Neutron Scattering

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ABA (deg ) Figure 4 .7 : Isotopic incoherent scattering from nickel obtained by rocking the analyzer crystal through the elastic position . Essentially all scattering is non-spin flip scattering (++) measured with "flipper off" . In flipper on mode the spin-flip data (+-) are taken, In contrast to magnetic scattering the result is independent of the neutron polarization with respect to the scattering vector Q .[7] Actually, this example is not trivial, and it is not so straightforward to reproduce this result . Since at room temperature Ni is a ferromagnet, additional magnetic scattering is to be expected if the magnetization has any component perpendicular to Q, and a saturating magnetic field has to be applied to avoid any magnetic demain structure . Such inhomogeneities typically cause depolarization effects . A much simpler example for pure non-spin flip scattering would be Bragg scattering which is due to the coherent nuclear scattering amplitude from a non-magnetic material, for instance the Debye-Scherrer rings of aluminum or other materials . In practice, the ratio of NSF- to SF-intensities (ftipping ratio) for such a measurement is useful to determine the degree of polarization for the experimental set-up . 4- 13
Fig. 4 .3 .4 probably represents the first verification of the spin-flip and non-spin flip scattering from a spin-incoherent scatterer . The example is Vanadium a typical material used for absolute calibrations of neutron measurements . The scattering above the background level shows nearly the ideal intensity ratio 2 :1 for spin-flip to non-spin-flip intensities . In particular, hydrogenous materials have large spin incoherent cross sections . Figure 4 .8 : Nuclear-spin incoherent scattering from vanadium obtained by rocking the analyzer crystal through the clastic position . The flipper off data are proportional te the (++) cross section and the flipper on data are proportional to the (-) cross section . In contrast to magnetic scattering the result is independent of the neutron polarization with respect to the scattering vector Q .[7] We recall that for a magnetic system the spin-flip and non-spin flip scattering should depend on the polarization of the neutron with respect to Q . This field dependence is illustrated in Fig . 4 .9 showing the paramagnetic scattering from MnF 2 . In general, we expect that the final polarization to vary between 0 and -PZ,,tit2al . It is obvious that this scattering can be distinguished from spin-incoherent scattering . Indeed, one can easily verify that the difference between the spin-flip scatterings with polarization P I~ Q and P L Q is proportional te the (para-)magnetic scattering only, free from any other scattering contributions like coherent nuclear scattering, spin-incoherent scattering and possible background . The saine is truc for the difference of non-spin flip scatterings with P Ij Q and P L Q, and Fig . 4 .10 shows such a separation of the paramagnetic scattering from MnF2 powder diffraction data . Measurements with the unpolarized beam show a background intensity decaying with Q and various Bragg peaks on top . The Bragg peaks 4-14
Page 1 and 2:
Forschungszentrum Jülich in der He
Page 4 and 5:
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Inst
Page 6:
Contents . . 1 Neutron Sources H .
Page 10 and 11:
1 . Neutron Sources Harald Conrad 1
Page 12 and 13:
d) f, = v a, , q - ti = P a, - 0 .3
Page 14 and 15:
Period Example Flux (D [1013 1950-6
Page 16 and 17:
In stage 1 the primary proton knock
Page 18 and 19:
get as heat, the rest is transporte
Page 20 and 21:
down power and stronger absorption
Page 22 and 23:
Appendix Neutron Sources - an overv
Page 24:
led remotely. It is rauch more conv
Page 28 and 29:
2 . Properties of the neutron, elem
Page 30 and 31:
In the 60's the ferst high flux rea
Page 32 and 33:
Hot neutrons in reactors are obtain
Page 34 and 35:
elated values for the FRJ-2 reactor
Page 36 and 37:
2 .5 Scattering amplitude and cross
Page 38 and 39:
(A+k2 ) yr = u(Z:) yr V( u~r)= z "
Page 40 and 41:
_du _ mn \2 A2-~2z r2~ I(k' IVI k)I
Page 42 and 43:
E ô ô x z w 0 z _w U N Figure 2 .
