Diversity of weeds in sorghum.pdf - ResearchGate
Diversity of weeds in sorghum.pdf - ResearchGate
Diversity of weeds in sorghum.pdf - ResearchGate
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
J.Res. ANGRAU 37(3&4)1-12, 2009<br />
ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MICROSATELLITES IN<br />
OIL PALM (Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis)<br />
P CHERUKU, K MANORAMA and S. SIVARAMAKRISHNAN<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Biotechnology<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University<br />
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Microsatellites were isolated from Oil Palm (Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis) by selective hybridization which<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved captur<strong>in</strong>g DNA fragments conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g repeat motifs. Two biot<strong>in</strong>ylated oligonucleotides conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Di<br />
and Tr<strong>in</strong>ucleotide repeats were used as probes <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual hybridization reactions, for captur<strong>in</strong>g microsatellites.<br />
Genomic DNA isolated from flush<strong>in</strong>g tender leaves <strong>of</strong> oil palm and digested with RsaI was ligated to Super SNX<br />
ds l<strong>in</strong>kers, hybridized with biot<strong>in</strong>ylated repeat oligonucleotides, and the eluted microsatellite enriched DNA<br />
fragments were amplified by PCR us<strong>in</strong>g Super SNX primer. Enriched DNA fragments were cloned <strong>in</strong> a TA<br />
clon<strong>in</strong>g vector and transformed <strong>in</strong>to E. coli DH-5á competent cells. White colonies were screened and the<br />
clones hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sert size above 300 bp were selected and sequenced. Of the 30 clones sequenced, 9 were<br />
positive for microsatellites, <strong>of</strong> which, 5 were d<strong>in</strong>ucleotide repeats, 4 were tr<strong>in</strong>ucleotide and imperfect repeats.<br />
SSR primers were designed from the flank<strong>in</strong>g regions <strong>of</strong> microsatellites and PCR conditions were standardized.<br />
Oil palm, is reported to be the highest yielder with the potential <strong>of</strong> 4-6 tonnes <strong>of</strong><br />
vegetable oil per ha (Mielke, 1996). It produces two dist<strong>in</strong>ct oils, palm oil and palm kernel oil,<br />
used for cul<strong>in</strong>ary and <strong>in</strong>dustrial purposes respectively.<br />
Oil palm is a monocotyledonous plant belong<strong>in</strong>g to the palm family (Arecaceae). It is<br />
a s<strong>in</strong>gle stemmed plant i.e., it possesses a s<strong>in</strong>gle shoot apical meristem and grows to 20<br />
metres height. Established trees over 10 years produce about 20 leaves a year. The flowers<br />
are produced <strong>in</strong> dense clusters; each <strong>in</strong>dividual flower is small, with 3 sepals and 3 petals.<br />
Fruit takes 5 to 6 months to mature from poll<strong>in</strong>ation to maturity; it comprises an oily, fleshy<br />
outer layer (the pericarp), with a s<strong>in</strong>gle seed (kernel), also rich <strong>in</strong> oil. Unlike its relative, the<br />
coconut palm, the oil palm does not produce <strong>of</strong>f shoots. It has 16 pairs <strong>of</strong> chromosomes<br />
(2n=32). The genome size is reported to be 3.42 X 10 9 bp, a medium sized genome when<br />
compared with that <strong>of</strong> rice (Rival et al., 1997).<br />
As Oil Palm is a tree crop, breed<strong>in</strong>g selection is slow, with a typical round <strong>of</strong> selection<br />
tak<strong>in</strong>g around 10 years. By develop<strong>in</strong>g genetic markers for this species, the management <strong>of</strong><br />
germplasm can be improved and it helps to <strong>in</strong>vestigate new sources <strong>of</strong> variation for <strong>in</strong>troduction<br />
<strong>in</strong>to breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes, eventually allow<strong>in</strong>g selection <strong>of</strong> traits us<strong>in</strong>g markers before the<br />
E-Mail: makanuri@yahoo.com<br />
1
CHERUKU et al.<br />
trait itself is expressed. This could significantly decrease the breed<strong>in</strong>g cycle time. RFLP<br />
markers were used to assess genetic diversity with<strong>in</strong> palms <strong>of</strong> a specific oil palm breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
programme by Jack and Mayes (1993). Rival et al.(1998) employed RAPD analysis for the<br />
detection <strong>of</strong> somaclonal variants <strong>in</strong> oil palm . Isoenzymes and AFLP markers were used for<br />
genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> oil palm by Purba et al., (2000). Barcelos et al., (2002) used RFLP and<br />
AFLP to evaluate the genetic diversity, its organisation and the genetic relationships with<strong>in</strong><br />
oil palm (Elaeis oleifera kunth) from America and E. gu<strong>in</strong>eensis (Jacq.), from Africa. Morentzon<br />
et al., (2000) identified two RAPD markers l<strong>in</strong>ked to shell thickness. Work on genetic diversity<br />
and palm identification has been <strong>in</strong>itiated us<strong>in</strong>g RAPD markers, STMS markers at NRCOP<br />
(National research center for Oil Palm) by Mandal and Pillai, (2005).<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the most recent advances <strong>in</strong> molecular genetics is the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong><br />
microsatellite markers to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> natural and hybrid, as well as<br />
transformed populations <strong>of</strong> crops (Balloux and Moul<strong>in</strong>, 2002). Microsatellites are a tandem<br />
array <strong>of</strong> short stretches <strong>of</strong> 2-6 base pairs length, normally repeated about 15 to 30 times and<br />
scattered randomly throughout the genome, found <strong>in</strong> both prokaryotes and eukaryotes<br />
(Bennett, 2000). Their presence <strong>in</strong> genomes <strong>of</strong> all liv<strong>in</strong>g organisms, high level <strong>of</strong> allelic<br />
variation, co-dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>heritance pattern and potential for automated analysis make them<br />
excellent molecular markers for a number <strong>of</strong> applications. They have been used for a variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> applications like genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g, level <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g, positional clon<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> genes, etc<br />
(Schulter et al., 1996). Their flank<strong>in</strong>g regions are usually genetically conserved (Bennet,<br />
2000). Microsatellite primers developed for one species frequently amplify loci <strong>in</strong> related<br />
species.<br />
The major challenge with microsatellites is that they need to be isolated de novo<br />
from most species be<strong>in</strong>g exam<strong>in</strong>ed for the first time. Selective hybridization method is the<br />
most successful method used until now (Karagyozov et al., 1993).<br />
The present study has therefore been undertaken to isolate microsatellites from oil<br />
palm and characterize the isolated microsatellites.<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
Flush<strong>in</strong>g tender leaves <strong>of</strong> oil palm ( Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis Jacq ) were collected from<br />
green house farm <strong>of</strong> College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rajendranagar, ANGRAU, Hyderabad.<br />
2
ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MICROSATELLITES<br />
Oligonucleotides and primers<br />
Two primer sets were used for isolation <strong>of</strong> microsatellites, one for the preparation <strong>of</strong><br />
double strand l<strong>in</strong>ker (ds) named as ‘superSNX24’ and ‘superSNX24 + 4P’, and the other for<br />
confirm<strong>in</strong>g the presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>serts, M13 universal forward and reverse primers (sigma). Two<br />
Biot<strong>in</strong>ylated repeat primers (CT, TCG) were also synthesized based on their frequency <strong>in</strong><br />
plant genome. Primer sequences adopted <strong>in</strong> the study are listed <strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />
Genomic DNA was extracted by modified CTAB method (Sambrook and Russel,<br />
2001). Flush<strong>in</strong>g tender oil palm leaves were extracted with DNA extraction buffer (2% CTAB,<br />
100 mM Tris, 20 mM EDTA, 1.4 M NaCl) preheated at 60ÚC and 200 mg <strong>of</strong> PVP<br />
(Polyv<strong>in</strong>ylpyrolidone). The quality and quantity <strong>of</strong> extracted DNA was judged by compar<strong>in</strong>g it<br />
with uncut ë DNA <strong>in</strong> agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA quantification and purity was checked<br />
by measur<strong>in</strong>g the O.D at 260 nm and 280 nm us<strong>in</strong>g a UV visible spectrophotometer.<br />
Microsatellite capture was performed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the method described by Glenn<br />
and Schable (2005), <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g different steps, namely, restriction digestion us<strong>in</strong>g Rsa I,<br />
preparation and ligation <strong>of</strong> double stranded Super SNX l<strong>in</strong>kers to size selected Rsa1 digest.<br />
After PCR confirmation <strong>of</strong> ligated ds l<strong>in</strong>kers repeat-enrichment was done us<strong>in</strong>g Biot<strong>in</strong>ylated<br />
Oligonucleotides described <strong>in</strong> Table 1, <strong>in</strong>dividually with the two oligonucleotides at their<br />
respective hybridization temperatures . Repeat enrichment was carried out <strong>in</strong> 5 steps, namely,<br />
preparation <strong>of</strong> streptavid<strong>in</strong> magnetic beads, hybridization <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ker-ligated genomic DNA with<br />
biot<strong>in</strong>ylated repeat oligo, conjugation <strong>of</strong> biot<strong>in</strong> - streptavid<strong>in</strong> beads, wash<strong>in</strong>g and elution, as<br />
described <strong>in</strong> detail by Glenn and Schable, 2005. Then, amplification <strong>of</strong> repeat enriched DNA<br />
was done us<strong>in</strong>g PCR for each <strong>of</strong> the eluted samples. Each 25 µl reaction volume conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
about 2.0 µl <strong>of</strong> eluted DNA, 1 x PCR buffer (Invitrogen), 1.5 mM MgCl 2<br />
(Invitrogen), 0.1 mM<br />
dNTPs (Amersham), 0.5 p moles <strong>of</strong> super SNX24 primer, 0.3 units Taq polymerase (Invitrogen)<br />
and programmed for an <strong>in</strong>itial denaturation step <strong>of</strong> 2 m<strong>in</strong> at 95ÚC followed by 30 cycles <strong>of</strong> 20<br />
sec denaturation at 95ÚC, 20 sec anneal<strong>in</strong>g at 60ÚC, 1.5 m<strong>in</strong> extension at 72ÚC and f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
extension at 72ÚC for 30 m<strong>in</strong> and a hold temperature <strong>of</strong> 15ÚC at the end. All the 5 PCR<br />
reaction products were pooled and stored at 4 0 C until further use.<br />
The repeat enriched DNA fragments obta<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g two biot<strong>in</strong>ylated repeat<br />
oligonucleotides were cloned <strong>in</strong>to TA clon<strong>in</strong>g vector (Promega) and transformed <strong>in</strong>to E. coli<br />
DH 5a competent cells as per standard methods (Sambrook and Russel, 2001).<br />
White colonies were screened for the presence <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>sert by colony PCR and<br />
plasmid DNA from positive clones was isolated for sequenc<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g standard dideoxy<br />
3
CHERUKU et al.<br />
sequenc<strong>in</strong>g protocol (Sanger et al., 1977). The colonies that had <strong>in</strong>serts with more than 300<br />
bp were selected. Plasmid PCR was conducted to further confirm the presence <strong>of</strong> the 300 bp<br />
band and the positive samples were sent for sequenc<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g an automated sequencer.<br />
The sequences were screened for the presence <strong>of</strong> microsatellites manually.<br />
The sequences conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g microsatellites with sufficient flank<strong>in</strong>g regions on either<br />
side were submitted <strong>in</strong> primer 3 s<strong>of</strong>tware (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/cgi-b<strong>in</strong>/primer3/<br />
primer3_www.cgi), for design<strong>in</strong>g primers <strong>of</strong> length 18-22 base length and product sizes <strong>of</strong><br />
150-250 bp.<br />
Standardization <strong>of</strong> primers<br />
Primers were diluted to a concentration <strong>of</strong> 10 picomoles/ml. Fifteen PCR reactions<br />
were set up for each primer <strong>in</strong> a total reaction volume <strong>of</strong> 10 ml conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a f<strong>in</strong>al concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1 X PCR buffer (Invitrogen), 1.5 mM MgCl 2<br />
(Invitrogen), 0.1mM dNTPs (Invitrogen), 20 ng<br />
template DNA, 10 picomoles <strong>of</strong> each forward and reverse primers. As per the primer melt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
temperature [Tm] different anneal<strong>in</strong>g temperatures were programmed <strong>in</strong> eppendorf mastercycler<br />
gradient thermal cycler. Amplified products were detected on 2.5 % agarose gel. The <strong>in</strong>tensity<br />
<strong>of</strong> bands was <strong>in</strong>creased by us<strong>in</strong>g different concentrations <strong>of</strong> MgCl 2.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Rsa1 be<strong>in</strong>g a 4 base cutter, on an average cuts DNA every 256 bases. Digestion <strong>of</strong><br />
genomic DNA was found to be successful, as <strong>in</strong>dicated by a uniform smear visualized on a<br />
1.5% agarose gel (Figure 1). Ligation <strong>of</strong> ds l<strong>in</strong>kers to size selected Rsa1 digest (between 500<br />
to 1000 bp) was confirmed by PCR amplification with l<strong>in</strong>ker specific primer SuperSNX24<br />
(Fig. 2). The l<strong>in</strong>kers will provide the primer b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g site for subsequent PCR steps. They also<br />
provide sites to ease clon<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> fragments <strong>in</strong>to the vectors that will subsequently be used.<br />
The l<strong>in</strong>kers are compatible with the restriction sites <strong>in</strong> the vector’s multiple clon<strong>in</strong>g site. The<br />
Super SNX primer also <strong>in</strong>corporates a GTTT “pigtail” to facilitate non template ‘A’ addition by<br />
Taq DNA polymerase dur<strong>in</strong>g PCR, which can be used for clon<strong>in</strong>g (Glenn and Schable, 2005).<br />
Efficient attachment <strong>of</strong> ds l<strong>in</strong>kers to Rsa I digest was atta<strong>in</strong>ed at a molar ratio <strong>of</strong> 1:10.<br />
Ligation <strong>of</strong> ds l<strong>in</strong>ker gave a thick smear between 300-1000 bp after confirmation us<strong>in</strong>g PCR<br />
with 2 ìl <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ker ligated DNA, which <strong>in</strong>dicated the successful ligation <strong>of</strong> ds l<strong>in</strong>kers to all size<br />
selected Rsa1 digested DNA fragments (Fig. 2).<br />
Hybridization <strong>of</strong> DNA fragments with biot<strong>in</strong>ylated repeat oligonucleotides<br />
was achieved by <strong>in</strong>cubat<strong>in</strong>g the mixture at respective hybridization temperatures, followed<br />
by confirmation by PCR us<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>ker specific Super SNX24 primer. A smear was formed<br />
4
ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MICROSATELLITES<br />
between 300-500 bp region <strong>in</strong>dicated the successful hybridization <strong>of</strong> repeat conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g DNA<br />
fragments. (Figure 3). To capture the repeat motifs <strong>in</strong> oil palm genome (CT)<br />
10 and (TCG) 10<br />
biot<strong>in</strong>ylated oligo repeats were used as probes, because <strong>of</strong> their high frequency <strong>in</strong> plant<br />
genome, to isolate microsatellite repeats. Hybridization <strong>of</strong> biot<strong>in</strong>ylated oligo aga<strong>in</strong>st Super<br />
SNX l<strong>in</strong>ker ligated genomic digest was carried out separately as it <strong>in</strong>creases the efficiency<br />
<strong>of</strong> isolation at a specific hybridization temperature (Table 2) for each probe. This was done to<br />
ensure a higher efficiency <strong>of</strong> isolation at a specific hybridization temperature for each probe,<br />
which also allows control over hybridization and gives more products for repeats with different<br />
melt<strong>in</strong>g temperatures or repeats that are rare.<br />
The enriched fragments were cloned <strong>in</strong>to pGEM-T easy clon<strong>in</strong>g vector (Promega).<br />
The ligated products were used to transform DH5á competent cells. The presence <strong>of</strong> both<br />
blue and white colonies after transformation <strong>in</strong>dicated the presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>serts <strong>in</strong> the vector.<br />
Totally, 100 white colonies were screened for the presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>serts by conduct<strong>in</strong>g colony<br />
PCR. Among these 60 colonies were found to be positive for <strong>in</strong>serts, as visualized on a<br />
1.5% agarose gel. The amplification pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> colony PCR results are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.<br />
Sequenc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
30 positive colonies were randomly selected from the 60 which were found positive<br />
for the <strong>in</strong>serts, as sequenc<strong>in</strong>g is an expensive process. They were grown <strong>in</strong> LB culture<br />
medium and plasmid DNA was isolated for sequenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the microsatellite repeat conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
regions. Of the 10 microsatellites captured five were GA/CT type, and imperfect repeats like<br />
(CTT) 2<br />
GTT(CTT) 2<br />
(CCT) 3<br />
(CTT) (AAT) (GAA) CAA(GAA) are obta<strong>in</strong>ed with (CT) biot<strong>in</strong>ylated<br />
3, 5, 2 4 10<br />
repeat oligo. With (TCG) biot<strong>in</strong>ylated repeat oligo, (GTC) ATC(ATT) microsatellite was<br />
10 6 9<br />
captured. The types <strong>of</strong> microsatellite repeats captured are listed <strong>in</strong> Table 2. Overall efficiency<br />
<strong>of</strong> the protocol was found to be 30%, as 9 microsatellites were isolated from 30 positive<br />
clones sequenced which is similar when compared to previous reports on selective<br />
hybridization. In Coconut (Cocos nucifera) 1341 microsatellites were captured from 1880<br />
clones (Rivera et al.,1999), and <strong>in</strong> another study 8 microsatellites were captured <strong>in</strong> Oenocarpus<br />
bacaba (Billotte et al., 2005). In Bactris gasipaes 27 clones were show<strong>in</strong>g microsatellite<br />
sequences from 62 positive colones sequenced (Mart<strong>in</strong>ez et al.,2002). Honsho et al., (2005)<br />
reported 6 mango microsatellite loci and Viruel et al., (2005) reported 16 mango microsatellite<br />
loci. Two different repeat conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g probes were used <strong>in</strong> hybridization reactions separately.<br />
This <strong>in</strong>dicates that the protocol used is best suited for captur<strong>in</strong>g the di-nucleotide repeat<br />
motifs rather than tri nucleotide repeat motifs. Imperfect repeats were also obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> coconut<br />
(Rivera et al.,1999), Geum urbanum (Rosaceae) (Arens et al., 2004).<br />
5
CHERUKU et al.<br />
The microsatellite repeats captured were submitted to the Vector Screen s<strong>of</strong>tware <strong>in</strong><br />
NCBI web site (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/VecScreen/VecScreen.html) to remove the vector<br />
sequences. Seven microsatellite sequences hav<strong>in</strong>g sufficient flank<strong>in</strong>g regions were used<br />
for primer design<strong>in</strong>g, us<strong>in</strong>g Primer 3 s<strong>of</strong>tware. Primer designation and product sizes are<br />
given <strong>in</strong> the Table 3.<br />
Primers were standardized with different anneal<strong>in</strong>g temperatures and MgCl 2<br />
concentrations (Figure 5), PCR conditions for the respective primers are given <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Table 3.<br />
N<strong>in</strong>e captured microsatellite conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g sequences with flank<strong>in</strong>g regions were<br />
submitted <strong>in</strong> the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) web site for BLAST-<br />
N (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/)<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the microsatellites showed high homology with Prochilodus argenteus<br />
microsatellite sequence, Acacia mellifera subspp. mellifera microsatellite sequence, Oryza<br />
sativa (japonica cultivar- group) genomic DNA, chromosome 12, complete sequence. The<br />
microsatellite (GA) 12<br />
was show<strong>in</strong>g high homology with Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis microsatellite DNA,<br />
clone mEgCIRO219 and Cocos nucifera microsatellite DNA, clone CncirB6. (AAT) 5<br />
microsatellite was show<strong>in</strong>g high homology with Ostertagia ostertagi mRNA for heat shock<br />
prote<strong>in</strong> 20 (hsp 20).<br />
This work represents the first Indian effort <strong>in</strong> the isolation <strong>of</strong> microsatellites from Oil<br />
palm (Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis Jacq.). Marker based characterization <strong>of</strong> genomes is generally done<br />
for phylogenetic studies and gene discovery. Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis microsatellites can serve as<br />
a powerful tool for genetic studies <strong>of</strong> the genus Elaeis, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g variety identification and<br />
<strong>in</strong>tra or <strong>in</strong>ter-specific genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g. Phylogenetic <strong>in</strong>formation based on SSR flank<strong>in</strong>g<br />
region sequences makes Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis SSR markers a potentially useful molecular<br />
resource for any researcher study<strong>in</strong>g the phylogeny <strong>of</strong> palm taxa.<br />
Table 1. List <strong>of</strong> primer sequences<br />
S.No Primer Name Primer Sequence (5’ 3’)<br />
1. Super Snx24 5’GTTTAAGGCCTAGCTAGCAGAATC<br />
2. Super Snx24 +4p 5’pGATTCTGCTAGCTAGGCCTTAAACAAAA<br />
3. M13 F CCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAAAACG<br />
4. M13 R AGCGGATAACAATTTCACACAGG<br />
5. (CT)<br />
10<br />
CTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCT<br />
6. (TCG)<br />
10<br />
TCGTCGTCGTCGTCGTCGTCGTCGTCGTCG<br />
6
ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MICROSATELLITES<br />
Table 2. List <strong>of</strong> microsatellite repeat motifs captured<br />
S.No Clone Insert size( bp ) Repeat motif Biot<strong>in</strong>ylated oligo<br />
1. E 4<br />
376 (GA) 16<br />
(CT)<br />
10<br />
2. B 4<br />
489 (CT) 9<br />
(CG) 3<br />
(CA) 6<br />
(CT)<br />
10<br />
3. C 2<br />
489 (CT) 9<br />
(CG) 3<br />
(CA) 6<br />
(CT)<br />
10<br />
4. E 9<br />
209 (CT) 6<br />
(CT)<br />
10<br />
5. H 4<br />
511 (AAT) 5<br />
(CT)<br />
10<br />
6. C 4<br />
374 (CTT)<br />
2 GTT(CTT) 2<br />
(CT)<br />
10<br />
(CCT)<br />
3 (CTT) 3<br />
7. E 5<br />
362 (GA) 12<br />
(CT)<br />
10<br />
8. B 10<br />
546 (GAA) 2<br />
CAA(GAA) 4<br />
(CT)<br />
10<br />
9 A 6<br />
- (GTC)<br />
6 ATC(ATT) 9<br />
(TCG)<br />
10<br />
Table 3. List <strong>of</strong> standardized conditions for captured microsatellites.<br />
S. Anneal<strong>in</strong>g MgCl2<br />
Repeat motif<br />
Primer sequences<br />
No Temperature (mM)<br />
(oC)<br />
1 (GA)16 5’CTTGATTGGATGGCGGATAG3’5 58.5 1.5<br />
’GGAATGAACATAGAGCTTTTTCC3’<br />
2 (CT)9(CG)3(CA)6 5’GGACTGCTAGGGTGCCACT3’ 58.5 1.5<br />
CCCCTATAGATGGGGCTGAT<br />
3 (CT)9(CG)3(CA)6 5’GGACTGCTAGGGTGCCACT3’5’ 58.5 1.5<br />
CCCCTATAGATGGGGCTGAT3’<br />
4 (CT)6 5’AATCACATGGGCTTGGGTTA3’ 58.5 2<br />
5’GCAAGAGGGAGAAGAGAGAGAG3’<br />
5 (AAT)5 5’TGGATCCTGGAGATTGCTTT3’ 46.1 2<br />
5’CTCAAGCTATGCATCCAACG3’<br />
6 (CTT) 2 GTT(CTT) 2 5’ATGGCAAAGCTGGAGAAGTG3’ 46.1 2<br />
(CCT) 3 (CTT) 3 5’AGCAGAATCACAGTCACAGCA3’<br />
7 (GA)12 5’CGCGAATTCACTAGTGATT3’ 47.5 2<br />
5’GGTGCTAACAGGTTGAGTTGG3’<br />
7
CHERUKU et al.<br />
1000 bp<br />
500 bp<br />
RD M<br />
M: 100 bp marker RD: Restriction digest <strong>of</strong> genomic<br />
FIGURE 1. Rsa I digested genomic DNA <strong>of</strong> Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis Jacq.<br />
1000 bp<br />
500 bp<br />
M A N<br />
FIGURE 2. Amplification <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ker ligated Rsa I digest<br />
M: 100 bp marker<br />
A: 2ml <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ker ligated DNA template<br />
N: Negative control without l<strong>in</strong>ker ligated DNA<br />
8
ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MICROSATELLITES<br />
M A B<br />
M:100bp marker<br />
A: DNA fragments enriched with (CT) 10 repeat oligo<br />
B: DNA fragments enriched with (TCG) 10 repeat oligo<br />
FIGURE 3. Amplification <strong>of</strong> DNA fragments enriched with repeat oligos<br />
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16<br />
M:100 bp marker<br />
1: Blue colony<br />
2:16: White colonies<br />
FIGURE 4. Colony PCR <strong>of</strong> transformed colonies<br />
9
CHERUKU et al.<br />
M<br />
______________A______________ ______________B____________<br />
M: 100 bp ladder<br />
A: 3 mM MgCl 2<br />
B: 2 mM MgCl 2<br />
FIGURE 5. Standardization <strong>of</strong> SSR primers for optimization <strong>of</strong> MgCl 2<br />
concentration<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Arens, P., Durka, W., Wernke, J. H and Smulders, J. M. 2004. Isolation and characterization<br />
<strong>of</strong> microsatellite loci <strong>in</strong> Geum urbanun (Rosaceae) and their transferability with<strong>in</strong> the<br />
genus Geum. Moleculor Ecology Notes, 4: 209-212<br />
Balloux, F and Lugon-Moul<strong>in</strong>, N. 2002. The estimation <strong>of</strong> population differentiation with<br />
microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology, 11(2): 155-165.<br />
Barcelos, E., Amblard, P., Berthaud, J and Segu<strong>in</strong>, M. 2002. Genetic diversity and relationship<br />
<strong>in</strong> American and African oil palm as revealed by RFLP and AFLP molecular markers.<br />
Pesq. agropec. bras.37: 1105-1114.<br />
Bennett, P. 2000. Microsatellites. Journal <strong>of</strong> Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Pathology, 53: 177-183.<br />
Billotte, N., Marseillac, N., Risterucci, A. M., Adon, B., Brottier, P., Baurens, F. C and<br />
Charrier, A. 2005. Microsatellite based high density l<strong>in</strong>kage map <strong>in</strong> oil palm (Elaeis<br />
gu<strong>in</strong>eensis Jacq.). Theory & Applied Genetics110: 754-765.<br />
Glenn, T.C and Schable, N.A. 2005. Isolat<strong>in</strong>g microsatellite DNA loci. Methods <strong>in</strong> Enzymology,<br />
395: 202-222.<br />
Honsho, C., Nishiyama, K., Eiadthong, W and Yonemori, K. 2005. Isolation and<br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> new microsatellite markers <strong>in</strong> mango (Mangifera <strong>in</strong>dica L.). Molecular<br />
Ecology Notes, 5: 152-154.<br />
10
ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MICROSATELLITES<br />
Jack, P. L and Mayes, S. 1993. Use <strong>of</strong> molecular markers for oil palm breed<strong>in</strong>g. II. Use <strong>of</strong><br />
DNA markers (RFLPs). Oleag<strong>in</strong>eux, 48: 1-8.<br />
Karagyozov, L., Kalcheva, I. D and Chapman, V. M. 1993. Construction <strong>of</strong> random small<strong>in</strong>sert<br />
genomic libraries highly enriched for simple sequence repeats. Nucleic Acids<br />
Research, 21: 3911-3912.<br />
Mandal, P. K and Pillai, R. S. N. 2005. Screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> PCR primers for oil palm (Elaeis<br />
gu<strong>in</strong>eensis Jacq.) shell thickness marker. In: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the ICAR National<br />
Symposium on Biotechnological Interventions for Improvement <strong>of</strong> Horticultural Crops:<br />
Issues and Strategies. College <strong>of</strong> Horticulture, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur,<br />
India. pp. 280-281.<br />
Mart<strong>in</strong>ez, A. K., Gaitan-Solis, E., Duque, M. C., Bernal, R. S and Tohme J, 2002. Microsatellite<br />
loci <strong>in</strong> Bactris gasipaes ( Arecaceae) their isolation and characterization. Molecular<br />
Ecology Notes, 2: 408-410.<br />
Mielke, T. 1996. Outlook for oils and fats from 1996 onwards with special emphasis on oil<br />
palm and kernel oil. PAC sem<strong>in</strong>ars <strong>of</strong> the Palm Oil Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Malaysia<br />
(PORIM), Kuala Lumpur. 28 March 1996.<br />
Moretzsohn, M. C., Nunes, C. D. M., Ferreira, M. E and Grattapagliad 2000. RAPD l<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the shell thickness <strong>of</strong> the shell thickness locus <strong>in</strong> oil palm (Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis<br />
Jacq.). Theory & Applied Genetics, 100: 63-70.<br />
Purba, A. R., Noyer, J. L., Baudou<strong>in</strong>, L., Perrier, X. Hamon, S and Lagoda, P. J. L. 2000.<br />
A new aspect <strong>of</strong> genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> Indonesian oil palm (Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis Jacq.)<br />
revealed by isoenzyme and AFLP markers and its consequences for breed<strong>in</strong>g. Theory<br />
& Applied Genetics, 101: 956-961.<br />
Rival, A. Beule, T. Barre, P. Hamon, S. Duval, Y and Noirot, M. 1997. Comparative flow<br />
cytometric estimation <strong>of</strong> nuclear DNA content <strong>in</strong> oil palm (Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis Jacq.)<br />
tissue cultures and seed derived plants. Plant Cell Report, 16: 884-887.<br />
Rival, A., Bertrand, C., Beule, T., Combes M. C., Trouslot, P and Lashermes, P. 1998.<br />
Suitability <strong>of</strong> RAPD analysis for the detection <strong>of</strong> somaclonal variants <strong>in</strong> oil palm (Elaeis<br />
gu<strong>in</strong>eensis Jacq.). Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g,117 (1): 73-76<br />
Rivera, R., Edwards, K. J., Barker, J. H.A., Arnold, G. M., Ayad, G., Hodgk<strong>in</strong>, T and Karp,<br />
A. 1999. Isoaltion and characterization <strong>of</strong> polymorphic microsatellites <strong>in</strong> Cocos nucifera<br />
L. Genome, 42: 668-675.<br />
11
CHERUKU et al.<br />
Sambrook, J and Russel, D.W. 2001. “Molecular Clon<strong>in</strong>g: A Laboratory Manula.” Cold Spr<strong>in</strong>g<br />
harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spr<strong>in</strong>g Harbor, Newyark.<br />
Sanger, F., Nicklen, S and Coulson, A.R. 1977. DNA sequenc<strong>in</strong>g with cha<strong>in</strong>-term<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>hibitors, Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, 74: 5463-5467.<br />
Schulter, G. D., Boguski, M. S and Stewart, E. 1996. A gene map <strong>of</strong> the human genome.<br />
Science, 274: 540-546.<br />
Viruel, M. A., Escribano, P., Barbieri, M., Ferri, M and Hormaza, J. I. 2005. F<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
embryo type and geographic differentiation <strong>in</strong> Mango (Mangifera <strong>in</strong>dica L.,<br />
Anacardiaceae) with microsatellites. Molecular breed<strong>in</strong>g, 15: 383-393.<br />
12
J.Res. ANGRAU 37(3&4)13-21, 2009<br />
COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR PRODUCTIVITY AND FIBRE<br />
QUALITY TRAITS IN INTRA-HERBACEUM AND INTERSPECIFIC<br />
(G. herbaceum L. x G. arboreum L.) CROSSES OF<br />
DIPLOID COTTON<br />
VEMANNA IRADDI and S. T. KAJJIDONI<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad -580 005<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The study was conducted at Ma<strong>in</strong> Agricultural Research Station, Dharwad dur<strong>in</strong>g kharif 2006-07 to<br />
estimate comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g four female parents <strong>of</strong> Gossypium herbaceum L. and four male parents<br />
<strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> G. herbaceum L. and G. arboreum L. These were evaluated to select donor parents and hybrids for<br />
seed cotton yield and fibre quality traits along with agronomically superior varieties which were used <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e x<br />
tester analysis for yield and yield components, economic traits and fibre quality traits. Analysis <strong>of</strong> variance for<br />
comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability revealed that magnitude <strong>of</strong> SCA variance was greater than GCA variance for all the traits.<br />
This <strong>in</strong>dicated predom<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>of</strong> non-additive gene action, which is important <strong>in</strong> exploitation <strong>of</strong> heterosis<br />
through hybrid breed<strong>in</strong>g. The l<strong>in</strong>e ´ tester analysis for comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>of</strong> four l<strong>in</strong>es and eight testers are<br />
crossed to produce 32 F 1<br />
s. The parents KS-16, 9747 and DLSA-17 for seed cotton yield and boll weight,<br />
RAHS-14, RAHS-131, MB-3200 and RDC-53 for 2.5 per cent span length and fibre strength were observed to<br />
be good general comb<strong>in</strong>ers. The crosses KS-16 ´ BLACH-1, RDC-53 ´ MB-3200, RDC-88 ´ DLSA-17, RAHS-<br />
14 ´ MDL-2601, KS-16 ´ MDL-2582, RDC-53 ´ MDL-2582 and RDC-88 ´ DLSA-17 exhibited significant sca<br />
effects for seed cotton yield per plant. In general, RAHS-14, KS-16 and RDC-88 exhibited good general<br />
comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability for most <strong>of</strong> the yield and fibre quality traits.<br />
Cotton, “The k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> apparel fibre” is the most important commercial crop <strong>of</strong> India,<br />
cultivated ma<strong>in</strong>ly for its fibre and other byproducts such as nutritionally desirable oil quality.<br />
Yield be<strong>in</strong>g a complex character and components which contribute towards high yield<strong>in</strong>g<br />
potential <strong>in</strong> cotton needs careful study. Several studies revealed the utility <strong>of</strong> comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
ability analysis <strong>in</strong> cotton <strong>in</strong> predict<strong>in</strong>g the pre-potency on the basis <strong>of</strong> genetic <strong>in</strong>formation. In<br />
any breed<strong>in</strong>g programme, the proper choice <strong>of</strong> parents depend<strong>in</strong>g upon their comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability<br />
is a pre-requisite. The present <strong>in</strong>vestigation l<strong>in</strong>e x tester design was used to obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
on comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability for yield and yield components, economic traits, and fibre quality traits<br />
<strong>of</strong> genotypes obta<strong>in</strong>ed from lead<strong>in</strong>g centres work<strong>in</strong>g on diploid cotton.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
All the 45 entries consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> four females RAHS-14, KS-16, RDC-53 and RDC-88;<br />
eight males RAHS-131, 9747, MB-3200, BLACH-1, AK-235, DLSA-17, MDL-2601, MDL-<br />
2582 and 32 F 1<br />
s along with agronomically superior variety Jayadhar as check were grown <strong>in</strong><br />
email.id: vemanraddi@gmail.com<br />
13
IRADDI and KAJJIDONI<br />
randomized block design with two replications dur<strong>in</strong>g kharif 2006-07 at Ma<strong>in</strong> Agricultural<br />
Research Station, Dharwad. The crop was planted at 90 and 30 cm distance apart between<br />
row and plant to plant, respectively. Data were recorded for number <strong>of</strong> bolls per plant, boll<br />
weight, seed cotton yield per plant, g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn, l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex, seed <strong>in</strong>dex, 2.5 per cent span<br />
length, uniformity ratio, fibre strength and micronaire value. The data were averaged and<br />
analysed accord<strong>in</strong>g to the method outl<strong>in</strong>ed by Kempthorne (1957).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Among <strong>in</strong>tra-herbaceum crosses, mean square due to tester were higher <strong>in</strong> magnitude<br />
for boll weight, 2.5 per cent span length and fibre strength. The l<strong>in</strong>es exhibited significant<br />
differences for boll weight and seed cotton yield per plant, whereas l<strong>in</strong>e x tester <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
were significant for most <strong>of</strong> the traits. In <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses, the mean squares due to<br />
testers were significant for number <strong>of</strong> bolls per plant and uniformity ratio. The l<strong>in</strong>es exhibited<br />
significant differences for 2.5 per cent span length, uniformity and fibre strength and l<strong>in</strong>e x<br />
tester <strong>in</strong>teractions were significant for most <strong>of</strong> the traits. The estimates <strong>of</strong> gca and sca<br />
variance component revealed that non-additive components were predom<strong>in</strong>ant for all the<br />
characters (Table 1 to 4). The predom<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>of</strong> sca variance <strong>in</strong> diploid cotton for yield and its<br />
component characters were also reported by Neelima (2002) and Laxman and Ganesh (2003).<br />
Yield and yield components<br />
Seed cotton yield is a complex trait, dependent on many other component traits.<br />
Boll number and boll weight <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>traspecific hybrids and boll number <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids<br />
were reported as major components <strong>of</strong> yield heterosis <strong>in</strong> diploid cotton (Bhatade, 1983 and<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh et al., 1995). Hence, <strong>in</strong> the present study, the results <strong>of</strong> these traits are discussed as<br />
component characters <strong>of</strong> seed cotton yield. Among <strong>in</strong>traspecific crosses, parents, KS-16<br />
and 9747 exhibited significant gca effects for seed cotton yield per plant and boll weight.<br />
Hence they are the best general comb<strong>in</strong>ers. Three crosses viz., KS-16xBLACH-1, RDC-53 x<br />
MB-3200 and RDC-88 x RAHS-131 exhibited significant sca effects <strong>in</strong> desirable direction for<br />
seed cotton yield per plant. Out <strong>of</strong> these crosses, KS-16 x BLACH-1 exhibited significant<br />
sca effects for seed cotton yield per plant and number <strong>of</strong> bolls per plant. All the crosses<br />
exhibited negative sca effects for boll weight.<br />
Among <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses, parent KS-16 had significant gca effects for seed<br />
cotton yield and boll weight <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g it is best general comb<strong>in</strong>er for these two traits. AK-235<br />
was the good general comb<strong>in</strong>er for seed cotton yield per plant, boll weight and number <strong>of</strong><br />
bolls per plant. The parent DLSA-17 was the good general comb<strong>in</strong>er for seed cotton yield per<br />
plant and boll weight. Five crosses exhibited significant sca effects <strong>in</strong> desirable direction for<br />
seed cotton yield per plant. Out <strong>of</strong> these four crosses viz., RAHS-14xMDL-2601,<br />
