22.09.2015 Views

Association

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104 5. Results II: EuO integration directly on silicon<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Figure 5.15.: Surface processes for a magnetic oxide (MO) on Si deposition. First, MO atoms are supplied<br />

and arrive on the Si surface. Either desired processes may proceed (b,c,d) which form a<br />

stoichiometric and heteroepitaxial MO layer; or undesired chemisorption or contaminations may<br />

form with the Si surface (a,e). Adapted from Venables (1994). 204<br />

nucleation energy,<br />

ΔG(j)=−j Δμ + j 2 /3<br />

X, X =<br />

∑<br />

C k γ k<br />

k<br />

}{{}<br />

+ C SF (γ ∗ − γ F )<br />

}{{}<br />

interface energy<br />

surface energy of k between substrate S<br />

and film F<br />

faces of the deposited cluster<br />

. (5.3)<br />

Herein, C k and C SF are geometrical constants depending on the shape of the cluster of size j.<br />

The saturation factor Δμ of the deposit is discriminated between<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨ < 0, undersaturation, and<br />

Δμ ⎪⎩ > 0, supersaturation of the deposit.<br />

Typical shapes of ΔG(j) curves for different Δμ are shown in Fig. 5.14. In case of an undersaturation<br />

of the deposit, nucleation is unfavored (red lines). If, however, a supersaturation<br />

is eminent (Δμ ≫ 0), the thermodynamic behavior of ΔG(j) predicts growth of clusters of the<br />

deposit. Thereby, the cluster size j allowing for a nucleation reduces to a few atoms.<br />

Now, we apply the classical nucleation theory to obtain comparisons of cluster formation<br />

probabilities at the EuO/Si interface. In the EuO/Si heterosystem, however, for EuO and<br />

the interfacial contaminants EuSi 2 , Eu(OH) 3 , and SiO 2 the nanostructure of nucleation sites<br />

directly on Si (001) is unknown to date. This hampers a numerical evaluation of ΔG(j) by<br />

eq. (5.3), and thus predictions have to be taken with a grain of salt.<br />

First, we consider the initial stage of EuO growth which is a Eu seed layer in the monolayer<br />

regime. This means supersaturation and a large Δμ. Moreover, Eu has an extremely low surface<br />

energy (γ Eu = 0.46 J/m 2 < 1 2 ·γ Si). Thus, for Eu on Si (001), the factor X in eq. (5.3) is<br />

small and allows for negative energies ΔG(j) of the nucleation, independent from the cluster<br />

size j: Eu wets the Si surface.<br />

see Table 3.1 on p. 37.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!