Association
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
104 5. Results II: EuO integration directly on silicon<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Figure 5.15.: Surface processes for a magnetic oxide (MO) on Si deposition. First, MO atoms are supplied<br />
and arrive on the Si surface. Either desired processes may proceed (b,c,d) which form a<br />
stoichiometric and heteroepitaxial MO layer; or undesired chemisorption or contaminations may<br />
form with the Si surface (a,e). Adapted from Venables (1994). 204<br />
nucleation energy,<br />
ΔG(j)=−j Δμ + j 2 /3<br />
X, X =<br />
∑<br />
C k γ k<br />
k<br />
}{{}<br />
+ C SF (γ ∗ − γ F )<br />
}{{}<br />
interface energy<br />
surface energy of k between substrate S<br />
and film F<br />
faces of the deposited cluster<br />
. (5.3)<br />
Herein, C k and C SF are geometrical constants depending on the shape of the cluster of size j.<br />
The saturation factor Δμ of the deposit is discriminated between<br />
⎧<br />
⎪⎨ < 0, undersaturation, and<br />
Δμ ⎪⎩ > 0, supersaturation of the deposit.<br />
Typical shapes of ΔG(j) curves for different Δμ are shown in Fig. 5.14. In case of an undersaturation<br />
of the deposit, nucleation is unfavored (red lines). If, however, a supersaturation<br />
is eminent (Δμ ≫ 0), the thermodynamic behavior of ΔG(j) predicts growth of clusters of the<br />
deposit. Thereby, the cluster size j allowing for a nucleation reduces to a few atoms.<br />
Now, we apply the classical nucleation theory to obtain comparisons of cluster formation<br />
probabilities at the EuO/Si interface. In the EuO/Si heterosystem, however, for EuO and<br />
the interfacial contaminants EuSi 2 , Eu(OH) 3 , and SiO 2 the nanostructure of nucleation sites<br />
directly on Si (001) is unknown to date. This hampers a numerical evaluation of ΔG(j) by<br />
eq. (5.3), and thus predictions have to be taken with a grain of salt.<br />
First, we consider the initial stage of EuO growth which is a Eu seed layer in the monolayer<br />
regime. This means supersaturation and a large Δμ. Moreover, Eu has an extremely low surface<br />
energy (γ Eu = 0.46 J/m 2 < 1 2 ·γ Si). Thus, for Eu on Si (001), the factor X in eq. (5.3) is<br />
small and allows for negative energies ΔG(j) of the nucleation, independent from the cluster<br />
size j: Eu wets the Si surface.<br />
see Table 3.1 on p. 37.