Association
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
22 2. Theoretical background<br />
E F =0<br />
E kin<br />
photoelectrons<br />
spectrum<br />
E<br />
electronic structure<br />
hν<br />
Figure 2.13.: Photoemission from a solid.<br />
The photoemission process translates the<br />
electronic density of states of the specimen<br />
into a photoemission spectrum, if a<br />
single-electron picture is assumed. The<br />
intensity of the photoelectrons as a function<br />
of the binding energy, the so-called<br />
energy distribution curve (EDC), shows<br />
the density of occupied electronic states<br />
in the solid. After Hüfner (2010). 80<br />
E vac<br />
E F =0<br />
E B<br />
vacuum level<br />
Φ 0<br />
Fermi level<br />
valence band<br />
core levels<br />
N(E)<br />
hν<br />
I(E)<br />
Here, E f is the final state energy relative to the Fermi level E F , E bin denotes the binding energy<br />
of the electron, and φ 0 is the work function of the solid which equals the difference between<br />
the Fermi level and the vacuum level (4–10 eV). The final states are free electron states in<br />
the vacuum and generally not relevant, and the photoemission intensity is proportional to<br />
the density of initial states of energy E i . Thus, in the one-electron picture, photoemission<br />
spectroscopy images the occupied density of states (DOS) of the solid. The exit process of the<br />
photoelectron and the resulting spectrum (energy distribution curve) is sketched in Fig. 2.13.<br />
Exciting the sample involves diffraction (i. e. a change of k ⊥ ) at the potential barrier of the<br />
crystal surface. In core-level photoemission in the XPS and HAXPES regime (hν > 1 keV),<br />
however, the so-called XPS limit can be applied: for most materials at room temperature,<br />
the combined effects of phonons and angular averaging in the spectrometer yield photoemission<br />
spectra that are directly related to the matrix element-weighted density of states (MW-<br />
DOS). 85 This means, in HAXPES, the k dependence in eq. (2.19) is negligible. Furthermore,<br />
element-specific atomic cross-sections can be used to weight the MW-DOS for quantitative<br />
evaluations. 86 which the simplified three-step model does not account for.<br />
The one-step theory of photoemission<br />
An exhaustive treatment of the photoemission process is provided in a the one-step theory.<br />
80,87,88 It contains the Golden Rule equation with proper wave functions of the initial<br />
and final states, and the dipole operator for the interaction of the electron with the incoming<br />
light. Inverse LEED wave functions are used for the final state of the photoelectrons and<br />
the wave functions are expanded as Bloch functions in the periodic crystal, as sketched in<br />
Fig. 2.11b. This allows one to discriminate between different scenarios of matching types<br />
between the free electron wave in the vacuum and the Bloch function in the crystal. This<br />
matching can be (i) simply inside the crystal, (ii) in a band gap yielding an “evanescent wave”,<br />
or (iii) in a band-to-band photoemission for small escape depths. Damping due to inelastic