Association
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
Magnetic Oxide Heterostructures: EuO on Cubic Oxides ... - JuSER
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5. Results II: The integration of the magnetic oxide EuO directly<br />
on silicon<br />
The interface is still the device.<br />
(H. Y. Hwang and J. M. Chakhalian,<br />
Nat. Mat. editorial, 2012 146,169,170 )<br />
Despite its tremendous potential as tunnel contacts with spin functionality, the successful<br />
stabilization of stoichiometric EuO thin films directly on silicon without any buffer layer is<br />
not reported to date. At present, a number of studies have used interfacial barriers of several<br />
nanometers thickness, which prevent diffusion and serve as epitaxial seed for EuO synthesis<br />
on silicon. 7,25,27 This, however, largely extends the tunneling path, as the total thickness<br />
of the oxide barrier and the magnetic oxide EuO can easily exceed 5 nm. This may result in<br />
hopping transport and scattering of spin-polarized electrons rather than tunnel transmission.<br />
Therefore, our goal is the integration of ultrathin EuO on Si (001) without any buffer layer.<br />
This study is based on the predicted thermal stability of the magnetic oxide EuO in contact<br />
with silicon. 14 A moderate lateral strain of 5.6% provided by Si (001) to the EuO lattice is<br />
in the usual range which allows for heteroepitaxy of oxides on semiconductors. Remarkably,<br />
this lattice mismatch is clearly lower than for the dielectric oxide HfO 2 epitaxially integrated<br />
with Si (strain = 6.9%), which is presently attracting great interest. Having established a<br />
high quality EuO synthesis on cubic oxides (Ch. 4) with single crystalline quality and bulklike<br />
magnetism, now we proceed stepwise towards the application side: epitaxial integration<br />
of EuO directly on Si (001). This system combines lattice strain with a challenging interface<br />
chemistry.<br />
We start the study with a chemically well-defined system: polycrystalline EuO on HF-passivated<br />
Si. Herein, EuO is grown with the well-established EuO distillation growth mode as<br />
used for oxide substrates, yielding a bulk-like EuO thin film. A detailed picture of the valence<br />
state of Eu ions in EuO and the electronic structure depending on the chemical composition<br />
is still missing. A major reason is the difficulty to probe this highly reactive compound by<br />
conventional surface-sensitive photoelectron spectroscopy, due to the necessity for a protective<br />
capping layer in EuO/Si hybrid structures. Here, we control the chemical integrity of<br />
the buried EuO bulk and surface layers by hard X-ray photoemission (HAXPES) experiments<br />
carried out at the high brilliance synchrotron light source PETRA III.<br />
In the next step, we prepare and investigate ultrathin EuO on atomically smooth Si (001).<br />
We remove any oxides and contaminations from the Si substrate by in situ flashing procedures.<br />
For the system EuO directly on Si, the interface chemistry is the crucial challenge,<br />
as all the constituents Eu, O 2 , and Si easily react to either metallic silicides, various oxides<br />
or over-oxidized EuO phases. Thus, we dedicate one section explicitly to a thermodynamic<br />
analysis of the EuO/Si interface. For different regimes of EuO synthesis, we identify the most<br />
probable interface reaction products and quantify balanced interface reactions by means of<br />
their resulting Gibbs free energies. In this way, we derive three different passivation meth-<br />
85