14
COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR PRODUCTIVITY<br />
KS-16xMDL-2582, RDC-53xMDL-2582 and RDC-88xDLSA-17 exhibited significant positive<br />
sca effects for seed cotton yield per plant and boll weight. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are <strong>in</strong> accordance<br />
with Neelima (2002). Only one cross viz., RAHS-14 xDLSA-17 exhibited significant positive<br />
sca effects for seed cotton yield per plant and number <strong>of</strong> bolls per plant. The results <strong>of</strong> sca<br />
effects are <strong>in</strong> agreement with the reports <strong>of</strong> Kajjidoni (1982) and Neelima (2002). In contrast<br />
to this, the cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation RDC-53xAK-235 exhibited significant positive sca effects for<br />
only boll weight. This <strong>in</strong>dicates predom<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>of</strong> additive gene effect for number <strong>of</strong> bolls per<br />
plant. Similar f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were also reported by Wilson (1991) and Neelima (2002).<br />
Economic traits<br />
Among three economic traits, g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn primarily depends on seed and l<strong>in</strong>t<br />
weight. L<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex is directly governed by g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g per cent and higher estimate <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex is<br />
desirable. The present f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>dicated that among <strong>in</strong>tra-herbaceum crosses, RAHS-14<br />
had significant gca effects for g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn, l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex and seed <strong>in</strong>dex. Hence it is the best<br />
general comb<strong>in</strong>er for these three traits. Similarly, MB-3200 was the good general comb<strong>in</strong>er<br />
for g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn and l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex. The parents KS-16, RDC-88 and BLACH-1 were good<br />
general comb<strong>in</strong>er for seed <strong>in</strong>dex. The study <strong>of</strong> sca effects <strong>of</strong> economic traits revealed that<br />
two <strong>in</strong>tra-herbaceum crosses viz., RAHS-14xMB-3200 and KS-16x9747 exhibited significant<br />
sca effect for g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn, l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex and seed <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong> desirable direction. While two<br />
cross comb<strong>in</strong>ations viz., RDC-53xRAHS-131 and RDC-88xBLACH-1 were good specific<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ers for g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn and l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong> desirable direction. In contrast to this, four<br />
crosses viz., RAHS-14xBLACH-1, KS-16xRAHS-131, RDC-53x9747 and RDC-88xMB-3200<br />
exhibited significant sca effects for seed <strong>in</strong>dex. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are <strong>in</strong> conformity with Maisuria<br />
et al. (2006).<br />
In <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses, RAHS-14 female was good general comb<strong>in</strong>er for g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />
out turn, l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex and seed <strong>in</strong>dex, while RDC-88, AK-235 and DLSA-17 were good general<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ers for g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn and l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex. In contrast to this, RDC-53 and MDL-2582<br />
exhibited significant gca effect for seed <strong>in</strong>dex. Similar f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> sca effects were reported<br />
by Pavasia et al. (1999) and Karande et al. (2004).The study <strong>of</strong> sca effects <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
traits revealed that two <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses viz., RAHS-14xDLSA-17 and RDC-88xAK-235<br />
exhibited significant sca effect for g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn, l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex and seed <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong> desirable<br />
direction. Three crosses viz., KS-16xMDL-2582, KS-16xMDL-2601 and RDC-53xAK-235<br />
exhibited significant sca effect for g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn and l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex. Two crosses viz.,<br />
KS-16x DLSA-17 and RDC-53xMDL-2582 exhibited significant sca effects for seed <strong>in</strong>dex.<br />
The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> sca effects are <strong>in</strong> agreement with the results <strong>of</strong> Laxman and Ganesh (2003)<br />
and Maisuria et al. (2006).<br />
15
IRADDI and KAJJIDONI<br />
Fibre quality traits<br />
Among the <strong>in</strong>tra-herbaceum crosses, RAHS-14 was good general comb<strong>in</strong>er for 2.5<br />
per cent span length, uniformity ratio, and fibre strength. But, KS-16 was a good general<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>er for 2.5 per cent span length and micronaire value. The parent RDC-88 was good<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>er for uniformity ratio and fibre strength. The results <strong>of</strong> gca effects are <strong>in</strong> agreement<br />
with the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Neelima (2002) and McCarthy et al. (2004). The parent RDC-53 was a<br />
good general comb<strong>in</strong>er for 2.5 per cent span length and micronaire value. Among male<br />
parents, RAHS-131 and MB-3200 were good general comb<strong>in</strong>ers for 2.5 per cent span length,<br />
fibre strength and micronaire value. Parent BLACH-1 was a good general comb<strong>in</strong>er for fibre<br />
strength. Seven crosses exhibited significant sca effects <strong>in</strong> desirable direction for 2.5 per<br />
cent span length. Out <strong>of</strong> which, five crosses viz., RAHS-14xRAHS-131, RAHS-14x9747,<br />
KS-16xMB-3200, RDC-53x9747 and RDC-88xRAHS-131 exhibited significant sca effects for<br />
2.5 per cent span length and fibre strength. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are <strong>in</strong> agreement with Muthuswamy<br />
et al. (2003) and Manickam and Gururajan (2004). Five crosses exhibited significant sca<br />
effects for micronaire value. Out <strong>of</strong> which, three crosses viz., RAHS-14xRAHS-131,<br />
KS-16xMB-3200 and RDC-53x9747 exhibited sca effects <strong>in</strong> desirable direction for 2.5 per<br />
cent span length and fibre strength .<br />
In <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses, RDC-53 female was good general comb<strong>in</strong>er for all the fibre<br />
quality traits viz., 2.5 per cent span length, uniformity ratio, fibre strength, and micronaire<br />
value. The results <strong>of</strong> gca effects are <strong>in</strong> agreement with the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Neelima (2002) and<br />
McCarthy et al. (2004). The parent RDC-88 was good general comb<strong>in</strong>er for some traits except<br />
micronaire value. Among male parents, DLSA-17 was a good general comb<strong>in</strong>er for 2.5 per<br />
cent span length, MDL-2601 was good general comb<strong>in</strong>er for 2.5 per cent span length and<br />
fibre strength while, MDL-2582 was good general comb<strong>in</strong>er for fibre strength. Seven<br />
<strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses exhibited significant sca effects <strong>in</strong> desirable direction for fibre strength.<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> which five crosses viz., RAHS-14xAK-235, KS-16xDLSA-17, KS-16xMDL-2601,<br />
RDC-53xAK-235 and RDC-88xDLSA-17 exhibited significant sca effects for 2.5 per cent<br />
span length and fibre strength. A total <strong>of</strong> n<strong>in</strong>e crosses exhibited significant sca effect for<br />
micronaire value. Out <strong>of</strong> which RAHS-14xAK-235 and KS-16xMDL-2601 exhibited sca effect<br />
<strong>in</strong> desirable direction for 2.5 per cent span length, fibre strength and micronaire value.<br />
In general, the parents RAHS-14, KS-16 and RDC-88 exhibited good general<br />
comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability for most <strong>of</strong> the yield and fibre quality traits. They can be exploited for<br />
further recomb<strong>in</strong>ation breed<strong>in</strong>g programme to isolate superior segregants for both seed cotton<br />
and fibre quality traits.<br />
16
COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR PRODUCTIVITY<br />
Table 1. gca effects <strong>of</strong> female and male parents for yield and yield components and fibre quality traits <strong>of</strong><br />
G. herbaceum L. cotton.<br />
Source<br />
Female parent<br />
Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> bolls<br />
per<br />
plant<br />
Boll<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Seed<br />
cotton<br />
yield<br />
per<br />
plant<br />
(g)<br />
G<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />
out turn<br />
(%)<br />
L<strong>in</strong>t<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex<br />
(g)<br />
Seed<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex<br />
(g)<br />
2.5%<br />
span<br />
length<br />
(mm)<br />
Uniformity<br />
ratio (%)<br />
Fibre<br />
strength<br />
(g/tex)<br />
Micronaire<br />
value<br />
(g/<strong>in</strong>)<br />
RAHS-14 0.33 0.10 3.08 1.12** 0.22** 0.11** 0.24**<br />
1.50** 0.59** -0.27**<br />
KS-16 1.27 0.16** 10.27** -1.56** -0.19** 0.09* 0.39** -1.47** -1.06** 0.18**<br />
RDC-53 -0.87 -0.02 -2.73 0.11 -0.09 -0.25** -0.47* -1.19** 0.00 0.15**<br />
RDC-88 -0.73 -0.24** -10.61** 0.33 0.06 0.04* -0.16** 1.18**<br />
0.46** -0.06<br />
GCA l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
CD at 5 % 3.08 0.15 4.64 1.00 0.13 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.11<br />
Male parent<br />
RAHS-131 2.71* -0.09 0.70 0.61 -0.01 -0.21** 0.36**<br />
1.58** 1.34** 0.10*<br />
9747 0.08 0.28** 8.45** -1.65** -0.23** 0.02 -1.33** -1.82** -2.07** 0.27**<br />
MB-3200 0.02 -0.09 -2.23 1.75** 0.23** -0.03* 2.04**<br />
-0.01 0.64** 0.30**<br />
BLACH-1 -2.81* -0.09 -6.92** -0.71* 0.01 0.22** -1.07**<br />
0.25** 0.10* -0.07<br />
GCA testers<br />
CD at 5 % 3.08 0.15 4.64 1.00 0.13 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.11<br />
17
IRADDI and KAJJIDONI<br />
Crosses<br />
RAHS-14 RAHS-<br />
131<br />
Table 2. sca effects <strong>of</strong> hybrids for yield and yield components and fibre quality<br />
traits <strong>of</strong> Intra-herbaceum cotton<br />
Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> bolls<br />
per plant<br />
Boll<br />
weight (g)<br />
Seed<br />
cotton<br />
yield per<br />
plant (g)<br />
G<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />
out turn<br />
(%)<br />
L<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex<br />
(g)<br />
Seed<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex (g)<br />
2.5% span<br />
length<br />
(mm)<br />
Uniformity<br />
ratio (%)<br />
Fibre<br />
strength<br />
(g/tex)<br />
Micronaire<br />
value<br />
(g/<strong>in</strong>)<br />
-1.21 -0.04 -1.45 -1.81* -0.32** -0.15** 0.54** -1.28** 0.88** 0.26**<br />
RAHS-14 9747 1.42 -0.01 3.30 -0.96 -0.18 -0.14** 0.40** 1.08** 1.12** 0.15<br />
RAHS-14 MB-3200 0.86 0.10 2.98 1.96** 0.35** 0.13** -1.77** 1.07** -1.43** -0.50**<br />
RAHS-14 BLACH-1 -1.07 -0.05 -4.83 0.86 0.15 0.16** 0.83** -0.87** -0.57** 0.09<br />
KS-16 RAHS-131 -0.64 -0.14 -7.14* 0.52 0.15 0.14** -1.80** 0.68**<br />
-1.24 0.01<br />
KS-16 9747 -0.52 0.02 -2.89 2.56** 0.23* 0.12** -0.30** 0.68** 0.82** -0.36**<br />
KS-16 MB-3200 -4.68 0.00 -5.45 0.14 0.03 0.00 3.24** -4.91** 0.25** 0.17*<br />
KS-16 BLACH-1 5.24* 0.12 15.48** -3.23** -0.41** -0.02 -1.14** 3.56**<br />
0.17* 0.17*<br />
RDC-53 RAHS-131 0.24 -0.03 -1.39 1.69* 0.21* -0.02 -0.08** -0.53* -0.81** -0.22<br />
RDC-53 9747 -2.63<br />
0.09 -1.89 -2.27** -0.11 0.37** 0.24* 0.20** 1.45** 0.49**<br />
RDC-53 MB-3200 3.06 0.09 8.30* 0.55 -0.07 -0.28** -0.81** 0.72** -0.49** 0.03<br />
RDC-53 BLACH-1 -0.67 -0.15 -5.02 0.03 -0.04 -0.07* 0.66** -0.39** -0.16* -0.30**<br />
RDC-88 RAHS-131 1.61<br />
0.21 9.98** -0.41 -0.04 0.03 1.34** 1.14** 1.17** -0.05<br />
RDC-88 9747 1.73 -0.10 1.48 0.67 0.06 -0.12** -0.34** -1.96** -3.40** -0.28**<br />
RDC-88 MB-3200 0.17 -0.19 -5.83 -2.65** -0.31** 0.15** -0.66** 3.13** 1.66** 0.30**<br />
RDC-88 BLACH-1 -3.51 0.07 -5.64 2.40** 0.29** -0.06 -0.34** -2.30**<br />
0.56** 0.04<br />
sca effects<br />
CD at 5 % 6.17 0.30 9.29 2.00 0.26 0.09 0.09 0.20 0.21 0.22<br />
18
COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR PRODUCTIVITY<br />
Table 3. gca effects <strong>of</strong> female and male parents for yield and yield components and fibre quality traits <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>ter-specific crosses (G. herbaceum L. G. arboreum L.) <strong>of</strong> diploid cotton<br />
Source<br />
Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> bolls<br />
per<br />
plant<br />
Boll<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Seed<br />
cotton<br />
yield<br />
per<br />
plant (g)<br />
G<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />
out turn<br />
(%)<br />
L<strong>in</strong>t<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex<br />
(g)<br />
Seed<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex<br />
(g)<br />
2.5%<br />
span<br />
length<br />
(mm)<br />
Uniformity<br />
ratio (%)<br />
Fibre<br />
strength<br />
(g/tex)<br />
Micronaire<br />
value<br />
(g/<strong>in</strong>)<br />
Female parent<br />
RAHS-14 -0.45 -0.09* -3.29* 0.40** 0.07** 0.06** -1.79** -0.38** -3.38** -0.11**<br />
KS-16 1.29 0.18** 6.84** -0.05 0.00 0.02 0.09 -3.20** 0.27** 0.27**<br />
RDC-53 -1.14 -0.00 -2.07 -1.44** -0.14** 0.11**<br />
1.05** 2.28** 1.67** 0.16**<br />
RDC-88 0.30 -0.09* -1.48 1.09** 0.06** -0.19** 0.65** 1.30** 1.44** -0.32**<br />
GCA l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
CD at 5 % 2.92 0.10 4.32 0.40 0.06 0.05 0.18 0.07 0.12 0.06<br />
Male parent<br />
AK-235 3.67** 0.08* 9.09** 0.97** 0.08** -0.12** -0.60** 0.01 -0.18** -0.01<br />
DLSA-17 0.05 0.17** 4.40** 0.43** 0.06** 0.02 0.39** 0.05 -1.69** -0.02<br />
MDL-2582 -2.48* -0.05 -5.73** -1.36** -0.12** 0.13**<br />
-0.04 2.18** 1.31** 0.11**<br />
MDL-2601 -1.24<br />
-0.21** -7.76** -0.04 -0.02 -0.03 0.25** -2.24** 0.56** -0.07**<br />
GCA testers<br />
CD at 5 % 2.98 0.10 4.32 0.40 0.06 0.0586 0.18 0.07 0.12 0.06<br />
19
IRADDI and KAJJIDONI<br />
Table 4. sca effects <strong>of</strong> hybrids for yield and yield mponents co and fibre quality traits <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter-specific<br />
crosses (G. herbaceum L. G. arboreum L.) <strong>of</strong> diploid cotton<br />
Crosses<br />
Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> bolls<br />
per plant<br />
Boll<br />
weight (g)<br />
Seed<br />
cotton<br />
yield per<br />
plant (g)<br />
G<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />
out turn<br />
(%)<br />
L<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex<br />
(g)<br />
Seed<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex (g)<br />
2.5% span<br />
length<br />
(mm)<br />
Uniformity<br />
ratio (%)<br />
Fibre<br />
strength<br />
(g/tex)<br />
Micronaire<br />
value<br />
(g/<strong>in</strong>)<br />
RAHS-14 AK-235 -4.33* 0.01 -6.09<br />
-0.67* -0.14** -0.11* 0.35* -1.27** 1.54** 0.15**<br />
RAHS-14 DLSA-17 4.17*<br />
-0.05 8.98** 2.11** 0.33** 0.12** 0.57** 0.17** -4.07** 0.25**<br />
RAHS-14MDL-2582 -0.80 -0.23** -13.40**<br />
-0.39 -0.08 -0.08* -0.01 1.65** 2.59** 0.18**<br />
RAHS-14MDL-2601 0.96 0.28** 10.51** -1.05** -0.10* 0.07 -0.91** -0.55**<br />
-0.06 -0.59**<br />
KS-16 AK-235 1.68 -0.24**<br />
-3.21 -3.32** -0.48** -0.22** -1.59** 0.80** -1.90** -0.72**<br />
KS-16 DLSA-17 -1.82 0.12 -4.65<br />
-0.94** -0.06 0.17** 1.03** -0.30** 1.10** -0.51**<br />
KS-16 MDL-2582 2.83 0.24** 15.23** 2.64** 0.36** 0.08 -0.49**<br />
-0.76** -0.19* 0.37**<br />
KS-16 MDL-2601 -2.69<br />
-0.11 -7.37* 1.61** 0.19** 0.02 1.05** 0.26** 0.99* 0.86**<br />
RDC-53 AK-235 1.48 0.17* 4.57 2.13* 0.26** 0.01 1.80** 0.56** 0.49** -0.05<br />
RDC-53 DLSA-17 -2.27<br />
-0.26** -11.99** -0.13 -0.10* -0.22** -1.99** -3.46** 0.53** 0.26**<br />
RDC-53 MDL-2582 -1.36<br />
0.21** 7.13* -1.17** -0.06 0.23** 0.18 1.31** -0.89** 0.26**<br />
RDC-53 MDL-2601 2.15 -0.12 0.29 -0.83** -0.10*<br />
-0.02 0.00 1.59** -0.13 -0.48**<br />
RDC-88 AK-235 1.17 0.06 4.73<br />
1.85** 0.36** 0.33** -0.57** -0.10 -0.13 0.61**<br />
RDC-88 DLSA-17 -0.08<br />
0.20* 7.66* -1.04** -0.16** -0.07 0.39** 3.59** 2.44** 0.00<br />
RDC-88 MDL-2582 -0.67<br />
-0.21** -8.96** -1.08** -0.21** -0.23** 0.33* -2.19** -1.57** -0.82**<br />
RDC-88 MDL-2601 -0.42 -0.05 -3.43 0.28 0.02 -0.03 -0.15 -1.30 -0.80** 0.21**<br />
sca effects<br />
CD at 5 % 5.85<br />
0.20 8.64 0.80 0.12 0.11 0.37 0.14 0.24 0.12<br />
20
COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR PRODUCTIVITY<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Bhatade, S. S. 1983. Environmental <strong>in</strong>fluence on the magnitude <strong>of</strong> heterosis <strong>in</strong> G. arboreum<br />
L. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Science. 53 (8): 627-633.<br />
Kajjidoni, S. T. 1982. Heterosis, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability and gene action for earl<strong>in</strong>ess, yield and<br />
yield components <strong>in</strong> 2x10 crosses <strong>of</strong> G. arboreum L. ´ G. herbaceum cotton. M. Sc.<br />
(Agri.) Thesis submitted to University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.<br />
Karande, S. S., Wandhare, M. R., Ladole, M. Y., Waode, M. M and Meshram, L. D. 2004.<br />
Heterosis and comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability studies <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific diploid cotton hybrids for fibre<br />
quality parameters. International Symposiam on Strategies for Susta<strong>in</strong>able Cotton<br />
Production – A Global Vision 1. Crop Improvement, Dharwad, 23-25 November, 2004.<br />
Kempthorne, O. 1957. An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, 1 st Edn.,<br />
New York, USA. pp. 456-471.<br />
Laxman, S and Ganesh, M. 2003. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability for yield components and fibre characters<br />
<strong>in</strong> cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). The Journal <strong>of</strong> Research ANGRAU. 31 (4): 19-23.<br />
Maisuria, A. T., Patel, J. C., Patel, K. G and Solanki, B. G. 2006. Study <strong>of</strong> best per se<br />
performance, heterosis and comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability effects for seed cotton yield and its<br />
component characters through GMS system <strong>in</strong> Asiatic cotton. Journal <strong>of</strong> Indian Society<br />
for Cotton Improvement. 31 (2): 88-91.<br />
Manickam, S and Gururajan, K. N. 2004. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis for fibre quality <strong>in</strong><br />
upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal <strong>of</strong> Indian Society for Cotton<br />
Improvement. 29 (2): 86-91.<br />
McCarthy, J., Jenk<strong>in</strong>s, J. N and Wu, J. 2004. Primitive accession derived germplasm by<br />
cultivar crosses as sources for cotton improvement: II Genetic effects and genotypic<br />
values. Crop Science. 44 (4): 1231-1235.<br />
Muthuswamy, A., Vivekanandan, P and Jayaramachandram, M. 2003. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability<br />
and gene action for fibre characters <strong>in</strong> upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Indian Society for Cotton Improvement. 28 (3): 127-131.<br />
Neelima, S. 2002. Heterosis and comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis for yield and yield components<br />
<strong>in</strong> cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis submitted to Acharya N. G.<br />
Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad.<br />
Pavasia, M. J., Shukla, P. T and Patel, U. G. 1999. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis over<br />
environments for fibre characters <strong>in</strong> upland cotton. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Genetics and<br />
Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g. 59 (1): 77-81.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh, H., S<strong>in</strong>gh, S and Omprakash, 1995. Heterotic response <strong>of</strong> ten American cotton hybrids<br />
for some quality traits. Journal <strong>of</strong> Cotton Research and Development. 9 (1): 13-16.<br />
Wilson, F. D. 1991. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability for yield characteristics and earl<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>of</strong> p<strong>in</strong>k boll<br />
worm resistant cotton. Crop Science. 31: 922-925.<br />
21
J.Res. ANGRAU 37(3&4)22-34, 2009<br />
WEED AND CROP RESISTANCE TO HERBICIDES<br />
A. S. RAO<br />
Integrated Weed Management Unit, Regional Agricultural Research Station<br />
Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University<br />
Lam Farm, GUNTUR- 522 034, A.P.<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Weeds cont<strong>in</strong>ually pose a serious threat to pr<strong>of</strong>itable crop production, and the extent <strong>of</strong> loss depends<br />
on the degree <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>festation. Due to shortage and <strong>in</strong>creased costs <strong>of</strong> labour, use <strong>of</strong> herbicides became <strong>in</strong>tegral<br />
part <strong>of</strong> weed management <strong>in</strong> different crops and cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems even <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries. However,<br />
their <strong>in</strong>tensive use poses alarm<strong>in</strong>g threat to the mank<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> environmental pollution, shift <strong>in</strong> weed<br />
flora and evolution <strong>of</strong> herbicide resistance <strong>in</strong> <strong>weeds</strong>. Herbicide resistant <strong>weeds</strong>, causes and mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />
resistance, types <strong>of</strong> resistance, characteristics <strong>of</strong> resistance, management <strong>of</strong> herbicide resistant <strong>weeds</strong>,<br />
herbicide resistant crops, their advantages and disadvantages <strong>in</strong> effective weed management have been<br />
discussed <strong>in</strong> this review paper.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Due to the high population growth rate, every endeavour is be<strong>in</strong>g made to produce<br />
more gra<strong>in</strong> per unit area per unit time. Of the several methods be<strong>in</strong>g adopted, <strong>in</strong>tensive<br />
cropp<strong>in</strong>g, efficient water and fertilizer use, breed<strong>in</strong>g photo <strong>in</strong>sensitive short statured crop<br />
varieties responsive to higher levels <strong>of</strong> fertilizer, chemical control <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong> are some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
important agronomic practices <strong>in</strong>tended for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g level <strong>of</strong> food production.<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> selective herbicides disturbs the micro-environment <strong>of</strong> the weed population. Such a<br />
tremendous pressure (80 to 90% weed kill with a s<strong>in</strong>gle spray) on a weed species, <strong>in</strong>duces<br />
some diversity (genetic, physiological or any other) <strong>in</strong> the weed species that show adequate<br />
resistance to the herbicides. The manifestation <strong>of</strong> this behaviour <strong>in</strong> weed species and its<br />
implications and use <strong>of</strong> herbicide resistant crops are reviewed <strong>in</strong> this article. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
Whitehead and Switzer (1963), resistance <strong>in</strong> a weed population is usually def<strong>in</strong>ed as adequate<br />
tolerance to a concentration <strong>of</strong> herbicide which at agriculture rates <strong>of</strong> application would normally<br />
kill susceptible plants. Such resistance usually develops by natural selection, as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
repeated application <strong>of</strong> a herbicide over a number <strong>of</strong> years and operates at the <strong>in</strong>tra species<br />
level ,resistance is then passed on to the mutant biotype’s progeny.<br />
E mail:sraoatluri@yahoo.co.<strong>in</strong><br />
22
WEED AND CROP RESISTANCE TO HERBICIDES<br />
Herbicide Resistant Weeds<br />
The repeated use <strong>of</strong> herbicides with similar modes <strong>of</strong> action on the same site over a<br />
period <strong>of</strong> years (rang<strong>in</strong>g from 5 to 12 years) has resulted <strong>in</strong> weed biotypes that are resistant<br />
to such herbicides.S<strong>in</strong>ce1970, follow<strong>in</strong>g the discovery <strong>of</strong> resistance <strong>of</strong> a biotype <strong>of</strong> common<br />
groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) to the s- triaz<strong>in</strong>e herbicides simaz<strong>in</strong>e and atraz<strong>in</strong>e, the<br />
phenomenon <strong>of</strong> herbicide resistance <strong>in</strong> <strong>weeds</strong> have become well known. Prior to 1970, the<br />
only confirmed <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>of</strong> herbicide resistance, attributed to selection by repeated use <strong>of</strong><br />
the same herbicide was the differential susceptibility <strong>of</strong> wild carrot (Daucus carota) to 2,4-D.<br />
(Anderson, 1996). The follow<strong>in</strong>g weed species were reported to be resistant for different<br />
herbicides (Table1)<br />
Table 1. Weed species with resistance to different herbicides<br />
Weed species<br />
Herbicide (s) to which resistance observed<br />
(1) (2)<br />
Agropyron repens<br />
Agrotis stolonifera<br />
Alopercurus myosuroides<br />
Amaranthus hybridus<br />
Amaranthus palmeri<br />
Amaranthus powelli<br />
*Amaranthus retr<strong>of</strong>lexus<br />
Amaranthus rudi<br />
Ambrosia artemissifolia<br />
Ambrosia trifida<br />
*Aristolochia bractesta<br />
*Avena fatua<br />
Cardaria chalepensis<br />
Chenopodium album<br />
Chenopodium polyspermum<br />
*Chrozhophora rotteleri<br />
Dalapon Phenoxy acetic acid herbicides<br />
2,4-D<br />
Pendimethal<strong>in</strong>, chlorosulfurondiclfopmethyl and<br />
several triaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Triaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Glyphosate<br />
Triaz<strong>in</strong>es<br />
Atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Glyphosate<br />
Atraz<strong>in</strong>e,glyphosate<br />
Glyphosate<br />
Pendimethal<strong>in</strong><br />
Proham, diallate,isoproturon, Triallate ,barban<br />
2,4-D<br />
Atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Pendimethal<strong>in</strong><br />
23
Table1. contd..<br />
RAO<br />
Weed species<br />
Herbicide (s) to which resistance observed<br />
(1) (2)<br />
Cirisium arvense<br />
*Convolvulus arvensis<br />
Conyza Canadensis<br />
*Cressa critica<br />
*Cucumis trigonus<br />
*Cynodon dactylon<br />
Daucos carota<br />
Digitaria sangu<strong>in</strong>alis<br />
Digitaria sps.<br />
Ech<strong>in</strong>ocloa crusgalli<br />
Erechtites hieracifolia<br />
Euphorbia heterophylla<br />
*Ischaemum rugosum<br />
Kochia scoparia<br />
Lolium multiflorum<br />
Myosotis arvensis<br />
Phalaris arund<strong>in</strong>acea<br />
Phalaris m<strong>in</strong>or<br />
*Phyllantus maderas patensis<br />
Picea abies<br />
*Poa annua<br />
Polygonum persicaria<br />
Polygonum lapathifolium<br />
Polygonum lapathifolium<br />
Sencio vulgaris<br />
Setaria viridis<br />
Setaria spp.<br />
Setaria spp.<br />
2,4-D and amitrol<br />
2,4-D<br />
Paraquat,glyphosate<br />
Paraquat,oxyfluorfen<br />
2,4-D<br />
Dalapon<br />
2,4 – D<br />
Atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
TCA<br />
Dalapon, propanil, metoxuron atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
2,4-D<br />
Glyphosate<br />
Anil<strong>of</strong>os<br />
Chlorosulfuron<br />
Glyphosate<br />
MCPA<br />
Glysophate<br />
Isoproturon,fenoxaprop,clod<strong>in</strong>afop,sulfosulfuron<br />
Pendimethal<strong>in</strong><br />
Glysophate<br />
Metoxuron<br />
Atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Dichlorprop<br />
Atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Metoxuron<br />
Atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Dalapon<br />
24
WEED AND CROP RESISTANCE TO HERBICIDES<br />
Table1. contd..<br />
Weed species<br />
Herbicide (s) to which resistance observed<br />
(1) (2)<br />
*Solanum nigrum<br />
*Sorghum halepense<br />
Sonchus arvensis<br />
Stellaria media<br />
Tripleuro spermum <strong>in</strong>odorum<br />
Veronica persica<br />
Atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
MSMA, dalapon, glyphosate<br />
Am<strong>in</strong>e salt <strong>of</strong> 2,4-D<br />
Atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
MCPA<br />
Atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />
(Source: Gill et al.,1986: Anderson1996;Das and Duary,1999; Heap,2007;Reddy,2007;Yadav and Malik,2007)<br />
*Weeds <strong>of</strong> local importance<br />
There is no evidence that any herbicide resistant weed biotypes has occurred through<br />
mutations caused by herbicide, nor is there any evidence to show whether or not these<br />
resistant biotypes were already present prior to herbicide treatment at the sites when they<br />
were detected. Herbicide resistant weed biotypes are presumed to arise through naturally<br />
occur<strong>in</strong>g mutations, form small, pre exist<strong>in</strong>g populations <strong>of</strong> the species. Resistance becomes<br />
apparent when herbicide selection kills <strong>of</strong>f the herbicide susceptible plants, leav<strong>in</strong>g the herbicide<br />
resistant biotype.<br />
Factors regulat<strong>in</strong>g the development <strong>of</strong> resistance<br />
Over reliance /overdependence on herbicides as the only and the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal means <strong>of</strong><br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>weeds</strong> and cont<strong>in</strong>uous use <strong>of</strong> a herbicide(s) hav<strong>in</strong>g same mechanism <strong>of</strong> action <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>tensive agriculture <strong>in</strong>dulg<strong>in</strong>g only crop monoculture and m<strong>in</strong>imum tillage have been major<br />
causes <strong>of</strong> herbicide resistance <strong>in</strong> most weed species (Das and Duary,1999). The factors<br />
regulat<strong>in</strong>g the rate <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> resistance are<br />
1. Initial frequency : Herbicide resistance is not entirely due to the mutation caused by<br />
herbicides. In the naturally-exist<strong>in</strong>g population <strong>of</strong> a weed species, the resistant genotypes<br />
are present <strong>in</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g frequency, may be very low-one <strong>in</strong> a lakh population. This is its <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
frequency. The development <strong>of</strong> resistance at the field level depends upon the <strong>in</strong>crease on<br />
the proportion <strong>of</strong> the resistant genotypes with<strong>in</strong> population. Repeated use <strong>of</strong> same herbicide(s)<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g same mechanism <strong>of</strong> action results <strong>in</strong> kill<strong>in</strong>g the susceptible biotypes allow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
resistant <strong>in</strong>dividuals to multiply and produce seeds year after year, and thus with<strong>in</strong> few<br />
seasons/years <strong>of</strong> application the population becomes dom<strong>in</strong>ated by resistant biotypes. The<br />
more the <strong>in</strong>itial frequency, the quicker is the appearance <strong>of</strong> the resistance. This is the start<strong>in</strong>g<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> resistance<br />
25
RAO<br />
2. Use <strong>of</strong> herbicide(s) : Herbicide(s) hav<strong>in</strong>g higher efficacy, used as pre/post emergence<br />
and applied frequently over several grow<strong>in</strong>g seasons without rotat<strong>in</strong>g, alternat<strong>in</strong>g or comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
with other types <strong>of</strong> herbicides favour selective evolution <strong>of</strong> resistant biotypes <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong>.<br />
3. Soil seed bank : The seed bank acts as a buffer, <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the rate <strong>of</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong><br />
resistance. The appearance <strong>of</strong> resistance will be delayed by the recruitment <strong>of</strong> susceptible<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals from the seed bank. This depends on the germ<strong>in</strong>ation dynamics, tillage and<br />
cultivation practices followed. For example zero or no tillage enhance the rate <strong>of</strong> development<br />
<strong>of</strong> resistance, as the herbicide applied <strong>in</strong> this practice kill all the susceptible <strong>in</strong>dividuals on<br />
the surface and thus allow<strong>in</strong>g the resistant weed seeds which are deposited <strong>in</strong> previous<br />
season to germ<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong> greater proportion. Deep tillage otherwise bury these seeds.<br />
4. Other factors : Mode <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> resistance ,gene flow, mode <strong>of</strong> poll<strong>in</strong>ation, relative<br />
fitness etc. are other factors which are also responsible for regulat<strong>in</strong>g the rate <strong>of</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong><br />
resistance.<br />
Mechanism <strong>of</strong> Resistance<br />
There are three ma<strong>in</strong> mechanisms <strong>of</strong> resistance viz.<br />
1. Altered site <strong>of</strong> action : Refers to the modification <strong>in</strong> the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g site <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> a<br />
herbicide due to some genetic changes <strong>in</strong> biotypes show<strong>in</strong>g resistance compared to the<br />
susceptible ones and thus rema<strong>in</strong>s unaffected when the same herbicide is applied to them.<br />
Eg. Resistance <strong>in</strong> many <strong>weeds</strong> species/biotypes to most <strong>of</strong> the triaz<strong>in</strong>es, sulfonyl ureas,<br />
d<strong>in</strong>itro anil<strong>in</strong>es and <strong>in</strong> some cases <strong>of</strong> ACCase <strong>in</strong>hibitors (fenoxprop, fluazifop etc) is developed<br />
through this mechanism<br />
2. Enhanced metabolism : Refers to the rapid degradation and /or conjugation <strong>of</strong> herbicide<br />
molecules <strong>in</strong>to non –toxic or less toxic metabolites/forms is a major mechanism <strong>of</strong> resistance<br />
<strong>in</strong> several weed species Eg. Phalaris m<strong>in</strong>or resistance to isoproturon<br />
3. Sequestration and Compartmentation : Refers to the stor<strong>in</strong>g/accumulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
herbicides or its metabolites <strong>in</strong> the cell vacuole or gett<strong>in</strong>g sequestered <strong>in</strong> cells or tissues and<br />
thus gets prevented from reach<strong>in</strong>g to its site <strong>of</strong> action, is the other mechanism operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
under sequestration and compartmentation. Eg.Resistance to paraquat, a photosynthesis<br />
<strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g herbicide, <strong>in</strong> some biotypes <strong>of</strong> Lolium rigidum (Mathews,1997)<br />
Extent <strong>of</strong> Resistance<br />
Ryan (1970) observed that resistant biotypes <strong>of</strong> Senecio vulgaris were not controlled<br />
by pre emergence application <strong>of</strong> simaz<strong>in</strong>e or atraz<strong>in</strong>e at the rate <strong>of</strong> up to 17.92 kg/ha; while<br />
this limit was found to be only 2.8 kg/ha <strong>in</strong> experiments conducted by Holliday & Putwa<strong>in</strong>(1977).<br />
26
WEED AND CROP RESISTANCE TO HERBICIDES<br />
A resistant biotype <strong>of</strong> Chenopodium album was not killed with a dose as high as 40 kg<br />
atraz<strong>in</strong>e/ha (Souza Machado et al., 1977) and 20 kg/ha (Souza Machado and Bandeen,<br />
1978). Kees (1978) reported a biotype <strong>of</strong> Stellaria media to be unaffected by atraz<strong>in</strong>e 9 kg/<br />
ha.<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> Resistance :<br />
Three types <strong>of</strong> resistance as it relates to herbicides and <strong>weeds</strong>, namely:<br />
1. Herbicide resistance : Refers to a weed biotype that is resistant to one specific herbicide,<br />
as <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> amitrole or glyphosate. However, the term may also be used to denote the<br />
phenomenon <strong>of</strong> herbicide resistance <strong>in</strong> weed biotypes.<br />
2. Cross resistance : Refers to a weed biotype that is resistant to two or more chemically<br />
similar herbicides, as those grouped <strong>in</strong> the same herbicide family, and that have the same<br />
mode <strong>of</strong> action. For example, a powell amaranth biotype is cross resistant to the uracil<br />
herbicides, bromacil and terbacil.<br />
3. Multiple resistance : Refers to weed biotypes resistant two or more <strong>in</strong>dividual or series <strong>of</strong><br />
chemically unrelated herbicides, as are those <strong>in</strong> different herbicide families, which have<br />
different modes <strong>of</strong> action.<br />
Characteristics <strong>of</strong> resistance biotypes:<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
(iii)<br />
(iv)<br />
(v)<br />
Plant resistant to atraz<strong>in</strong>e show some degree <strong>of</strong> resistance to other herbicides<br />
tested (Barralis et al., 1979).<br />
Resistant biotypes emerged late and flower late than the susceptible<br />
(S-biotypes) ones (Souza Machado & Bandeen, 1978).<br />
Resistant Amaranthus have been suggested to be hybrids between two<br />
closely related species (Gasquez and Compo<strong>in</strong>t, 1980).<br />
Nitrate reductase activity <strong>in</strong> resistant biotypes <strong>of</strong> Chenopodium album is not<br />
affected by atraz<strong>in</strong>e (whereas there is 35% reduction <strong>in</strong> susceptible biotypes)<br />
as reported by Foster et al., (1980) and Lawrence et al., (1980). Similarly<br />
paraquat- resistant biotypes <strong>of</strong> Conyza possessed significantly higher<br />
superoxide dismutase activity than the susceptible types (Youngman and<br />
Dodge, 1980). Also a high frequency <strong>of</strong> esterase has been reported from the<br />
triaz<strong>in</strong>e resistant Chenopodium album (Gasquez and Compo<strong>in</strong>t, 1981).<br />
Triaz<strong>in</strong>e-tolerant parent plants <strong>of</strong> Amaranthus retr<strong>of</strong>lexus were found to have<br />
small cotyledons.<br />
27
RAO<br />
(vi)<br />
Resistant and susceptible biotypes <strong>of</strong> Senecio vulgaris have also been<br />
reported (Jodie and Radosevich, 1983) to differ on the basis <strong>of</strong> growth<br />
depend<strong>in</strong>g on the light <strong>in</strong>tensities they are exposed to eg. dry matter<br />
production, height, number <strong>of</strong> leaves and leaf area <strong>of</strong> the resistant biotypes<br />
were lower under both the low and high light regimes. Roots/shoot ratios<br />
were lower <strong>in</strong> the resistant biotype only under high light regimes. Lower<br />
values <strong>of</strong> these parameters <strong>in</strong> resistant plants were due to lowered photo<br />
synthetic capacity. Net assimilation rate (NAR) was true for mean leaf area<br />
ratio over a harvest <strong>in</strong>terval. Shad<strong>in</strong>g lowered dry weight production, height,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> leaves, Leaf area (LA), Net assimilation rate (NAR), Relative<br />
