.26)<br />
where λ EAL denotes the experimentally determined effective attenuation length, 80 and α the<br />
off-normal exit angle of the photoelectron.<br />
As evident from eq. (2.26), the bulk-vs-surface sensitivity of the photoemission measurement<br />
can be controlled the kinetic energy or by varying the photoelectron’s off-normal exit angle<br />
α. The behavior is determined by cosine, which gives e. g. a halving of the mean escape<br />
depth at λ ∗ (60 ◦ )=1/2λ ∗ (0 ◦ ). This phenomenon is extremely useful, since simply by tilting<br />
the sample one can obtain depth-resolved information, 86 which we apply for chemical depth<br />
profiles of EuO/Si in Ch. 5. Most intuitive for depth-selective measurements, however, is<br />
the information depth ID, from which 95% of the detected photoelectrons originate. This<br />
definition coincides, in practice, with the detection limit for chemical species in buried layers<br />
(see Ch. 5.1), and equals approximately ID 95% ≈ 3λ ∗ .<br />
Concluding, hard X-ray excitation offers the advantage of a largely tunable probing depth up<br />
to tens of nanometers, thus allowing to investigate buried layers and functional interfaces.<br />
Minor drawbacks are reduced photoemission cross-sections and Debye-Waller factors. Those,<br />
however, can be compensated by nowadays highly brilliant hard X-ray radiation sources, as<br />
introduced in Ch. 3.4.3.