Page 44 and 45: scattering is observed with the ave
Page 46 and 47: For a spherical electron distributi
Page 48: A more thorough introduction to neu
Page 52 and 53: 3 . Elastie Seattering from Many-Bo
Page 54 and 55: Q = Q = k2 + k2 - 2kk' cos2B (3 .3)
Page 56 and 57: 3 .2 Fundamental Scattering Theory
Page 58 and 59: The meaning of (3 .l4) is immediate
Page 60 and 61: 1 . e. in the second approximation,
Page 62 and 63: The saure problem will bc dealt wit
Page 64 and 65: ALQ) = Y-bfe'Q'-rB(r-(n .a+m .b+p»
Page 66 and 67: du LQ) = ALQJ2 = e'Q .A' . * -i e-
Page 68 and 69: Tab . 3.1 : The scattering lengths
Page 70 and 71: We note immediately that we should
Page 72 and 73: These magnetic structures can be un
Page 74 and 75: M1LQ)=Q-MQ)xQ M(Q)= IM (r)e i Q " d
Page 76 and 77: Orbital magnetic spin angular ,,- m
Page 78 and 79: aQ . r 3 àQ . N . QR . aQ .t k _ML
Page 80: Schweika Analysis Polarization W .
Page 83 and 84: ducing a complex component and were
Page 85 and 86: ir v s ftft 3956 2 s 2 0.81[X] 80 c
Page 87 and 88: Some polarizers using Bragg reflect
Page 89 and 90: Different to the coherent nuclear s
Page 91 and 92: where QBG denotes the background .
Page 93: 4 .4 Applications We now consider e
Page 97 and 98: . occur only in the non-spin flip c
Page 99 and 100: The results for the magnetization d
Page 101 and 102: a large solid angle with polarizers
Page 103 and 104: scattering to spin-flip scattering
Page 105 and 106: An experimental verification of thi
Page 108: Correlation Functions Measured by S
Page 111 and 112: In real liquids however usually an
Page 113 and 114: The term in big parentheses of equa
Page 115 and 116: 4 0 -5 0 5 10 15 20 ho) [meV] Figur
Page 117 and 118: Figure 5 .5 : The pair correlation
Page 119 and 120: Figure 5 .6 : Partial differential
Page 121 and 122: Then equation (5 .21) can be conver
Page 123 and 124: The route from expression (5 .27) t
Page 125 and 126: In addition it is often useful to d
Page 127 and 128: 2 . The pair correlation function h
Page 129 and 130: G(r, t) G(r, t) i(Q, t) r Q i(Q, t)
Page 131 and 132: Insertion of this result into (5 .6
Page 133 and 134: With this example we can also demon
Page 136 and 137: 6. Continuum description : Grazing
Page 138 and 139: Starting point is the exact atomic
Page 140 and 141: For specular reflectivity measureme
Page 142 and 143: v v z l 2r V(z) = 2 -2erfC~ with er
Page 144 and 145:
F{dV(z)/dz ) to calculate the refle
Page 146 and 147:
Equation (6 .13) also shows that th
Page 148 and 149:
ut is completely reflected . The cr
Page 150 and 151:
0.4° . The full dynamical theory c
Page 152 and 153:
1) If no magnetic induction B (whic
Page 154:
Diffractometer Gernot Heger
Page 157 and 158:
select a special wavelengths band (
Page 159 and 160:
" The direction of the reciprocal l
Page 161 and 162:
Bragg-intensities of single crystal
Page 163 and 164:
monochromator, on the mosaic spread
Page 165 and 166:
complex sample environments, such a
Page 167 and 168:
the diffraction plane) two further
Page 170:
Small-angle Scattering and Reflecto
Page 173 and 174:
L= (1) ( k ) a e -(k/k T ) 2 Ak (8
Page 175 and 176:
possible neutron wave lengths betwe
Page 177 and 178:
figure and with neutrons of about 1
Page 179 and 180:
1 .0 Danvinkurve 0 .8 0 .6 0 .4 0 .
