22.09.2015 Views

Association

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

124 6. Conclusion and Outlook<br />

we focus on the characterization and careful optimization of the spin-functional EuO/Si heterointerface.<br />

First, we explore how to stabilize metastable EuO on Si using Oxide-MBE. We adapt a common<br />

strategy from silicon technology, the surface etching with hydrofluoric acid (HF), in<br />

order to remove native SiO 2 and chemically passivate the Si surface (H-Si). On such passivated<br />

Si substrates, we synthesized polycrystalline EuO using different growth parameters.<br />

By means of HAXPES, we clearly distinguished two EuO valency phases: stoichiometric EuO<br />

and over-oxidized Eu 1 O 1+x . For the stoichiometric EuO heterostructures, we confirmed a<br />

bulk-like ferromagnetism – this is an important prerequisite for magnetic EuO tunnel contacts.<br />

This result paves the way for a following interface study of ultrathin EuO tunnel barriers<br />

directly on Si (001).<br />

In the next step of our integration of ultrathin EuO directly with silicon, we focus on experimentally<br />

realizing a high structural and chemical quality of the EuO/Si heterointerface. Such<br />

atomically sharp interfaces of high crystalline quality may lead to coherent tunneling. Thus,<br />

we carefully studied how to chemically control the highly reactive EuO/Si heterointerface<br />

in order to permit an epitaxial integration of EuO on Si (001). Our thermodynamic analysis<br />

of the EuO/Si interface – taking into account the high chemical reactivity of Eu, EuO, and<br />

Si during EuO synthesis at elevated temperatures – gives us a guideline of probable reaction<br />

paths. In this way, we decided to compare three complementary in situ passivation procedures<br />

of the Si (001) surface: (i) hydrogen passivation, (ii) Eu passivation in the monolayer<br />

regime, and (iii) SiO x formation in the Ångström regime. We apply these passivations selectively<br />

against interfacial silicon oxides and silicide formation – both being major antagonists<br />

to efficient spin filter tunneling.<br />

In order to quantify the impact of different chemical passivations of the Si (001) surface<br />

on the EuO/Si interface properties, we conducted optimization studies comprising the control<br />

of surface crystalline structure and chemical interface properties by electron diffraction<br />

techniques and HAXPES, respectively. We conclude, that the respective Si surface passivations<br />

have minimized silicon oxides to below 1 nm and interfacial silicides to 2 Ångströms,<br />

which is clearly in the sub-nanometer regime. In particular, for an optimum passivation<br />

using the SiO x method, the ultrathin EuO layer showed a magnetic saturation moment of<br />

5μ B /EuO, comparable to that of bulk EuO. Thus, our work demonstrates how to successfully<br />

apply chemical passivations to the Si (001) surface and – at the same time – maintain a<br />

mainly heteroepitaxial integration of EuO with the Si (001) wafer. This is an important result<br />

for possible spin-dependent coherent tunneling in EuO/Si contacts. Such optimized EuO/Si<br />

heterointerfaces may be used as spin-functional EuO tunnel contacts for silicon spintronic<br />

devices in the near future.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!