Bibliometric Analysis Asia-Pacific Research Area ... - JuSER
Bibliometric Analysis Asia-Pacific Research Area ... - JuSER
Bibliometric Analysis Asia-Pacific Research Area ... - JuSER
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Central Library<br />
With the aid of a network analysis, we studied the output of South-East <strong>Asia</strong>n countries (both<br />
between the countries studied and with others outside this area) and illustrated the results in the<br />
form of a network diagram. Using Salton’s measure, a normalisation was performed. The results<br />
of these investigations allow us to draw the conclusion that cooperation between the countries<br />
studied has intensified in the period from 1998 to 2007 and that an <strong>Asia</strong>-<strong>Pacific</strong> research area<br />
has emerged. This conclusion is based solely on the bibliometric analyses performed in this<br />
study and must be supplemented with more results before it can be generalised.<br />
A counter example, in which ten selected countries with the same bibliometric parameters are<br />
investigated in the same manner as the South-East <strong>Asia</strong>n countries, should furthermore prove<br />
that increasing networking activities within the research area investigated cannot be explained<br />
by a general global increase in international cooperations nor are they simply a matter of<br />
coincidence.<br />
Verification of networks using randomly selected countries<br />
In the preceding investigation, different analysis methods revealed that cooperation between the<br />
key countries increased disproportionately between 1998 and 2007. To conclude that the<br />
proportion of international co-publications has generally increased worldwide, the same method<br />
will be applied in the following to a counter sample of ten 9 selected countries 10 . Figure 118<br />
shows the annual number of scientific publications by the selected comparative countries<br />
between 1992 and 2007. Germany and Japan, which have already been analysed in relation to<br />
South-East <strong>Asia</strong>, once again come out way ahead of the other countries. France and Russia<br />
follow in third place. In the case of Russia, the drop in the number of scientific papers must be<br />
considered in the context of the political collapse. Excluding Russia, the publication output of all<br />
countries investigated increased between 1992 and 2007.<br />
Publication output of the ten selected countries between 1992 and 2007<br />
120000<br />
100000<br />
number of publications<br />
80000<br />
60000<br />
40000<br />
20000<br />
0<br />
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
Argentina Brazil France Germany Japan Mexico South Africa South Korea Ukraine Russia<br />
Figure 118: Publication output of the ten selected countries between 1992 and 2007<br />
9 The countries chosen are: Argentina, Brazil, Germany, France, Japan, Mexico, South Africa, South Korea, Ukraine<br />
and Russia.<br />
10 The selection was made based on the following criteria: both small and large countries (measured in terms of<br />
publication output), countries from South-East <strong>Asia</strong>, as well as countries with and without geographical<br />
relationships.<br />
144