growth rate (RGR), Plastachron <strong>in</strong>dex (PI) and root/shoot ratio <strong>of</strong> both<br />
biotypes. Values for these growth parameters for resistant plants were either<br />
similar to or lower than for susceptible plants when grown under low light.<br />
Management <strong>of</strong> Herbicide Resistant Weeds:<br />
The Herbicide Resistance Action Committee (HRAC) has developed the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
list <strong>of</strong> strategies for avoid<strong>in</strong>g and manag<strong>in</strong>g problems with herbicide resistant weed biotypes<br />
(Abraham et al.,1993; Timothy et al,2000 and David vitolo,2001). Keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that reliance<br />
upon any one strategy is not likely to be effective. The crop grower must use the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
strategies <strong>in</strong> carefully selected comb<strong>in</strong>ations, if herbicide resistant weed problems are to be<br />
avoided or properly managed.<br />
• Use Herbicides only when necessary. Where available, herbicide applications should be<br />
based on economic thresholds. Cont<strong>in</strong>ued development <strong>of</strong> effective economic threshold<br />
models should be helpful.<br />
• Use <strong>of</strong> rapidly degradable herbicides<br />
• Rotate herbicides (sites <strong>of</strong> action). Do not make more than two consecutive applications<br />
<strong>of</strong> herbicides with the same site <strong>of</strong> action to the same field unless other effective control<br />
practices are also <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the management system. Two consecutive applications<br />
could be s<strong>in</strong>gle annual applications for two years, or two split applications <strong>in</strong> one year.<br />
• Apply herbicides <strong>in</strong> tank-mixed, prepackaged, or sequential mixtures that <strong>in</strong>clude multiple<br />
sites <strong>of</strong> action. Both herbicides, however, must have substantial activity aga<strong>in</strong>st potentially<br />
resistant <strong>weeds</strong> for this strategy to be effective.<br />
• Rotate crops, particularly those with different life cycles (e.g. rice-pulse). At the same<br />
time, remember not use herbicides with the same site <strong>of</strong> action <strong>in</strong> these different crops<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st the same weed unless other effective control practices are also <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong> the<br />
management system.<br />
28
WEED AND CROP RESISTANCE TO HERBICIDES<br />
• IWM approach/Comb<strong>in</strong>e, where feasible, mechanical weed control practices such as<br />
rotary hoe<strong>in</strong>g and cultivation with herbicide treatment.<br />
• Include, where soil erosion potential is m<strong>in</strong>imal, primary tillage as a component <strong>of</strong> the<br />
weed management programme.<br />
• Scout/survey fields regularly and identify <strong>weeds</strong> present. Respond quickly to changes <strong>in</strong><br />
weed populations to restrict spread <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong> that may have been selected for resistance.<br />
• Clean tillage and harvest equipment before mov<strong>in</strong>g from fields <strong>in</strong>fested with resistant<br />
weed to those that are not.<br />
• Germ<strong>in</strong>ation stimulators<br />
• Encourage rail roads, public utilities, highways departments and similar organizations<br />
that use total vegetation control programmes should be encouraged to use vegetation<br />
management systems that do not lead to selection <strong>of</strong> herbicide resistant <strong>weeds</strong>.<br />
• Introduction <strong>of</strong> Herbicide Resistant Crops (HRCs) and Plant<strong>in</strong>g new herbicide resistant<br />
crop varieties should not result <strong>in</strong> more than two consecutive applications <strong>of</strong> herbicides<br />
with the same site <strong>of</strong> action aga<strong>in</strong>st the same weed unless other effective control practices<br />
are also <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the management system.<br />
Herbicide Resistant Crops (GM Crops /Transgenic Crops)<br />
Modern agriculture is dependent upon crop selective herbicides for effective control.<br />
However, it is becom<strong>in</strong>g extremely difficult and costly to f<strong>in</strong>d out and develop new herbicide<br />
with favourable weed control properties and friendly environmental characteristics. An alternate<br />
approach is to develop crop resistance to the exist<strong>in</strong>g herbicides with desirable properties<br />
(Sankaran, 2001; Yaduraj et al., 2005 and Rao, 2006).To generate herbicide resistance crop<br />
plants, the major approaches used are<br />
1. Conventional breed<strong>in</strong>g-with herbicide resistant biotypes<br />
2. Invitro-mutation selection- by cultur<strong>in</strong>g cells or tissues <strong>in</strong> normally toxic concentrations<br />
<strong>of</strong> herbicides<br />
3. Mutant selection by somatic hybridization-fusion <strong>of</strong> prootoplasts <strong>in</strong> culture from different<br />
plants to comb<strong>in</strong>e genetic <strong>in</strong>formation to create a new hybrid<br />
4. Genetic transformation-transfer <strong>of</strong> clone genes <strong>in</strong>to susceptible crop plants.<br />
29
RAO<br />
Table 2. Some <strong>of</strong> the herbicide resistant crops grouped accord<strong>in</strong>g to the techniques<br />
<strong>of</strong> development (Duke, 1998)<br />
Technique Resistance Crops<br />
Traditional selection triaz<strong>in</strong>e-resistance Canola<br />
Seed Mutagenesis terbutyn-resistance Wheat<br />
sulfonyl urea- resistance Soybean<br />
imidazol<strong>in</strong>one- resistance Wheat<br />
Cell selection sulfonyl urea- resistance Canola<br />
atraz<strong>in</strong>e- resistance<br />
Soybean<br />
Genetic Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g sulfonyl urea- resistance Cotton<br />
glufos<strong>in</strong>ate (basta) resistance Rice, Canola<br />
Glyfosate resistance Cotton, Soybean, Maize, Wheat<br />
bromoxynil- resistance Cotton, Sub clover<br />
2,4-D resistance<br />
Cotton<br />
In this regard, it has been reported that several laboratories around the world have<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eered crop plants that harbour genes for resistance to known potent herbicides (Hatzios,<br />
1987 and Manju Sharma et al.,2003). In crops such as rice, wheat, corn, sugarcane and<br />
soybeans herbicide resistant genotypes may be useful where it is difficult to control <strong>weeds</strong><br />
or environmental conditions dictate the use <strong>of</strong> specific herbicides to which the crop is normally<br />
susceptible. Some <strong>of</strong> the commercialized transgenic crops with herbicide resistance are<br />
given below.<br />
Table 3. Commercialized transgenic crops with herbicide resistance<br />
S.No Transgenic Herbicide Trademark Agrochemical<br />
crop resistant Designation seed company<br />
1 Rice Glufos<strong>in</strong>ate ammonium Liberty l<strong>in</strong>k rice AgrEvo<br />
2 Corn Glufos<strong>in</strong>ate ammonium Liberty l<strong>in</strong>k corn AgrEvo<br />
Glyphosate Roundup ready corn Monsanto<br />
Dekalb Genetics<br />
Imidazol<strong>in</strong>ones IMICorn American cynamid<br />
Pioneeretc<br />
Sethoxydim SRCorn BASF/DeKalb<br />
Genetics<br />
30
WEED AND CROP RESISTANCE TO HERBICIDES<br />
Table 2. contd...<br />
S.No Transgenic Herbicide Trademark Agrochemical<br />
crop resistant Designation seed company<br />
3 Cotton Bromoxynil BXN Cotton Rhone–poulene<br />
Glufos<strong>in</strong>ate ammonium Liberty l<strong>in</strong>k cotton Agro Evo<br />
Glyphosate Roundup ready cotton Monsanto<br />
Sulfonylureas 19-51a cotton Dupont<br />
4 Soybean Glufos<strong>in</strong>ate ammonium Liberty l<strong>in</strong>k soybeans AgrEvo<br />
Glyphosate Roundup readysoybeans MonsantoAsgowseeds<br />
Sulfonylureas STS soybeans DuPont<br />
5 Canola(Bras Glyphosate Roundup readyrape Monsanto<br />
sica napus) Glufos<strong>in</strong>ate ammonium Liberty l<strong>in</strong>k canola AgrEvo<br />
Bromoxynil BXN Canola Rhone poulene<br />
6 Tobacco Bromoxynil BXN Tobacco Rhone poulene<br />
7 Sugar Beet Glyphosate Roundup ready beet Monsanto<br />
Advantages<br />
(WSSA,1998)<br />
1. Transgenic herbicide resistant crops decrease the risk <strong>of</strong> crop <strong>in</strong>jury<br />
2. Decreas<strong>in</strong>g herbicide carry over problem<br />
3. Broaden<strong>in</strong>g the spectrum <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong> controlled<br />
4. Us<strong>in</strong>g the herbicides that present less risk to the environment<br />
5. The available herbicide can be used <strong>in</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> crops<br />
6. Limitations <strong>in</strong> the choice <strong>of</strong> rotation crops can be reduced<br />
7. Farmer will have to know about limited number <strong>of</strong> herbicides to fulfill weed management<br />
needs (simplicity <strong>of</strong> weed control programme)<br />
8. Use <strong>of</strong> environmentally safe herbicides that can be used <strong>in</strong> a cost effective manner<br />
9. Flexibility <strong>in</strong> application rate and tim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Limitations<br />
1. Herbicide resistant crops(HRCs) promotes <strong>in</strong>creased use <strong>of</strong> herbicides<br />
2. Exclusive and repetitive use <strong>of</strong> a specific herbicide may well allow to develop resistant<br />
<strong>weeds</strong> <strong>in</strong> course <strong>of</strong> time<br />
31
RAO<br />
3. Herbicide resistant crops may transfer resistance to related <strong>weeds</strong> and possibility <strong>of</strong><br />
creat<strong>in</strong>g ‘super <strong>weeds</strong>’<br />
4. HRCs may lead to abandonment <strong>of</strong> alternative weed control practices<br />
5. Loss <strong>of</strong> farm biodiversity<br />
6. Over reliance on HRCs may <strong>in</strong>crease potential for shift <strong>in</strong> weed species<br />
7. Increased herbicide residues <strong>in</strong> food, feed and water<br />
8. Fear <strong>of</strong> consumers aga<strong>in</strong>st adverse effects <strong>of</strong> HRCs<br />
9. Every year farmer has to purchase seeds from seed developer<br />
10. Abandonment <strong>of</strong> IWM approach<br />
Conclusion<br />
From the literature reviewed, it could be concluded that cont<strong>in</strong>uous use <strong>of</strong> same<br />
herbicide for longer periods leads to development <strong>of</strong> resistant <strong>weeds</strong>. For management <strong>of</strong><br />
herbicide resistant weed population, no s<strong>in</strong>gle weed control method is likely to provide effective<br />
control when used exclusively. Therefore, weed control <strong>in</strong> crop lands should be long term<br />
strategy <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g a range <strong>of</strong> management techniques (i.e. IWM approach).In India, the use<br />
<strong>of</strong> herbicide resistant crops is still <strong>in</strong> test<strong>in</strong>g stage, and it may take time for their commercial<br />
use.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Abraham, C.T., Neer, B. Sar<strong>in</strong> and Mahesh Ja<strong>in</strong>.1993.Application <strong>of</strong> biotechnology for weed<br />
management. Proc. <strong>of</strong> International Symposium, Indian Society <strong>of</strong> Weed Science,<br />
Hisar, November,18-20, Vol.1:209-219<br />
Anderson,W.P.1996. Weed Science Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and Practices. West Publish<strong>in</strong>g Co. New<br />
York, pp.125-128<br />
Barralis,G. J., Gasquez, J., Jan and S<strong>of</strong>fietti, S. 1979.Physiological and ecological behaviour<br />
<strong>of</strong> broad leaved <strong>weeds</strong> resistant to atraz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> France. Proc.EWRS symposiumon<br />
the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> different factors on development and control <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong>,Ma<strong>in</strong>z.pp.217-<br />
224.(c.f. Weed Abstr.29:1177)<br />
Das,T. K and Duary, B.1999.Herbicide resistance <strong>in</strong> <strong>weeds</strong>. Annals <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />
Research.20(4):393-398<br />
Duke, S.O. 1998.Herbicide resistant crops-their <strong>in</strong>fluence on weed science. Journal <strong>of</strong> Weed<br />
Science and Technology (Zasso-Kenkuyu, Japan) 43:94-100.<br />
32
WEED AND CROP RESISTANCE TO HERBICIDES<br />
David Vitolo. 2001.Guide l<strong>in</strong>es to the management <strong>of</strong> herbicide resistant <strong>weeds</strong> The Herbicide<br />
Resistance Action Committee (HRAC). http://www.gcpf.org/<br />
Foster, R. J., Lawerence, J. M and Herrick, H. E.1980.Nitrate reductase <strong>in</strong>roots <strong>of</strong> lamb’s<br />
quarters biotypes resistant and susceptible to atraz<strong>in</strong>e Plant Physiology.65(6<br />
supplement):112<br />
Gill, H.S., Krishna Kumar and Kolar, J.S.1986. Resistance <strong>in</strong> weed biotypes to herbicides a<br />
review.Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Weed Science.18(2):90-105<br />
Gasquez, J and Compo<strong>in</strong>t, J. P.1980.The new atraz<strong>in</strong>e-resistant <strong>weeds</strong> <strong>in</strong> France: Amaranthus<br />
retr<strong>of</strong>lexusS.I.ChenopodiumpolyspermumL.Polygonupersicaria L. Chemosphere 9:39-<br />
43 (c.f. Weed Abstr.29:4207)<br />
Gasquez, Jand Compo<strong>in</strong>t, J.P.1981. Isoenzymatic variations <strong>in</strong> populations <strong>of</strong> Chenopodium<br />
album L. resistant to and susceptible to triaz<strong>in</strong>es. Agro-Ecosystems 7:1-10.(c.f. Weed<br />
Abstr.31:611)<br />
Hatzios, K. K. 1987.Biotechnology applications <strong>in</strong> weed management:Now and <strong>in</strong> the future.<br />
Advances <strong>in</strong> Agronomy.41:325-375<br />
Heap, I. M. 2007.International survey <strong>of</strong> herbicide resistant <strong>weeds</strong> on l<strong>in</strong>e s.Weed science<br />
Society <strong>of</strong> America.www.Weed science.org./<strong>in</strong>.asp.<br />
Holliday, R. Jand Putwa<strong>in</strong>, P.D. 1977.Evolution <strong>of</strong> resistance to simaz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Senecio<br />
vulgarisL.Weed Research.17:291-296<br />
Jodie, S. H and Radosevich,S. R.1983. Differential growth <strong>of</strong> two common groundsel(Senecio<br />
vulgaris)biotypes Weed Science.31: 112-120<br />
Kees, H.1978.Observations on the resistance <strong>of</strong> Chickweed (Stellaria media) to atraz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />
maize.Gesunde Pflanzen.30:137-139(c.f Weed Abstr.28:55)<br />
Lawerence, J. M., Foster, R. J and Herrick, H. E. 1980.Reduction <strong>of</strong> nitrate and nitrite <strong>in</strong><br />
lamb’s quarters biotypes resistant and susceptible to atraz<strong>in</strong>e toxicity. Plant<br />
Physiology.65:984-989<br />
Manju Sharma, Charak, K.S and Ramaiah, T.V. 2003.Agricultural biotechnology research <strong>in</strong><br />
India:Status and policies. Current Science. 84(3):297-302<br />
33
RAO<br />
Mathews, J.M.1997. Herbicide resistance.Ed.Stephen B.Powles and Joseph A.M.Hotur. Lewis<br />
Publisher.London pp.317-315<br />
Rao, A.S. 2006. Biotechnology applications <strong>in</strong> weed management. Proc.National symposium<br />
on ‘Conservation <strong>of</strong> Biodiversity and Applications <strong>of</strong> biotechnology’Andhra Loyola<br />
College,Vijayawada,11-12thAug,2006,pp.63<br />
Reddy, K.N. 2007.Herbicide–resistant crop and glyphosate–resistant <strong>weeds</strong> Abstracts <strong>of</strong><br />
papers.’New and emerg<strong>in</strong>g issues <strong>in</strong> Weed Science’,Biennial conference.ISWS/<br />
HAU,HisarNov.2-3,2007.pp.67<br />
Ryan,G.F. 1970. Resistanc <strong>of</strong> common groundsel to simaz<strong>in</strong>e and atraz<strong>in</strong>e. Weed<br />
Science.18:614-616<br />
Sankaran, S. 2001.Eco-friendly weed management options for susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture.<br />
Keynote address. First Biennial Conference<strong>in</strong> the new millenium, Indian Society <strong>of</strong><br />
Weed Science Bangalore, May,23-24.2001 pp.18-19<br />
Souza Machado, V. and Bandeen, J., Stephenson, G.R and Jensen, K.I.N.1977. Differetial<br />
atraz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>terfereance with Hill reaction <strong>of</strong> isolated chloroplasts from Chenopodium<br />
albumL biotypes. Weed Research. 17:407-413<br />
Souza Machado, V and Bandeen, J.D.1978.Atraz<strong>in</strong>e-resistant lamb’s quarters. Weeds Today<br />
9(2):11<br />
Timothy, S. Prather., Joseph, M and Ditomaso, 2000. Herbicide Resistance: Def<strong>in</strong>ition and<br />
Management Strategies, Publication 8012, Division <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Natural<br />
Resources, University <strong>of</strong> California.pp.21<br />
WSSA (Weed Science Society <strong>of</strong> America ).1998.Herbicide Hand book .Supplement to seventh<br />
edition, WSSA, Lawrence, Kansas, USA. pp.79-80<br />
Whitehead,C.W and Switzer. C.M 1963.The differential response <strong>of</strong> stra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> wild carrot to<br />
2,4-Dand related herbicides. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Sciences.43:255-262<br />
Yadav, A and Malik,R. K. 2007.Herbicide resistance <strong>in</strong> Phalaris m<strong>in</strong>or and management<br />
options.Abstracts <strong>of</strong> papers’New and emerg<strong>in</strong>g issues <strong>in</strong> Weed Science’,Biennial<br />
conference.ISWS/HAU,HisarNov.2-3,2007.pp. b73<br />
Yaduraju, N.T., Chandrabhanu and Sushilkumar, 2005.Biological control <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong>:potential<br />
and prospects.Abstract book.First International Weed Science Sem<strong>in</strong>ar. West Bengal<br />
Weed Science Society,Kolkata,Jan.21-24.pp.ItoXII<br />
Youngman, R. J and Dodge, A.D.1980. Paraquat resistance <strong>in</strong> Conyza.Plant Physiology.65(6<br />
supplement):12<br />
34
J.Res. ANGRAU 37(3&4)35-43, 2009<br />
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON HETEROSIS FOR PRODUCTIVITY AND<br />
FIBRE QUALITY TRAITS IN INTRA-HERBACEUM AND<br />
INTERSPECIFIC(G. herbaceum L. × G. arboreum L.) CROSSES OF<br />
DIPLOID COTTON<br />
VEMANNA IRADDI and S. T. KAJJIDONI<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad -580 005<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A comparative study <strong>of</strong> heterosis was made <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g four female parents <strong>of</strong> Gossypium herbaceum<br />
L. and four male parents <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> G. herbaceum L. and G. arboreum L. These were evaluated to select donor<br />
parents for the exploitation <strong>of</strong> heterosis for different seed cotton yield, fibre quality traits and seed oil content.<br />
In the present study, superiority <strong>of</strong> the hybrids was observed over better parent and standard check Jayadhar<br />
for all the characters. The hybrids identified for high yield viz., RDC-53xMB-3200, KS-16xMB-3200,<br />
KS-16xMDL-2582, RAHS-14xMDL-2601, RAHS-14xDLSA-17 and RDC-88 DLSA-17 exhibited significant<br />
positive heterosis for seed cotton yield and fibre quality traits. However, hybrids failed to account heterosis<br />
over check Jayadhar for l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex and g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn except few crosses viz., RAHS-14xMB-3200,<br />
RAHS-14xBLACH-1, RDC-88xBLACH-1, RAHS-14xDLSA-17, RDC-88xAK-235. Although superiority <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>traspecific crosses for seed cotton yield was due to cumulative action <strong>of</strong> component traits like boll weight and<br />
number <strong>of</strong> bolls per plant, whereas boll number <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses for better expression <strong>of</strong> heterosis <strong>of</strong><br />
seed cotton yield <strong>in</strong> diploid cotton. However, <strong>in</strong> the present <strong>in</strong>vestigation for seed cotton yield <strong>in</strong> both sets <strong>of</strong><br />
hybrids contribution <strong>of</strong> boll weight is relatively more than number <strong>of</strong> bolls per plant.<br />
Cotton the ‘white gold’ enjoys a pre-em<strong>in</strong>ent status among all cash crops <strong>in</strong> the<br />
country, be<strong>in</strong>g the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal raw material for a flourish<strong>in</strong>g textile <strong>in</strong>dustry. In India, <strong>in</strong>spite <strong>of</strong><br />
severe competition from synthetic fibres <strong>in</strong> recent years, it is occupy<strong>in</strong>g the premier position<br />
with as much as 70 per cent share <strong>in</strong> the textile <strong>in</strong>dustry. Presently, cultivation <strong>of</strong> varieties<br />
and hybrids <strong>of</strong> tetraploid cotton is more risky and non-remunerative. The <strong>in</strong>creased cost <strong>of</strong><br />
cultivation <strong>of</strong> these cotton hybrids is due to high seed cost, more plant protection as they are<br />
susceptible types and needs higher fertilizer dose. On the contrary, diploid cottons virtually<br />
<strong>in</strong>volve low seed cost, low or no cost for plant protection and require comparatively less crop<br />
nutrition.<br />
Look<strong>in</strong>g to this, one will really be optimistic for cultivation <strong>of</strong> diploid cotton provided<br />
they yield at least on par with varieties and hybrids <strong>of</strong> tetraploid cotton and must possess<br />
equivalent fibre quality. For development <strong>of</strong> superior and heterotic hybrids <strong>in</strong> cotton, it is<br />
essential to have <strong>in</strong>formation about the extent <strong>of</strong> heterosis present <strong>in</strong> the hybrid comb<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />
Besides this, the quality <strong>of</strong> fibre plays major role <strong>in</strong> pric<strong>in</strong>g and market<strong>in</strong>g the produce. There<br />
email.id: vemanraddi@gmail.com<br />
35
IRADDI and KAJJIDONI<br />
is need to have more quality consciousness <strong>in</strong> addition to yield. While evolv<strong>in</strong>g new hybrids/<br />
varieties, it is more so particular <strong>in</strong> diploid cotton which are severely suffer<strong>in</strong>g from short<br />
staple length and coarse nature.<br />
Apart from this, one <strong>of</strong> the most important current scientific paradox with respect to<br />
cotton breed<strong>in</strong>g which has evoked the attention <strong>of</strong> plant breeder is the diversification <strong>of</strong><br />
cotton crop as an oil seed crop besides its fibre because <strong>of</strong> its nutritionally desirable oil<br />
quality and it can become one <strong>of</strong> the avenues for shorten<strong>in</strong>g the quantum <strong>of</strong> edible oil import.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The experimental material for the present study was selected from lead<strong>in</strong>g centres<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g on diploid cotton and were evaluated to select donor parents and hybrids for different<br />
seed cotton yield, fibre quality traits and seed oil content along with agronomically superior<br />
varieties. Out <strong>of</strong> the promis<strong>in</strong>g collections, 12 parents <strong>of</strong> two diploid species viz., Gossypium<br />
herbaceum L. and Gossypium arboreum L. were selected. Four females (Gossypium herbaceum<br />
L.) viz., RAHS-14, KS-16, RDC-53, RDC-88 and eight males (Gossypium herbaceum L. and<br />
Gossypium arboreum L.) viz., RAHS-131, 9747, MB-3200, BLACH-1, AK-235, DLSA-17,<br />
MDL-2601 and MDL-2582 were crossed to produce 32 F 1<br />
s.<br />
The 32 F 1<br />
s along with their parents were grown <strong>in</strong> a randomized block design at Ma<strong>in</strong><br />
Agricultural Research Station, Dharwad dur<strong>in</strong>g kharif 2006-07 at 90x30 cm spac<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Observations were recorded on 12 characters <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g seed cotton yield, yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g<br />
characters and fibre quality traits from five randomly selected plants <strong>in</strong> each replication for<br />
each treatment. The data was analysed as per the procedure given by Kempthrone (1957)<br />
and heterosis was calculated <strong>in</strong> percentage.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Yield and yield components<br />
The magnitude <strong>of</strong> heterosis was high for seed cotton yield compared to rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
traits. Among two sets <strong>of</strong> hybrids, the <strong>in</strong>tra-herbaceum crosses exhibited better heterosis<br />
than <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses for seed cotton yield and its component characters (Table 1 and<br />
2). Although, superiority <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>traspecific crosses for seed cotton yield was due to the cumulative<br />
action <strong>of</strong> components traits like boll weight and number <strong>of</strong> bolls per plant, whereas boll<br />
number <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses for better expression <strong>of</strong> heterosis <strong>of</strong> seed cotton yield (Bhatade,<br />
1983 and S<strong>in</strong>gh et al., 1995). However <strong>in</strong> the present <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong> both sets <strong>of</strong> crosses for<br />
seed cotton yield, contribution <strong>of</strong> boll weight was relatively more than number <strong>of</strong> bolls per<br />
plant.<br />
Ten <strong>in</strong>tra herbaceum crosses exhibited heterobeltiosis and three crosses standard<br />
heterosis for seed cotton yield. They also exhibited significant heterosis for seed cotton<br />
36
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON HETEROSIS FOR PRODUCTIVITY<br />
yield and boll weight. Out <strong>of</strong> 16 <strong>in</strong>tra herbaceum crosses, the cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation KS-16 ´<br />
BLACH-1 exhibited high mean seed cotton yield <strong>of</strong> 82.5 g per plant, with high standard<br />
heterosis <strong>of</strong> 38.66 per cent over Jayadhar and moderately high boll weight <strong>of</strong> 1.98 g. The<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> heterosis are <strong>in</strong> agreement with the studies <strong>of</strong> Reddy (2001) and Neelima (2002).<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 16 crosses, four crosses KS-16 xMB-3200, KS-16xBLACH-1, RDC-53xMB-3200 and<br />
RDC-88x9747 were identified based on seed cotton yield per plant, seed cotton yield per plot<br />
and fibre quality traits. Among these crosses, two <strong>of</strong> them viz., KS-16xMB-3200 and<br />
RDC-53xMB-3200 also exhibited significant positive heterosis for fibre quality trait 2.5 per<br />
cent span length.<br />
Seven <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses exhibited significant standard heterosis for seed cotton<br />
yield. Out <strong>of</strong> 16 <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses, the cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation KS-16xMDL-2582 exhibited<br />
high mean seed cotton yield <strong>of</strong> 78.25 g per plant, with high standard heterosis <strong>of</strong> 31.57 per<br />
cent over Jayadhar, it has medium to high boll number and high boll weight <strong>of</strong> 2.02 g. Four<br />
crosses viz., KS-16xDLSA-17, KS-16xMDL-2582, RDC-53xAK-235 and RDC-88xDLSA-17<br />
exhibited significant positive heterosis for seed cotton yield per plant and boll weight. The<br />
cross KS-16xAK-235 exhibited heterosis for seed cotton yield and number <strong>of</strong> bolls per plant.<br />
These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> heterosis are <strong>in</strong> agreement with the studies <strong>of</strong> Reddy (2001) and Neelima<br />
(2002). Five crosses RAHS-14xDLSA-17, KS-16xAK-235, KS-16xMDL-2582, RDC-53x<br />
MDL-2582 and RDC-88xDLSA-17 were identified based on seed cotton yield and yield<br />
components and fibre quality traits. The crosses identified for high seed cotton yield viz.,<br />
KS-16xMDL-2582, KS-16xAK-235 and RDC-88xDLSA-17 exhibited significant positive<br />
heterosis for majority <strong>of</strong> quality traits like 2.5 per cent span length, uniformity ratio, fibre<br />
strength and seed cotton yield.<br />
Economic traits<br />
Among the economic traits <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the study g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn per cent, primarily<br />
depends on seed weight and l<strong>in</strong>t weight. L<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex represents the absolute weight <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>t<br />
produced per seed. This character can be considered as more important <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g work<br />
rather g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g percentage as it is highly correlated with the l<strong>in</strong>t yield. L<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex is a<br />
complementation <strong>of</strong> high seed <strong>in</strong>dex and high g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn per cent.<br />
In both sets <strong>of</strong> hybrids, most <strong>of</strong> the crosses failed to record significant positive<br />
heterosis for g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn and l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex, but exhibited significant standard heterosis for<br />
seed <strong>in</strong>dex. Similar f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were also reported by Kajjidoni (1997), Laxman and Ganesh<br />
(2003) and Manickam and Gururajan (2004). Among <strong>in</strong>tra-herbaceum crosses,<br />
RAHS-14x MB-3200 exhibited heterosis for g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out turn per cent, seed <strong>in</strong>dex and l<strong>in</strong>t<br />
<strong>in</strong>dex. Among <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses, RAHS-14xDLSA-17 and RDC-88xAK-235 exhibited<br />
significant positive heterosis for l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex, seed cotton yield and seed <strong>in</strong>dex.<br />
37
IRADDI and KAJJIDONI<br />
Fibre quality traits<br />
In recent years, more emphasis is laid on quality traits apart from seed cotton yield.<br />
For 2.5 per cent span length, six crosses exhibited heterobeltiosis and eight crosses accounted<br />
significant standard heterosis. Among <strong>in</strong>tra herbaceum crosses, RDC-53xMB-3200 identified<br />
for high heterosis for seed cotton yield also exhibited significant standard heterosis for 2.5<br />
per cent span length. The results <strong>of</strong> heterosis are <strong>in</strong> conformity with the reports <strong>of</strong> Reddy<br />
(2001), Neelima (2002) and Tuteja et al. (2005). Four crosses manifested heterobeltiosis and<br />
three crosses viz., RAHS-14xRAHS-131, RDC-88xRAHS-131 and RDC-88xMB-3200 recorded<br />
significant standard heterosis for fibre strength. They also recorded significant positive<br />
heterosis over check Jayadhar for 2.5 per cent span length. The present f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs corroborate<br />
with Tuteja et al. (2005).<br />
For 2.5 per cent span length, n<strong>in</strong>e crosses recorded high heterobeltiosis while all the<br />
16 crosses were superior over check Jayadhar. The <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses viz., KS-16x<br />
MDL-2582, KS-16xAK-235, RDC-88xDLSA-17 and RDC-53xAK-235 recorded high heterosis<br />
for seed cotton yield and the quality traits 2.5 per cent span length, uniformity ratio and fibre<br />
strength. The results <strong>of</strong> heterosis are <strong>in</strong> conformity with the reports <strong>of</strong> Reddy (2001), Neelima<br />
(2002) and Tuteja et al. (2005). Ten crosses recorded significant positive heterosis over<br />
better parent and 15 crosses over the check Jayadhar for fibre strength.<br />
Oil content<br />
None <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tra-herbaceum crosses exhibited significant heterosis over standard<br />
check Jayadhar. However seven crosses recorded significant heterobeltiosis for oil content.<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> these, two crosses viz., KS-16xBLACH-1 and RDC-53xMB-3200 recorded significant<br />
positive heterosis for seed cotton yield and oil content. None <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses,<br />
exhibited significant heterosis over standard check Jayadhar. But, seven crosses exhibited<br />
significant heterobeltiosis. Out <strong>of</strong> these crosses, KS-16xMDL-2601 exhibited significant<br />
positive heterosis for seed <strong>in</strong>dex, 2.5 per cent span length, uniformity ratio, and fibre strength.<br />
The best cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation for seed cotton yield was KS-16xBLACH-1 among <strong>in</strong>traherbaceum<br />
crosses. Among these crosses, RDC-53xMB-3200 exhibited significant positive<br />
heterosis for 2.5 per cent span length and seed cotton yield. The best comb<strong>in</strong>ation for fibre<br />
quality traits was KS-16xMB-3200.<br />
The best cross comb<strong>in</strong>ation for seed cotton yield among <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses was<br />
KS-16xMDL-2582. Among these, four crosses KS-16xMDL-2582, RAHS-14xMDL-2601 and<br />
RDC-88xDLSA-17 exhibited significant positive heterosis for seed cotton yield, 2.5 per cent<br />
span length, uniformity ratio, and fibre strength. The best comb<strong>in</strong>ation for fibre quality traits<br />
was RDC-88xDLSA-17. Among these crosses, RDC-88xDLSA-17 exhibited significant positive<br />
heterosis for 2.5 per cent span length, uniformity ratio and fibre strength.<br />
38
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON HETEROSIS FOR PRODUCTIVITY<br />
Table 1. Per cent heterosis for yield, yield components and fibre quality traits <strong>of</strong> Intraherbaceum<br />
Cotton.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> bolls<br />
per plant<br />
Boll weight (g)<br />
Seed cotton yield<br />
per plant (g)<br />
Seed cotton yield<br />
per plot (g)<br />
G<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g outturn<br />
(%)<br />
L<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex (g)<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Crosses<br />
RAHS-14 RAHS-131 1.74 -2.01 -3.42 6.02 1.15 10.92 32.08* 27.85*<br />
3.21 -6.86* 15.75 0.43<br />
RAHS-14 9747 1.74 -2.01 18.49* 30.08** 20.31** 31.93** 18.87 15.07 1.63 -11.32** 1.98 -2.96<br />
RAHS-14 MB-3200 0.00 -3.68 4.11 14.29 3.45 13.45 -3.77 -6.85 21.33** 8.65* 36.24** 34.58**<br />
RAHS-14 BLACH-1 -13.19 -16.39* -4.11 5.26 -15.71* -7.56 0.00 -3.20 0.44 2.80<br />
19.03* 18.78**<br />
KS-16 RAHS-131 20.55*<br />
2.01 10.63 3.31 36.36** 13.45 19.70 44.29** -4.31 -7.97* 1.09 2.64<br />
KS-16 9747 12.65 -4.68 24.14** 35.34** 60.61** 33.61** -7.88 11.42 -5.03<br />
--8.66* -4.41 -2.96<br />
KS-16 MB-3200 1.19 -14.38 7.97 13.03 33.84** 11.34<br />
14.39 37.90** -1.84 -5.60 5.39 7.00<br />
KS-16 BLACH-1 21.74* 3.01 27.86** 19.40* 66.67** 38.66** 75.76** 111.87** -21.50** -24.03** -19.00* -17.77*<br />
RDC-53 RAHS-131 20.41* -1.34 8.55 -0.75 33.89** 1.26<br />
-4.88 -28.77* 5.66 1.01 20.05* 8.53<br />
RDC-53 9747 2.45<br />
-16.05* 18.62* 29.32** 43.62** 13.45 30.61 -2.19 -14.93** -18.67** -7.42 -11.90*<br />
RDC-53 MB-3200 20.82* -1.00 2.90 6.77 39.58** 12.61 82.93** 36.99*<br />
5.62 0.98 8.30 7.00<br />
RDC-53 BLACH-1 -0.57 -18.53* 1.15 -7.52 8.89 -17.65* 58.54**<br />
18.72 -5.39 -8.44* 0.08 -0.13<br />
RDC-88 RAHS-131 8.10 2.68 22.94* 0.75 30.10* 7.14 33.70* 12.3 -0.60<br />
-4.93 1.99 4.89<br />
RDC-88 9747 1.06 -4.01 -4.14 4.51 28.57** 5.88<br />
45.65* 22.37 -4.50 -8.66* -2.43 0.34<br />
RDC-88 MB-3200 -3.52 -8.36 -26.09** -23.31* -8.16 -24.37** -17.39 -30.59* -4.27 -8.44* 1.10 3.97<br />
RDC-88 BLACH-1 -21.83* -25.75** 7.89 -7.52 -17.35* -31.93** -23.91 -36.07* 3.07 -0.25 14.84* 18.11**<br />
SE+ 4.02<br />
2.81 0.17 0.13 5.28 4.24 89.08 70.73 1.95 0.95 0.25 0.13<br />
CD at 5 % 8.34 5.95 0.36 0.29 10.94 9.02 184.52 150.17<br />
Contd….1 st page<br />
4.04 2.02 0.54 0.27<br />
39
IRADDI and KAJJIDONI<br />
Table1. contd…..<br />
Seed <strong>in</strong>dex (g)<br />
2.5% span length<br />
(mm)<br />
Uniformity ratio (%)<br />
Fibre strength<br />
(g/tex)<br />
Micronaire value<br />
(g/<strong>in</strong>)<br />
Oil content (%)<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Crosses<br />
RAHS-14 RAHS-131 10.53** 11.14** 12.05** 7.60** 11.20** 2.15** 22.29** 10.07** -13.12** -6.98** 8.16** 1.60<br />
RAHS-14 9747 -9.14** 15.3** 3.71** -0.42 7.88** -0.90** 3.32** -7.00** -11.87** -5.64** 3.57 1.92<br />
RAHS-14 MB-3200 2.92 19.04** -1.51* 4.83** 2.66** 4.40** -7.09** -6.14** -33.57** -28.87** 2.04 -4.15<br />
RAHS-14 BLACH-1 18.20** 23.88** 0.95 2.57** 2.21** -0.54 -0.73 -4.44** -19.20** -13.48** 8.50** 1.92<br />
KS-16 RAHS-131 7.48** 15.76** 2.65** -2.06** 10.90** -0.88** 11.55** -10.93** 0.70 -3.06 -3.59 -5.75*<br />
KS-16 9747 -9.14** 15.33** 1.82** -2.86** 0.82** -10.89** 2.51** -17.51** -4.79** -6.79** 2.60 0.96<br />
KS-16 MB-3200 0.67 16.44** 19.77** 27.48** -23.32** -22.02** -6.90** -5.95** -3.97* -7.55** 3.59 1.28<br />
KS-16 BLACH-1 11.82** 20.44** -6.96** -5.47** 6.55** 3.68** -5.79** -9.32** 0.50 -3.25 6.21* 3.83<br />
RDC-53 RAHS-131 6.43**<br />
7.02** 2.91** 1.74** -1.61** -3.56** -3.56** -2.15** -2.24 -8.03** 7.28** 3.51<br />
RDC-53 9747 -7.19** 17.80** -3.15** -4.26** -9.61** -11.41** -9.69* -8.38** 11.04** 8.70** 3.25 1.60<br />
RDC-53 MB-3200 -8.74** 5.56** -0.47 5.93** -6.64** -4.55** -5.57** -4.20** -5.28** -10.90** 5.30* 1.60<br />
RDC-53 BLACH-1 8.29** 13.56** -2.55** -1.30** -5.18** -7.07** -6.74** -5.39** -7.42** -12.91** 0.99 -2.56<br />
RDC-88 RAHS-131 3.40*<br />
12.98** -2.08** 9.36** 1.88** 8.33** -3.35** 10.96** -2.15 -8.80** 4.24 -5.75*<br />
RDC-88 9747 -9.88** 14.39** -15.34** -5.45** -16.13** -10.82** -40.79* -32.02** -7.91** -9.85** -0.97 -2.56<br />
RDC-88 MB-3200 2.13<br />
18.13** -3.36** 7.93** 2.99** 9.51** -4.32** 9.86** -2.48 -9.66** 11.43** -0.32<br />
RDC-88 BLACH-1 8.74** 18.82** -14.36** -4.35** -11.32** -5.71** -12.03** 1.00 -4.19*<br />
-10.42** 10.00** 1.92<br />
SE+ 0.14<br />
0.04 0.18 0.06 0.16 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.52 0.37<br />
CD at 5 % 0.29<br />
0.09 0.40 0.13 0.32 0.21 0.27 0.21 0.24 0.21 1.10 0.79<br />
40
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON HETEROSIS FOR PRODUCTIVITY<br />
Table 2. Per cent heterosis for yield, yield components and fibre quality traits <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter-specific crosses<br />
(G. herbaceum L. G. arboreum L.) <strong>of</strong> diploid cotton.<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> bolls per<br />
plant<br />
Boll weight (g)<br />
Seed cotton yield<br />
per plant (g)<br />
Seed cotton yield<br />
per plot (g)<br />
G<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g outturn (%) L<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dex (g)<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Crosses<br />
RAHS-14 AK-235 0.35 -3.34 -8.90 0.00 -5.56 3.57 24.53 20.55 -18.03** -11.40** -11.05 -7.30**<br />
RAHS-14 DLSA-17 13.89 9.70 -7.53 1.50 10.34 21.01** 1.89 -1.37 -9.61** -4.33** 5.73 9.49**<br />
RAHS-14 MDL-2582 -6.94 -10.37 -29.45 -22.56** -39.46** -33.61** -60.38** -61.64** -5.91 -17.90** 5.30 -12.80**<br />
RAHS-14 MDL-2601 1.39 -2.34 -10.27 -1.50 -5.94 3.15 -15.09 -17.81 -18.55** -15.84** -2.62 -9.77**<br />
KS-16 AK-235 32.45** 17.39* 7.89 0.75 50.76** 25.42** 7.58 29.68 -27.09** -21.19** -25.92** -22.79**<br />
KS-16 DLSA-17 5.38 -1.67 36.88** 27.82** 37.00** 15.13* -27.27 -12.33 -20.03** -15.37** -10.91 -7.74**<br />
KS-16 MDL-2582 22.92* 4.01 18.25** 21.80** 58.08** 31.57** 15.15 38.81 -6.12 -9.71** -0.32 1.20<br />
KS-16 MDL-2601 9.41 -7.42 -2.58 -9.02 8.33 -9.87 -34.85* -21.46 -11.75** -8.82** -2.87 -1.38<br />
RDC-53 AK-235 24.53* 10.37 25.82** 15.04* 61.54** 23.53** 36.59 2.28 -15.23** -8.36** -4.21 0.17<br />
RDC-53 DLSA-17 -2.87 -9.36 2.80 -6.02 4.50 -17.18 17.07 -12.33 -21.80** -17.23** -17.45** -14.51**<br />
