22.09.2015 Views

Association

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 2. Theoretical background<br />

E F =0<br />

E kin<br />

photoelectrons<br />

spectrum<br />

E<br />

electronic structure<br />

hν<br />

Figure 2.13.: Photoemission from a solid.<br />

The photoemission process translates the<br />

electronic density of states of the specimen<br />

into a photoemission spectrum, if a<br />

single-electron picture is assumed. The<br />

intensity of the photoelectrons as a function<br />

of the binding energy, the so-called<br />

energy distribution curve (EDC), shows<br />

the density of occupied electronic states<br />

in the solid. After Hüfner (2010). 80<br />

E vac<br />

E F =0<br />

E B<br />

vacuum level<br />

Φ 0<br />

Fermi level<br />

valence band<br />

core levels<br />

N(E)<br />

hν<br />

I(E)<br />

Here, E f is the final state energy relative to the Fermi level E F , E bin denotes the binding energy<br />

of the electron, and φ 0 is the work function of the solid which equals the difference between<br />

the Fermi level and the vacuum level (4–10 eV). The final states are free electron states in<br />

the vacuum and generally not relevant, and the photoemission intensity is proportional to<br />

the density of initial states of energy E i . Thus, in the one-electron picture, photoemission<br />

spectroscopy images the occupied density of states (DOS) of the solid. The exit process of the<br />

photoelectron and the resulting spectrum (energy distribution curve) is sketched in Fig. 2.13.<br />

Exciting the sample involves diffraction (i. e. a change of k ⊥ ) at the potential barrier of the<br />

crystal surface. In core-level photoemission in the XPS and HAXPES regime (hν > 1 keV),<br />

however, the so-called XPS limit can be applied: for most materials at room temperature,<br />

the combined effects of phonons and angular averaging in the spectrometer yield photoemission<br />

spectra that are directly related to the matrix element-weighted density of states (MW-<br />

DOS). 85 This means, in HAXPES, the k dependence in eq. (2.19) is negligible. Furthermore,<br />

element-specific atomic cross-sections can be used to weight the MW-DOS for quantitative<br />

evaluations. 86 which the simplified three-step model does not account for.<br />

The one-step theory of photoemission<br />

An exhaustive treatment of the photoemission process is provided in a the one-step theory.<br />

80,87,88 It contains the Golden Rule equation with proper wave functions of the initial<br />

and final states, and the dipole operator for the interaction of the electron with the incoming<br />

light. Inverse LEED wave functions are used for the final state of the photoelectrons and<br />

the wave functions are expanded as Bloch functions in the periodic crystal, as sketched in<br />

Fig. 2.11b. This allows one to discriminate between different scenarios of matching types<br />

between the free electron wave in the vacuum and the Bloch function in the crystal. This<br />

matching can be (i) simply inside the crystal, (ii) in a band gap yielding an “evanescent wave”,<br />

or (iii) in a band-to-band photoemission for small escape depths. Damping due to inelastic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!