Page 181 and 182:
tails. This reflection curve leads
Page 183 and 184:
For the Nickel film one gets a thic
Page 185 and 186:
I The rotor of a velocity selector
Page 187 and 188:
multiplier are arranged in a quadra
Page 190 and 191:
9 . Crystal spectrometer : triple-a
Page 192 and 193:
machine which will be followed by a
Page 194 and 195:
10 .3 Beaur shaping Due to the fact
Page 196 and 197:
G.k=zGz . (11) This case is fulfill
Page 198 and 199:
tribution of bisecting planes (ntos
Page 200 and 201:
directions which is exploited for t
Page 202 and 203:
Fig . 14) Dispersion surfaces for B
Page 204 and 205:
whereby E and v,, denote energy and
Page 206:
[1] B . N. Brockhouse, in Inelastic
Page 210 and 211:
10 . Time-of-flight spectrometers M
Page 212 and 213:
Tnloderator /K V7 2/m/s A/nm Aiw/eV
Page 214 and 215:
10.2 .1 Interpretation of spectra A
Page 216 and 217:
----~ Probe ' (Chopper 2) Zeit I Ch
Page 218 and 219:
the similar intensity distribution
Page 220 and 221:
is performed without Jacobian due t
Page 222 and 223:
10.2 .6 Crystal monochromators The
Page 224 and 225:
larger energy transfers . However i
Page 226 and 227:
10.3 Inverted TOF-spectrometer In t
Page 228 and 229:
constant offset to the TOF . To be
Page 230 and 231:
sample size of cm and a detection p
Page 232:
Contents 10 .1 Introduction . . . .
Page 236 and 237:
11 . Neutron spin-echo spectrometer
Page 238 and 239:
2 0 L Tr -0 L 2 ArDet Figure 11 .1
Page 240 and 241:
initial velocity-reassemble at the
Page 242 and 243:
distribution (current sheets) that
Page 244 and 245:
esults, where il is an irrelevant c
Page 246 and 247:
10000 - 8000 - co 6000 - C ô 4000-
Page 248 and 249:
e0 oX n .5 1 .0 1 .5 so 0 .0 0 .0 1
Page 250 and 251:
nel" coils) the required homogeneit
Page 252 and 253:
Figure 11 .9 : S(Q, t)IS(Q) of a 2
Page 254:
Contents 11 .1 Introduction . . . .
Page 258 and 259:
12 . Structure determination G . He
Page 260 and 261:
Important: Thc measured Bragg inten
Page 262 and 263:
determination of accurate atomic pa
Page 264 and 265:
The knowledge of the overall occupa
Page 266 and 267:
(even anharmonic) effects. This com
Page 268 and 269:
Fig . 4 . Coordination ofthe D20 mo
Page 270 and 271:
fenoelectric phase of orthorhombic
Page 272 and 273:
(c) and (d) calculated densities at
Page 274:
13 Inelastic Neutron Scattering Pho
Page 277 and 278:
Figurel Schematical drawing of a ge
Page 279 and 280:
equilibrium position the atom is in
Page 281 and 282:
s - ' f N .mwn .I )oo K L .~um..un
Page 283 and 284:
esults from the quantum mechanics o
Page 285 and 286:
y absorption . 13 .1 .3 Magnetic in
Page 287 and 288:
Figure 7 The plane in reciprocal sp
Page 289 and 290:
5 100s1 [OSl ] IOSSI [SSS y i 4 0 r
Page 291 and 292:
dynamics of ionic compounds with th
Page 293 and 294:
16 14 12 F.. . 10 ô 8 q 6 cr 4 G.