RDC-53 MDL-2582 5.31 -13.75 5.84 9.02 23.74** 2.94 -12.20 -34.25 -22.80** -26.20** -11.72 -20.20**<br />
RDC-53 MDL-2601 20.82* -1.00 -12.83* -20.30** 16.39 -11.97 43.90 7.76 -23.49** -20.95** -11.25 -17.77**<br />
RDC-88 AK-235 19.37* 13.38 34.31** 3.01 51.53** 24.79** -23.90 -36.07 -8.66* -1.26 6.84 11.35**<br />
RDC-88 DLSA-17 5.63 0.33 28.10** 16.54** 45.00** 21.85** 32.61 11.42 -16.97** -12.13** -12.43* -9.32**<br />
RDC-88 MDL-2582 -3.17 -8.03 -23.50** -21.20** -7.58 -23.11** 13.04 -5.02 -14.15** -17.90** -20.41** -18.14**<br />
RDC-88 MDL-2601 1.06 -4.01 -11.02 -21.05** 0.51 -17.23* 50.00 26.03 -12.36** -9.45** -8.24 -5.63*<br />
SE+ 4.32 2.78 0.11 0.08 5.42 4.07 128.52 105.38 1.61 0.42 0.21 0.07<br />
CD at 5 % 8.95 5.89 0.26 0.19 11.24 8.62 266.20 223.75 3.33 0.90 0.45 0.14<br />
41
IRADDI and KAJJIDONI<br />
Table 2. contd….<br />
Seed <strong>in</strong>dex (g)<br />
2.5% span length<br />
(mm)<br />
Uniformity ratio (%)<br />
Fibre strength<br />
(g/tex)<br />
Micronaire value<br />
(g/<strong>in</strong>)<br />
Oil content (%)<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Heterobeltiosis<br />
Standard<br />
Heterosis<br />
Crosses<br />
RAHS-14 AK-235 12.84* 10.29** -5.38** 10.78** -4.31** 11.42** -9.65** 6.19** -30.45** -25.53** 9.46** 3.51<br />
RAHS-14 DLSA-17 19.53** 16.83** -3.89** 16.10** -4.86** 15.78** -43.84** -32.16** -28.84** -23.80** 2.86 3.51<br />
RAHS-14 MDL-2582 6.99** 15.08** -1.17 11.68** 19.05** 26.41** 6.79** 19.85** -27.68** -22.56** 8.50** 1.92<br />
RAHS-14 MDL-2601 17.74** 15.08** -3.03** 9.03** -7.95** 6.90** -6.73** 1.56** -44.73** -40.82** 6.10* 0.00<br />
KS-16 AK-235 -0.03 7.67** -5.57** 10.56** -6.21** 9.21** -8.64** 7.38** -32.27** -34.80** 3.27 0.96<br />
KS-16 DLSA-17 8.47** 16.83** 4.64** 26.40** -12.78** 6.68** -4.50** 15.35** -28.50** -31.17** 1.90 2.56<br />
KS-16 MDL-2582 8.87** 17.26** 4.30** 17.86** 4.52** 10.98** 11.02** 24.59** -8.14** -11.57** 1.63 -0.64<br />
KS-16 MDL-2601 4.60** 12.66** 11.99** 25.92** -13.05** 0.97** 16.55** 26.91** -2.28* -5.93** 4.90* 2.56<br />
RDC-53 AK-235 17.17** 13.23** 10.75** 29.67** 7.05** 24.65** 8.68** 27.74** -19.31** -24.09** -2.32 -5.75*<br />
RDC-53 DLSA-17 15.48** 11.60** -2.874** 17.37** -7.16** 12.91** -0.80 19.82** -13.31** -18.45** -12.06** -11.50**<br />
RDC-53 MDL-2582 12.82** 21.36**<br />
10.67** 25.06** 25.46** 33.22** 14.37** 28.36** -10.47** -15.77** -5.30* -8.63**<br />
RDC-53 MDL-2601 18.19** 14.21** 11.64** 25.52** 4.25** 21.06** 17.88** 28.36** -29.27** -33.46** 6.20* 2.56<br />
RDC-88 AK-235 3.92** 13.55** 0.34 17.48** 2.91** 19.83** 4.81** 23.19** -14.34** -20.65** 2.70 -2.88<br />
RDC-88 DLSA-17 -0.26** 8.98** 4.33** 26.03** 7.53** 30.78** 6.73** 28.93** -27.14** -32.50** 1.27 1.92<br />
RDC-88 MDL-2582 -1.06** 8.11** 9.64** 23.90** 12.89** 20.03** 7.83** 23.81** -4.28** -45.60** 6.92** -1.28<br />
RDC-88 MDL-2601 -0.32** 8.92** 9.47** 23.08** -5.56 9.67** 7.62** 23.57** -23.94** -29.54** 6.78** 0.64<br />
SE+ 0.11<br />
0.06 0.24 0.17 0.13 0.07 0.13 0.11 0.07 0.06 0.49 0.38<br />
CD at 5 % 0.25<br />
0.12 0.49 0.36 0.26 0.14 0.28 0.24 0.15 0.12 1.03 0.81<br />
42
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON HETEROSIS FOR PRODUCTIVITY<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Bhatade, S. S. 1983. Environmental <strong>in</strong>fluence on the magnitude <strong>of</strong> heterosis <strong>in</strong> G. arboreum<br />
L. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Science. 53 (8): 627-633.<br />
Kajjidoni, S. T. 1997. Histological basis <strong>of</strong> genetic male sterility and its utilization <strong>in</strong> hybrid<br />
development <strong>in</strong> diploid cottons. Ph. D. Thesis submitted to University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural<br />
Sciences, Dharwad.<br />
Kempthrone, O. 1957. An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, 1 st Edn.,<br />
New York, USA. pp. 456-471.<br />
Laxman, S and Ganesh, M. 2003. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability for yield components and fibre characters<br />
<strong>in</strong> cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). The Journal <strong>of</strong> Research ANGRAU. 31 (4): 19-23.<br />
Manickam, S and Gururajan, K. N. 2004. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis for fibre quality <strong>in</strong> upland<br />
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal <strong>of</strong> Indian Society for Cotton Improvement.<br />
29 (2): 86-91.<br />
Neelima, S. 2002. Heterosis and comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis for yield and yield components <strong>in</strong><br />
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis submitted to Acharya N. G.<br />
Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad.<br />
Reddy, A. N. 2001. Heterosis, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability and stability analysis <strong>of</strong> hybrids for yield and<br />
yield components <strong>in</strong> cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Ph. D. Thesis submitted to<br />
Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh, H., S<strong>in</strong>gh, S and Omprakash, 1995. Heterotic response <strong>of</strong> ten American cotton hybrids<br />
for some quality traits. Journal <strong>of</strong> Cotton Research and Development. 9 (1): 13-16.<br />
Tuteja, O. P., Kumar, S., Hasan, H and S<strong>in</strong>gh, M. 2005, Heterosis and <strong>in</strong>terrelationship<br />
between seed cotton yield and qualitative characters <strong>in</strong> upland cotton (Gossypium<br />
hirsutum L.). Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Science. 75 (3): 167-171.<br />
43
J.Res. ANGRAU 37(3&4)44-51, 2009<br />
DIVERSITY OF WEEDS IN THE SORGHUM (Sorghum bicolor (L.)<br />
Moench.) FIELDS OF ANDHRA PRADESH<br />
P. KIRAN BABU, M. ELANGOVAN and J. S. MISHRA<br />
Directorate <strong>of</strong> Sorghum Research (DSR)<br />
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad – 500030, AP<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
The study was conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g 2007-2009 to identify major <strong>weeds</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong> <strong>in</strong> different regions<br />
<strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. Results revealed that the fields were <strong>in</strong>fested with 105 weed species. They belonged to 82<br />
genera and 32 families <strong>of</strong> which 90 were dicotyledons and 15 monocotyledons. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant weed <strong>of</strong> the<br />
regions belonged to the families amaranthaceae, poaceae, fabaceae, asteraceae, euphorbiaceae and<br />
solanaceae <strong>of</strong> the regions, Celosia argentea, Digera muricata, Trichodesma <strong>in</strong>dicum, Euphorbia hirta, Tribulus<br />
terrestris, Parthenium hysterophorus, Chloris <strong>in</strong>flata, Portulaca oleracea, Boerhavia diffusa and Cleome viscosa<br />
were dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>weeds</strong>. The most dom<strong>in</strong>ant weed species <strong>in</strong> Rayalaseema region were Digera muricata<br />
(37.87), Celosia argentea (32.85), and Cleome viscosa (21.20). In the Telangana region dom<strong>in</strong>ant species<br />
were Digera muricata (42.49), Celosia argentea (38.01) and Parthenium hysterophorus (22.61). In Coastal<br />
Andhra, the dom<strong>in</strong>ant species were Digera muricata (41.38), Cleome viscosa (33.06) and Portulaca oleracea<br />
(30.48).<br />
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is an important cereal crop grown <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y<br />
and post ra<strong>in</strong>y seasons <strong>in</strong> semi-arid regions <strong>of</strong> the country on the marg<strong>in</strong>al lands. In India,<br />
the crop is mostly grown <strong>in</strong> Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh,<br />
Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu. In Andhra Pradesh, <strong>sorghum</strong> is cultivated<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> Rayalaseema and Telangana zones dur<strong>in</strong>g the ra<strong>in</strong>y season and <strong>in</strong> coastal pla<strong>in</strong>s<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g post – ra<strong>in</strong>y season as rice fallows. The <strong>sorghum</strong> fields <strong>of</strong> these zones are <strong>in</strong>fested<br />
heavily with large number <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong>, caus<strong>in</strong>g heavy losses to the crop yields. Uncontrolled<br />
<strong>weeds</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong> reduces crop yield by 15-65% depend<strong>in</strong>g on the nature and <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong><br />
weed flora, agro-ecological situations and management practices (Okafor and Zitta, 1991<br />
and Mishra, 1997). The losses due to <strong>weeds</strong> are more dur<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>y than post-ra<strong>in</strong>y season.<br />
The nature and <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> weed flora varies depend<strong>in</strong>g on agro – ecological conditions and<br />
management practices. To develop effective and economical weed management practices<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong>, it is necessary to identify the weed flora, their nature and <strong>in</strong>tensity. Hence, the<br />
present <strong>in</strong>vestigation was undertaken to study the diversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong> <strong>in</strong> different<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The study was carried dur<strong>in</strong>g 2007-2009 to identify major <strong>weeds</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong> <strong>in</strong> different<br />
regions <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh The state <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh has 23 districts which are grouped<br />
<strong>in</strong>to three zones: 1). Circar or Coastal Andhra compris<strong>in</strong>g the districts <strong>of</strong> Srikakulam,<br />
Vijayanagaram, Visakhapatnam, East Godavari, West Godavari, Krishna, Guntur, Prakasam<br />
E-mail: elangovan@<strong>sorghum</strong>.res.<strong>in</strong><br />
44
DIVERSITY OF WEEDS IN THE SORGHUM<br />
and Nellore. 2). Rayalaseema region consists <strong>of</strong> Kurnool, kadapa, Anantapur and Chittoor<br />
districts and 3). Telangana region <strong>in</strong>cludes Adilabad, Hyderabad, Karimnagar, Khammam,<br />
Mahbubnagar, Medak, Nalgonda, Nizamabad, Rangareddy and Warangal districts. The<br />
diversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>sorghum</strong> fields <strong>in</strong> all the three regions was studied. All the <strong>weeds</strong><br />
encountered <strong>in</strong> the <strong>sorghum</strong> fields <strong>of</strong> each district. In each district hav<strong>in</strong>g 3-5 field site<br />
villages. In Rayalaseema, Kurnool (Nandikotkur, Nandyal, Atmakur, Kodumur, Yemmiganur),<br />
Kadapa (Badvel, B.Matam, Pulivendula, Jyothi, Rayachoti), Chittoor (Kanipakam, Puttur,<br />
Kambakkam, Satyavedu, Mangalam), Anantapur (Uravakonda, Peddamushtur, Tadipatri,<br />
Gorantla, Vajrakarur). In Telangana region Mahbubnagar (Appapur, vanaparthi, Kollapur, Ija,<br />
Mannanur), Hyderabad (Rajendranagar, Shamsabad), Warangal (Hanmakonda, Khazipet,<br />
Pakal, Warangal). In Coastal Andhra, Prakasam (Giddalur, Kambam, Markapuram, Dornala,<br />
Podili), Nellore (Atmakur, B.Palem, Somasila), Guntur (Macherla, Karempudi, V<strong>in</strong>ugonda,<br />
Sattenapalli), East Godavari (Draksharamam, Yanam, Ramachandrapuram, Mummidivaram),<br />
Srikakulam (Amudalavalasa, Vemulada, Tekkali, Ichapuram). All the <strong>weeds</strong> encountered <strong>in</strong><br />
the <strong>sorghum</strong> fields were carefully collected and identified. Random quadrat method was<br />
adopted for study<strong>in</strong>g phyto-sociological attributes <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong>. In each field site quadrat <strong>of</strong> 1m<br />
x 1m was laid down <strong>in</strong> each village and a sum <strong>of</strong> 20 quadrats for each region. These studies<br />
were carried <strong>in</strong> the flower<strong>in</strong>g stage <strong>of</strong> the crop.<br />
Vegetation composition was evaluated by analyz<strong>in</strong>g the frequency, density and<br />
Importance Value Index (IVI) accord<strong>in</strong>g to Mishra (1968) and Curtis and McIntosh (1950). IVI<br />
(Importance Value Index) = Relative Density + Relative Frequency + Relative Dom<strong>in</strong>ance.<br />
All the <strong>weeds</strong> from each quadrat were collected separately <strong>in</strong> polythene bags. Every<br />
specimen was carefully studied regard<strong>in</strong>g vegetative and reproductive features. Provisional<br />
identification was made follow<strong>in</strong>g ‘Flora <strong>of</strong> Presidency <strong>of</strong> Madras’ (Gamble and Fischer,<br />
1915-1935) and other state, regional and local floras. All the plant families were arranged <strong>in</strong><br />
sequence follow<strong>in</strong>g Bentham and Hooker’s classification (1862-83) with certa<strong>in</strong> exceptions<br />
to accommodate recent modifications adopted after Cronquist (1968).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
A total number <strong>of</strong> 105 <strong>weeds</strong> species belong<strong>in</strong>g to 82 genera and 32 families were<br />
recorded, <strong>of</strong> which 90 were dicotyledonous and 15 monocotyledonous species. Six families<br />
amaranthaceae, poaceae, fabaceae, asteraceae, euphorbiaceae and solanaceae were<br />
represented by more than 5 weed species. In Andhra Pradesh, the major <strong>weeds</strong> were Digera<br />
muricata, Trichodesma <strong>in</strong>dicum, Celosia argentea, Euphorbia hirta, Parthenium hysterophorus,<br />
Tribulus terrestris, Commel<strong>in</strong>a benghalensis, and Cyperus rotundus. A critical study on the<br />
flora <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh (Pullaiah,1997; Pullaiah and Alimoulali, 1997; Pullaiah and Chennaiah,<br />
1997) revealed the presence <strong>of</strong> 715 taxa as <strong>weeds</strong> <strong>in</strong> crop fields <strong>of</strong> the state. The <strong>weeds</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>sorghum</strong> comprised <strong>of</strong> 14.68% <strong>of</strong> the total <strong>weeds</strong> encountered <strong>in</strong> the state crop fields.<br />
45
BABU et al.<br />
Results depicted <strong>in</strong> table.1 show the acquired density <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong> <strong>in</strong> these regions.<br />
Euphorbia hirta (1.95 plants/m 2 ) followed by Digera muricata (1.9 plants/m 2 ) Portulaca oleracea<br />
(1.8 plants/m 2 ) and were dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> the Rayalaseema region. Where as Euphorbia hirta<br />
(2.15 plants/m 2 ), Digera muricata (2.05 plants/m 2 ), and Portulaca oleracea (1.95 plants/m 2 ) <strong>in</strong><br />
the Telangana region and Portulaca oleracea (2.10 plants/m 2 ), Euphorbia hirta (2.0 plants/<br />
m 2 ) and Digera muricata (1.80 plants/m 2 ) <strong>in</strong> the Coastal Andhra region maximum density<br />
were recorded.<br />
The Important Value Index was 37.87 for Digera muricata, 32.87 for Celosia argentea,<br />
and 21.20 for Cleome viscosa <strong>in</strong> Rayalaseema region. Whereas <strong>in</strong> Telangana region dom<strong>in</strong>ance<br />
<strong>of</strong> Digera muricata (42.49), Celosia argentea (38.01) and Parthenium hysterophorus (22.61)<br />
was observed. In Coastal Andhra, the dom<strong>in</strong>ant species were Digera muricata (41.38),<br />
Cleome viscosa (33.06) and Portulaca oleracea (30.48). These results shows that Digera<br />
muricata <strong>in</strong> three regions, Celosia argentea <strong>in</strong> Rayalaseema amd Telangana region, Cleome<br />
viscosa <strong>in</strong> Rayalaseema and Coastal Andhra were dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> the <strong>sorghum</strong> fields. Based on<br />
the presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong> fields <strong>of</strong> Rayalaseema hav<strong>in</strong>g 102 species, Telangana<br />
103 species and coastal Andhra 94 species, these results show that Telangana region weed<br />
<strong>in</strong>festation was very high it may be due to the availability <strong>of</strong> abundant nutrient content less<br />
competition with <strong>sorghum</strong> plants. Telangana region is heavily <strong>in</strong>fected and Coastal Andhra is<br />
low and Rayalaseema is medium.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Bentham, G and Hooker, J. D. 1862-1883. Genera Plantarum. 3 vols. London.<br />
Cronquist, A. J. 1968. The Evolution and Classification <strong>of</strong> Flower<strong>in</strong>g plants. London.<br />
Curtis, J. T and Mclntosh, R. P. 1950. The <strong>in</strong>terrelationships <strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> analytic and synthetic<br />
phytosociological characters. Ecology 31 : 434-455.<br />
Gamble, J. S and Fischer, C. E. C. 1915-35. Flora <strong>of</strong> the Presidency <strong>of</strong> Madras. London<br />
(repr. ed. 1957, Calcutta).<br />
Mishra, J.S. 1997. Critical period <strong>of</strong> crop – weed competition and losses due to <strong>weeds</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
major field crops. Farmers and Parliament. XXXIII (6) : 19-20.<br />
Misra, R. 1968. Ecology Workbook. Oxford and IBH Publish<strong>in</strong>g Company Ltd., New Delhi.<br />
Okafor, L.I and Zitta, C. 1991. The <strong>in</strong>fluence on nitrogen on <strong>sorghum</strong> weed competition <strong>in</strong> the<br />
tropics. Tropical Pest Management. 37 (2) : 138-143.<br />
Pullaiah, T. 1997. Flora <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh, India. Vol.III. Scientific publishers, Jodhpur.<br />
Pullaiah, T and Alimoulali, D.A. 1997. Flora <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh, India. Volume. II. Scientific<br />
Publishers, Jodhpur.<br />
Pullaiah, T and Chennaiah, E. 1997. Flora <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh, India. Volume. I. Scientific<br />
Publishers, Jodhpur.<br />
46
DIVERSITY OF WEEDS IN THE SORGHUM<br />
Table1. Weed density and Importance value Index<br />
Sl. Name <strong>of</strong> the taxon Family Rayala Telangana Coastal<br />
No. seema Andhra<br />
D IVI D IVI D IVI<br />
1. Cleome aspera Koenig ex DC. Cleomaceae 0.6 2.16 0.4 1.17 0.75 3.67<br />
2. C. viscosa L. Cleomaceae 1.4 21.20 1.25 16.63 1.6 33.06<br />
3. Hybanthus enneaspermus(L.) F.Muell. Violaceae 0.95 7.99 0.6 3.48 0.4 2.18<br />
4. Polygala elongata Kle<strong>in</strong> ex Willd. Polygalaceae 1.05 5.26 0.95 4.36 0.6 2.59<br />
5. Portulaca oleracea (L.) Portulacaceae 1.8 18.95 1.95 21.34 2.1 30.48<br />
6. P. quadrifida L. Portulacaceae 0.95 6.05 0.85 4.88 0.55 2.92<br />
7. Sida acuta Burm. f., Malvaceae 1.05 15.61 1.15 17.99 0.85 12.72<br />
8. S. cordata (Brum.f.) Borssum Walkes Malvaceae 0.75 6.68 0.85 8.16 0.4 2.68<br />
9. Melochia corchorifolia (L.) Sterculiaceae 0.6 6.74 1.15 22.24 0.95 19.30<br />
10. Waltheria <strong>in</strong>dica (L.) Sterculiaceae 0.45 3.31 0.45 3.22 0.35 2.57<br />
11. Corchorus aestuans (L.) Tiliaceae 0.55 6.86 0.55 6.67 0.35 3.62<br />
12. C. trilocularis (L.) Tiliaceae 0.65 9.38 0.75 11.93 0.55 8.30<br />
13. Tribulus terrestris (L.) Zygophyllaceae 1.6 20.79 1.45 16.81 0.45 2.65<br />
14. Alysicarpus bupleurifolius (L.) DC. Fabaceae 0.9 4.09 1.05 5.14 0.65 2.93<br />
15. Indig<strong>of</strong>era l<strong>in</strong>ifolia (L.f.) Retz. Fabaceae 0.6 2.16 0.65 2.39 0.4 1.42<br />
16. I. l<strong>in</strong>naei Ali Fabaceae 0.9 4.09 0.8 3.31 0.95 5.37<br />
17. Macroptilium atropurpureum (DC.) Urb. Fabaceae 0.3 0.96 0.25 0.72 - -<br />
18. Rhynchosia m<strong>in</strong>ima (L.) DC. Fabaceae 0.6 2.80 0.65 3.11 0.5 2.50<br />
19. Tephrosia pumila (Lam.) Pers. Fabaceae 0.45 3.98 0.5 4.69 0.35 3.07<br />
20. T. purpurea (L.) Pers. Fabaceae 0.65 9.38 0.55 6.67 0.45 5.73<br />
21. Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal Fabaceae 0.5 2.62 0.45 2.15 0.1 0.29<br />
47
BABU et al.<br />
Table 1. contd...<br />
Sl. Name <strong>of</strong> the taxon Family Rayala Telangana Coastal<br />
No. seema Andhra<br />
D IVI D IVI D IVI<br />
22. Cassia pumila Lam. Caesalp<strong>in</strong>iaceae 0.15 0.41 0.1 0.24 0.15 0.49<br />
23. Mimosa pudica (L.) Mimosaceae 0.1 0.36 0.05 0.13 0.65 11.36<br />
24. Ammania baccifera (L.) var. baccifera Lythraceae - - - - 0.2 1.77<br />
25. Citrullus colyc<strong>in</strong>thus (L.) Schrad. Cucurbitaceae 0.6 11.17 0.45 6.29 0.1 0.54<br />
26. Cocc<strong>in</strong>ia grandis (L.) Voight. Cucurbitaceae 0.45 3.98 0.4 3.14 - -<br />
27. Cucumis melo (L.) Cucurbitaceae 0.2 1.47 0.35 3.94 0.1 0.54<br />
28. C. sativus (L.) Cucurbitaceae 0.3 3.49 0.45 7.25 0.15 1.21<br />
29. Mollugo nudicaulis Lam. Mollug<strong>in</strong>aceae 0.6 1.67 0.75 2.25 0.45 1.35<br />
30. M. pentaphylla (L.) Mollug<strong>in</strong>aceae 0.65 1.87 0.4 0.96 0.25 0.64<br />
31. Centella asiatica (L.,) Urban Apiaceae - - - - 0.4 1.42<br />
32. Borreria articularis (L.f.) F. Will. Rubiaceae 0.5 4.82 0.55 5.58 0.25 1.71<br />
33. B. pusilla (Wall.) DC. Rubiaceae 0.95 15.93 0.75 9.91 0.7 10.85<br />
34. Hedyotis corymbosa (L.) Lam. Rubiaceae 0.65 1.87 0.6 1.64 0.5 1.55<br />
35. H. puberula (G.Don) Arn. Rubiaceae 0.6 2.16 0.45 1.38 0.65 2.93<br />
36. Ageratum conyzoides (L.) Asteraceae 0.6 5.54 0.85 10.21 0.55 5.72<br />
37. Blumea mollis D.Don) Merr. Asteraceae 0.2 0.73 0.25 1.01 0.4 2.86<br />
38. Ech<strong>in</strong>ops ech<strong>in</strong>atus Roxb. Asteraceae 0.45 3.98 0.45 3.87 0.35 3.07<br />
39. Eclipta prostrata (L.) L. (= E. alba) Asteraceae 0.25 1.21 0.1 0.29 0.6 6.69<br />
40. Parthenium hysterophorus (L.) Asteraceae 1.35 15.16 1.7 22.61 1.3 17.10<br />
41. Tridax procumbens (L.) Asteraceae 1.15 11.30 1.4 15.76 1.25 15.91<br />
42. Vernonia c<strong>in</strong>eria (L.,) Less. Asteraceae 0.9 11.69 0.75 8.10 0.8 11.36<br />
43. Xanthium strumarium (L.) Asteraceae 0.1 0.61 0.05 0.19 - -<br />
44. Catheranthus pusillus (Murr.) G. Apocyanaceae 0.4 2.69 0.55 4.61 - -<br />
48
DIVERSITY OF WEEDS IN THE SORGHUM<br />
Table 1. contd...<br />
IVI<br />
Coastal<br />
Andhra<br />
45. Calotropis gigantia (L.) R. Br. Asclepiadaceae 0.1 1.03 0.1 1.00 0.05 0.36<br />
46. C. procera (W.T. Aiton) R. Br. Asclepiadaceae 0.15 2.01 0.25 5.16 0.1 1.15<br />
47. Coldenia procumbens (L.) Borag<strong>in</strong>aceae 0.2 0.62 0.15 0.41 0.15 0.49<br />
48. Heliotropium <strong>in</strong>dicum (L.) Borag<strong>in</strong>aceae 0.25 1.42 0.2 0.95 0.3 2.34<br />
49. H. ovalifolium Forssk. Borag<strong>in</strong>aceae 0.35 2.13 0.35 2.08 0.1 0.35<br />
50. Trichodesma <strong>in</strong>dicum (L.) R.Br. Borag<strong>in</strong>aceae 1.6 15.28 1.85 19.37 1.45 15.45<br />
51. Evolvulus als<strong>in</strong>oides (L.) Convolvulaceae 0.95 2.35 0.9 2.16 1 2.99<br />
52. Ipomoea pes-tigridis (L.) Convolvulaceae 0.2 0.62 0.35 1.43 - -<br />
53. Merremia gangetica (L.) Cufod. Convolvulaceae 0.95 4.47 1.05 5.14 0.65 2.93<br />
54. M. tridentata (L.) Hallier f. Convolvulaceae 0.7 2.07 0.6 1.64 0.75 2.73<br />
55. Datura metel (L.) Solanaceae 0.25 2.49 0.3 3.39 0.05 0.20<br />
56. D. stramonium (L.) Solanaceae 0.1 0.45 0.15 0.87 - -<br />
57. Physalis m<strong>in</strong>ima (L.) Solanaceae 0.15 0.79 0.1 0.40 0.1 0.49<br />
58. Solanum nigrum (L.) Solanaceae 0.25 1.42 0.25 1.38 0.55 6.94<br />
59. S. surattense Burm. Solanaceae 0.8 9.39 0.65 6.23 - -<br />
60. Scoparia dulcis (L.) Scrophulariaceae 0.1 0.22 0.05 0.09 0.25 0.88<br />
61. Striga asiatica (L.) O. Kuntze Scrophulariaceae 0.65 2.44 0.6 2.12 0.4 1.42<br />
62. S. gesneroides (Willd.) Vatke Scrophulariaceae 0.25 0.73 0.15 0.36 - -<br />
63. Verbascum ch<strong>in</strong>ense (L.) Santapau Scrophulariaceae 0.25 1.21 0.25 1.18 0.05 0.14<br />
64. Sesamum alatum Thonn. Pedaliaceae 0.2 0.84 0.15 0.53 - -<br />
65. Asystasia gangetica (L.) T. Acanthaceae - - 0.05 0.10 0.35 1.76<br />
66. Indoneesiella echioides (L.) Sreemadh. Acanthaceae 0.35 2.54 0.45 3.87 0.45 4.81<br />
67. Lepidagathis cristata Willd. Acanthaceae 0.15 0.37 0.15 0.36 - -<br />
49
BABU et al.<br />
Table 1. contd...<br />
IVI<br />
Coastal<br />
Andhra<br />
68. Rungia repens Nees Acanthaceae 0.35 0.99 0.45 1.38 0.55 2.27<br />
69. Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. Lamiaceae 0.2 1.47 0.35 3.94 0.1 0.54<br />
70. Leucas aspera (willd.) L<strong>in</strong>k Lamiaceae 0.55 3.08 0.65 3.99 0.4 2.18<br />
71. L. cephalotes (Roth) Spreng. Lamiaceae 0.65 4.10 0.75 5.12 0.45 2.65<br />
72. Ocimum americanum (L.) Lamiaceae 0.7 3.60 0.6 2.73 0.3 1.14<br />
73. Boerhavia diffusa L. Nyctag<strong>in</strong>aceae 1.45 17.31 1.35 14.74 1.2 14.76<br />
74. B. erecta (L.) Nyctag<strong>in</strong>aceae 0.6 2.80 0.45 1.73 0.25 0.88<br />
75. Achyranthus aspera (L.) Amaranthaceae 0.7 8.97 0.45 3.87 0.3 2.34<br />
76. Aerva javanica (Burm.f.) Juss. Amaranthaceae 0.15 0.47 0.1 0.26 - -<br />
77. A. lanata (L.,) A.L. Juss. Amaranthaceae 0.4 1.81 0.35 1.43 0.55 3.71<br />
78. Allmania nodiflora (L.,) R.Br. Amaranthaceae 0.65 3.19 0.6 2.73 0.45 2.12<br />
79. Alternanthera pungens Kunth, Amaranthaceae 0.85 5.00 0.95 5.90 0.55 2.92<br />
80. A. sessilis (L.) R.Br. Amaranthaceae 1.05 9.58 0.85 6.38 0.95 9.66<br />
81. Amaranthus viridis (L.) Amaranthaceae 1.3 14.14 1.15 10.98 1 10.59<br />
82. Celosia argentea (L.) Amaranthaceae 1.05 32.85 1.15 38.01 0.55 11.47<br />
83. Digera muricata (L.) C. Martius, Amaranthaceae 1.9 37.87 2.05 42.49 1.8 41.38<br />
84. Gomphrena serrata (L.) Amaranthaceae 0.45 2.20 0.35 1.43 0.35 1.76<br />
85. Acalypha <strong>in</strong>dica (L.) Euphorbiaceae 0.25 1.03 0.4 2.17 0.3 1.66<br />
86. Croton bonplandianum Baill. Euphorbiaceae 0.75 5.25 0.95 7.78 0.65 4.94<br />
87. Euphorbia hirta (L.) Euphorbiaceae 1.95 15.27 2.15 17.69 2 19.29<br />
88. Phyllanthus amarus Schum. & Thonn. Euphorbiaceae 0.6 1.67 0.5 1.28 0.45 1.35<br />
89. P. maderaspatensis (L.) Euphorbiaceae 0.3 0.80 0.15 0.32 0.25 0.74<br />
90. Tragia <strong>in</strong>volucrata (L.) Euphorbiaceae 0.45 2.20 0.35 1.43 0.5 3.16<br />
50
DIVERSITY OF WEEDS IN THE SORGHUM<br />
Table 1. contd...<br />
IVI<br />
Coastal<br />
Andhra<br />
91. Commel<strong>in</strong>a benghalensis (L.) Commel<strong>in</strong>aceae 0.95 10.29 0.9 9.06 1.15 17.74<br />
92. Cyanotis fasciculata (Roth.) Commel<strong>in</strong>aceae 0.6 4.48 0.85 8.16 1.1 16.33<br />
Schultes& Schultes<br />
93. Tonn<strong>in</strong>gia axillaris (L.,) O. Kuntze, Commel<strong>in</strong>aceae 0.75 6.68 0.7 5.74 0.95 12.44<br />
94. Cyperus compressus (L.) ssp. Cyperaceae 0.2 0.84 0.25 1.18 0.9 14.15<br />
compressus<br />
95. C. difformis (L.) Cyperaceae 0.35 1.46 0.35 1.43 0.55 3.71<br />
96. C. rotundus (L.) Cyperaceae 0.45 2.20 0.55 3.00 0.7 5.62<br />
97. Apluda mutica (L.) Poaceae 0.95 6.05 1.05 7.02 0.75 4.87<br />
98. Aristida hystrix (L.) Poaceae 0.65 2.44 0.6 2.12 0.5 1.97<br />
99. Arund<strong>in</strong>ella setosa Tr<strong>in</strong>.Gram. Poaceae 0.7 4.66 0.55 3.00 0.45 2.65<br />
100. Chloris <strong>in</strong>flata L<strong>in</strong>k. Poaceae 1.45 12.79 1.35 10.94 1.6 18.47<br />
101. Chrysopogon fulvus (Sprengel) Chiov. Poaceae 0.65 3.19 0.9 5.38 0.6 3.36<br />
102. Heteropogon contortus (L.) P. Beauv. Poaceae 0.65 3.19 0.75 3.95 0.35 1.44<br />
103. Perotis <strong>in</strong>dica (L.) O. Kuntze. Poaceae 1.15 4.32 0.95 3.17 0.4 1.16<br />
104. Setaria verticillata (L.) Beauv. Poaceae 0.55 2.43 0.4 1.44 0.45 2.12<br />
105. Urochloa panicoides P. Beauv. Poaceae 0.25 0.73 0.35 1.18 0.3 1.14<br />
D = Density, IVI = Importance Value Index<br />
51
J.Res. ANGRAU 37(3&4)52-58, 2009<br />
EFFECT OF INCREMENTAL DOSE OF PHOSPHORUS IN RICE ON<br />
THE YIELD OF BLACKGRAM IN RICE (Oryza sativa) – BLACKGRAM<br />
(Phaseolus mungo) CROPPING SEQUENCE<br />
I. USHA RANI and V. SANKAR RAO<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science, Agricultural College<br />
Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Bapatla – 522101<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A field experiment on rice-black gram relay cropp<strong>in</strong>g was conducted at Agricultural College Farm,<br />
Bapatla dur<strong>in</strong>g 2004-05 to study the need <strong>of</strong> additional dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus for the system over the recommended<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> 60 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 to rice. The soil was sandy loam <strong>in</strong> texture. It was low <strong>in</strong> available nitrogen (218 kg ha -<br />
1<br />
), medium <strong>in</strong> available P 2<br />
O 5<br />
(23.2 kg ha -1 ) and rich <strong>in</strong> available K 2<br />
O (407 kg ha -1 ). The results <strong>in</strong>dicated that the<br />
additional dose <strong>of</strong> 10, 20 or 30 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g and 10, 20 or 30 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage<br />
significantly <strong>in</strong>creased the soil available phosphorus at maturity stage <strong>of</strong> rice but there was no effect on soil<br />
available N, K, Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn. There was no direct effect on additional dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus on gra<strong>in</strong> or<br />
straw yield <strong>of</strong> rice but its residual effect significantly <strong>in</strong>creased the seed and haulm yield <strong>of</strong> black gram. The<br />
most beneficial effect was to apply additional 20 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage <strong>of</strong> rice for maximum<br />
productivity with the added advantage <strong>of</strong> substantial improvement <strong>in</strong> soil available nitrogen and phosphorus<br />
from the <strong>in</strong>itial 218 to 287 kg N ha -1 and 23.2 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
to 38.6 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 but the soil available potassium<br />
reduced from the <strong>in</strong>itial 407 kg to 369 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 . The Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn content also recorded slight<br />
reduction.<br />
Relay cropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> black gram <strong>in</strong> rice on residual moisture and fertility is a common<br />
practice <strong>in</strong> Krishna- Godavari agro climatic zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. Fertilizer recommendations<br />
are based on the nutrient requirement <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual crops. The dynamics <strong>of</strong> nutrient availability<br />
is ignored. Among the major nutrients phosphorus is highly expensive and its utilization by<br />
the crops is <strong>of</strong>ten low as it gets immobilized. However, substantial quantity <strong>of</strong> this nutrient <strong>in</strong><br />
the puddled rice fields is available <strong>in</strong> the soluble form after the harvest <strong>of</strong> the crop (Gill and<br />
Meelu 1983 and Kundu et al. 1986). Residual nutrient is best exploited by the legum<strong>in</strong>ous<br />
crops for their better root development, nodule formation and nitrogen fixation. Information is<br />
not available on the quantity <strong>of</strong> phosphorus application to rice which exhibit maximum residual<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence on the performance <strong>of</strong> relay cropped black gram. Hence, this experiment was<br />
conducted.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
A Field experiment was conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g 2004-05 at Agricultural college farm,<br />
Bapatla. The soil was sandy loam <strong>in</strong> texture and the pH was 7.92. It was low <strong>in</strong> fertility with<br />
0.38 percent organic carbon, 218 kg ha -1 available nitrogen, and medium (23.2 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 )<br />
E-mail: <strong>in</strong>eediu@gmail.com<br />
52
EFFECT OF INCREMENTAL DOSE OF PHOSPHORUS IN RICE<br />
<strong>in</strong> available phosphorus but high <strong>in</strong> potassium with 407 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 and the layout was RBD.<br />
There were seven treatments which <strong>in</strong>cluded the basal application <strong>of</strong> phosphorus to rice at<br />
60 kg P 2-<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 with the additional quantity <strong>of</strong> 10, 20 and 30 kg P 2-<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 applied at tiller<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage. A uniform dose <strong>of</strong> 120 kg nitrogen, 60 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
and 60 kg K 2<br />
O<br />
ha -1 was applied to the crop. Entire dose <strong>of</strong> P and K with 1/3 rd dose <strong>of</strong> nitrogen was applied<br />
as basal. Rest <strong>of</strong> the nitrogen was top dressed <strong>in</strong> two equal splits at maximum tiller<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
panicle <strong>in</strong>itiation stage. Rice nursery <strong>of</strong> variety BPT 5204 was transplanted on 28 th August<br />
2004 and harvested on 4 th December 2004. The seed <strong>of</strong> black gram variety LBG-645 was<br />
broadcast four days before the harvest <strong>of</strong> rice and allowed to grow on the residual moisture<br />
and fertility. Initial soil sample and those from different treatments <strong>in</strong> the rice field at the time<br />
<strong>of</strong> sow<strong>in</strong>g black gram and after the harvest <strong>of</strong> this relay crop were analyzed by follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
standard procedures (Jackson, 1973).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> rice:<br />
The data on soil available nutrients after the harvest <strong>of</strong> rice due to the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong><br />
different treatments is presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The results showed that the soil available N<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased from the <strong>in</strong>itial 218 kg ha -1 to 264 kg ha -1 at the time <strong>of</strong> harvest <strong>in</strong> response to the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> recommended dose <strong>of</strong> fertilizers. The soil available phosphorus <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
almost twice. The <strong>in</strong>itial test value was 23.2 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 while it is <strong>in</strong>creased to 44.9 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at the time <strong>of</strong> harvest. On the other hand the soil available potassium reduced from the<br />
<strong>in</strong>itial 407 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 to 390 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 . The <strong>in</strong>itial test values <strong>of</strong> micronutrients <strong>of</strong> Fe, Cu,<br />
Zn and Mn are <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> 9.58 ppm, 3.68 ppm, 234 ppm and 40.2 ppm, respectively and<br />
they also tended to reduce sharp. The additional dose <strong>of</strong> 10, 20 and 30 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at<br />
tiller<strong>in</strong>g or 10, 20 and 30 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage significantly <strong>in</strong>creased the<br />
soil available phosphorus compared to the availability due to the application <strong>of</strong> recommended<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> 60 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 . The enrichment <strong>of</strong> soil available phosphorus was not fixed nor it was<br />
entirely absorbed by the crop (S<strong>in</strong>garam and Kothandaraman, 1994). Initial flood<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rice is<br />
also known to decrease the Al-P and Fe-P, which result <strong>in</strong> more availability <strong>of</strong> this nutrient<br />
(Tiwari, 2002). The additional dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus did not br<strong>in</strong>g a significant change <strong>in</strong> the<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> other nutrients compared to the recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus.<br />
The gra<strong>in</strong>, straw yield <strong>of</strong> rice and 1000 gra<strong>in</strong> weight were not altered by the additional<br />
dose <strong>of</strong> 10, 20 and 30 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 applied either at tiller<strong>in</strong>g or at primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage<br />
compared to the recommended dose <strong>of</strong> 60 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 (Table 2). This result implied that the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 60 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 to rice is sufficient and the improvement <strong>in</strong> the soil available<br />
phosphorus content due to the application <strong>of</strong> additional dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus may benefit the<br />
relay crop (Rao, 1975).<br />
53
RANI and RAO<br />
Table 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> additional dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus app lied to rice on the available N, P, K and micronutrient<br />
status after harvest <strong>of</strong> rice<br />
Recommended<br />
Treatment Nitrogen<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus (60 kg P2O5 ha -1 )<br />
as basal<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus as basal +10 kg<br />
P2O5 ha -1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage<br />
Recommended<br />
dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus as basal +20 kg<br />
P2O5 ha -1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus as basal +30 kg<br />
P2O5 ha -1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus as basal +10 kg<br />
P2O5 ha-1 at primordial<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiation stage<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus as basal +20 kg<br />
P2O5 ha-1 at primordial<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiation stage<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus as basal +30 kg<br />
P2O5 ha-1 at primordial<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiation stage<br />
Phosphorus<br />
(kg P2O5<br />
ha -1 )<br />
Potassium<br />
(kg K2O<br />
ha -1 )<br />
Iron<br />
(ppm)<br />
Copper<br />
(ppm)<br />
Z<strong>in</strong>c<br />
(ppm)<br />
Manganese<br />
(ppm)<br />
264 44.9 390 9.29 3.49 2.22 39.4<br />
257 51.4 388 9.23 3.45 2.19 38.7<br />
252 56.3 387 9.20 3.42 2.18 38.5<br />
259 62.7 386 9.14 3.37 2.15 37.4<br />
250 53.8 384 9.06 3.33 2.10 37.1<br />
256 58.5 382 9.05 3.31 2.09 36.7<br />
254 64.4 380 8.98 3.23 2.05 35.8<br />
SE± 7.5 3.5 11.5 0.70 0.45 0.04 1.69<br />
CD at 5 % NS 7.5 NS NS NS NS NS<br />
54
EFFECT OF INCREMENTAL DOSE OF PHOSPHORUS IN RICE<br />
Table 2. Effect <strong>of</strong> additional dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus applied to rice on the test weight,<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> and straw yield <strong>of</strong> rice.<br />
Treatment 1000 Gra<strong>in</strong> Straw<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield yield<br />
weight (g) (kg ha- -1 ) (kg ha- -1 )<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus(60 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
14.8 4183 5019<br />
ha -1 ) as basal<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus as basal+ 15.0 4195 5064<br />
10 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus as basal+ 15.2 4220 5117<br />
20 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus as basal + 15.3 4242 5172<br />
30 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus as basal + 15.1 4257 5228<br />
10 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus as basal + 15.3 4276 5271<br />
20 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus as basal + 15.4 4299 5318<br />
30 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage<br />
SE± 0.3 14 14<br />
CD at 5 % NS NS NS<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> black gram:<br />
The relay crop black gram transformed the low available nitrogen status <strong>of</strong> the soil<br />
to medium. This improvement is expected due to the atmospheric nitrogen fixation by legumes<br />
(Thakuria and Saharia, 1990). But, the soil available phosphorus reduced substantially after<br />
the harvest <strong>of</strong> blackgram compared to the available quantity after the harvest <strong>of</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rice <strong>in</strong> all treatments. Hence it is probable that this residual nutrient might have been utilized<br />
