Association
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.3. Interface engineering I: Hydrogen passivation of the EuO/Si interface 105<br />
Second, a possible H supply from a H-passivated Si surface motivates an analysis of the hydrate<br />
Eu(OH) 3 . An extreme undersaturation of H far from equilibrium is given at the H-Si<br />
surface. Given Δμ ≪ 0forHandΔμ ≈ 0 for limited O 2 supply, the nucleation theory predicts<br />
a large formation barrier for Eu(OH) 3 clusters (either 2D or 3D), corresponding to red or orange<br />
lines in Fig. 5.14. Thus, from the classical nucleation theory, Eu(OH) 3 is not predicted<br />
to form clusters.<br />
Finally, the remaining compounds are the desired magnetic oxide EuO, and the interfacial<br />
contaminants EuSi 2 and SiO 2 . However, as mentioned before, a nucleation of these compounds<br />
cannot be evaluated due to the lack of nano-structural and surface energy data.<br />
Besides the classical nucleation theory, many kinetic surface effects between Si and the deposit<br />
will likely proceed at elevated temperatures of synthesis. These are sketched in Fig. 5.15.<br />
In particular, special kinetics at substrate imperfections and edges (the Ehrlich-Schwoebel<br />
barrier 205 ), as well as interdiffusion of the deposit with Si layers change the stoichiometry,<br />
structure and even magnetism, and render themselves as major antagonists to a functional<br />
transport interface. This motivates a comprehensive experimental study, in which we determine<br />
conditions for which the functional EuO/Si interface remains structurally sharp and<br />
chemically clean: nowadays often referred to as interface engineering. 7<br />
5.3. Interface engineering I: Hydrogen passivation of the EuO/Si interface<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Figure 5.16.: Si (001) surface reconstructions. Clean Si (001) reconstructs as (2 × 1) dimers (a) and<br />
would have the least dense H-termination. The bulk (1 × 1) surface has the most dense H-<br />
termination (b). However, mixed variants like (3×1) are energetically favorable (c), and in reality,<br />
a canted (1 × 1) H-Si surface is usually observed (d). After Northrup (1991). 206<br />
Dangling bonds of the Si (001) bulk (1 × 1) surface will either form a reconstructed (2 × 1)<br />
surface under clean UHV conditions, or react with air or organic adsorbates to form a bulklike<br />
yet contaminated surface layer. Here, we discuss the in situ hydrogen passivation of the<br />
Si (001) dangling bonds. Predicted reconstructions of the Si (001) surface with H-termination<br />
are compiled in Fig. 5.16. Experimentally, this is achieved in situ by a special atomic hydrogen<br />
supply as introduced in the experimental chapter (Ch. 3.3).<br />
Routinely, the Si wafer pieces of prime quality are treated with an in situ flashing procedure<br />
at a background pressure better than 5 × 10 −10 mbar, this yields a superior clean and<br />
atomically smooth Si (001) surface, as controlled by Auger electron spectroscopy and LEED.