Association
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
112 5. Results II: EuO integration directly on silicon<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Figure 5.22.: Eu monolayers on top of the Si (001) surface under surface diffusion. The simulation<br />
is carried out for vanishing Eu–Si surface diffusion (top row), and for Eu–Si surface diffusion<br />
assumed to be equal with Eu–Eu self diffusion (bottom row). Programmed in HT-Basic by<br />
Ibach (2013). 207<br />
crease island sizes but their large scale distribution does not change. As Eu is highly mobile<br />
near its sublimation point during the Eu distillation condition (T S = 450 ◦ C), a distinction<br />
between Eu–Eu diffusivity (ν large) and Eu–Si (ν small) is realistic. Therefore, in the upper<br />
row of Fig. 5.22 we assume the very first Eu layer in contact with the Si surface to show no<br />
surface diffusion. For comparison, in the second row the Eu–Si surface diffusivity is the same<br />
as for Eu–Eu.<br />
For vanishing Eu–Si surface diffusion (top row), a characteristic difference for 0.5 an one<br />
monolayer Eu is that Eu atoms on Si (001) form many single nucleation sites which are randomly<br />
distributed and will form islands upon ongoing coverage. The difference between the<br />
two initial values for surface diffusivity vanishes already after 1.5 monolayers Eu. Remarkably,<br />
no islands of height two are identified. In the pictures of the second Eu layer, no larger<br />
islands form, but the Eu atoms are rather diffusing and settling in sites with larger coordination<br />
number (holes, sites with only one ML Eu).<br />
From two monolayers Eu on, a closed coverage of the Si (001) surface is confirmed and the difference<br />
in island height is mostly not exceeding one monolayer. We consider Eu this coverage<br />
as a promising basis for an oxygen-protective passivation of the Si (001) surface.<br />
In Fig. 5.23b, we analyze the the surface crystal structure of 2 nm EuO/Eu-Si (001) heterostructures<br />
(Fig. 5.23a) by RHEED (E = 10 keV) pattern recorded immediately after EuO<br />
growth. As a reference, the clean (flashed) Si (001) surface exhibits a clear pattern of (1 × 1)<br />
No diffusion barrier at island edges (Ehrlich-Schwoebel barrier) is included in the calculation, this is a reasonable<br />
assumption for the highly mobile Eu ions.