by blackgram. Yet the soil was high <strong>in</strong> available phosphorus <strong>in</strong> all the treatments than the<br />
<strong>in</strong>itial value (Table 3). The additional dose <strong>of</strong> 30 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g or primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation<br />
stage to rice was not only sufficient to meet the requirement <strong>of</strong> the two crops but also left<br />
beh<strong>in</strong>d substantially large quantity <strong>of</strong> 38.8 and 41.3 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 but the potassium, Fe, Cu,<br />
Zn and Mn content were less than the <strong>in</strong>itial level. The additional dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus had no<br />
significant <strong>in</strong>fluence on any nutrient except phosphorus. S<strong>in</strong>garam and Kothandaraman (1992)<br />
also reported that the application <strong>of</strong> higher doses <strong>of</strong> phosphorus to rice leave beh<strong>in</strong>d larger<br />
residues <strong>of</strong> this nutrient.<br />
55
RANI and RAO<br />
Table 3. Effect <strong>of</strong> additional dose <strong>of</strong> Phosphorus app lied to rice on the available N, P, K and micronutrien<br />
statusafter harvest <strong>of</strong> black gram<br />
Treatment Nitrogen<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
Phosphorus<br />
(kg P2O5 ha -1 )<br />
Potassium<br />
(kg K2O ha -1 )<br />
Iron<br />
(ppm)<br />
Copper<br />
(ppm)<br />
Z<strong>in</strong>c<br />
(ppm)<br />
Manganese<br />
(ppm)<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus (60 kg P2O5 ha -1 )<br />
as basal 312 28.7 373 7.63 3.39 1.76 37.9<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus as basal +10<br />
kg P 2O5 ha-1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stage 305 34.3 372 7.62 3.36 1.75 37.2<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus as basal +20<br />
kg P 2O5 ha-1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stage 297 37.9 371 7.69 3.33 1.75 37.1<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus as basal +30<br />
kg P 2O5 ha-1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stage 292 38.8 370 7.61 3.29 1.74 36.0<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
kg P2O5 ha -1 at primordial<br />
kg P2O5 ha -1 at primordial<br />
phosphorus as basal +10<br />
kg P2O5 ha -1 at primordial<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiation stage 293 35.1 369 7.59 3.25 1.71 35.8<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus as basal +20<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiation stage 287 38.6 369 7.60 3.23 1.71 35.4<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorus as basal +30<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiation stage 283 41.3 368 7.56 3.17 1.69 34.6<br />
SE± 9.8 1.3 11.3 0.07 0.05 0.07 1.69<br />
CD at 5 % NS 2.8 NS NS NS NS NS<br />
56
EFFECT OF INCREMENTAL DOSE OF PHOSPHORUS IN RICE<br />
Black gram produced significantly larger quantity <strong>of</strong> seed and haulm yield <strong>in</strong> response<br />
to the additional dose <strong>of</strong> 10, 20 and 30 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 applied to the preced<strong>in</strong>g crop <strong>of</strong> rice at<br />
tiller<strong>in</strong>g or primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage (Table 4). Maximum residual advantage was harvested<br />
by the application <strong>of</strong> additional 30 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 to rice at primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage. Black<br />
gram produced gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>of</strong> 984 kg ha -1 and haulm yield <strong>of</strong> 1828 kg ha -1 . This was on par<br />
with the response due to the additional 20 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 applied to rice at primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation<br />
stage. Its residual effect enabled the black gram crop to yield 973 kg ha -1 gra<strong>in</strong> and 1783 kg<br />
ha -1 haulm yield. Patel and Thakur (1997) also obta<strong>in</strong>ed significant yield response ow<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
substantial improvement <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> parameters <strong>of</strong> black gram ow<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>creased availability<br />
<strong>of</strong> phosphorus <strong>in</strong> the soil and its absorption by the crop.<br />
That is else to highlight the need to apply additional 20 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at primordial<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiation stage <strong>in</strong> puddled rice to enhance the residual effect <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>of</strong><br />
relay cropped black gram <strong>in</strong> sandy loam soil medium <strong>in</strong> available phosphorus status.<br />
Table 4. Effect <strong>of</strong> additional dose <strong>of</strong> Phosphorus applied to rice on the seed and<br />
haulm yield <strong>of</strong> black gram<br />
Treatment Seed yield Haulm yield<br />
(kg ha -1 ) (kg ha -1 )<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus(60 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 )<br />
as basal 845 1454<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus as basal +<br />
10 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage 898 1580<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus as basal +<br />
20 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage 937 1686<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus as basal +<br />
30 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at tiller<strong>in</strong>g stage 951 1735<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus as basal +<br />
10 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage 936 1691<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus as basal +<br />
20 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage 973 1783<br />
Recommended dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus as basal +<br />
30 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 at primordial <strong>in</strong>itiation stage 984 1828<br />
SE± 20 41<br />
CD at 5% 42 87<br />
57
RANI and RAO<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Gill, H.S and Meelu, O.P. 1983. Studies on utilization <strong>of</strong> P and causes for its differential<br />
response to rice-wheat. Plant and Soil. 74: 211-222.<br />
Jackson, M.L.1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice- Hall <strong>of</strong> India pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. pp:<br />
40.<br />
Kundu, S., Kamath, M.B and Goswami, N.N.1986. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> residual effect <strong>of</strong> phosphate<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice-wheat-blackgram-rice cropp<strong>in</strong>g sequence us<strong>in</strong>g 32 P as a tracer. Journal <strong>of</strong> Nuclear<br />
and Agricultural Biology. 15(2): 115-119.<br />
Patel, S.R and Thakur, D.S. 1997. Influence <strong>of</strong> phosphorus and rhizobium on yield attributes,<br />
yield and nutrient uptake <strong>of</strong> groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). Journal <strong>of</strong> Oil Seeds<br />
Research. 14(2): 189-193.<br />
Rao, I.V.S. 1975. Nutritional disorder <strong>of</strong> crops <strong>in</strong> Andhra Pradesh. Andhra Pradesh Agricultural<br />
University Publication, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>garam, P and Kothandaraman, G.V. 1992. Residual effect <strong>of</strong> different phosphatic fertilizers<br />
on available phosphorus <strong>of</strong> soil <strong>in</strong> a cropp<strong>in</strong>g sequence. Journal <strong>of</strong> Indian Society <strong>of</strong><br />
Soil Science. 40: 213-215.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>garam, P and Kothandaraman, G.V. 1994 Studies on residual, direct and cumulative<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> phosphorus sources on the availability, content, and uptake <strong>of</strong> phosphorus<br />
and yield <strong>of</strong> maize. Madras Agricultural Journal. 81 (8): 425-429.<br />
Thakuria, K and Saharia, P. 1990. Response <strong>of</strong> green gram genotypes to plant density and<br />
phosphorus levels <strong>in</strong> summer. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy. 35(4): 431-432.<br />
Tiwari, K.N. 2002 Phosphorus In: Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> soil science (Ed. Sekhon G. S.). Indian<br />
Society <strong>of</strong> Soil Science, New Delhi. pp.353-368.<br />
58
J.Res. ANGRAU 37(3&4)59-64, 2009<br />
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OF WET AND DRY SPELLS BY<br />
MARKOV CHAIN MODEL AND ITS APPLICATION TO CASTOR<br />
(Ric<strong>in</strong>us communis L.) CULTIVATION IN RANGA REDDY DISTRICT<br />
M.A.BASITH and SHAIK MOHAMMAD<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />
Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University<br />
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Initial and conditional probabilities for expected threshold limits <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall are provided for different<br />
weeks to plan cultural operations dur<strong>in</strong>g the grow<strong>in</strong>g period <strong>of</strong> castor <strong>in</strong> Ranga Reddy district <strong>of</strong> Andhra<br />
Pradesh. Threshold ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>of</strong> ≥ 20 mm was estimated to be optimum for land preparation as the soils are<br />
partially moist and ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>of</strong> ≥ 15 mm per week between 25th to 26 th standard weeks ensures good germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
<strong>of</strong> castor. The <strong>in</strong>itial probability <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall occurrence dur<strong>in</strong>g 22 nd and 23 rd weeks was 6 and 9% whereas it was<br />
50 and 62% for the 25 th and 26 th weeks. The probability <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall ≥ 10 mm dur<strong>in</strong>g seedl<strong>in</strong>g establishment was<br />
56, 26, 21 and 68% for the 30 th , 31 st , 32 nd and 33 rd weeks. The <strong>in</strong>itial probabilities for occurrence <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
reproductive phase were 29, 35, 32, 24 and 35% dur<strong>in</strong>g the 39 th , 40 th , 41 st , 42 nd and 43 rd weeks respectively.<br />
The conditional probabilities for the follow<strong>in</strong>g weeks to be wet were 100, 92, 73, 100 and 100% respectively.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>itial probability <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall for a low threshold limit <strong>of</strong> 10 mm for the 48 th standard week dur<strong>in</strong>g start<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
maturity phase was 56% and conditional probability for the subsequent week to be wet was 100%.<br />
Castor (Ricnus communis L.) is an important and the most dependable non-edible<br />
oilseed crop <strong>of</strong> poor farmers with poor resource base. It has great <strong>in</strong>dustrial and commercial<br />
value. It br<strong>in</strong>gs considerable amount <strong>of</strong> foreign exchange to the country. In India, it is cultivated<br />
over an area <strong>of</strong> 8.70 lakh hectares produc<strong>in</strong>g 11.15 lakh tonnes beans. In Andhra Pradesh,<br />
it is cultivated on 1.57 lakh hectares with a production <strong>of</strong> 0.8 lakh tonnes. The national<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> castor is 1282 kg ha -1 while the average yield <strong>in</strong> A.P. is 510 kg ha -1 (CMIE,<br />
2009).<br />
Andhra Pradesh ranks second <strong>in</strong> area and production <strong>of</strong> this crop next only to Gujarat.<br />
In Andhra Pradesh, it is ma<strong>in</strong>ly cultivated ra<strong>in</strong>fed <strong>in</strong> the districts <strong>of</strong> Nalgonda, Mahbubnagar<br />
and Rangareddy. Andhra Pradesh has a tropical climate with moderate overlapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
subtropical weather conditions. The normal annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>of</strong> the state is 925 mm with major<br />
portion <strong>of</strong> 68.5% be<strong>in</strong>g contributed by South – West monsoon. The state has a history <strong>of</strong><br />
droughts <strong>of</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g degrees <strong>in</strong> 3 out <strong>of</strong> 5 years and ra<strong>in</strong>fed farm<strong>in</strong>g is prone for risk (Babu<br />
and Padmaja, 2003).<br />
First order Markov cha<strong>in</strong> model gives the <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>in</strong>itial and conditional<br />
probabilities for various threshold limits <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall. Under <strong>in</strong>itial probabilities, the probability<br />
E mail: basith@naarm.ernet.<strong>in</strong><br />
59
BASITH and MOHAMMAD<br />
<strong>of</strong> a given period to be wet or dry is estimated while <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> conditional probabilities,<br />
if given period is wet or dry, then the chances <strong>of</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g week to be wet or dry and given as<br />
wet/wet or wet/dry are estimated. A period is said to be wet when the weather parameter <strong>of</strong><br />
that period exceeds a threshold limit.<br />
Markov cha<strong>in</strong> probability model has been extensively used to f<strong>in</strong>d out the wet and<br />
dry spells (Victor and Sastry,1979) and for computation <strong>of</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> daily<br />
precipitation (Stern,1982). Earlier Agarwal et al. (1984), Pandar<strong>in</strong>ath (1991) and Dalabehara<br />
and Sahoo (1993) used Markov cha<strong>in</strong> probability model for dry and wet spell analysis <strong>in</strong><br />
terms <strong>of</strong> shortest period like week and demonstrated its practical utility <strong>in</strong> agricultural plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Such studies are lack<strong>in</strong>g for Ranga Reddy district to plan and execute the agricultural<br />
operations for the cultivation <strong>of</strong> castor.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The experimental site selected is a ra<strong>in</strong>fed belt <strong>of</strong> Ranga Reddy district. It is located<br />
at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 542.6 m above mean sea level on 17 o 19' North latitude and 78 o 23' East<br />
longitude. In the National Agricultural Research Project Zonation, it comes under the Southern<br />
Telangana region <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. The water hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>of</strong> the soil is 92 mm per<br />
meter depth. Weekly ra<strong>in</strong>fall data for the past 34 years from 1975 to 2008 was collected from<br />
meteorological observatory <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research Institute, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy<br />
district.<br />
The method <strong>of</strong> comput<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itial and conditional probabilities <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g the first order Markov cha<strong>in</strong> model described by Gabriel and Neumann (1962); Gates<br />
and Tong (1976) and Hann et al. (1976) was followed.<br />
Step - 1:<br />
Compute for each week the number <strong>of</strong> occasions the weekly ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>of</strong> week i (Ri) ≥<br />
the threshold limit x. If this condition is satisfied <strong>in</strong> ‘n’ years out <strong>of</strong> the total N years then the<br />
probability <strong>of</strong> a given week i is wet (Wi) is given as<br />
þWi = (n/N) x 100, % and thus a given week is dry (Di) is given as<br />
þDi = 100 - Wi, %<br />
These estimates present the <strong>in</strong>itial probabilities <strong>of</strong> a given week i is wet or dry.<br />
Step - 2:<br />
Compute for each week, the number <strong>of</strong> occasions<br />
R i<br />
≥ x and R i+k<br />
≥ x<br />
60
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OF WET AND DRY SPELLS<br />
It is seen <strong>in</strong> step - 1 that <strong>of</strong> the N years <strong>in</strong> n years Ri ≥ x <strong>in</strong> week i and thus if <strong>in</strong> n’<br />
years out <strong>of</strong> n years, R ≥ x, then the probability <strong>of</strong> gett<strong>in</strong>g a wet on week i and week i + k,<br />
i+k<br />
namely a wet week followed by a wet week (if k = 1 [cw/w]) is given as<br />
þ(W/W)i = (n’/n) x 100, %<br />
and thus a dry week followed by a wet week, (D/W) is given as<br />
þ(D/W)i = 100 - (W/W)i, %<br />
These two estimates present the conditional probabilities <strong>of</strong> a wet or dry week (i + 1)<br />
followed by a wet week (i).<br />
Step - 3:<br />
Compute for each week, the number <strong>of</strong> occasions, R i<br />
< x but R i+k<br />
≥ x.<br />
It is seen <strong>in</strong> step - 1 that <strong>of</strong> the N years <strong>in</strong> N-n years Ri < x <strong>in</strong> week i and thus <strong>in</strong> n” years out<br />
<strong>of</strong> N - n years R i+k<br />
≥ x, then the probability <strong>of</strong> gett<strong>in</strong>g dry spell on week i and wet on week i+k,<br />
namely a wet week followed by a dry week (if k = 1) [(W/D)i ] is given as<br />
þ(W/D)i = [n”/(N-n)] x 100, %<br />
and thus a dry week followed by a dry week. (D/D) is given as<br />
þ(D/D)i = 100 - (W/D)i, %<br />
These two estimates present the conditional probabilities <strong>of</strong> a wet or dry week (i + 1)<br />
followed by a dry week (i).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The first order Markov cha<strong>in</strong> analysis for the estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial and conditional<br />
probabilities <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall occurrence dur<strong>in</strong>g the crop grow<strong>in</strong>g period was worked out to assess<br />
the likely wet and dry weeks for any two consecutive weeks for effective field operations.<br />
The probabilities <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall occurrence for m<strong>in</strong>imum threshold ra<strong>in</strong>fall per week<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g the Markov cha<strong>in</strong> model dur<strong>in</strong>g the ra<strong>in</strong>y season for Ranga Reddy district is presented<br />
<strong>in</strong> table 1. This will help <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g agricultural operations for probable risk alertness. The<br />
<strong>in</strong>itial probability for ≥ 20 mm ra<strong>in</strong>fall due to summer showers <strong>in</strong> the 22 nd meteorological<br />
standard week is 6%. In the next week, the probability <strong>of</strong> this limit improved to 9%. The<br />
conditional probability for this week to be followed by wet week is 100%. The sow<strong>in</strong>g season<br />
spans from 2 nd week <strong>of</strong> June to 2 nd week <strong>of</strong> July. Ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>of</strong> ≥ 15 mm is considered as the<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imum threshold per week dur<strong>in</strong>g this period for good germ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> seed. The <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
probability for this limit was 50% for the 25th and 62% for 26 th standard week. The conditional<br />
61
BASITH and MOHAMMAD<br />
probabilities for the present and next week to be wet were 100%. The <strong>in</strong>itial probability for ≥<br />
15 mm was 38% <strong>in</strong> the 27 th standard week but a high probability <strong>of</strong> 74% was <strong>in</strong> the 28 th<br />
standard week with a conditional probability <strong>of</strong> wet-wet be<strong>in</strong>g 100%. Ra<strong>in</strong>fall requirement <strong>of</strong><br />
≥ 10 mm per week was considered as the threshold limit for the emergence and establishment<br />
<strong>of</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. The <strong>in</strong>itial probability for this limit was 56, 26, 21 and 68% for the 30, 31, 32 and<br />
33 rd standard weeks. The probability <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall occurrence for the threshold limit <strong>of</strong> ≥ 15 mm<br />
for seedl<strong>in</strong>g growth and development was 12, 3 and 68% for 34,35 and 36 th standard weeks.<br />
The conditional probabilities for the two weeks to be wet were 100 and 96% <strong>in</strong> the 36 and 37 th<br />
standard week. Water requirement <strong>of</strong> crop <strong>in</strong>crease dur<strong>in</strong>g the reproductive development and<br />
growth. Threshold limit was, therefore, <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> the subsequent weeks. The <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
probabilities for occurrence <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fall dur<strong>in</strong>g the 39 th , 40 th , 41 st , 42 nd and 43 rd weeks were 29,<br />
35, 32, 24 and 35 % respectively. The conditional probabilities for the follow<strong>in</strong>g weeks to be<br />
wet were 100, 92, 73, 100 and 100 % respectively. The crop water requirement is relatively<br />
low dur<strong>in</strong>g its maturity and senile phase. Hence, the threshold limit was scheduled ≥ 10 mm<br />
from 48th standard week. The <strong>in</strong>itial probability <strong>of</strong> this week to be wet was 56% and conditional<br />
probability for the subsequent week to be wet was 100%.<br />
The first order Markov cha<strong>in</strong> analysis for the estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial and conditional<br />
probabilities <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum threshold ra<strong>in</strong>fall required for castor crop will help <strong>in</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g up<br />
effective field operations and risk avoidance.<br />
Table 1. First order Markov cha<strong>in</strong> model for <strong>in</strong>itial and conditional probability <strong>of</strong><br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fall occurrence for castor <strong>in</strong> Ranga Reddy district<br />
Date-Month MSW MTRF<br />
(mm)<br />
Initial Conditional probability %<br />
probability %<br />
Wet- Dry- Wetwet<br />
dry Wet Wet Dry<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />
28 May -3 June 22 20 6 94 100 0 15 85<br />
4-10 June 23 20 9 91 100 0 97 3<br />
11-17 June 24 15 9 91 100 0 10 90<br />
18-24 June 25 15 50 50 100 0 55 45<br />
25 June- 1 July 26 15 62 38 100 0 100 0<br />
2-8 July 27 15 38 62 62 38 100 0<br />
9-15 July 28 15 74 26 100 0 100 0<br />
Dry-<br />
Dry<br />
62
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OF WET AND DRY SPELLS<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />
16-22 July 29 15 3 97 4 96 11 89<br />
23-29 July 30 10 56 44 100 0 58 42<br />
30 July- 5 Aug 31 10 26 74 47 53 60 40<br />
6-12 Aug 32 10 21 79 78 22 28 72<br />
13-19 Aug 33 10 68 32 100 0 85 15<br />
20-26 Aug 34 15 12 88 30 70 36 64<br />
27 Aug- 2 Sep 35 15 3 97 25 75 3 97<br />
3-9 Sep 36 15 68 32 100 0 70 30<br />
10-16 Sep 37 25 56 44 96 4 100 0<br />
17-23 Sep 38 25 12 88 100 0 27 73<br />
24-30 Sep 39 30 29 71 100 0 43 57<br />
1-7 Oct 40 30 35 65 100 0 50 50<br />
8-14 Oct 41 30 32 68 92 8 50 50<br />
15-21 Oct 42 30 24 76 73 27 35 65<br />
22-28 Oct 43 30 35 65 100 0 46 54<br />
29 Oct-4 Nov 44 20 62 38 100 0 77 23<br />
5-11 45 20 32 68 52 48 85 15<br />
12-18 46 20 53 47 100 0 78 22<br />
19-25 47 20 18 82 33 67 38 62<br />
26-2 Dec 48 10 56 44 100 0 46 54<br />
3-9 49 10 76 24 100 0 100 0<br />
10-16 50 10 29 71 38 62 100 0<br />
17-23 51 10 74 26 100 0 100 0<br />
24-31 Dec 52 10 65 35 88 12 100 0<br />
1-7Jan 1 10 3 97 5 95 8 92<br />
MSW : Meteorological standard week;<br />
MTRF : M<strong>in</strong>imum threshold ra<strong>in</strong>fall<br />
63
BASITH and MOHAMMAD<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Agarwal, A., S<strong>in</strong>gh, R.V and Chauhan, H.S. 1984. Probability <strong>of</strong> sequences <strong>of</strong> wet and dry<br />
days <strong>in</strong> Na<strong>in</strong>ital Tarai Region. Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g 21 (4): 61-70<br />
Babu, S.N and Padmaja, K. V. 2003. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g systems <strong>in</strong> Ranga Reddy<br />
district <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh with reference to castor. Indian journal <strong>of</strong> Dryland Agriculture<br />
and Development. 18 (1): 75-83<br />
CMIE. 2009. Economic <strong>in</strong>telligence service, agriculture. Centre for Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Indian Economy<br />
Private Limited. www.cmie.com<br />
Dalabehara, M and Sahoo, J. 1993. On the chances <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> wet and dry days at<br />
regional research station, Bhawanipatna <strong>of</strong> Kalahandi district <strong>of</strong> Orissa. Indian Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Power and River valley Development.44 (Feb-March): 37-40<br />
Gabriel, K. R and Neumann, J. 1962. A Markov cha<strong>in</strong> model for daily ra<strong>in</strong>fall occurrence at<br />
Tel Aviv. Quarterly Journal Royal Meteorological Society 88: 90-95.<br />
Gates, P. R and Tong, H. 1976. On Markov cha<strong>in</strong> model<strong>in</strong>g to some weather data. Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Applied Meteorology 15: 1145-1151.<br />
Hann, T., Allen, P. M and Street, J. D.1976. A Markov cha<strong>in</strong> model for daily ra<strong>in</strong>fall. Water<br />
Resources Research 12: 433.<br />
Pandar<strong>in</strong>ath,N.1991. Markov cha<strong>in</strong> model probability <strong>of</strong> dry and wet weeks dur<strong>in</strong>g monsoon<br />
periods over Andhra Pradesh. Mausam. 42(4): 393-400<br />
Stern, R.D.1982. Comput<strong>in</strong>g a probability distribution for the start <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>s from a Markov<br />
cha<strong>in</strong> model for precipitation. Journal <strong>of</strong> applied Meteorology. 21(3): 420-423<br />
Victor, V.S and Sastry, P.S.N. 1979. Dry spell probability by Markov cha<strong>in</strong> model and its<br />
application to crop development stage. Mausam. 30: 479-484<br />
64
J.Res. ANGRAU 37(3&4)65-70, 2009<br />
IDENTIFICATION OF PARENTS AND HYBRIDS FOR YIELD AND ITS<br />
COMPONENTS USING LINE X TESTER ANALYSIS IN PIGEONPEA<br />
(Cajanus cajan L. Millsp)<br />
C.V.SAMEER KUMAR, CH.SREELAKSHMI, D.SHIVANI AND M.SURESH<br />
Agricultural Research Station<br />
Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University<br />
Tandur, Ranga Reddy - 501 141<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Six well adapted l<strong>in</strong>es and four testers <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp) were crossed <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e x<br />
tester design to elicit <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the desirable parents and crosses for their use <strong>in</strong> crop improvement<br />
programmes. The material was raised <strong>in</strong> a randomized block design with three replications. Sufficient genetic<br />
variability was observed among the parents, l<strong>in</strong>es and crosses for all quantitative traits. Non – additive gene<br />
action predom<strong>in</strong>ated for all the traits studied. The estimates <strong>of</strong> gca effects revealed that the genotypes PRG-<br />
158 and LRG-30 among the l<strong>in</strong>es and among the testers ICP 8863 and ICPL 87119 were the best general<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ers for seed yield and its components and could be utilized <strong>in</strong> future breed<strong>in</strong>g programme. Significant<br />
sca effect was exhibited by LRG 30 x ICP 8863, PRG 100 x ICP 8863, LRG 30 x ICPL 87119, ICPL 85063 x<br />
ICPL 87119 and PRG 100 x ICPL 87119 for seed yield and could be used for exploitation <strong>of</strong> heterosis to<br />
achieve high yields.<br />
Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp.) is an important pulse crop grown <strong>in</strong> India with 76% <strong>of</strong><br />
global acreage. Possibilities <strong>of</strong> commercial exploitation <strong>of</strong> hybrid vigour <strong>in</strong>creased s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />
reports <strong>of</strong> genetic male sterility <strong>in</strong> pigeonpea and presence <strong>of</strong> considerable degree <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
out cross<strong>in</strong>g. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis is frequently employed to identify the desirable<br />
parents and crosses. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to estimate comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
ability for some yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g components <strong>in</strong> pigeonpea.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The experimental material consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> twenty four crosses <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e x tester design<br />
<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g six diverse l<strong>in</strong>es and four well adapted testers were grown along with parents <strong>in</strong> the<br />
randomized block design with three replications at Agricultural Research Station, Tandur<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g kharif 2006-07. Each treatment <strong>in</strong> a replication had a s<strong>in</strong>gle row <strong>of</strong> 5 m length, with 90<br />
x 20 cm spac<strong>in</strong>g. All the recommended crop management practices were followed. Data<br />
were recorded on five random competitive plants from each genotype / replication for days to<br />
cv_sameerkumar@yahoo.com<br />
65
KUMAR et al.<br />
50% flower<strong>in</strong>g, days to maturity, plant height, number <strong>of</strong> primary branches per plant, number<br />
<strong>of</strong> pod clusters per plant, number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant, 100 seed weight and seed yield per plant.<br />
The statistical analysis was done as per procedure given by Kempthorne (1957).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> variance for comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability revealed significant differences <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
x tester component for all the characters, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the material chosen was variable<br />
with respect to traits under <strong>in</strong>vestigation. The l<strong>in</strong>es showed significant differences for days<br />
to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g, days to maturity and 100 seed weight, while the testers exhibited significant<br />
differences for days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g, days to maturity, plant height, number <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
branches per plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield per plant (Table 1).<br />
Partition<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability variances <strong>in</strong>to fixable additive genetic variance and<br />
non-fixable dom<strong>in</strong>ance variance <strong>in</strong>dicated that non-additive gene action play a significant<br />
role <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> all the traits. Therefore, it would be beneficial to build up a population by<br />
<strong>in</strong>ter mat<strong>in</strong>g these parents <strong>in</strong>ter se before <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g random mat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> F 2<br />
to allow higher<br />
recomb<strong>in</strong>ation (Rawat, 1982). Preponderance <strong>of</strong> non-additive gene action for majority <strong>of</strong><br />
traits observed was found <strong>in</strong> agreement with Kumar et al., (2003) and Reddy et al., (2004).<br />
The estimates <strong>of</strong> gca effect revealed that, the genotypes PRG 100 and LRG 30<br />
among the l<strong>in</strong>es and ICP 8863 and ICPL 87119 among the testers proved as good general<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ers for seed yield per plant (Table 2). The parent PRG 100 was a good general comb<strong>in</strong>er<br />
for all the characters except days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g and plant height while LRG 30 was good<br />
general comb<strong>in</strong>er for number <strong>of</strong> primary branches per plant, number <strong>of</strong> pods cluster per plant,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant and seed yield per plant.<br />
The l<strong>in</strong>es ICPL 85063 and LRG 38 were the best general comb<strong>in</strong>ers for earl<strong>in</strong>ess.<br />
Among the testers ICP 8863 was good general comb<strong>in</strong>er for days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g, days to<br />
maturity, number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant, 100 seed weight and seed yield per plant and ICP 84063<br />
and ICP 89044 were good general comb<strong>in</strong>ers for earl<strong>in</strong>ess. The tester ICPL 87119 was good<br />
general comb<strong>in</strong>er for number <strong>of</strong> pod clusters per plant, number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant, 100 seed<br />
weight and seed yield per plant but not for earl<strong>in</strong>ess. Crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g these parents might<br />
produce heterotic hybrids with high mean performance for respective traits.<br />
High sca effects mostly from the additive and dom<strong>in</strong>ant effects existed between the<br />
hybridiz<strong>in</strong>g parents. In the present study, significant sca effects were exhibited by five crosses<br />
viz, PRG 100 x ICP 8863, PRG 100 x ICPL 87119, LRG 30 x ICP 8863, LRG 30 x ICPL<br />
87119 and ICPL 85063 x ICPL 87119 for seed yield per plant (Table 3). These crosses could<br />
be used for isolat<strong>in</strong>g superior genotypes from segregat<strong>in</strong>g generation. It was observed that,<br />
66
IDENTIFICATION OF PARENTS AND HYBRIDS<br />
these crosses also exhibited significant sca effects for number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant and 100<br />
seed weight. The cross comb<strong>in</strong>ations for high gca l<strong>in</strong>es x high gca testers manifested <strong>in</strong> to<br />
higher sca comb<strong>in</strong>ations except <strong>in</strong> the cross ICPL 85063 x ICPL 87119. These results are <strong>in</strong><br />
agreement with the earlier reports <strong>of</strong> Kumar et al., (2003).<br />
It is evident from the present study that non-additive gene effects were important <strong>in</strong><br />
the <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the traits. The good general comb<strong>in</strong>er parents viz, PRG 158, LRG<br />
30 and ICP 8863 and ICPL 87119 could be utilized <strong>in</strong> future breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Kempthorne, O. 1957. An <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> Genetic statistics. John Wiley and sons, New<br />
York, pp: 458-471.<br />
Rawat, D. S. 1982. Analysis <strong>of</strong> reciprocal differences <strong>in</strong> Indian mustard. Acta Agronomica<br />
Hungarice. 41: 227-233.<br />
Reddy, S. M. S<strong>in</strong>gh, S. P. Mehra, R. B and Govil, J. N. 2004. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability and heterosis<br />
<strong>in</strong> early matur<strong>in</strong>g pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp) hybrids. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Genetics<br />
and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g 64 (3): 212-216.<br />
Kumar, S. Lohit Aswa, H and Dharamaraj, P. 2003. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis for gra<strong>in</strong><br />
yield, prote<strong>in</strong> content and other quantitative traits <strong>in</strong> Pigeonpea. Journal <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />
Agricultural Universities 28: 141-144.<br />
Kumar, K. Ramdhari and Tomar, Y. S. 2003. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis for seed yield and its<br />
attributes <strong>in</strong> Pigeonpea. National journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Improvement 5: 124-126.<br />
67
KUMAR et al.<br />
Table 1. Analysis <strong>of</strong> variance for comb<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>of</strong> the characters <strong>in</strong> pigeonpea<br />
Source <strong>of</strong> variation df<br />
Days to<br />
50%<br />
flower<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Days<br />
to<br />
maturity<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
primary<br />
branches<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
clusters /<br />
plant<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
pods /<br />
plant<br />
100 seed<br />
weight (g)<br />
Seed yield<br />
Plant (g)<br />
Replications 2 6.39 2.61 46.39 0.66 18.02 610.53 0.35 14.29<br />
Treatments 33 372.69** 373.08** 403.50** 13.50** 403.21** 6157.64** 5.73** 99.22**<br />
Parents 9 499.55** 522.09** 652.73** 12.64** 412.48** 5837.42** 9.47** 79.98**<br />
Parents vs. Crosses 1 634.09** 453.96** 1815.07** 56.74** 15.66 11835.38** 3.32** 226.97**<br />
Crosses 23 311.68** 311.26** 244.61 11.96** 416.44** 6036.12** 4.38** 101.19**<br />
L<strong>in</strong>es 5 551.06** 837.14** 367.28 11.70 447.21 9226.47 11.95** 63.79<br />
Testers 3 1010.28** 514.98* 541.38* 38.83** 644.99 9420.85 7.67** 385.40**<br />
L<strong>in</strong>es x Testers 15 92.16** 95.23** 144.38 6.67** 360.47** 4295.74** 1.19** 56.82*<br />
Error 66 3.42 2.71 194.44 1.31 28.10 1586.31 0.22 25.61<br />
68
IDENTIFICATION OF PARENTS AND HYBRIDS<br />
Table 2. Estimates <strong>of</strong> general comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g abilit y effects for l<strong>in</strong>es and testers <strong>in</strong> pigeonpea<br />
Days to<br />
50%<br />
flower<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Days to<br />
maturity<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
branches/plant<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
clusters/plant<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
pods/plant<br />
100 seed<br />
weight (g)<br />
Seed<br />
yield/plant<br />
(g)<br />
L<strong>in</strong>es<br />
PRG-100 -0.22 -2.76** 1.24 1.60** 6.05** 33.79** 1.27** 3.48*<br />
PRG-88 -0.06 -5.68** -0.78 -0.57 -7.64** -1.88 0.74** -2.15<br />
LRG-30 10.03** 15.99** 5.15 0.76* 6.23** 32.62** 0.20 3.68*<br />
LRG-38 -1.89** -1.68** -5.28 -0.87* -3.20* -41.20** -0.90** -2.13<br />
ICPL-85034 -10.81** -7.01** -7.12 -0.80* -5.27** -22.48 -1.40** -2.87<br />
ICPL-85063 2.94** 1.15* 6.77 -0.12 3.83* -0.85 0.10 -0.02<br />
SE (gi) 0.53 0.47 4.02 0.33 1.53 11.49 0.14 1.46<br />
Testers<br />
ICP-8863 -3.36** -1.04** 0.94 0.36 -0.38 20.41* 0.54** 4.28**<br />
ICPL-84036 -1.03* -3.38** -3.56 -1.09** -3.65** -20.67* -0.62** -5.32**<br />
ICPL-87119 10.75** 7.85** 7.36* 1.93** 8.57** 19.19* 0.59** 3.44**<br />
ICPL-89044 -6.36** -3.43** -4.74 -1.19** -4.54** -18.93* -0.51** -2.40*<br />
SE (gj) 0.44 0.39 3.29 0.27 1.25 9.39 0.11 1.19<br />
69
KUMAR et al.<br />
Table 3. Estimates <strong>of</strong> specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability effects <strong>in</strong> pigeonpea<br />
Cross Days to<br />
50%<br />
flower<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Days to<br />
maturity<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
primary<br />
branches<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
clusters/<br />
plant<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
pods /<br />
plant<br />
100 seed<br />
weight(g)<br />
Seed<br />
yield/plant<br />
(g)<br />
1 PRG-100 x ICP-8863 1.78 4.71** 1.80 1.36* 13.54** 47.10* 0.65* 6.74*<br />
2 PRG-100 x ICP-84036 -5.89** -5.96** -4.14 -2.26** -13.88** -14.59 -0.15 -6.32*<br />
3 PRG-100 x ICP-87119 3.67** 0.82 6.00 0.79 7.80* 48.35* 0.65* 6.76*<br />
4 PRG-100 x ICP-89044 0.44 0.43 -3.66 0.11 -7.46* -45.86 0.60* -1.18<br />
5 PRG-88 x ICP-8863 4.28** 5.29** -0.95 -0.81 0.86 -15.49 -0.50 -2.26<br />
6 PRG-88 x ICP-84036 0.28 0.29 -3.92 1.11 7.90* -10.41 0.12 2.79<br />
7 PRG-88 x ICP-87119 -1.17 -7.60** 3.95 0.62 -4.12 20.92 -0.08 0.86<br />
8 PRG-88 x ICP-89044 -3.39** 2.01* 0.93 -0.92 -4.64 -0.02 0.02 -0.81<br />