Page 295 and 296:
21 [ooç 1 " - 19 18 17 16 "" 298 K
Page 297 and 298:
n = v - cap[i(pga . - wt)] (13 .22)
Page 299 and 300:
Y c 3 c Cc E Figure 16 Magnon dispe
Page 301 and 302:
. . 2 H . Bilz and W . Kress, Phono
Page 304 and 305:
14 . Soft Matter : Structure Dietma
Page 306 and 307:
length density of a sample against
Page 308 and 309:
2 P(Q) = 1 ~exp(-Ii - j'6 Q2 ) (14
Page 310 and 311:
fraction. In the region of large Q
Page 312 and 313:
with the partial structure factor S
Page 314 and 315:
and which lead to the scattering cr
Page 316 and 317:
For the intramolecular and intermol
Page 318 and 319:
500 450 -400 U 0 ;, 350 42, 300 s~.
Page 320 and 321:
scaling behavior of the susceptibil
Page 322:
15 Polymer Dynamics Dieter Richter
Page 325 and 326:
constraints due to the mutual inter
Page 327 and 328:
(15 .3) T ß ( E)=T ô exp E k,T -
Page 329 and 330:
This incoherent approximation does
Page 331 and 332:
10 an 0 2 0 Figure 15.4 : Relaxatio
Page 333 and 334:
In order to test Eq .[15 .9] the re
Page 335 and 336:
Arrhenius temperature dependence wi
Page 337 and 338:
1 3kBT ~ z 2 72 2 p2 a = f2 N2 P =W
Page 339 and 340:
S (Q,t) = 12 fdu exp ~ -u_ (S2Rt) v
Page 341 and 342:
We now use these data, in order to
Page 343 and 344:
c 0 .8 0 .6 00 .055 x 0 .1 110 .14
Page 345 and 346:
small but systematic deviations fro
Page 347 and 348:
S(Q,t) is predicted . Such a platea
Page 349 and 350:
only one single parameter, the tube
Page 351 and 352:
confinement of the relaxation of la
Page 354:
16 Magnetism Thomas Brückel
Page 357 and 358:
the ground state of metallic magnet
Page 359 and 360:
c~ ~ o 0 `,~i) g',, b o 0 Q! b o 0
Page 361 and 362:
only "sec" this component and not t
Page 363 and 364:
200 ¬ 400 500 600 700 E 3 QI J (h0
Page 365 and 366:
Fie. 16.4: Scattering geometry for
Page 367 and 368:
0 .8 ' D3 ° Stassis 3d spin - - 3d
Page 369 and 370:
Here, J;j denotes the exchange cons
Page 371 and 372:
Fig. 16.8 : Contour plot of the mag
Page 373 and 374:
0.0001 0.001 0 .01 0.1 2 Fig. 16 .1
Page 376:
17 Translation and Rotation M . Pra
Page 379 and 380:
17.1 Introduction Atomic and molecu
Page 381 and 382:
17 .2.2 Diffusion, microscopic appr
Page 383 and 384:
0.6 H20 2 x2tÄ z ) Figure 17 .2 :
Page 385 and 386:
The scattering function of a polycr
Page 387 and 388:
e (2) 1 (j 1, 0 > - 0,1 >), respect
Page 389 and 390:
leads to the eigenvalue problem ~q
Page 391 and 392:
allow a good determination of the E
Page 393 and 394:
m Eu W Figure 17 .7 : Eigenenergies
Page 395 and 396:
-so o so Energy transfer (NeV) Ener
Page 397 and 398:
Bibliography [1] T. Springer, Quasi
Page 400 and 401:
18 . Texture in Materials and Earth
Page 402 and 403:
Further important structure related
Page 404 and 405:
The axes of the cartesian Kp coordi
Page 406 and 407:
4.0 Experimental Texture Analysis T
Page 408 and 409:
Fig. 18.14: Variation of reflection
Page 410 and 411:
measurements can be performed in tr
Page 412 and 413:
Apart from the global description o
Page 414 and 415:
In the following, two experimental
Page 416 and 417:
The neutron diffraction pole figure
Page 418 and 419:
dependent pole densities, and (4) g
Page 420 and 421:
Schriften des Forschungszentrums J
Page 423:
Forschungszentrum Jülich in der He
show all

Neutron Scattering

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?