22.09.2015 Views

Association

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20 2. Theoretical background<br />

the single-electron picture is expressed as<br />

H = H 0 + H S = 1 ( ) 2<br />

2m i ∇−e c A(r) + V (r), (2.12)<br />

here, H 0 is the Hamiltonian of the unperturbed system, H S is the perturbation operator,<br />

p = /i ∇ denotes the momentum operator, and V (r) is the potential within the solid from the<br />

ionic cores. The single Hamiltonians are written as<br />

H 0 = − 2<br />

2m ∇2 + V (r), H S = 1 (<br />

− e<br />

)<br />

e2<br />

(2A∇ +(∇A)) +<br />

2m ic c 2 |A|2 . (2.13)<br />

Here, we approximate |A| 2 ≈ 0 for small electromagnetic field strengths, and the gradient<br />

∇A ≈ 0, because the field changes within the crystal only very slowly (X-ray penetration of<br />

the crystal).<br />

The ansatz for A is a plane wave with wave vector k γ , the amplitude A 0 , and r is the unit<br />

vector in direction of the electric field:<br />

A(r,t)=A 0 e ik γ r<br />

⇒ H S = − e<br />

mc A 0e ik γ r p. (2.14)<br />

The wave vector k γ = 2π λ<br />

is small with respect to the size of a typical Brillouin zone up to the<br />

XPS regime, therefore e ik γ r ≈ 1, which simplifies the perturbation Hamiltonian in the dipole<br />

approximation as<br />

H S = − e<br />

mc A 0 ·p. (2.15)<br />

We remark that for high-energetic photons (HAXPES), the dipole approximation may be insufficient<br />

and higher order transitions (electric quadrupole E2, or magnetic dipole M1) are<br />

emerging. The Hamiltonian (2.15) depends only on the momentum transfer p between the<br />

plane wave (light) and the electron, which is to be determined now. It is used in Fermi’s<br />

golden rule, which expresses the probability per time that the system is excited by a photon<br />

of the energy hν,<br />

w i→f = 2π 〈 ∣ ∣ f ∣∣H ∣ S 〉 ∣ 2<br />

∣i<br />

∣∣∣<br />

·δ(E f − E i − hν) (2.16)<br />

Here, |i〉 denotes the electron’s initial state with the energy eigenvalue E i , and |f 〉 is the final<br />

state in the single particle model with energy E f , as depicted in Fig. 2.11a. The δ-function<br />

ensures the energy conservation. The transition matrix element in Fermi’s golden rule, M if ,<br />

depends on the symmetries of the final and initial state as<br />

M if = 〈 f ∣ ∣ ∣H<br />

S ∣ ∣ ∣i<br />

〉<br />

∝〈f |p|i〉. (2.17)<br />

Besides the energy conservation, also the conservation of the momentum (∝ k, the wave<br />

The E2 or M1 distributions occur for very short wavelength photons (hν ≫ 1 keV) and for the ejection of electrons<br />

in very large orbits. However, these distortions only alter the angular dependence of photoemission. Since<br />

we conduct angle-integrated HAXPES only at fixed emission angles, the inclusion of higher order transitions is<br />

negligible in this thesis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!