9 LRG-30 x ICP-8863 4.53** -0.38 4.22 2.16** 14.79** 49.54* 0.63* 6.77*<br />
10 LRG-30 x ICP-84036 2.19* 4.29** -2.78 -1.01 -8.47** -35.61 0.78** 0.45<br />
11 LRG-30 x ICP-87119 -2.25* 1.07 6.26 0.90 4.48 52.52* 0.64* 6.96*<br />
12 LRG-30 x ICP-89044 -4.47** -4.99** -7.70 -2.05** -10.81** -25.45 -0.95** -4.18<br />
13 LRG-38 x ICP-8863 5.11** 6.62** 6.88 -0.74 -15.35** -36.67 -0.51 -2.95<br />
14 LRG-38 x ICP-84036 -7.56** -3.38** 4.71 0.35 4.12 -11.69 -0.80** -1.01<br />
15 LRG-38 x ICP-87119 2.33* -2.26* -9.91 -0.14 2.57 -56.83* -0.07 -5.14<br />
16 LRG-38 x ICP-89044 0.11 -0.99 -1.67 0.52 8.65** 47.19* -0.17 2.10<br />
17 ICPL-85034 x ICP-8863 -8.31** -6.38** -10.14 -0.38 0.19 -11.29 -0.29 0.46<br />
18 ICPL-85034 x ICP-84036 3.03** 4.96** 7.55 0.34 3.70 18.28 -0.02 -4.94<br />
19 ICPL-85034 x ICP-87119 1.25 1.07 -7.37 -0.61 -7.78* -54.15* -0.17 -1.16<br />
20 ICPL-85034 x ICP-89044 4.03** 0.35 9.97 0.64 3.89 17.17 -0.22 -4.36<br />
21 ICPL-85063 x ICP-8863 -7.39** -9.88** -1.80 -1.59* -14.04** -41.19 -1.73** -4.76<br />
22 ICPL-85063 x ICP-84036 7.94** -0.21 -1.41 1.46* 6.63* 4.02 0.06 -0.39<br />
23 ICPL-85063 x ICP-87119 -3.83** 6.90** 1.07 -1.56* -2.95 47.19* 0.64* 6.72*<br />
24 ICPL-85063 x ICP-89044 3.28** 3.18** 2.14 1.69* 10.36** 6.98 0.72* 3.42<br />
SE (sij) 1.07 0.95 8.05 0.66 3.06 22.99 0.27 2.92<br />
70
J.Res. ANGRAU 37(3&4)71-76, 2009<br />
GENE EFFECTS FOR YIELD CONTRIBUTING CHARACTERS IN<br />
PIGEONPEA (Cajanus cajan L.Millsp) BY GENERATION MEAN<br />
ANALYSIS<br />
C.V. Sameer Kumar, Ch. Sreelakshmi, D. Shivani and M.Suresh<br />
Agricultural Research Station<br />
Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University<br />
Tandur, Rajendranagar - 501 141<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Estimates <strong>of</strong> gene effects based on analysis <strong>of</strong> generation mean obta<strong>in</strong>ed for eight characters <strong>in</strong> four<br />
crosses <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea <strong>in</strong>dicated the presence <strong>of</strong> additive, dom<strong>in</strong>ance and epistatic gene effects. Among nonallelic<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions dom<strong>in</strong>ance x dom<strong>in</strong>ance (l) was <strong>of</strong> greater magnitude than ma<strong>in</strong> gene effects for most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
characters <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the importance <strong>of</strong> heterosis breed<strong>in</strong>g to utilize non- additive gene effects. The additive<br />
gene effects (d) also contributed significantly for different traits like plant height, number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant and<br />
seed yield <strong>in</strong> the cross LRG 30 x ICP 8863. Dom<strong>in</strong>ant gene effects (h) contributed significantly for most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
characters <strong>in</strong> the crosses PRG 100 x ICPL 87119 and LRG 30 x ICP 8863. Selection <strong>in</strong> segregat<strong>in</strong>g generations<br />
<strong>of</strong> these crosses will be effective for the development <strong>of</strong> these traits. However, to exploit additive as well as<br />
non- additive gene effects reciprocal recurrent selection procedure may be adopted.<br />
Pigeonpea is an important edible pulse crop <strong>in</strong> India grown <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed and irrigated<br />
conditions. Multiple path ways <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g different yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g characters <strong>in</strong>fluence seed<br />
yield and hence seed yield can also be improved through improvement <strong>of</strong> yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g<br />
characters (Solanki and Joshi, 2000). The estimation <strong>of</strong> gene effects <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
<strong>of</strong> yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g or quantitative characters are helpful <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes.<br />
Though gene effects for seed yield and other traits have been estimated <strong>in</strong> pigeonpea,<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation on epistatic gene effects is limited. Thus, <strong>in</strong> the present <strong>in</strong>vestigation, genetic<br />
parameters namely, additive, dom<strong>in</strong>ance and epistatic gene effects were estimated through<br />
generation mean study for eight quantitative traits <strong>in</strong> 4 crosses <strong>of</strong> pigeonpea.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Experimental material comprised <strong>of</strong> 6 generations i.e., P1, P2, F1, F2, BC1(F1xP1)<br />
and BC2(F1xP2) <strong>of</strong> 4 crosses namely PRG 100 x ICPL 87119, LRG 30 x ICP 8863, PRG<br />
100 x ICP 8863 and LRG 30 x ICPL 87119. The six generations <strong>of</strong> each cross were grown<br />
separately <strong>in</strong> randomized block design with two replications. In each replication parents and<br />
crosses were randomized separately, P1, P2 and F1 were grown <strong>in</strong> two rows <strong>of</strong> 5m length.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>ter and <strong>in</strong>tra row spac<strong>in</strong>g was 1.0 x 0.2 m, respectively. Plant population <strong>in</strong> segregat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cv_sameerkumar@yahoo.com<br />
71
Kumar et al.<br />
generations varied from 62 to 225 plants. The crop was raised as per standard practices for<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>fed crop. Observations on <strong>in</strong>dividual plants were recorded for eight quantitative traits<br />
(Table 1). The data recorded were subjected to weighted analysis <strong>of</strong> Cavalli (1952) to know<br />
the adequacy <strong>of</strong> additive dom<strong>in</strong>ance model. In the presence <strong>of</strong> epistasis, the data where any<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 4, 5, 6 parameters are found adequate <strong>in</strong> the model <strong>of</strong> J<strong>in</strong>ks and Jones (1958) was<br />
subjected accord<strong>in</strong>gly to sequential model <strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong> more precise estimate for these<br />
parameters. The adequacy <strong>of</strong> these sequential models was tested by x 2 test.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Significant scal<strong>in</strong>g test for different traits were observed <strong>in</strong> almost all crosses <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the presence <strong>of</strong> digenic or higher order <strong>in</strong>teractions. The non-significant scal<strong>in</strong>g test (Table1)<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated the absence <strong>of</strong> non-allelic <strong>in</strong>teractions for number <strong>of</strong> branches per plant <strong>in</strong> all the<br />
crosses except PRG100 x ICP 8863 and number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant <strong>in</strong> the cross LRG 30 x<br />
ICPL 87119. Thus <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>in</strong> these characters <strong>in</strong> the above referred crosses could be<br />
expla<strong>in</strong>ed on the basis <strong>of</strong> simple additive-dom<strong>in</strong>ance model. The estimates <strong>of</strong> genetic<br />
parameters m, d and h <strong>in</strong> these crosses <strong>in</strong>dicated that both additive (d) and dom<strong>in</strong>ance (h)<br />
gene effects were responsible for <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> traits. Absence <strong>of</strong> non- allelic <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
for some characters was also reported by Patel (1996).<br />
The estimates <strong>of</strong> genetic parameters for different yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g traits <strong>in</strong> the cross<br />
PRG 100 x ICPL 87119 revealed that dom<strong>in</strong>ance gene effects (h) govern the <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong><br />
all the characters. Epistatic gene effects additive x additive (i) was more important <strong>in</strong> the<br />
<strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> plant height and number <strong>of</strong> clusters per plant. In the same cross dom<strong>in</strong>ance x<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ance (l) were more pronounced than additive gene effects for number <strong>of</strong> pods per<br />
plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield. Similar results were observed by earlier workers<br />
(Kandalkar, 2005 and S<strong>in</strong>gh, 2002).<br />
Dom<strong>in</strong>ance gene effects (h) governed the <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> all the traits except number<br />
<strong>of</strong> branches per plant <strong>in</strong> the cross LRG 30 x ICP 8863. Non allelic <strong>in</strong>teractions viz., additive<br />
x additive (i) and additive x dom<strong>in</strong>ance (j) were <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> plant height,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant and 100 seed weight. Epistatic <strong>in</strong>teraction like dom<strong>in</strong>ance x<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ance gene effect (l) was also observed for the expression <strong>of</strong> seed yield. These results<br />
are <strong>in</strong> agreement with the earlier reports <strong>of</strong> Hooda et al., (2000) and Oommen et al., (1994).<br />
Dom<strong>in</strong>ance gene effects (h) governed the <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> mostly yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g<br />
traits <strong>in</strong> the cross PRG 100 x ICP 8863 like days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g, days to maturity, plant<br />
height, number <strong>of</strong> clusters per plant, 100 seed weight and seed yield. In this cross additive<br />
x additive gene effects (i) were also responsible for the <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
72
GENE EFFECTS FOR YIELD CONTRIBUTING CHARACTERS<br />
days to maturity, plant height and number <strong>of</strong> clusters per plant. However, non- allelic gene<br />
effects additive x dom<strong>in</strong>ance (j) also controlled the <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> branches per<br />
plant and number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant <strong>in</strong> this cross.<br />
Cross LRG 30 x ICPL 87119 exhibited the importance <strong>of</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ance gene effects (h)<br />
for the <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g traits. In epistatic <strong>in</strong>teractions like additive<br />
x additive (i) govern the <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> clusters per plant. Non allelic <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
viz., dom<strong>in</strong>ance x dom<strong>in</strong>ance gene effects (l) controlled the <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> clusters<br />
per plant, 100 seed weight and seed yield.<br />
The role <strong>of</strong> non allelic <strong>in</strong>teractions as <strong>in</strong>dicated by scal<strong>in</strong>g test was not confirmed by<br />
estimates <strong>of</strong> genetic parameters <strong>in</strong> crosses PRG 100 x ICPL87119, LRG 30 x ICP 8863 and<br />
LRG 30 x ICPL87119 for number <strong>of</strong> branches per plant and <strong>in</strong> the cross LRG 30 x ICPL<br />
87119 for number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant. It might be due to presence <strong>of</strong> higher order <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
for <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> these traits. The magnitude <strong>of</strong> epistatic <strong>in</strong>teraction ma<strong>in</strong>ly dom<strong>in</strong>ance x<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ance (l) gene effects (l) for most <strong>of</strong> the traits was higher <strong>in</strong> almost all traits under study.<br />
Such non additive gene effects may be exploited by heterosis breed<strong>in</strong>g. Additive gene effects<br />
observed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> important yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g characters like plant height, number<br />
<strong>of</strong> clusters per plant, number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant and seed yield <strong>in</strong> the above crosses can be<br />
utilized <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g programme by selection method.<br />
The complementary type <strong>of</strong> gene action observed <strong>in</strong> cross PRG 100 x ICPL 87119<br />
for most <strong>of</strong> the yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g traits and for number <strong>of</strong> branches per plant and number <strong>of</strong><br />
pods per plant for PRG 100 x ICP 8863 can be utilized <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g programme. Duplicate<br />
type <strong>of</strong> gene action observed for other traits is not easy to use <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g programme. It is<br />
there fore concluded that heterosis breed<strong>in</strong>g may be used where large magnitude <strong>of</strong> non<br />
fixable gene effects is observed. A sizable amount <strong>of</strong> additive gene effects observed <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
that segregat<strong>in</strong>g generations <strong>of</strong> cross LRG 30 x ICP 8863 may be handled to develop <strong>in</strong>bred/<br />
varieties possess<strong>in</strong>g more number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant and 100 seed weight. Such type <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>bred /varieties are likely to provide higher seed yield also. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the importance <strong>of</strong><br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ance as well as non-additive gene effects observed <strong>in</strong> the present study recurrent<br />
selection and diallel selective mat<strong>in</strong>g system may be used to exploit both types <strong>of</strong> gene<br />
effects.<br />
73
Kumar et al.<br />
Table 1. Estimation <strong>of</strong> genetic parameters <strong>in</strong> selected pigeonpea crosses evaluated<br />
at ARS, Tandur, kharif, 2007<br />
Character m d h i j l<br />
Cross: PRG 100 x ICPL 87119<br />
Days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g 107.07** -10.03** 25.67** 10.46 2.10 6.27<br />
Days to maturity 165.63** -9.23** 28.60** 14.60 3.50 6.13<br />
Plant height 179.30** -20.34** 40.64** 18.75* -4.71* 3.46<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> branches per plant 14.93** -0.76 2.90 - - -<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> clusters per plant 83.00** -5.56** 35.27** 23.40** 0.30 -10.53<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant 417.32** -31.63** 56.47* -26.93 11.90 160.47**<br />
100-seed weight 12.27** 0.84** 4.76** 1.27 0.28 6.93**<br />
Seed yield 55.24** -4.15** 1.19 -9.04** -3.51** 31.49**<br />
Cross: LRG 30 x ICP 8863<br />
Days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g 109.95** 3.00* 24.40** 7.26** -1.40 -13.93<br />
Days to maturity 169.95** 3.00* 22.93** 17.27** -2.26 -11.00<br />
Plant height 179.12** 18.87** 43.69** 22.73** 12.35** -3.61<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> branches per plant 16.55** 0.77 0.57 - - -<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> clusters per plant 82.37** -12.20** 17.70** 8.00 -6.43** 4.20<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant 417.57** 30.03** 147.00** 72.60* -17.30 -52.53<br />
100-seed weight 10.33** -2.20** 5.66** 3.51** -0.36 -1.06<br />
Seed yield 53.35** 3.16* 23.52** 14.73** 3.88** -11.46**<br />
74
GENE EFFECTS FOR YIELD CONTRIBUTING CHARACTERS<br />
Table1. contd….<br />
Character m d h i j l<br />
Cross: PRG 100 x ICP 8863<br />
Days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g 97.95 ** -7.57 ** 20.70 ** 13.73 ** -1.07 -2.80<br />
Days to maturity 158.20 ** -7.57 ** 18.43 ** 12.33 ** -1.07 -0.33<br />
Plant height 168.63 ** -8.29 ** 31.31 ** 15.07 * -3.5* -1.06<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> branches per<br />
plant<br />
14.75 ** -0.67 1.03 -1.80 -0.17 6.40 **<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> clusters per plant 87.47 ** -2.97 ** 23.50 ** 11.27 * 1.07 -10.73<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant 419.52 ** -4.60 12.00 -68.60** -0.47 167.00**<br />
100-seed weight 12.98 ** 0.31 2.38* 1.23 -0.13 0.01<br />
Seed yield 53.68 ** 0.69 13.91 ** 5.11 1.36 6.72<br />
Cross: LRG 30 x ICPL 87119<br />
Days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g 119.30 ** -3.43 ** 11.57 ** 4.20 -2.20* -2.20<br />
Days to maturity 178.95 ** -1.03 13.16** 5.33 -0.07 6.13<br />
Plant height 191.68 ** -6.59 ** 13.56 * 3.41 -2.29 6.41<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> branches per<br />
plant<br />
15.52**<br />
-1.57** 6.10* - - -<br />
Number 84.73 ** -7.70 ** 33.33 ** 20.73 ** -0.10 -17.60*<br />
<strong>of</strong> clusters per plant Number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant 433.62** -3.30 43.20 - - -<br />
100-seed weight 11.21 ** -1.88 ** 0.91 -1.01 -0.17 3.48*<br />
Seed yield 54.56 ** -1.98 ** 15.39 ** 4.37 -1.28 8.76 *<br />
Seed yield 53.68 ** 0.69 13.91 ** 5.11 1.36 6.72<br />
* Significant at 5% level ** Significant at 1% level<br />
75
Kumar et al.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Cavalli, L. L. 1952. An analysis <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>kage <strong>in</strong> quantitative <strong>in</strong>heritance. Ed Reive E CR and<br />
Wadd<strong>in</strong>gton, C. H. pp: 135-144, HMSO, London.<br />
Comstock, R. E. Rob<strong>in</strong>son, H. F and Harvey, P. H. 1949. A breed<strong>in</strong>g procedure designed to<br />
make maximum use <strong>of</strong> both general and specific comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability. Agronomy Journal<br />
41: 360-367.<br />
Hooda, J. S. Tomar, Y. S. Vashistha, R. D and Phogat, D. S. 2000. Generation mean<br />
analysis <strong>in</strong> Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp). Annals <strong>of</strong> Biology 16: 105-109.<br />
J<strong>in</strong>ks, J. L. and Jones, M. 1958. Estimation <strong>of</strong> components <strong>of</strong> heterosis. Genetics 43: 223-<br />
234.<br />
Kandalkar, V. S. 2005. Genetic analysis <strong>of</strong> early and medium duration pigeonpea hybrids<br />
(Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp) crosses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g wilt resistant donor <strong>in</strong> F1 and F2<br />
generations. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Genetics and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g. 65: 184-187.<br />
Oommen, A. Namboodri, K. M. N and Unnithan, V. K. G. 1994. Genetic analysis <strong>of</strong> some<br />
quantitative characters <strong>in</strong> pigeonpea. Journal <strong>of</strong> Tropical Agriculture 32: 109-111.<br />
Patel, A. A .1996. Genetic analysis <strong>in</strong> castor (Ric<strong>in</strong>us communis L.) M.Sc (Ag.) Thesis<br />
submitted to Gujarat Agricultural University, S K Nagar.<br />
Perera, A. M. Pooni, H. S and Saxena, K. B. 2001. Components <strong>of</strong> genetic variation <strong>in</strong> short<br />
duration pigeonpea crosses under water logged conditions. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Genetics<br />
and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g 55: 31-38.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gh, I. P and Srivastava, D. P. 2002. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter specific hybrids <strong>of</strong><br />
pigeonpea. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pulses Research 14: 27-30.<br />
76
Research Note<br />
J.Res. ANGRAU 37(3&4)77-81, 2009<br />
EVALUATION OF F 1<br />
HYBRIDS OF TOMATO<br />
(Solanum lycopersicum L.)<br />
P.S.SUDHAKAR and K. PURUSHOTHAM<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Horticulture, S.V. Agricultural College,<br />
Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Tirupati - 517 502.<br />
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) covers an area <strong>of</strong> about 5.35 lakh hectares <strong>in</strong><br />
India with a production <strong>of</strong> 9.36 million tones rank<strong>in</strong>g second after Potato (NHB, 2006). Recently,<br />
its cultivation is commercialized due to its rapid development <strong>of</strong> high yield<strong>in</strong>g potential F 1<br />
hybrids dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade. But, it is observed that arrival <strong>of</strong> huge quantity <strong>of</strong> the produce<br />
at a time, leads to glut and price fall <strong>in</strong> the market every season due to lack <strong>of</strong> specific hybrid<br />
suitable for staggered harvest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> southern zone <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh. Hence, the present<br />
study was undertaken to evaluate different F 1<br />
hybrids <strong>of</strong> tomato for higher yield and staggered<br />
harvest<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The present study was carried out dur<strong>in</strong>g spr<strong>in</strong>g-summer season <strong>of</strong> 2005-2006 between<br />
the months <strong>of</strong> December and June at Horticultural garden, S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati<br />
with 8 hybrids viz., T 1<br />
– JK Asha, T 2<br />
– Lakshmi, T 3<br />
– Lehar, T 4<br />
– Ruchi, T 5<br />
– Ab<strong>in</strong>av, T 6<br />
–<br />
Manisha, T 7<br />
– NS 2535 and T 8<br />
– US 618. The trial was laid out <strong>in</strong> randomized complete block<br />
design with three replications. All hybrids received a common basal dose <strong>of</strong> FYM @<br />
5 t ha -1 , 50% <strong>of</strong> full dose <strong>of</strong> 150 kg N, full dose <strong>of</strong> 60 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
and 80 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 at the time<br />
<strong>of</strong> field preparation. Rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 50% N was top dressed <strong>in</strong> two equal splits, one at 30 and the<br />
other at 60 days after plant<strong>in</strong>g. Recommended package <strong>of</strong> practices were followed to raise<br />
the crop under irrigated conditions. Plant height and number <strong>of</strong> branches per plant were<br />
recorded at 120 days after transplant<strong>in</strong>g. Fruit set (%) was calculated as per formula suggested<br />
by Baruah et al. 1994). The fruit size (cm 2 ) was obta<strong>in</strong>ed by multiply<strong>in</strong>g the maximum length<br />
and breadth <strong>of</strong> the fruit. The fruit size and pericarp thickness were recorded with the help <strong>of</strong><br />
vernier calipers. A hand refractometer was used to measure total soluble solids (TSS).<br />
Ascorbic acid content was determ<strong>in</strong>ed follow<strong>in</strong>g 2, 6 - dichlorophenol - <strong>in</strong>dophenol visual<br />
titration method. Shelf life was estimated as the time taken by fruits to reach 50% shrivell<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Data were collected on five randomly selected plants <strong>of</strong> each plot to record growth, yield and<br />
quality parameters and were subjected to statistical analysis.<br />
E-mail Id: psshorti@yahoo.co.<strong>in</strong><br />
77
SUDHAKAR and PURUSHOTHAM<br />
The results presented <strong>in</strong> table 1 revealed that growth characters varied significantly<br />
among different tomato hybrids. Ruchi showed the tallest plants grow<strong>in</strong>g to a height <strong>of</strong> 143.7<br />
cm with maximum number <strong>of</strong> 26.0 branches per plant compared to other hybrids. On the<br />
other hand, Lakshmi recorded shortest plants grow<strong>in</strong>g to a height <strong>of</strong> only 103.7 cm produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
15.67 branches per plant. These growth parameters were on par with Lehar and NS 2535.<br />
Plant height <strong>of</strong> JK Asha was also on par with Lakshmi. This variation <strong>in</strong> plant growth arose<br />
on account <strong>of</strong> growth habit <strong>of</strong> genotypes. Similar k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>in</strong> growth characters among<br />
different tomato hybrids was also observed by Mohanty et al. (2001).<br />
The hybrids showed significant differences <strong>in</strong> flower<strong>in</strong>g and maturity. Lakshmi was<br />
the earliest to atta<strong>in</strong> 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 24.33 days after transplant<strong>in</strong>g and was on par with JK<br />
Asha (25.00 days) which was <strong>in</strong> turn on par with Ruchi (27.33 days). On the contrary, Ab<strong>in</strong>av,<br />
NS 2535, Lehar and Manisha were late to flower. They atta<strong>in</strong>ed 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 41.00 to<br />
42.00 days. Raymon (1985) reported that early flower<strong>in</strong>g resulted <strong>in</strong> early maturity which<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicates earl<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>of</strong> the genotype. In the present <strong>in</strong>vestigation, it is evident that early<br />
flower<strong>in</strong>g hybrids Lakshmi, JK Asha and Ruchi matured early <strong>in</strong> 71.00, 71.33 and 75.33 days<br />
after transplant<strong>in</strong>g compared to late flower<strong>in</strong>g hybrids.<br />
The data presented <strong>in</strong> the table 2 revealed that highest fruit set <strong>of</strong> 78.6% was observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> Ab<strong>in</strong>av compared to rest <strong>of</strong> the hybrids, while the lowest fruit set <strong>of</strong> 28.1% was recorded<br />
<strong>in</strong> Lakshmi which was on par with Ruchi (34.55%). Thus, the hybrids which atta<strong>in</strong>ed early<br />
and pr<strong>of</strong>use flower<strong>in</strong>g had lower fruit set. These differences <strong>in</strong> flower<strong>in</strong>g characters might be<br />
attributed to changes <strong>in</strong> their genotypic habits as reported by Mangal (1981). The early<br />
matur<strong>in</strong>g hybrid Lakshmi produced the highest number <strong>of</strong> fruits per plant (20.13), yield per<br />
plant (1532 g) and per hectare (567.7q) and was significantly superior over rest <strong>of</strong> the hybrids.<br />
Moreover, pr<strong>of</strong>use flower<strong>in</strong>g and fruit bear<strong>in</strong>g enabled it to produce more fruits and yield <strong>in</strong> 3<br />
- 4 pick<strong>in</strong>gs as observed <strong>in</strong> early matur<strong>in</strong>g hybrids when compared to late matur<strong>in</strong>g hybrids<br />
with 5 – 6 pick<strong>in</strong>gs. On the contrary, late matur<strong>in</strong>g hybrids Manisha, Abh<strong>in</strong>av and Lehar<br />
recorded significantly low yields <strong>of</strong> 395 g, 567 g and 627 g per plant (Table 2). Jasm<strong>in</strong>e and<br />
Ramdas (1993) also reported that early matur<strong>in</strong>g hybrids produced higher yield than late<br />
matur<strong>in</strong>g hybrids. But, synchronization <strong>of</strong> fruit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Lakshmi could not enable it to produce<br />
staggered harvests. Similar observations <strong>in</strong> different tomato genotypes were observed by<br />
Gould (1983) who reported that synchronization <strong>of</strong> fruit<strong>in</strong>g after a period <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>use flower<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> early matur<strong>in</strong>g cultivars leads to once-over harvest<strong>in</strong>g. The hybrid US618 was the second<br />
best. It yielded 341.0 q ha -1 which was significantly more than rest <strong>of</strong> the hybrids. The fruit<br />
set <strong>of</strong> the hybrid was 60.65%. Its unique characteristic is that it provides cont<strong>in</strong>uous supply<br />
<strong>of</strong> fruits through staggered harvests. The habit <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>determ<strong>in</strong>ate growth, staggered flower<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and fruit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> hybrid US 618 enabled it to become suitable hybrid for staggered harvest<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
78
EVALUATION OF F 1<br />
HYBRIDS OF TOMATO<br />
In the present <strong>in</strong>vestigation, all the hybrids showed significant differences <strong>in</strong> their quality<br />
characters (Table 3). The largest fruit size <strong>of</strong> 23.11 cm 2 and weight <strong>of</strong> 80.42 g were recorded<br />
<strong>in</strong> the hybrid Ruchi. These parameters were on par <strong>in</strong> US 618 and Lakshmi. The fruits <strong>of</strong> Jk<br />
Asha and Manisha had maximum TSS content <strong>of</strong> 4.8%. The hybrid Ruchi was on par with<br />
these two hybrids. Lakshmi recorded the lowest TSS content <strong>of</strong> 3.67%. Manisha was very<br />
rich <strong>in</strong> ascorbic acid content <strong>of</strong> 19.71 mg 100g -1 and this was on par with ascorbic acid<br />
content <strong>of</strong> 19.27 mg 100g -1 <strong>in</strong> US 618, 18.63 mg 100g -1 <strong>in</strong> NS 2535, 18.09 mg 100g -1 <strong>in</strong> Ab<strong>in</strong>av<br />
and 16.47 mg 100g -1 <strong>in</strong> Ruchi. The late matur<strong>in</strong>g hybrids were thus rich <strong>in</strong> ascorbic acid<br />
content. Elliptical shape fruited hybrid NS 2535 had the thickest pericarp thickness measur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
0.73 cm and longest shelf life <strong>of</strong> 17.33 days. The pear shape fruited hybrid Abh<strong>in</strong>av also had<br />
thick pericarp <strong>of</strong> 0.70 cm and long shelf life <strong>of</strong> 15 days. The round shape fruited hybrid Ruchi<br />
showed the th<strong>in</strong> pericarp <strong>of</strong> 0.5 cm and short shelf life <strong>of</strong> 9.00 days. Thus, the elliptical or<br />
oblong or pear shaped fruits had thick pericarp thickness and long shelf life than those with<br />
rounded flat and spherical shaped fruits. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are <strong>in</strong> agreement with those <strong>of</strong><br />
Vanajalatha (1987). Thus, Lakshmi and US618 can be recommended as suitable hybrids for<br />
higher yield and staggered harvest<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Table 1. Growth performance <strong>of</strong> different tomato hybrids<br />
Hybrids Plant Number <strong>of</strong> Days to 50% Days to<br />
height branches per flower<strong>in</strong>g maturity<br />
at f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
plant at<br />
harvest(cm) f<strong>in</strong>al harvest<br />
JK Asha 112.33 19.67 25.00 71.33<br />
Lakshmi 103.33 15.67 24.33 71.00<br />
Lehar 108.33 17.67 41.00 93.00<br />
Ruchi 143.67 26.00 27.33 75.33<br />
Ab<strong>in</strong>av 110.33 18.67 42.00 95.00<br />
Manisha 118.33 20.67 41.33 94.00<br />
NS2535 109.33 18.33 41.67 94.67<br />
US618 125.00 21.67 39.33 90.67<br />
SE+ 3.10 0.89 0.86 1.60<br />
CD at 5% 9.41 2.71 2.61 3.42<br />
79
SUDHAKAR and PURUSHOTHAM<br />
Table 2. Fruit yield components <strong>of</strong> different tomato hybrids<br />
Hybrids Fruit set (%) Number <strong>of</strong> Yield per Yield<br />
fruits per plant plant (g) q ha -1<br />
JK Asha 41.18 11.75 637.0 236.3<br />
Lakshmi 28.10 20.13 1532.0 567.7<br />
Lehar 53.38 8.51 627.0 232.5<br />
Ruchi 34.55 9.77 785.0 290.9<br />
Ab<strong>in</strong>av 78.60 8.12 567.0 210.1<br />
Manisha 54.37 5.80 395.0 146.3<br />
NS2535 60.14 12.07 865.0 320.5<br />
US618 60.65 12.13 920.0 341.0<br />
SE+ 2.99 1.31 8.0 3.0<br />
CD at 5% 9.08 3.98 24.0 9.1<br />
Table 3. Fruit quality components <strong>of</strong> different tomato hybrids.<br />
Hybrids Fruit Fruit size Pericarp TSS (%) Ascorbic Shelf life<br />
weight (cm 2 ) thickness acid (days)<br />
(g) (cm) content<br />
(mg 100 g -1 )<br />
JK Asha 54.29 7.68 0.53 4.80 14.04 11.00<br />
Lakshmi 76.15 18.21 0.63 3.67 15.06 13.00<br />
Lehar 73.77 16.48 0.57 3.93 12.11 11.00<br />
Ruchi 80.42 23.11 0.50 4.60 16.47 9.00<br />
Ab<strong>in</strong>av 69.87 15.32 0.70 4.07 18.09 15.00<br />
Manisha 68.12 11.37 0.67 4.80 19.71 14.00<br />
NS2535 71.69 16.31 0.73 4.20 18.63 17.33<br />
US618 75.91 18.19 0.60 4.00 19.27 12.00<br />
SE+ 2.30 2.00 0.03 0.18 1.26 0.68<br />
CD at 5% 6.98 6.29 0.10 0.56 3.81 2.07<br />
80
EVALUATION OF F 1<br />
HYBRIDS OF TOMATO<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Baruah, G. K. S., Arora, S. K and Pandita, M. L. 1994. Effect <strong>of</strong> Paclobutrazole and nitrogen<br />
levels on fruit yield <strong>of</strong> Pusa ruby tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Indian Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences 64: 567-569.<br />
Gould, W. A. 1983. Tomato production, process<strong>in</strong>g and quality evaluation. 2 nd edition, AVI<br />
publish<strong>in</strong>g company, Westport, Connecticut.<br />
Jasm<strong>in</strong>e, A. P. J and Ramadas, S. 1993. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> F 1<br />
hybrids and cultivars <strong>of</strong><br />
tomato for yield components. South Indian Horticulture 41 (5): 248-250.<br />
Mangal, J. L., Sidhu, A. S and Pandey,V. C. 1981. Effect <strong>of</strong> stak<strong>in</strong>g and prun<strong>in</strong>g on growth,<br />
earl<strong>in</strong>ess and yield <strong>of</strong> tomato varieties. Indian Journal Agricultural Research 15 (2):<br />
103-106.<br />
Mohanty, B. K. 2001. Varietal performance <strong>of</strong> tomato <strong>in</strong> black soils <strong>of</strong> orissa. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Research, ANGRAU 29 (4): 22-26<br />
NHB, 2006. Crop wise area, production and productivity <strong>of</strong> major vegetable crops for the<br />
year 2005-2006 <strong>in</strong> India. www.<strong>in</strong>diastat.com. (onl<strong>in</strong>e statistical database).<br />
Raymon, 1985. Vegetable seed production University <strong>of</strong> Bath pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> Great Brita<strong>in</strong> at the<br />
pitman press Bath.<br />
Vanajalatha, K. 1987. Studies on the performance <strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum<br />
Mill) hybrids and varieties under Hyderabad conditions, M.Sc.(Ag.) thesis submitted<br />
to Acharya N.G. Ranga Agril. University, Hyderabad.<br />
81
Research Note<br />
J.Res. ANGRAU 37(3&4)82-85, 2009<br />
INFLUENCE OF GROWTH HORMONAL TREATMENTS ON SEED<br />
GERMINATION AND SEEDLING GROWTH OF SIMAROUBA<br />
(Simarouba glauca L.)<br />
L. PRASANTHI, P. MAHESWARA REDDY, P. S. SUDHAKAR,<br />
B. BALAKRISHNA BABU and K. RAJA REDDY<br />
Bi<strong>of</strong>uel Scheme, Regional Agricultural Research Station<br />
Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Tirupathi - 517 502<br />
Simarouba glauca commonly known as paradise tree belongs to family<br />
simaroubaceae. It is an ever green multipurpose tree, native <strong>of</strong> EL Salvador, Central America.<br />
It was <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> India <strong>in</strong> 1966, exclusively for soil conservation purpose, especially<br />
earmarked for waste lands, bald hills and degraded lands. In recent years, it has atta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
greater importance <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> its potential for edible oil, <strong>in</strong>dustrial vegetable oil and bi<strong>of</strong>uel<br />
production. It is a versatile oil tree with productivity potential as high as 2000 kg edible oil per<br />
hectare per year with ability to establish well even <strong>in</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>al/ wastelands (Syamasundar<br />
and Hiremath, 2001). It can play an important role not only <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the shortage <strong>of</strong> edible<br />
oil/ fat <strong>in</strong> the country but also limit<strong>in</strong>g country’s dependence on oil imports to meet domestic<br />
oil requirement. Simarouba is ma<strong>in</strong>ly propagated through seeds and like other oil seeds,<br />
seeds can be stored only for a limited period with slight reduction <strong>in</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ation percentage.<br />
Even the fresh seeds have germ<strong>in</strong>ation problems as only 60 percent <strong>of</strong> seeds are able to<br />
produce normal seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. In many <strong>of</strong> the forestry species, seed germ<strong>in</strong>ation and seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
growth is enhanced by externally applied growth promoters. Due to lack <strong>of</strong> sufficient literature,<br />
an attempt was made to <strong>in</strong>crease the seed germ<strong>in</strong>ation percentage and seedl<strong>in</strong>g growth<br />
<strong>in</strong> Simarouba glauca with externally applied growth regulators and chemicals.<br />
Freshly harvested Simarouba glauca seeds were collected from Forest Research<br />
Station, BIOTRIM, Tirupati dur<strong>in</strong>g May 2009 for the present study. The seeds were surface<br />
sterilized with 0.1% mercuric chloride for 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes and thoroughly washed with distilled<br />
water. There were eight treatments replicated four times. The seeds were treated by soak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> distilled water and growth regulators viz., IAA and GA at concentrations <strong>of</strong> 150, 200 and<br />
250 ppm for 24 h before sow<strong>in</strong>g and the seeds without any treatment served as control. The<br />
seeds were sown <strong>in</strong> polybags. The experiment was laid out <strong>in</strong> completely randomized design.<br />
The study was conducted under shade net conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g June, 2009 at Regional Agricultural<br />
Research Station, Tirupati. Irrigation was provided by pot water<strong>in</strong>g twice a day. Seed<br />
e mail: prasanthi64@rediffmail.com<br />
82
INFLUENCE OF GROWTH HORMONAL TREATMENTS<br />
germ<strong>in</strong>ation was counted upto 30 days after sow<strong>in</strong>g. The seedl<strong>in</strong>gs started germ<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
12 th day and cont<strong>in</strong>ued upto 25 th day after sow<strong>in</strong>g. Data on germ<strong>in</strong>ation time (days), germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
percentage, root and shoot length (cm), total seedl<strong>in</strong>g length (cm), fresh and dry weight <strong>of</strong><br />
root and shoot (g) and vigour <strong>in</strong>dex were recorded. Seedl<strong>in</strong>g vigour was measured <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />
vigour <strong>in</strong>dex. It was calculated as vigour <strong>in</strong>dex = germ<strong>in</strong>ation percentage X Total seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
length (cm) given by Abdul-Baki and Anderson (1973). The data recorded were subjected to<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> variance.<br />
The results showed that Simarouba glauca seed germ<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> mean 13.45 to 16.45<br />
days. This was not significantly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by different treatments. The untreated seed had<br />
a low germ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> 64.4%. The high concentration <strong>of</strong> IAA @ 250 ppm was deleterious and<br />
had also low seed germ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> 66.6%. The seeds soaked <strong>in</strong> distilled water or treated with<br />
IAA or GA @ 150 and 200 ppm for 24 h recorded 100% germ<strong>in</strong>ation. This could be due to<br />
plant growth regulators which <strong>in</strong>duced metabolization <strong>of</strong> stored reserves dur<strong>in</strong>g germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
as reported by Verma and Tandon (1988). Seed treatment with IAA @ 150 ppm significantly<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased not only the length <strong>of</strong> shoot (14.44 cm), root (30.70 cm) and seedl<strong>in</strong>g (45.14 cm)<br />
but also the fresh weight (2.60 g; 1.19 g) and dry weight (0.58 g; 0.26 g) <strong>of</strong> shoot and root<br />
