22.09.2015 Views

Neutron Scattering

Neutron Scattering - JuSER - Forschungszentrum Jülich

Neutron Scattering - JuSER - Forschungszentrum Jülich

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10.5 Back-<strong>Scattering</strong> Spectrometer<br />

It follows from Fig .6) and eq . (12) that for a given divergence<br />

of the neutron beam a crystal will achieve the optimum<br />

resolution in the modulus of k_ for the case of backscattering,<br />

i .e . for 0 = 90° . This is the basic idea for the<br />

backscattering-( ;r )-spectrometer which realizes this optimum<br />

deflection angle both at the monochromator and the<br />

analyzer . For the case of backscattering one may rewrite<br />

eq. (12) to :<br />

Aḵ div<br />

_4k 1 -1 -<br />

(AO)2<br />

4, j d , cos(AO / 2) 8<br />

(15)<br />

Fig. 16) Bragg-reflection in the case of<br />

near baclcscattering<br />

Assuming that the divergence of the beam is determined by a neutron guide, one gets from eq .<br />

(9) and for the isotope 58Ni<br />

AO,,; -<br />

2 (4zpb )<br />

k<br />

(16)<br />

Inserting AO,,,; into eq. (15) delivers ° o ~dN - 510-5 and with eq. (12) an energy resolution<br />

of AE = i AkN; 2 - E / k2 - 2 .4-10 -7 eV. This contribution to the energy resolution is thus independent<br />

of the selected energy . Even with a triple axis spectrometer at a cold source this extreme<br />

value of AE is out of question . An additional contribution to the variance of k results<br />

from primary extinction, i .e . the fact that a final number of lattice planes contributes to the<br />

Bragg-reflection, only. Perfect crystals are used in order to maximise this number . This second<br />

variance is expressed in Fig . 5) by the thickness ofthe bisecting plane . The primary extinction<br />

is proportional to the number of unit cells per volume NZ and the absolute value of the structure<br />

factor FG, and inversely proportional to G2. For perfect crystals like e.g . Si the additional<br />

variance is of about the saine order as that due to the divergence of the k-vector . The maximum<br />

error for the energy results then from the sum of both contributions, i.e . adding the extinction<br />

in eq. (15) (without derivation).<br />

AE Ak (AO)2<br />

=2(<br />

E -ZCk<br />

8 +<br />

0 div<br />

16 ZNZF, 1<br />

G Z (17)<br />

Yet, how is it now still possible to vary the incident energy at such a spectrometer being restricted<br />

to the deflection angles 0=90' ? To this end one needs - according to eq. (1) - a<br />

variation of the lattice parameter or the reciprocal lattice vector !2 . This can be achieved by<br />

heating the monochromator crystal or simply by moving the crystal (periodically) parallel to<br />

the direction of G with a velocity v,, . The change of energy (in the laboratoty system, Doppler<br />

effect) is then<br />

AE= 2E- vo / v (18)<br />

9- 1 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!