22.09.2015 Views

Bibliometric Analysis Asia-Pacific Research Area ... - JuSER

Bibliometric Analysis Asia-Pacific Research Area ... - JuSER

Bibliometric Analysis Asia-Pacific Research Area ... - JuSER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Central Library<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> research area. Germany did not experience any significant shifts over the course of the<br />

survey conducted here in either of the two periods analysed.<br />

China, Physics<br />

1998-2007<br />

The next step involves breaking down the output into<br />

scientific disciplines in order to provide an exact outline of<br />

the development of scientific publications at this level. This<br />

allowed us to determine that of all of the publications by the<br />

12 countries studied in the field of biology and biotechnology,<br />

30 % were contributed by Japan, while China contributed<br />

30 % in the mathematical and chemistry publications that<br />

were evaluated (see Figures 39 and 40 for more on this).<br />

In the third chapter of this study, a citation analysis is<br />

performed in order to determine the citation rates for all of the<br />

countries studied in the scientific disciplines. The perception<br />

of each of the countries in the individual disciplines is then<br />

compared in a variety of constellations for the entire period under review and over time<br />

between the countries. In order to include another benchmark in addition to the comparison of<br />

countries, the perception of the countries in the individual disciplines is compared to that of<br />

Germany in the same subject. If we take Australia as an example, as shown in the adjacent<br />

figure, we<br />

can see how<br />

high the<br />

percentage<br />

deviation of<br />

the citation<br />

rate is in<br />

comparison<br />

to Germany.<br />

For example,<br />

the<br />

perception<br />

Physics<br />

Nanotechnology<br />

Medicine<br />

Mathematics<br />

Materials science<br />

Engineering<br />

Information and computer science<br />

Geosciences<br />

Citation rates for Australia compared to Germany<br />

-18.25%<br />

-18.38%<br />

Co-<br />

Publications<br />

# Country<br />

1 USA 9932<br />

2 Japan 4562<br />

3 Germany 4197<br />

4 UK 2744<br />

5 France 2168<br />

6 Russia 1798<br />

7 South Korea 1657<br />

8 Canada 1656<br />

9 Italy 1587<br />

10 Singapore 1541<br />

Energy<br />

11.49%<br />

for Australia<br />

Chemistry<br />

-6.85%<br />

as a country<br />

-19.30%<br />

Biology and biotechnology<br />

in the<br />

Agricultural science<br />

14.34%<br />

discipline of<br />

Multidisciplinary journals -24.29%<br />

“agricultural<br />

science” is<br />

-30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20%<br />

Benchmark Germany<br />

14 % higher<br />

than for<br />

Germany. In mathematics, Australia’s perception is 6 % lower than Germany’s. The perception<br />

of Australia is as good as or better than that of Germany in four disciplines. It therefore counts<br />

as one of the countries with the highest citation rates in this study.<br />

Comparisons were not just performed with Germany, but also in relation to an international<br />

benchmark, whereby the publication behaviour of the countries studied together with their<br />

discipline-specific citation rates were compared to an appropriate global reference.<br />

-11.77%<br />

-6.55%<br />

-5.89%<br />

-3.43%<br />

5.93%<br />

7.34%<br />

V

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!