followed by IAA 200 ppm and GA 200 ppm when compared to control. However, soak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
seed <strong>in</strong> distilled water did not <strong>in</strong>fluence these variables. The positive response attributed for<br />
enhanced growth <strong>of</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> shoot and root length as well as for <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
biomass <strong>of</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs with IAA and GA treatments might be due to diffusion <strong>of</strong> endogenous<br />
aux<strong>in</strong> and gibberell<strong>in</strong>s like substances (Mathur et al., 1971). Enhancement <strong>of</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
and seedl<strong>in</strong>g growth with IAA treatment has been reported earlier <strong>in</strong> Neem by Kumaran et al.,<br />
(1994). The maximum vigour <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>of</strong> 4514 was recorded by treat<strong>in</strong>g the seed with IAA @<br />
150 ppm followed by IAA 200 ppm (4280) and was significantly higher than that <strong>of</strong> control<br />
(2268). Higher germ<strong>in</strong>ation per cent and seedl<strong>in</strong>g length <strong>in</strong>dicated better growth potential <strong>of</strong><br />
the seedl<strong>in</strong>gs, which <strong>in</strong> turn positively <strong>in</strong>creased the vigour <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong> IAA 150 ppm. These<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are similar to those earlier reported by Radha krishnan and Renganayaki (2008).<br />
Therefore, seed treatment with IAA @ 150 ppm is the best technique to improve the<br />
germ<strong>in</strong>ation percentage <strong>of</strong> the seeds, root and shoot length, total seedl<strong>in</strong>g length, fresh and<br />
dry weight <strong>of</strong> root and shoot and eventually to maximize the seedl<strong>in</strong>g vigour. Farmers who<br />
cannot afford to purchase IAA or <strong>in</strong> the event <strong>of</strong> its non availability can opt seed soak<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
distilled water which is the next best option to improve the germ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> seeds.<br />
83
PRASANTHI et al.<br />
Table 1. Effect <strong>of</strong> growth regulators on seed germ <strong>in</strong>ation and seedl<strong>in</strong>g growth <strong>of</strong> Simarouba glauca<br />
Treatment Germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
time (days)<br />
Germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
percentage<br />
(%)<br />
Shoot<br />
length<br />
(cm)<br />
Root<br />
length<br />
(cm)<br />
Total<br />
seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
length<br />
(cm)<br />
Fresh weight<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
Shoot<br />
(g)<br />
Root<br />
(g)<br />
Dry weight <strong>of</strong><br />
Shoot<br />
(g)<br />
Root<br />
(g)<br />
Vigour<br />
Index<br />
T1 - Control 16.11 64.5 11.92 23.28 35.20 2.18 0.83 0.45 0.14 2268<br />
T2 - Distilled water 13.45 100.0 13.11 25.69 38.80 2.50 0.90 0.53 0.18 3880<br />
T3 - IAA 150ppm 15.11 100.0 14.44 30.70 45.14 2.60 1.19 0.58 0.26 4514<br />
T4 - IAA 200ppm 14.78 100.0 14.19 28.61 42.80 2.57 1.09 0.55 0.22 4280<br />
T5 - IAA 250ppm 16.22 66.6 11.93 29.75 41.68 2.00 0.80 0.43 0.11 2776<br />
T6 - GA 150ppm 15.11 100.0 14.18 25.78 39.96 2.09 0.73 0.35 0.09 3996<br />
T7 - GA 200ppm 15.22 100.0 13.91 26.13 40.04 2.53 1.00 0.54 0.20 4004<br />
T8 - GA 250ppm 16.45 88.5 12.70 24.33 37.03 2.42 0.89 0.48 0.19 3274<br />
SE+ 0.91 10.5 0.87 1.64 2.13 0.11 0.06 0.03 0.005 470<br />
CD at 5% NS 21.3 2.04 3.53 4.56 0.22 0.12 0.06 0.013 1009<br />
84
INFLUENCE OF GROWTH HORMONAL TREATMENTS<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Abdul baki, A.A and Anderson, J.J. 1973. Vigour determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> Soyabean seed by multiple<br />
criteria. Crop Science 13: 630-633<br />
Kumaran, K., Palani, M., Jerl<strong>in</strong>, R and Surendran, C.1994. Effects <strong>of</strong> growth regulators on<br />
seed germ<strong>in</strong>ation and seedl<strong>in</strong>g growth <strong>of</strong> Neem (Azadirachta <strong>in</strong>dica). Journal <strong>of</strong> Tropical<br />
forest science 6:529-532.<br />
Mathur, D.D., Cuurillon, G.A., V<strong>in</strong>es, H.M and Hendershoot, C.H. 1971. Stratification effects<br />
on endogenous gibberelic acid <strong>in</strong> peach seed. Horticulture science 6: 538-539<br />
Radhakrishnan, P and Renganayaki, P.R.2008. Effect <strong>of</strong> plant growth regulators on seed<br />
germ<strong>in</strong>ation and seedl<strong>in</strong>g growth <strong>of</strong> stored Simarouba (Simarouba glauca L<strong>in</strong>n) seeds.<br />
Indian forester 134 (7): 947-949<br />
Syamasundar, J and Hiremath, S.2001. Simarouba oil tree. Booklet published by UAS,<br />
Bangalore <strong>in</strong> association with National Oilseeds and Vegetable oils Development Board<br />
(ICAR), Gurgoan.<br />
Verma, A.N and Tandon, P.1988. Effect <strong>of</strong> growth regulators on germ<strong>in</strong>ation and seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> P<strong>in</strong>us kasiya and Schima khasiana. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> forestry 11: 32-36.<br />
85
Research Note<br />
J.Res. ANGRAU 37(3&4)86-91, 2009<br />
STUDY OF HETEROSIS FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT TRAITS<br />
IN PIGEONPEA (Cajanus cajan. L. Millsp)<br />
C.V.SAMEER KUMAR, CH.SREELAKSHMI, D.SHIVANI AND M.SURESH<br />
Agricultural Research Station<br />
Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University<br />
Tandur, Ranga Reddy – 501 141<br />
Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp) is an important pulse crop <strong>in</strong> India. Its prote<strong>in</strong><br />
content is approximately 21% which compares well with other important gra<strong>in</strong> legumes.<br />
Exploitation <strong>of</strong> heterosis is one <strong>of</strong> the important breed<strong>in</strong>g options for break<strong>in</strong>g yield barrier. It<br />
<strong>of</strong>fers great possibilities <strong>in</strong> crop improvement programme and is the only effective conventional<br />
means <strong>of</strong> comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g desirable characters <strong>of</strong> two or more varieties. Breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes <strong>in</strong><br />
pigeonpea are oriented to develop new varieties which have high yield potential and resistance<br />
to pests and diseases. Thus the ma<strong>in</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> the present <strong>in</strong>vestigation was to estimate<br />
the extent <strong>of</strong> heterosis for seed yield and its component characters and to select better<br />
crosses for further breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The present study comprised <strong>of</strong> six l<strong>in</strong>es, PRG 100, PRG 88, LRG 30, LRG 38, ICPL 85034<br />
and ICPL 85063 and four testers, ICP 8863, ICPL 87119, ICPL 84063 and ICPL 89044 <strong>of</strong><br />
pigeonpea. The hybridization was carried out <strong>in</strong> a l<strong>in</strong>e x tester scheme at Agricultural Research<br />
Station, Tandur dur<strong>in</strong>g kharif 2007. Ten parents along with their 24 hybrids were sown <strong>in</strong> a<br />
randomized block design with three replications dur<strong>in</strong>g kharif 2008 adopt<strong>in</strong>g 100 x 20 cm<br />
spac<strong>in</strong>g. Entire material compris<strong>in</strong>g parents and F 1<br />
s was sown <strong>in</strong> 2 rows <strong>of</strong> each <strong>in</strong> 5 m<br />
length plot. All the recommended package <strong>of</strong> practices were followed for rais<strong>in</strong>g normal crop.<br />
The observations were recorded on five randomlycompetitive plants for plant height, number<br />
<strong>of</strong> primary branches per plant, number <strong>of</strong> pod clusters per plant, number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant,<br />
100- seed weight and seed yield per plant. Days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g and days to maturity was<br />
recorded on plot basis. Sample <strong>of</strong> 100 seeds was taken for record<strong>in</strong>g their weight. The data<br />
were subjected to analysis <strong>of</strong> variance for various characters, mean performance <strong>of</strong> parents<br />
and their hybrids and heterosis.<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> variance revealed that variation among the genotypes was highly<br />
significant for all the characters. The parents showed significant variation for all the characters<br />
studied. The crosses also showed significant variation for all the characters except plant<br />
height. The overall heterosis as tested by us<strong>in</strong>g parents vs crosses was significant for all the<br />
characters except for number <strong>of</strong> clusters per plant. The range <strong>of</strong> mean performance <strong>of</strong> hybrids<br />
was higher <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g significant heterosis for all the characters.<br />
cv_sameerkumar@yahoo.com<br />
86
STUDY OF HETEROSIS FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT<br />
The range and mean <strong>of</strong> heterosis, number <strong>of</strong> significant heterotic crosses over better<br />
parent and standard hybrid for eight traits are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1. Earl<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> flower<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
maturity is a highly desirable trait for the crop like pigeonpea. Hence, the crosses exhibit<strong>in</strong>g<br />
heterosis <strong>in</strong> negative direction are <strong>of</strong> immense value. The cross ICPL 85034 x ICP 8863<br />
showed highest negative heterosis for days to flower<strong>in</strong>g (-17.63%) and days to maturity (-<br />
11.02%) over standard check ICPL 87119. The magnitude <strong>of</strong> heterosis was highest for plant<br />
height <strong>in</strong> cross ICPL 85034 x ICPL 84036 over better parent (24.42%), while maximum<br />
heterosis for primary branches per plant (46.28%) was observed <strong>in</strong> cross PRG 100 x ICPL<br />
87119 over standard check, ICPL 87119. Significant and highest positive heterosis over<br />
mid parent, better parent and standard hybrid was observed <strong>in</strong> cross LRG 30 x ICP 8863 for<br />
number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant. Two crosses viz. LRG 30 x ICP 8863 and LRG 38 x ICP 8863<br />
showed significant positive heterosis over mid parent for 100 seed weight. The cross LRG<br />
30 x ICP 8863 exhibited significant and highest positive heterosis for number <strong>of</strong> pods per<br />
plant (58.31%) followed by seed yield per plant (54.14%). These results are <strong>in</strong> agreement<br />
with the earlier f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Rajesh et al., (2005) and Reddy et al., (2004).<br />
Heterosis for seed yield per plant ranged from -1.25 to 54.14% over better parent<br />
and -3.66 to 53.14% over standard check, respectively. Four crosses viz. PRG 100 x ICP<br />
87119, LRG 30 x ICPL 87119, PRG 100 x ICP 8863 and ICPL 85063 x ICPL 87119 exhibited<br />
significant positive heterosis over mid parent, better parent and standard hybrid check for<br />
seed yield per plant(Table 2). These four hybrids also registered higher seed yield per plant.<br />
Such crosses are likely to give better transgressive segregants and could be used for further<br />
improvement.<br />
The magnitude <strong>of</strong> heterosis over better parent and standard check varied from cross<br />
to cross for seed yield and its components <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that all the characters dist<strong>in</strong>ctly differed<br />
for mean heterosis and its range <strong>in</strong> desirable direction. Considerable high heterosis <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong><br />
crosses and low <strong>in</strong> others revealed that, nature <strong>of</strong> gene action varied with the genetic make<br />
up <strong>of</strong> the parents <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the crosses. Such nature <strong>of</strong> heterosis helps <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
superior cross comb<strong>in</strong>ations and exploitation to select better transgressive segregants (Joshi<br />
et al., 2001)<br />
It will be <strong>of</strong> considerable <strong>in</strong>terest to know the cause <strong>of</strong> heterosis for seed yield <strong>in</strong><br />
pigeonpea. A comparison <strong>of</strong> heterosis for seed yield per plant <strong>in</strong> four most heterotic crosses<br />
over better parent and standard check (PRG 100 x ICPL 87119, LRG 30 x ICPL 87119, PRG<br />
100 x ICP 8863 and ICPL 85063 x ICPL 87119 ) along with heterosis for other related characters<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated that significant and positive heterosis over better parent and standard check for<br />
seed yield per plant was also accompanied by significant and high positive heterosis for<br />
87
KUMAR et al.<br />
number <strong>of</strong> primary branches per plant, number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant, number <strong>of</strong> pod clusters per<br />
plant and 100 seed weight. The cross PRG 88 x ICP 87119 showed significant positive<br />
heterosis for number <strong>of</strong> primary branches per plant and 100 seed weight over mid parent and<br />
standard check. The cross <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g ICPL 85063 x ICP 87119 recorded significant positive<br />
heterosis for number <strong>of</strong> pods per plant and seed yield per plant over better parent and standard<br />
hybrid check. Similar f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were also reported by Wankhade et al, (2005) and Joshi (2001).<br />
Many top heterotic hybrids for different attributes <strong>in</strong>volved parental comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong><br />
high x high, high x low and low x low yielder. The present study further suggested that<br />
heterosis for yield should be through component trait heterosis. Hybrid vigour <strong>of</strong> even small<br />
magnitude for <strong>in</strong>dividual yield components may have additive or synergistic effect on the<br />
end product. Graffius (1959) reported that the yield is the end product <strong>of</strong> multivariable <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
between yield components. Similar f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were also reported by Mehta et al., (1991).<br />
Thus, on the basis <strong>of</strong> per se performance and heterotic response the crosses viz., LRG 30 x<br />
ICP 8863, PRG 100 x ICP 8863, LRG 30 x ICPL 87119, ICPL 85063 x ICPL 87119 and PRG<br />
100 x ICPL 87119 appeared to be more suitable for practical plant breed<strong>in</strong>g programme to<br />
exploit heterosis.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Graffius, J. E. 1959. Heterosis <strong>in</strong> barley. Agronomy Journal 51: 551-551.<br />
Joshi, H. V., Mehta, D. R and Jadon, B. S. 2001. Heterosis <strong>of</strong> yield and yield components <strong>in</strong><br />
castor hybrids. Journal <strong>of</strong> Oilseeds Research 18: 164-169.<br />
Kempthorne, O. 1957. An <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> genetic statistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York,<br />
pp: 458-471<br />
Mehta, D. R., Vashi, P. S and Kukadia, M. O. 1991. Hybrid vigour <strong>in</strong> castor, Gujarat Agricultural<br />
University Journal 17: 16-22.<br />
Rajesh, R., Wankhade, K. B., Wanjari, G. M., Kadam and Jadhav, B.P. 2005. Heterosis for<br />
yield and yield components <strong>in</strong> pigeonpea <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g male sterile l<strong>in</strong>es. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Pulses Research 18: 141-143.<br />
Reddy, S. M., S<strong>in</strong>gh, S. P., Mehra, R. B and Govil, J. N. 2004. Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability and<br />
heterosis <strong>in</strong> early matur<strong>in</strong>g pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp.) hybrids. Indian Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Genetics and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g 64: 212-216.<br />
88
STUDY OF HETEROSIS FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT<br />
Table 1. Analysis <strong>of</strong> variance for co mb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>of</strong> the characters stud ied <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e x tester analysis <strong>in</strong><br />
pigeonpea<br />
Source <strong>of</strong><br />
variation df<br />
Days to<br />
50%<br />
flower<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Days<br />
to<br />
maturity<br />
Plant<br />
height<br />
(cm)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
primary<br />
branches<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
clusters/<br />
plant<br />
No. <strong>of</strong><br />
pods /<br />
plant<br />
100 seed<br />
weight<br />
(g)<br />
Seed<br />
yield<br />
Plant (g)<br />
Replications 2 6.39 2.61 46.39 0.66 18.02 610.53 0.35 14.29<br />
Treatments 33 372.69** 373.08** 403.50** 13.50** 403.21** 6157.64** 5.73** 99.22**<br />
Parents<br />
Parents vs.<br />
Crosses<br />
9 499.55** 522.09** 652.73** 12.64** 412.48** 5837.42** 9.47** 79.98**<br />
1 634.09** 453.96** 1815.07** 56.74** 15.66 11835.38** 3.32** 226.97**<br />
Crosses<br />
23<br />
311.68** 311.26** 244.61 11.96** 416.44** 6036.12** 4.38** 101.19**<br />
L<strong>in</strong>es<br />
5 551.06** 837.14** 367.28<br />
11.70 447.21 9226.47 11.95** 63.79<br />
Testers<br />
L<strong>in</strong>es x<br />
Testers<br />
3<br />
1010.28** 514.98* 541.38* 38.83** 644.99 9420.85 7.67** 385.40**<br />
15 92.16** 95.23** 144.38 6.67** 360.47** 4295.74** 1.19** 56.82*<br />
Error 66 3.42 2.71 194.44 1.31 28.10 1586.31 0.22 25.61<br />
** Significant at 1% level, * Significant at 5% level<br />
89
KUMAR et al.<br />
Table 2. Heterosis over mid parent (H1), better parent (H2) and standard check (H3) <strong>in</strong> Pigeonpea<br />
S.No Cross Days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g Days to maturity<br />
Plant height (cm)<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
branches/plant<br />
H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3<br />
1 PRG-100 x ICP-8863 5.63** 11.54** 2.24 3.75** 6.87** -1.97* 8.96 14.09* 12.33 27.45** 24.40** 38.30**<br />
2 PRG-100 x ICPL-84036 3.06 5.94** -2.88 -1.29 -1.08 -9.65** 2.51 7.62 5.96 -6.12 -7.54 -2.13<br />
3 PRG-100 x ICPL-87119 13.98** 28.32** 17.63** 1.99* 10.09** 0.98 8.98<br />
20.68** 18.82** 27.31** 18.03** 46.28**<br />
4 PRG-100 x ICPL-89044 4.26** 6.99** -1.92 2.91** 3.24** -5.91** 5.05 7.19 5.53 12.81 9.55 15.96*<br />
5 PRG-88 x ICP-8863 4.98** 7.21** 4.81** 0.31 1.24 -3.35** 5.76 10.32 9.42 12.23 -6.70 3.72<br />
6 PRG-88 x ICPL-84036 6.10** 6.62** 3.21* -1.16 1.08 -7.68** 1.09 5.72 4.86 21.87* 4.66 7.45<br />
7 PRG-88 x ICPL-87119 6.49** 15.74** 13.14** -6.54** -1.24 -5.71** 6.35 17.29* 16.33* 29.21**<br />
3.00 27.66**<br />
8 PRG-88 x ICPL-89044 -2.64 -1.99 -5.45** 0.00 2.38** -6.69** 6.22 7.98 7.10 4.29 -9.33 -9.57<br />
9 LRG-30 x ICP-8863 5.14** 12.58** 14.74** 4.26** 9.11** 6.10** 5.64 7.85 16.19* 24.46** 24.16** 38.03**<br />
10 LRG-30 x ICPL-84036 7.67** 18.54** 14.74** 8.76** 17.67** 7.48** -0.99 0.83 9.17 -5.24 -8.65 1.06<br />
11 LRG-30 x ICPL-87119 5.41** 6.15** 21.79** 5.56** 5.56** 12.20** 4.69 8.12 21.36** 19.73** 13.30* 40.43**<br />
12 LRG-30 x ICPL-89044 -3.01* 6.98** 3.21* 3.29** 11.88** 1.97* -1.77 2.92 5.45 -12.52 -16.83* -7.98<br />
13 LRG-38 x ICP-8863 7.64** 14.08** 3.85* 6.29** 10.22** -0.20 7.44 11.75 11.45 2.96 -8.37 1.86<br />
14 LRG-38 x ICPL-84036 0.00 3.17 -6.09** 1.73 2.17* -7.48** 3.25 7.67 7.38 4.49 -3.63 -1.06<br />
15 LRG-38 x ICPL-87119 11.53** 26.06** 14.74** 1.40 10.22** -0.20 -4.14 5.40 5.13 13.13 -3.86 19.15*<br />
16 LRG-38 x ICPL-89044 2.56 5.63** -3.85* 3.36** 3.70** -6.10** 1.65 3.04 2.77 6.70 -0.27 -0.53<br />
17 ICPL-85034 x ICP-8863 -6.20** 11.74** -17.63** 0.33 11.06** -11.02** 2.75 15.14 -0.06 14.12 -5.26 5.32<br />
18 ICPL-85034 x ICPL-84036 12.03** 29.57** -4.49** 9.99** 17.69** -5.71** 10.72 24.42** 7.99 12.99 -3.11 -0.53<br />
19 ICPL-85034 x ICPL-87119 11.56** 42.61** 5.13** 5.81** 23.10**<br />
-1.38 2.29 21.61** 5.55 17.52* -6.44 15.96*<br />
20 ICPL-85034 x ICPL-89044 7.34** 23.91** -8.65** 6.90** 14.25** -8.46** 14.92* 25.29** 8.75 16.74 1.33 1.06<br />
21 ICPL-85063 x ICP-8863 -7.53** -5.35** -3.53* -5.76** -5.67** -8.27** 5.21 5.36 13.51 -4.28 -9.09 1.06<br />
22 ICPL-85063 x ICPL-84036 11.50** 17.22** 13.46** 1.77* 5.17** -3.94** 2.63 2.75 11.00 12.34 10.88 13.83<br />
23 ICPL-85063 x ICPL-87119 2.46 6.31** 13.46** 4.93** 9.70** 6.89** 4.72 10.32 19.18** 1.66 -8.15 13.83<br />
24 ICPL-85063 x ICPL-89044 2.21 7.64** 3.85* 3.97** 7.56** -1.97* 6.84 9.75 12.45 15.05* 14.89* 14.89*<br />
90
STUDY OF HETEROSIS FOR YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT<br />
Table 2. contd….<br />
Cross No. <strong>of</strong> clusters/plant No. <strong>of</strong> pods/plant 100 seed weight Seed yield/plant<br />
1 PRG-100 x ICP-8863 10.42* 4.87 11.87* 3.15<br />
0.92 3.15 0.92 3.15 0.92 51.70** 50.13** 22.80**<br />
2 PRG-100 x ICPL-84036 -11.97 -21.51** -24.68** -3.09 -10.31** -3.09 -10.31** -3.09 -10.31** 5.41 -0.95 -20.60**<br />
3 PRG-100 x ICPL-87119 10.98* 2.82 15.67** -1.94 -5.02 -1.94 -5.02 -1.94 -5.02 31.31** 28.18** 7.79<br />
4 PRG-100 x ICPL-89044 -4.36 -14.64** -18.10** 1.50 -3.98 1.50 -3.98 1.50 -3.98 -5.81 -8.52 -26.73**<br />
5 PRG-88 x ICP-8863 -18.16** -24.55** -19.52** -1.14 -4.18 -1.14 -4.18 -1.14 -4.18 9.74 4.14 -14.82*<br />
6 PRG-88 x ICPL-84036 2.88 -5.60 -15.04** 0.36 -2.27 0.36 -2.27 0.36 -2.27 8.14 5.92 -22.21**<br />
7 PRG-88 x ICPL-87119 -15.85** -24.27** -14.80** 7.42* 5.17 7.42* 5.17 7.42* 5.17 18.62* 11.11 -6.57<br />
8 PRG-88 x ICPL-89044 -16.56** -23.37** -31.03** -1.99 -2.30 -1.99 -2.30 -1.99 -2.30 7.80 6.34 -19.72**<br />
9 LRG-30 x ICP-8863 15.08** 6.47 13.57* 12.27** -0.31 12.27** -0.31 12.27** -0.31 58.31** 49.67** 37.43**<br />
10 LRG-30 x ICPL-84036 -1.15 -9.62 -18.02** 11.31** 4.21 11.31** 4.21 11.31** 4.21 -4.79 -15.88* -22.76**<br />
11 LRG-30 x ICPL-87119 10.17* -0.49 11.94* 6.19 -4.85 6.19 -4.85 6.19 -4.85 30.43** 24.94** 14.72*<br />
12 LRG-30 x ICPL-89044 -5.88 -13.87* -21.87** -6.34 -14.21** -6.34 -14.21** -6.34 -14.21** -4.75 -13.22 -20.32**<br />
13 LRG-38 x ICP-8863 -27.02** -37.69** -33.53** 12.54** -6.86* 12.54** -6.86* 12.54** -6.86* 0.07 -12.05 -28.06**<br />
14 LRG-38 x ICPL-84036 13.86* 13.62 -14.25** -7.08 -19.30** -7.08 -19.30** -7.08 -19.30** 16.69 9.70 -22.74**<br />
15 LRG-38 x ICPL-87119 4.75 -12.49** -1.55 8.55* -9.41** 8.55* -9.41** 8.55* -9.41** -9.75 -21.61** -34.09**<br />
16 LRG-38 x ICPL-89044 19.47** 19.35** -9.92 -2.37 -16.88** -2.37 -16.88** -2.37 -16.88** 15.57 5.23 -20.56**<br />
17 ICPL-85034 x ICP-8863 -7.89 -22.66** -17.50** -2.67 -19.19** -2.67 -19.19** -2.67 -19.19** 14.23 4.54 -14.49*<br />
18 ICPL-85034 x ICPL-84036 12.15 10.14 -17.22** -4.54 -16.82** -4.54 -16.82** -4.54 -16.82** 11.30 9.32 -23.01**<br />
19 ICPL-85034 x ICPL-87119 -9.55 -25.64** -16.35** 6.87 -10.53** 6.87 -10.53** 6.87 -10.53** -7.50 -16.39* -29.69**<br />
20 ICPL-85034 x ICPL-89044 10.90 8.80 -18.06** -8.07* -21.48** -8.07* -21.48** -8.07* -21.48** 7.55 2.16 -22.88**<br />
21 ICPL-85063 x ICP-8863 -20.49** -28.39** -23.61** -0.84 -10.88** -0.84 -10.88** -0.84 -10.88** 1.01 -1.12 -15.57*<br />
22 ICPL-85063 x ICPL-84036 20.90** 13.60* -2.90 2.28 -3.01 2.28 -3.01 2.28 -3.01 0.77 -8.05 -21.50**<br />
23 ICPL-85063 x ICPL-87119 1.26 -10.90* 0.24 6.62 -3.29 6.62 -3.29 6.62 -3.29 39.88** 31.78** 12.52<br />
24 ICPL-85063 x ICPL-89044 24.98** 17.55** 0.48 6.64 -1.09 6.64 -1.09 6.64 -1.09 -1.20 -6.92 -20.53**<br />
91
ABSTRACTS<br />
Abstracts <strong>of</strong> Theses Accepted for the Award <strong>of</strong> Post-Graduate and<br />
Doctorate Degrees <strong>in</strong> the Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,<br />
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500 030<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> carriers on the performance <strong>of</strong> herbicides <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed castor<br />
and <strong>sorghum</strong><br />
Student: P. Anantha Kumari<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. V. B. Bhanu Murthy<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy<br />
The present study was conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g Kharif 2003-04 and 2004-05 at Hayathnagar Research<br />
Farm <strong>of</strong> Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad. In the experiment – I on<br />
castor, alachlor was <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to the soil before sow<strong>in</strong>g (PPI) and applied on the same day after sow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
as pre-emergence to <strong>weeds</strong> and crop as well along with different carriers. Granular form was also tested for<br />
comparison. In the experiment – II on <strong>sorghum</strong>, atraz<strong>in</strong>e was <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to the soil (PPI) and applied after<br />
sow<strong>in</strong>g as pre-emergence spray and also with different carries such as soil, sand and urea. In case <strong>of</strong> castor,<br />
PPI <strong>of</strong> alachlor resulted <strong>in</strong> better weed control under vary<strong>in</strong>g soil moisture and ra<strong>in</strong>fall conditions. Application<br />
<strong>of</strong> alachlor granules was also effective dur<strong>in</strong>g both the years. Days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g was delayed by 22 days<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g 2003 and by 20.6 days dur<strong>in</strong>g 2004. Hand weed<strong>in</strong>g coupled with <strong>in</strong>tercultivation at 20, 40 and 70 DAS<br />
resulted <strong>in</strong> weed free conditions for most <strong>of</strong> the crop-grow<strong>in</strong>g period that led to taller plants, more leaves per<br />
plant with higher LAI and higher dry matter production and ultimately higher bean yield <strong>of</strong> 820 kg/ha dur<strong>in</strong>g 2003<br />
and 961 kg/ha dur<strong>in</strong>g 2004. The weed control <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>fed <strong>sorghum</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicated that the early post-emergence<br />
application <strong>of</strong> atraz<strong>in</strong>e with soil as carrier was most effective dur<strong>in</strong>g 2003, a good ra<strong>in</strong>fall year and the effect<br />
was slowly improved with passage <strong>of</strong> time dur<strong>in</strong>g 2004 till maturity.<br />
The crop growth was good with hand weed<strong>in</strong>g and also <strong>in</strong> the plots <strong>of</strong> early post-emergence<br />
atraz<strong>in</strong>e. The days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g was delayed by 12.6 days to 20 days due to unweeded conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
2003 and 2004, respectively. The returns per rupee <strong>in</strong>vested on early post-emergence atraz<strong>in</strong>e with soil as<br />
carriers were Rs. 14.4 and Rs. 11.1 as aga<strong>in</strong>st Rs. 2.3 and Rs. 3.7 due to hand weed<strong>in</strong>g. The residues <strong>of</strong><br />
atraz<strong>in</strong>e could not be traced but, 2,4-D was found to persist after 45 days <strong>of</strong> application, based on bioassay<br />
studies. The study clearly showed that PPI <strong>of</strong> alachlor was highly effective <strong>in</strong> caster while early post-emergence<br />
application <strong>of</strong> atraz<strong>in</strong>e with soil was best weed control method <strong>in</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong>. Carriers have shown some effect<br />
on <strong>weeds</strong> and the WCEs were nearly 40-50% <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> pre-emergence herbicides. But carries did not help<br />
<strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g the efficiency <strong>of</strong> post-emergence herbicides. The returns per rupee <strong>in</strong>vested were more with<br />
herbicidal use compared to hand weed<strong>in</strong>g. Ph.D (2007).<br />
92
ABSTRACTS<br />
A Study on impact <strong>of</strong> ANGRAU production technologies<br />
for selected crops<br />
Student: G. Venkata Murali Major Advisor: Dr. P. Ramesh Kumar Reddy<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Extension Education<br />
In Andhra Pradesh, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University formerly known as Andhra Pradesh<br />
Agricultural University (APAU) plays a major role <strong>in</strong> agricultural research activities. These research activities<br />
are need based and location specific, which are carried out at RARS as well as at other Research Stations. A<br />
few studies on adoption and performance <strong>of</strong> agricultural technologies have been conducted <strong>in</strong> different parts<br />
<strong>of</strong> the country. The impact <strong>of</strong> ANGRAU production technologies for selected crops was studied us<strong>in</strong>g explorative<br />
research design. Three districts viz., Krishna, Anantapur and Warangal districts, represent<strong>in</strong>g Coastal,<br />
Telangana and Rayalasema were selected as sample area. Two mandals were selected from each <strong>of</strong> the<br />
district. Three villages were selected from each <strong>of</strong> the mandals. A total <strong>of</strong> 12 farmers from each selected<br />
village were selected i.e., for each crop four farmers were selected. Thus, a total sample is 216 farmers and<br />
research scientists from concerned crops and all the extension scientists <strong>of</strong> DAATTCs and KVKs work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
sample districts were selected. The data were collected by personal <strong>in</strong>terview method through pre-tested<br />
<strong>in</strong>terview schedule. Adoption, attitude, productivity, pr<strong>of</strong>itability and livelihood improvement <strong>of</strong> the selected<br />
respondents were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the study. Statistical procedures like frequency, percentage, standard deviation<br />
and paired‘t’ test were adopted to analyse and <strong>in</strong>terpret the data. Salient f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the study were a majority<br />
(50%) <strong>of</strong> rice farmers <strong>of</strong> Krishna district possessed favorable attitude and medium (41.67%) level <strong>of</strong> adoption<br />
<strong>of</strong> recommended ANGRAU technologies. Majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents (41.67%) had favorable attitude towards<br />
recommended technologies, whereas, majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents occupied medium category (37.50%) <strong>of</strong><br />
adoption and same number <strong>of</strong> the respondents (37.50%) were fall under low level <strong>of</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> recommended<br />
technologies. Majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents (45.83%) recorded favorable attitude and low level <strong>of</strong> adoption<br />
(62.50%) <strong>of</strong> recommended technologies. Calculated values <strong>of</strong> the t-test concluded that the‘t’ values were<br />
found to be non-significant for all the impact <strong>in</strong>dicators except physical and natural capital, after adoption <strong>of</strong><br />
recommended technologies by groundnut farmers <strong>of</strong> Warangal district.<br />
Major problems expressed by the research scientists <strong>in</strong> technology generation <strong>of</strong> rice, groundnut<br />
and chilli crops were biotype variation <strong>in</strong> gall midge, lack <strong>of</strong> effective <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> groundnut and low<br />
participation <strong>of</strong> extension scientists and farmers at the time <strong>of</strong> research project proposal suggestions were<br />
given by the research scientists to overcome these problems were more research is needed on different<br />
biotypes, research on specific <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g system should be needed and encourage the participation <strong>of</strong><br />
researchers, extension scientists and farmers dur<strong>in</strong>g the project proposal. Major problems expressed by the<br />
extension scientists <strong>in</strong> technology dissem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> rice, groundnut and chilli crop were lack <strong>of</strong> high yield<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and early matur<strong>in</strong>g varieties, ferti-cum seed drillers are unsuitable to ra<strong>in</strong>fed conditions and no hybrids from<br />
the university. Suggestions given by the extension scientists to overcome these problems were research<br />
scientists should work on plant genetic characters, suitable ferti-cum seed drillers should be designed and<br />
university should concentrate on develop<strong>in</strong>g the hybrids. Ph.D (2007).<br />
93
ABSTRACTS<br />
Genetic analysis for yield, its components and fusarium wilt<br />
resistance <strong>in</strong> castor (Ric<strong>in</strong>us communis L.)<br />
Student: V. Sridhar<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. Kuldeep S<strong>in</strong>gh Dangi<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The present <strong>in</strong>vestigation was carried out at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Palem and<br />
College Farm, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad from Kharif, 2005 to rabi 2006-07. Fifty five<br />
germplasm l<strong>in</strong>es/varieties were screened <strong>in</strong> a wilt sick plot <strong>of</strong> Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Ric<strong>in</strong>i at Regional<br />
Agricultural Research Station, Palem, dur<strong>in</strong>g Kharif, 2005. Of the 55 genotypes screened, n<strong>in</strong>e genotypes<br />
showed resistance to wilt (50% <strong>in</strong>fection). Five l<strong>in</strong>es were crossed with fifteen testers and the resultant seventy<br />
five hybrids along with parents and two standard checks viz., DCH-177 and DCH-32 were evaluated for<br />
comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability (L<strong>in</strong>e x Tester design) and heterosis. Data were recorded on ten quantitative traits. The<br />
results <strong>of</strong> comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis revealed the importance <strong>of</strong> additive gene action for the characters viz.,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> nodes upto primary spike, number <strong>of</strong> capsules per primary spike and 100 seed weight while nonadditive<br />
gene action for plant height, primary spike length, seed yield per plant and oil content. Both additive<br />
and non-additive gene actions were important for the characters like days to 50% flower<strong>in</strong>g and days to<br />
maturity. Among the parents VP-1. LRES-17, DPC-9, DCS-5, RG-2374, RG-1713, RG-1719, 48-1, Haritha,<br />
RG-246 and RG-224 were adjudged as the best general comb<strong>in</strong>ers for seed yield per plant, whereas Kranthi,<br />
DPC-9, RG-1417, DCS-9, RG-2724 and RG-224 possessed favourable genes for oil content. Hence, these<br />
female and male parents can be utilized <strong>in</strong> future breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes to evolve potential hybrids. However,<br />
the parents LRES-17 and DCS-9 and RG-2724 were found to be good comb<strong>in</strong>ers for earl<strong>in</strong>ess and dwarfness,<br />
apart from seed yield and oil content, respectively.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce L x T design does not provide comprehensive picture on gene action govern<strong>in</strong>g the traits,<br />
generation mean analysis through jo<strong>in</strong>t scal<strong>in</strong>g test was studied <strong>in</strong> four crosses for ten characters. The results<br />
deciphered that, simple additive dom<strong>in</strong>ance model exhibited lack <strong>of</strong> good fit for most <strong>of</strong> the characters <strong>in</strong> all the<br />
four crosses studied. Dom<strong>in</strong>ance and epistic <strong>in</strong>terations were played a major role <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>of</strong> yield and<br />
its components <strong>in</strong> castor. It can be categorically stated that, reciprocal recurrent selection or diallel selective<br />
mat<strong>in</strong>g are the need <strong>of</strong> the hour to modify the genetic architecture <strong>of</strong> castor for atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g higher yields. In the<br />
present study, on the basis <strong>of</strong> per se performance, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability, heterosis and wilt resistance for two<br />
hybrids Kranthi x RG-224 and LRES-17 x RG-224 were found most promis<strong>in</strong>g for seed yield and other<br />
components. These hybrids may be further evaluated for their stability over locations and years <strong>in</strong> contrast<br />
environments for exploitation <strong>of</strong> heterosis on commercial scale. Ph.D (2007).<br />
94
Comparative Studies on Production Potential <strong>of</strong> Model Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />
Systems under Integrated Nutrient Management Practices <strong>in</strong> Drylands<br />
Student: E. Rajanikanth<br />
ABSTRACTS<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. M.V.R. Subrahmanyam<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy<br />
The present study was conducted <strong>in</strong> Alfisols at Students’ Farm, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rajendranagar,<br />
Hyderabad dur<strong>in</strong>g Kharif seasons <strong>of</strong> 2005 and 2006. The present <strong>in</strong>vestigation comprised <strong>of</strong> two agr<strong>of</strong>orestry<br />
models i.e. guava based agrihorticultural system and hardwickia based agrisilvicultural system. The field<br />
experiment was laid out <strong>in</strong> spilt plot design with three replications separately <strong>in</strong> 8 year old guava plantation as<br />
well as <strong>in</strong> 11 years old hardwickia plantation. Among the different cropp<strong>in</strong>g situations studied <strong>in</strong> guava based<br />
agrihorticultural system, growth parameters like number <strong>of</strong> branches per plant, number <strong>of</strong> leaves per plant,<br />
leaf area per plant, leaf area <strong>in</strong>dex per plant, dry matter production per plant and crop growth rate, physiological<br />
parameters like photosynthetically active radiation, leaf temperature and different resistance, yield attribut<strong>in</strong>g<br />
characters like number <strong>of</strong> filled pods per plant, 100 pod weight and shell<strong>in</strong>g percentages, pod and haulm yields,<br />
NPK uptake and gross and net monetary returns from the crop significantly <strong>in</strong>creased under solecropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
groundnut when compared to <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> groundnut <strong>in</strong> nutritioned and unnutritioned guava plantations.<br />
Among different <strong>in</strong>tegrated nutrient management practices studied, growth parameters, physiological<br />
parameters, yield attribut<strong>in</strong>g characters, pod and haulm yields, harvest <strong>in</strong>dex, oil content and NPK uptake<br />
were significantly <strong>in</strong>creased to the maximum extent with the application <strong>of</strong> recommended dose <strong>of</strong> NPK <strong>in</strong><br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation with vermicompost as well as enriched FYM. The next best treatments were application <strong>of</strong><br />
recommended dose <strong>of</strong> NPK either alone or with FYM.<br />
Among the <strong>in</strong>teraction effects between cropp<strong>in</strong>g situations and <strong>in</strong>tegrated nutrient management<br />
practices, solecropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> groundnut with application <strong>of</strong> recommended dose <strong>of</strong> NPK along with vermicompost<br />
as well as enriched FYM showed the best performance <strong>in</strong> yield attributes characters and pod and haulm yields<br />
<strong>in</strong> both the agr<strong>of</strong>orestry models studied. However, <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> groundnut <strong>in</strong> pollarded hardwickia trees<br />
proved effective <strong>in</strong> improvement <strong>of</strong> yields <strong>of</strong> groundnut with the same <strong>in</strong>tegrated nutrient management practices<br />
when compared to other <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g situation <strong>in</strong> pollarded hardwickia plantation which gave higher monetary<br />
returns than solecropp<strong>in</strong>g situation. Overall groundnut <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g either with guava irrespective <strong>of</strong> nutrition<br />
or with hardwickia trees with pollard<strong>in</strong>g showed better performance <strong>of</strong> crop growth, yield attributes and yields<br />
next to solecropped groundnut under ra<strong>in</strong>fed situations. Total monetary returns from the system (tree+crop)<br />
were higher under <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g situations either <strong>in</strong> guava trees or pollarded hardwickia trees when compared<br />
to solecropp<strong>in</strong>g situations with the comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> organic manures especially with enriched FYM or FYM with<br />
the recommended dose <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers. Ph.D(2007).<br />
95
ABSTRACTS<br />
Studies on genetic divergence, heterosis and comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>in</strong><br />
paprika (Capsicum annuam L.)<br />
Student: S. Surya Kumari<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. C. Ravi Shankar<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Horticulture<br />
The present <strong>in</strong>vestigation was carried out at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Lam Farm,<br />
Guntur, dur<strong>in</strong>g Kharif 2005 to 2007 with 94 paprika accessions to study the genetic variability heritability,<br />
genetic advances as per cent <strong>of</strong> mean, genetic divergence, character association and path analysis, heterosis<br />
and comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability for several economic characters <strong>in</strong> paprika genotypes. The results <strong>of</strong> multivariate<br />
analysis <strong>in</strong>dicated that, random distribution <strong>of</strong> 94 paprika genotypes <strong>in</strong>to ten clusters <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> D 2 analysis and<br />
<strong>in</strong>to twelve clusters <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipal component analysis, which <strong>in</strong>dicated that there is no association <strong>of</strong><br />
genetic diversity with geographic diversity. By Mahalanobis’ D 2 statistic, it could be <strong>in</strong>ferred that the fresh fruit<br />
weight per plant followed by oleores<strong>in</strong> content and capsanth<strong>in</strong> content, contributed maximum towards genetic<br />
divergence Based on the <strong>in</strong>ter and <strong>in</strong>tra cluster distance among the groups, fourteen parents were selected 3<br />
from cluster X, 3 from cluster IX and one each from clusters, I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII and VIII respectively keep<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> view the characters contributed for divergence to obta<strong>in</strong> better and desirable seggregants. Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal<br />
component analysis identified three pr<strong>in</strong>cipal components (PCs), which contributed 78.47 per cent <strong>of</strong> cumulative<br />
variance. The population with high PCI values was characterize by fresh fruit yield per plant fresh to dry fruit<br />
recovery percentage, number <strong>of</strong> fruits per plant, capsanth<strong>in</strong> content and oleores<strong>in</strong> content. Where as population<br />
with high PC2 value was characterizes by high oleores<strong>in</strong> content, capsanth<strong>in</strong> content, fresh to dry pod<br />
recovery percentage, plant spread and days to 50 per cent flower<strong>in</strong>g. Correlation studies <strong>in</strong>dicated significant<br />
positive association <strong>of</strong> plant height, plant spread, and number <strong>of</strong> fruits per plant. Fruit girth and seeds per fruit<br />
and capsanth<strong>in</strong> content with dry fruit per plant. Path analysis studies revealed high positive direct effect <strong>of</strong><br />
number <strong>of</strong> fruits per plant on dry fruit yield per plant. In addition, weight <strong>of</strong> dry stalkless chillies per plant,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> seeds per fruit and capsanth<strong>in</strong> content, which exerted positive direct effect.<br />
The superiority <strong>of</strong> the hybrids <strong>in</strong> crosses was estimated over mid parent, better parent and standard<br />
check for all the 17 characters studied. The cultivars Byadigi Kaddi was selected as a standard check. For<br />
high productivity the crosses LCA-436 x CA-960, LCA-428 x KTPL-19, LCA-428 x LCA-424, LCA-436 x<br />
KTPL-19, LCA-432 x KTPL-19 were identified as the best heterotic comb<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />
The hybrid LCA-437 x CA-960 is considered to be the best heterotic comb<strong>in</strong>ation, which has<br />
recorded high oleores<strong>in</strong> content (16.7 per cent), maximum capsanth<strong>in</strong> content (7249 EOA units) and m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />
capsaic<strong>in</strong> content (0.09%). For all the 17 characters studied except for fruit length, number <strong>of</strong> seeds per fruit,<br />
and 100 seed weight, about 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> the crosses recorded significant heterosis over the mid parent. For<br />
characters like plant height, fresh fruit per plant, dry fruit yield per plant, days to maturity and number <strong>of</strong> fruits<br />
yield per plant, majority <strong>of</strong> the hybrids showed significant heterosis, whereas for character like seeds mid per<br />
fruit, seed weight, capsaic<strong>in</strong>, less than 50 per cent <strong>of</strong> crosses showed significant mid parent heterosis.. But the<br />
comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis revealed more <strong>of</strong> SCA variance than GCA variance except for capsanth<strong>in</strong> content<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that non-additive type <strong>of</strong> gene action was predom<strong>in</strong>ant for all the characters studied and additive<br />
gene effect for capsanth<strong>in</strong> content. Among 14 parents, 7 parents have significant positive gca effect for dry<br />
fruit yield per plant with the maximum observed <strong>in</strong> LCA-428 (134.49) followed by LCA-436 (111.51) and LCA-<br />
432 (53.45). In the present study the top five hybrids with high per se performance for fresh fruit yield per plant<br />
were LCA-436 x CA-960 (279.7), LCA-436 x B. Dabbi (207.39), LCA-422 x CA-960 (217.19), LCA-431 x<br />
B.Dabbi (220.3) and LCA-414 x B.Dabbi (175.06). These hybrids also exhibited high sca effects for total yield<br />
96
ABSTRACTS<br />
per plant and yield components. Similarly the crosses LCA-437 x KTPL-19 and LCA-437 x CA-960 had<br />
significant sca effects <strong>in</strong> desirable direction for capsaic<strong>in</strong> content. The parents <strong>of</strong> the crosses were positive x<br />
negative general comb<strong>in</strong>ers. However, it can be observed that the cross LCA-414 x KTPL-19 can be considered<br />
the best as it has desirable sca effects for quality parameters both capsaic<strong>in</strong> and capsanth<strong>in</strong>. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
total yield and quality parameters <strong>of</strong> paprika <strong>in</strong> the present study the crosses LCA-436 x CA-960, LCA-436 x<br />
B. Dabbi, LCA-422 x CA-960, LCA-414 x B. Dabbi standout for potential yield and quality characters. However,<br />
the present study has resulted <strong>in</strong> F I hybrids with higher yield potential but the same did not have maximum<br />
quality parameters. Ph.D(2007).<br />
Integrated Management <strong>of</strong> Red Rot Disease <strong>in</strong> Sugarcane Incited by<br />
Colletotrichum falcatum Went<br />
Student: K. Krishnamma<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. T. Vithal Reddy<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Plant pathology<br />
Investigations were carried out on micr<strong>of</strong>lora associate with phylloplane, rhizosphere and <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />
stalk tissue <strong>of</strong> healthy canes <strong>of</strong> red rot susceptible sugarcane varieties. Eight species <strong>of</strong> fungal and eight<br />
bacterial isolates were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Out <strong>of</strong> them, fungal isolate Trichoderma viride and bacterial isolate<br />
Pseudomonas aerug<strong>in</strong>osa were found superior to <strong>in</strong>hibit the red rot pathogen under <strong>in</strong> vitro conditions. Field<br />
experiments were conducted to f<strong>in</strong>d out the most effective method <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> T. viride and P. aerog<strong>in</strong>ose<br />
<strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the red rot diseases <strong>in</strong>tensity. Soil application alone or soil application together with other treatments<br />
were found to be most effective <strong>in</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> the disease and also improvement <strong>in</strong> quantitative<br />
and qualitative parameters. The fungicide hexaconazole 5% EC at 0.002 per cent concentration <strong>in</strong>hibited the<br />
mycelia growth <strong>of</strong> the fungus. Under field conditions, the fungicide at 0.2 per cent foliar spary was proved to<br />
be the best <strong>in</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> per cent disease <strong>in</strong>tensity. It also improved the quantitative and qualitative parameters<br />
due to the reduction <strong>in</strong> the pathogen <strong>in</strong> the treated canes. Among the 41 sugarcane genotypes screened, 32<br />
genotypes were found to be resistance and four moderately resistant.<br />
In the <strong>in</strong>tegrated management <strong>of</strong> red rot disease, maximum reduction <strong>in</strong> per cent <strong>in</strong>tensity was<br />
observed when biocontrol agent was applied thrice followed by the treatments received soil application one<br />
time <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with other treatments. Improvement <strong>in</strong> quantitative parameters might be due to reduction<br />
<strong>in</strong> per cent disease <strong>in</strong>tensity. Exploitation <strong>of</strong> native potential biocontrol agents and need based foliar spray <strong>of</strong><br />
the fungicide <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> other cultural, agronomical strategies has high potential to manage the disease<br />
under field conditions <strong>in</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> resistance genotypes red rot pathogen. Ph.D(2007).<br />
97
ABSTRACTS<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Calcium, Plant growth Regulators, Fungicides and package<br />
material on quality and Shelf Life <strong>of</strong> Acid Lime<br />
(Citrus aurantifolia Sw<strong>in</strong>gle)<br />
Student: Meduri Madhavi<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. K. Hari Babu<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Horticulture<br />
A set <strong>of</strong> four experiments was conducted to f<strong>in</strong>d the effect <strong>of</strong> different pre and post harvest application<br />
<strong>of</strong> calcium compounds, growth regulators and fungicides, packages materials and their comb<strong>in</strong>ations on shelf<br />
life and quality <strong>of</strong> acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia) cv. Balaji at S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh.<br />
Physiological loss <strong>in</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> acid lime fruits <strong>in</strong>creased gradually dur<strong>in</strong>g storage. Pre and post harvest<br />
application <strong>of</strong> BA reduced the PLW when compared to other treatment and control. Calcium and <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> calcium and growth regulators (BA and GA) <strong>in</strong> pre and post harvest treatments. However,<br />
calcium and magnesium decreased dur<strong>in</strong>g storage whereas potassium <strong>in</strong>creased gradually with a decrease<br />
at the end <strong>of</strong> storage Fruit treated with gungicides and untreated fruits exhibits no <strong>in</strong>fluence on m<strong>in</strong>eral<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> Ca, Mg and K. But fruits treated with BA reta<strong>in</strong>ed better quality and <strong>in</strong>creased shelf life over the<br />
other treatments and control.<br />
With regard to different packages materials, vented polythene l<strong>in</strong>ed CFB boxes were found to<br />
reduce PLW, TSS total sugars, titratable acidity, ascorbic acid content and antioxidant enzyme actively.<br />
Further, ripen<strong>in</strong>g changes like development <strong>of</strong> carotenoids were effectively delayed with better retention on<br />
firmness and <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the shelf life. M<strong>in</strong>eral like Ca, Mg and K were higher <strong>in</strong> fruits stored <strong>in</strong> vented<br />
polythene l<strong>in</strong>ed CFB boxes. The treatmental comb<strong>in</strong>ation with preharvest spray <strong>of</strong> BA at 30 ppm + postharvest<br />
dip with BA 75 ppm and stored <strong>in</strong> vented polythene l<strong>in</strong>ed CFB boxes was found to be effective <strong>in</strong> delay<strong>in</strong>g<br />
postharvest changes, improv<strong>in</strong>g quality and extend<strong>in</strong>g shelf life <strong>of</strong> acid lime fruits. Ph.D(2007).<br />
Studies on development <strong>of</strong> transgenic male sterile and restorer l<strong>in</strong>es<br />
<strong>in</strong> safflower (Carthamus t<strong>in</strong>ctorius L.) us<strong>in</strong>g unedited mitochondrial<br />
gene(s)<br />
Student: K. N. Yam<strong>in</strong>i<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. S. Sokka Reddy<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Genetic and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The present <strong>in</strong>vestigation was carried out with aim <strong>of</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g constructs and us<strong>in</strong>g then for the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> transgenic male sterile and restores l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> safflower. In the first phase, studies were taken<br />
up with the aim <strong>of</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g suitable candidate genes for this approach. Three safflower mitochondrial genes<br />
viz., atp6, atp9 and nad3, were studied. In the next phase, constructs for <strong>in</strong>duction <strong>of</strong> transgenic male sterility<br />
and restoration <strong>of</strong> fertility were developed us<strong>in</strong>g the u-nad 3/u-atp9 genes. Vectors for restoration <strong>of</strong> fertility<br />
based on post-transcriptional gene silenc<strong>in</strong>g (PTGS) approach were developed so that they could down<br />
regulate the expression <strong>of</strong> u-nad/3u-atp9 genes thereby restor<strong>in</strong>g fertility. The full-length antisense constructs<br />
<strong>of</strong> these u-nads3 and u-atp9 genes were developed under both 35S promoter (SANP and SSAP) and TA29<br />
98
ABSTRACTS<br />
promoter (TANP and TAAP). Also the ihp-RNA vectors aga<strong>in</strong>st both these genes under 35S promoter (p-ihp<br />
nad 3 and p-ihp atp-9) and under TA29 promoter (p-T-ihp nad3 and p-T atp9) were developed. As reproducible<br />
regeneration and transformation protocols were not available <strong>in</strong> safflower, attempts were made under the<br />
present <strong>in</strong>vestigation towards regeneration <strong>of</strong> safflower shoots us<strong>in</strong>g immature embryos as explants.<br />
The two constructs for <strong>in</strong>duction <strong>of</strong> male sterility i.e., LBA4404: pB<strong>in</strong>-TCNN-Bar and LBA4404: pB<strong>in</strong>-<br />
TCAN-Bar as well as two constructs for restoration <strong>of</strong> fertility i.e., LBA4404: p-B<strong>in</strong>-T-ihp nad3 and LBA4404:<br />
pB<strong>in</strong>-T-ihp atp9 were used to develop transgenic safflower and tobacco plants. All these transgenic plants<br />
were confirmed by PCR analysis for presence <strong>of</strong> the transgene and by leaf assays for sensitivity to<br />
phosph<strong>in</strong>ithric<strong>in</strong> or hygromyc<strong>in</strong> (depend<strong>in</strong>g on the vector used). The plants and their flowers were observed<br />
for any morphological differences as well as for pollen fertility. Tissue culture derived shoots <strong>of</strong> safflower were<br />
lanky and they did not produce many flowers <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>herent problem <strong>of</strong> de novo regenerated shoots.<br />
Among the few transgenic safflower plants that reached flower<strong>in</strong>g, three out <strong>of</strong> the six obta<strong>in</strong>ed with TCNN-Bar<br />
construct and one out <strong>of</strong> five obta<strong>in</strong>ed with TCAN-Bar construct, showed partial sterility (34.2%-69% and 32%<br />
pollens fertility respectively). Of the tobacco transgenic plants that reached flower<strong>in</strong>g, one plant out <strong>of</strong> thirty<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed with TCNN-Bar construct was sterile with less that 5% pollen tak<strong>in</strong>g up actetocarm<strong>in</strong>e sta<strong>in</strong> and<br />
these pollen germ<strong>in</strong>ation medium. This study has provided the prelim<strong>in</strong>ary ground work and pro<strong>of</strong>-<strong>of</strong>-concept<br />
that the genes atp9 and nad3 could be used as candidate genes for <strong>in</strong>duction <strong>of</strong> male sterility <strong>in</strong> safflower and<br />
tobacco. The future l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> work <strong>in</strong>volves further molecular characterization <strong>of</strong> these transgenic plants along<br />
with development and characterization <strong>of</strong> more number <strong>of</strong> transgenic plants with these constructs to provide<br />
a strong foot<strong>in</strong>g to this approach. This could lead to development <strong>of</strong> a complete poll<strong>in</strong>ation control system, not<br />
only <strong>in</strong> safflower, but also <strong>in</strong> other crops. Ph.D(2007).<br />
Pollution potential <strong>of</strong> sewage sludge and Urban Compost and Their<br />
Evaluation as Manures <strong>in</strong> Tomato – Cabbage Cropp<strong>in</strong>g Sequence<br />
Student: P. Kavitha<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. K. Jeevan Rao<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry<br />
The present <strong>in</strong>vestigation entitled “Pollution potential <strong>of</strong> sewage sludge and urban compost and their<br />
evaluation <strong>in</strong> tomato – cabbage cropp<strong>in</strong>g sequences” was carried out at both <strong>in</strong> the field (2003 – 04) and<br />
greenhouse conditions simultaneously at College Farm, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.<br />
In order to know the m<strong>in</strong>eralization pattern and to understand the changes <strong>in</strong> the status <strong>of</strong> heavy metals <strong>of</strong><br />
organic manures and for organic matter fractions, an <strong>in</strong>cubation study was also carried out. The experimental<br />
soil was low <strong>in</strong> available N (196.3 kg ha -1 ) and P 2<br />
O 5<br />
(21.16 kg ha -1 and medium <strong>in</strong> K 2<br />
O (305.3 kg ha -1 A<br />
laboratory <strong>in</strong>cubation study <strong>in</strong>cubation study was also conducted to know the transformation <strong>of</strong> heavy metals<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g decomposition <strong>of</strong> organic manures applied. The treatment for tomato crop <strong>in</strong> the Kharif 2003 with four<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> treatments viz., 0, 50, 75 and 100 per cent RDF and seven sub treatments viz., two levels <strong>of</strong> each<br />
sewage sludge, urban compost, FYM (20 and 40 T ha -1 ) and control (without manure) and comb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>of</strong><br />
fertilizer levels along with organic manorial levels, thus, total <strong>of</strong> 28 treatments, each replicated thrice was laid<br />
out <strong>in</strong> a split plot design. The highest fresh fruit yield (43.12 t ha -1 ) and fruit dry matter (3105 kg ha -1 ) <strong>of</strong> tomato<br />
were resulted <strong>in</strong> treatment with sewage slugde applied @ 40 t ha -1 along with 100 per cent RDF. Greenhouse<br />
99
ABSTRACTS<br />
also showed higher fresh fruit yield (1142 g pot -1 ), plant dry matter (84.84 g pot -1 ) and head dry matter (82.22<br />
g pot -1 ) with sewage sludge applied @ 40 t ha -1 along with 100 percent RDF.<br />
The mean highest concentration and uptake <strong>of</strong> all heavy metals <strong>in</strong> tomato crop resulted with the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> sewage sludge @ 40 t ha -1 followed by 20 t ha -1. . Application <strong>of</strong> manures either alone or <strong>in</strong><br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation with fertilizers did not have significantly <strong>in</strong>fluence on quality parameters <strong>of</strong> tomato fruit at harvest<br />
but highest prote<strong>in</strong> content (18.31 per cent), ascorbic acid (25.50 mg 100 g -1 ) and total soluble solids (4.71 per<br />
cent) were observed <strong>in</strong> sewage sludge applied @ 40 t ha -1 along with 100 per cent RDF . The highest concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> major, micronutrients and heavy metals and their uptake <strong>of</strong> cabbage was noticed <strong>in</strong> the sewage sludge<br />
applied@ 40 t ha -1 along with 100 per cent RDF closely followed by sewage sludge applied @ 40 t ha -1 along<br />
with 75 per cent RDF both under field and greenhouse experiments. Whereas the highest Mn concentration<br />
and uptake <strong>in</strong> plant and head were recorded <strong>in</strong> sewage sludge applied @ 40 t ha -1 along with 50 per cent RDF.<br />
The results from organic manures <strong>in</strong>cubation study showed that production <strong>of</strong> humic fractions (humic acid and<br />
fulvic acid) were maximum with sewage sludge (14.23 and 3.42 per cent) followed by urban compost (9.90<br />
and 2.52 per cent) and FYM (9.12 and 2.31 per cent). The HA production <strong>in</strong>creased with <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> period <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>cubation from <strong>in</strong>itial to 120 days <strong>in</strong> all the treatments, while FA production <strong>in</strong>itially <strong>in</strong>creased upto 80 days and<br />
decreased thereafter.<br />
The highest benefit : cost ratio obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> treatment with sewage sludge applied @ 40 t ha -1 along<br />
with 50 per cent RDF for tomato (2.77) and residual sewage sludge applied @ 40 t ha -1 along with 100 per cent<br />
RDF for cabbage crop (5.51). However, applied data <strong>of</strong> economic analysis (from both the crops i.e., tomato<br />
and cabbage) <strong>in</strong>dicated that the highest B:C ratio (3.88) was obta<strong>in</strong>ed with sewage sludge applied @ 40 t ha -<br />
1<br />
along with 75 per cent RDF. To obta<strong>in</strong> higher <strong>in</strong>come and to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> better soil conditions, application <strong>of</strong><br />
sewage sludge @ 40 t ha -1 along with 75 per cent RDF for tomato – cabbage cropp<strong>in</strong>g sequence is<br />
recommended. Ph.D(2007).<br />
Studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> Pre and Post Harvest handl<strong>in</strong>g technologies<br />
on Extension <strong>of</strong> vase life <strong>of</strong> carnation flowers (Dianthus caryophyllus<br />
L.)cv. Dom<strong>in</strong>go<br />
Student: N.Sunanda Rani<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. R. Chandra Sekhar<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Horticulture<br />
The present <strong>in</strong>vestigation entitled “Studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> pre and post harvest handl<strong>in</strong>g techniques<br />
on extension <strong>of</strong> vase life <strong>of</strong> carnation cut flowers, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural<br />
University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, dur<strong>in</strong>g October 2005 to March 2007. A total <strong>of</strong> n<strong>in</strong>e experiments were<br />
conducted, from which the first experiment was conducted to evaluate the appropriate stage <strong>of</strong> harvest and<br />
age <strong>of</strong> mother plant. The flower harvested at pa<strong>in</strong>t brush from 6 months old mother plant recorded maximum<br />
vase life (13.62 days) with maximum flower diameter (5.98 cm) and quality, though the flowers harvested at<br />
tight bud stage recorded highest vase life (15.67 days) they did not open completely as that <strong>of</strong> flowers<br />
harvested at pa<strong>in</strong>t brush stage. Among the different biocides studies, 8-HQS 300 ppm was very effective <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the vase life <strong>of</strong> carnation cut flowers. Among the different organic extracts, neem extract at 2 per<br />
cent has recorded maximum vase life over other organic extracts studied. From a set <strong>of</strong> six experiments, the<br />
100
ABSTRACTS<br />
best treatments were selected based on their physiological, biochemical and anatomical parameters to prolong<br />
maximum vase life, 8-HQS 300 ppm (biocide), neem extract 2% (organic extract), STS 5.5 mM (ethylene<br />
<strong>in</strong>hibitor) and AgNO 3<br />
50 ppm (m<strong>in</strong>eral salt) were tried <strong>in</strong> different comb<strong>in</strong>ations along with sucrose 5 per cent<br />
commonly for all the treatments to study their comb<strong>in</strong>ed effect. Among the different treatment comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
tried, 8-HQS 300 pmm + AgNO 3<br />
50 ppm + sucrose 5 per cent significantly <strong>in</strong>creased the vase life by 209 per<br />
cent over control. Cut carnations were pulsed with best treatment comb<strong>in</strong>ations i.e., 8-HQS 300 pmm +<br />
AgNO 3<br />
50 ppm + sucrose 5 per cent for 24 hours and packed with three different packag<strong>in</strong>g material (polythene<br />
sheet, tissue paper, craft paper) at four levels <strong>of</strong> ventilation (0%, 20%, 40% and 60%) <strong>in</strong> corrugated fibre board<br />
boxes (CFB). Later, they were stored <strong>in</strong> room temperature for 4 days (as prevail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> domestic market).<br />
Based on physiological loss <strong>in</strong> weight, per cent spoiled flowers / wilted or faded flowers was subsequently<br />
evaluated for vase life. The treatment <strong>of</strong> tissue paper with 20 per cent ventilation CFB recorded maximum<br />
vase life (9.01 days) followed by polythene sheet with 20 per cent ventilation _ CFB (8. 51 days). These<br />
flowers also ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed moderate levels <strong>of</strong> anthocyan<strong>in</strong> content <strong>in</strong> flower petals (4.82 mg Congo Red/g f wt)<br />
compared to other treatments. Ph.D(2007).<br />
“Studies on propogation, production and post harvest storage <strong>in</strong><br />
Kakrol( Momordica dioicA Roxb.)”<br />
Student: T. S. K. K. Kiran Patro<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. K. Malla Reddy<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Horticulture<br />
A set <strong>of</strong> seven experiments were conducted to standardize the propagation, production and post<br />
harvest storage methods <strong>in</strong> kakrol fruits at Agriculture Research Institute and Post Harvest Technology<br />
Laboratory, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh dur<strong>in</strong>g the period from June<br />
2005 to November 2006.<br />
The experiment on the effect <strong>of</strong> different chemical temperatures and their comb<strong>in</strong>ations on break<strong>in</strong>g<br />
seed dormancy <strong>in</strong> kakrol was studied.<br />
The studies on effect <strong>of</strong> different growth substances and type <strong>of</strong> cutt<strong>in</strong>g on root formation <strong>in</strong> kakrol<br />
v<strong>in</strong>e cutt<strong>in</strong>g revealed that male cutt<strong>in</strong>gs treated with IBA at 1500 ppm recorded early and higher percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
root<strong>in</strong>g (92.60), number <strong>of</strong> roots per cutt<strong>in</strong>g, length <strong>of</strong> the shoot, number <strong>of</strong> leaves per cutt<strong>in</strong>g and percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> establishment compared with other treatment comb<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />
The studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> different chemicals on shelf <strong>of</strong> kakrol fruits revealed that <strong>in</strong> GA 3<br />
(10 ppm)<br />
physiological loss <strong>in</strong> weight and percentage <strong>of</strong> spoilage was lowest, higher total soluble solids, titrable acidity,<br />
ascorbic acid content, reduc<strong>in</strong>g sugars and organoleptic score compared with all other chemical treatments.<br />
The studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> different gauges <strong>of</strong> polythene bags with different ventilation levels on the<br />
shelf life <strong>of</strong> kakrol fruits recorded significantly lower physiological loss <strong>in</strong> weight at 0 per cent ventilation<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> gauges. The spoilage percentage was lower at 0.5 per cent ventilation irrespective <strong>of</strong> gauges.<br />
The studies on effect <strong>of</strong> gamma irradiation on the shelf life <strong>of</strong> kakrol fruits revealed that 0.25 kGy at<br />
room temperature and <strong>in</strong> cold storage recorded lower physiological loss <strong>in</strong> weight and percentage <strong>of</strong> spoilage.<br />
101
ABSTRACTS<br />
Further it also recorded the higher total soluble solids, titrable acidity ascorbic acid content, reduc<strong>in</strong>g sugars<br />
and organoleptic score expects total soluble solids than their rest <strong>of</strong> the irradiation treatments and control. The<br />
number <strong>of</strong> days <strong>of</strong> storage <strong>in</strong> cold storage was 12 days compared to n<strong>in</strong>e days at room temperature storage.<br />
The studies on effect <strong>of</strong> different chemicals for improv<strong>in</strong>g quality <strong>of</strong> dehydrated kakrol fruit revealed<br />
that among all the treatments, blanch<strong>in</strong>g for 30 seconds + 2000 ppm potassium metabisulphite recorded the<br />
higher rehydration ratio and the lower f<strong>in</strong>al moisture content <strong>of</strong> dried pieces, per cent loss <strong>of</strong> total soluble<br />
solids, per cent loss <strong>of</strong> titrable acidity, per cent loss <strong>of</strong> ascorbic acid content and per cent loss reduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sugars. The study on storage life and quality parameters <strong>of</strong> rehydrated products revealed a gradual decrease<br />
<strong>in</strong> cook<strong>in</strong>g quality, texture, colour and appearance, taste, flavor and overall acceptability with <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
storage period from zero to sixth month except f<strong>in</strong>al moisture content <strong>of</strong> dried pieces which <strong>in</strong>creased with<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> storage period. Ph.D(2007).<br />
Exploitation <strong>of</strong> Diverse cytoplasmic male sterile sources for the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> heterotic hybrids with resistance to Alternaria leaf<br />
blight disease <strong>in</strong> sunflower (Helianthus annus L.)<br />
Student: M. Sujatha<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. K. Hussian Sahib<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The present <strong>in</strong>vestigation entitled “Exploitation <strong>of</strong> diverse cytoplasmic male sterile sources for the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> heterotic hybrids with resistance to Alternaria leaf blight disease <strong>in</strong> sunflower (Helianthus<br />
annus L.)”. was conducted us<strong>in</strong>g six different cytoplasmic male sterile l<strong>in</strong>es belong<strong>in</strong>g to diverse cytoplasmic<br />
sources viz., CMS 234A (PET 1), CMS 7-1A(PET 1),DCMS 36 (ARG), DCMA 1 (GIG I), DCMS 15 (GIG 1)<br />
and 20 diverse <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es,. The study was aimed to identily the effective restorers for the six diverse CMS<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es, genetics <strong>of</strong> fertility restoration, extent ot heterosis, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability and to identify a potential donor with<br />
resistance to Alternaria leaf blight disease. The experiment was laid out at Directorate <strong>of</strong> Oil seeds Research,<br />
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad dur<strong>in</strong>g rabi 2004-05, Kharif 2005, rabi 2005-06 and kharif 2006.<br />
Six elite CMS l<strong>in</strong>es possess<strong>in</strong>g four different cytoplasmic sources were crossed with 20 diverse<br />
<strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es. The resultant 120 hybrids were evaluated for fertility restoration / ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>er pattern <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>bred<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es. Out <strong>of</strong> 20 <strong>in</strong>breds, 16 <strong>in</strong>breds restored fertility for CMS 234A (PET 1) and CMS 7-1A (PET 1), 12 <strong>in</strong>breds<br />
for DCMS 6 (PET 2), 14 <strong>in</strong>breds for DCMS 36 (ARG), 3 <strong>in</strong>breds for DCMS 1 (GIG 1) and DCMA 15 (GIG 1).<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 120 hybrids, fertility was restored <strong>in</strong> 64 hybrids. These 64 fertile hybrids were evaluated for yield and<br />
yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g traits, diseases reaction aga<strong>in</strong>st Alternaria leaf blight along with parents ad two standard<br />
checks. Data generated on a set <strong>of</strong> 40 F 1<br />
s (4l<strong>in</strong>es x 10 testers) were utilized for estimation <strong>of</strong> comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability<br />
and heterosis.<br />
The comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis was studie us<strong>in</strong>g four CMS l<strong>in</strong>es, 10 restorers and 40 hybrids. The<br />
estimates <strong>of</strong> variance components revealed that SCA variance was higher <strong>in</strong> magnitude compared to GCA<br />
variance except head diameter <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the predom<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>of</strong> non-additive gene action while additive gene<br />
action for head diameter. Among the l<strong>in</strong>es, DCMA 36 for seeds yield, DCMA 6 for oil content were found to be<br />
good general comb<strong>in</strong>ers and possessed favourble alleles for these traits. Among the testers , DRS 9. DRS<br />
102
ABSTRACTS<br />
102, RHA 340 and DRS 34 were adjudged as good general comb<strong>in</strong>ers for seed yield, oil content and other<br />
contribut<strong>in</strong>g characters. Among the forty cross comb<strong>in</strong>ations DCMS 6 x DRS 22, DCM 36 x DRS 16, DCMS<br />
6 x DRS 45, CMS 7-1A x RHA 340, CMS 234 A x DRS 16 were found to be good specific comb<strong>in</strong>ers and other<br />
yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g characters.<br />
Among the forty hybrids studied for heterosis CMS 7-1A x DRS 45, DCMS 36 x DRS 9 recorded<br />
positive significant heterosis, heterobeltiosis and standard heterosis over two checks (KBSH 1 and PAC<br />
1091) for seed yield and oil content also. These hybrids along with seed yield also recorded significant positive<br />
heterosis for other yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g characters.<br />
The 26 parents and 64 hybrids were screened both under field and laboratory conditions for their<br />
resistance / susceptibility aga<strong>in</strong>st Alternaria leaf blight disease. Four parents CMS 7-1A, DRS 9, DRS 63, DRS<br />
34 and four hybrids CMS 7-1A x DRS 22, CMS 7-1A, DRS 9, DCMS 15 x DRS 9, DCMS 15 x DRS 63 showed<br />
resistance reaction both under fields and laboratory conditions. It was observed that selected l<strong>in</strong>es, testers<br />
and their hybrids showed varied levels <strong>of</strong> resistance and none exhibited either immune or highly resistant<br />
reaction to the disease. Ph.D(2007).<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> stra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Beauveria bassiana vuillem<strong>in</strong> to certa<strong>in</strong><br />
production parameters and virulence aga<strong>in</strong>st Spodoptera litura<br />
fabricius<br />
Student: P. Rajanikanth<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. G. V. Subbaratnam<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology<br />
Investigation were conducted to evaluate four stra<strong>in</strong>s (Bb-13, Bb-11, Bb-5A and Bb-N) and two local<br />
isolates (Bb-L-1 and Bb-L-2) <strong>of</strong> Beauveria bassiana Vuillem<strong>in</strong> for their pathogenicity aga<strong>in</strong>st third <strong>in</strong>star larvae<br />
<strong>of</strong> Spodoptera litura Fabricius, stability <strong>of</strong> their biological properties at various subcultur<strong>in</strong>g frequencies, mass<br />
production ability on economically viable substrates and their compatibility with commonly used <strong>in</strong>secticides.<br />
The effective stra<strong>in</strong> was further evaluated for its bioefficiency <strong>in</strong> Green house conditions and its genetic<br />
variability was compared with other stra<strong>in</strong>s follow<strong>in</strong>g PCR-based RAPD analysis <strong>in</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology<br />
and AICRP on Biological control <strong>of</strong> crop pests and <strong>weeds</strong>, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g 2004-06.<br />
In respect <strong>of</strong> biological properties, the stra<strong>in</strong> Bb-5A was superior with significant higher radial growth,<br />
higher conidial concentration, less time taken germ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> spores and high spore viability.<br />
The stra<strong>in</strong> Bb-5A was highly virulent to S.litura followed by stra<strong>in</strong>s Bb-N, Bb-13 and Bb-13 and Bb-<br />
11 <strong>in</strong> decreas<strong>in</strong>g order <strong>of</strong> virulence. The local isolates Bb-L-1 and Bb-L-2 were least virulent to the <strong>in</strong>sect. The<br />
median lethal time (LT 50<br />
) <strong>of</strong> the stra<strong>in</strong> Bb-5A was low closely followed by Bb-13, Bb-11 and Bb-N while the local<br />
isolates recorded higher LT 50<br />
values at all the concentrations. The median lethal time values decreased with<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> concentration for all the stra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
The conidia obta<strong>in</strong>ed from 14 days old cultures <strong>of</strong> B. bassiana were highly virulent to third <strong>in</strong>star S.<br />
litura larvae compared to the conidia obta<strong>in</strong>ed from 7, 21 and 28 days oil cultures.<br />
103
ABSTRACTS<br />
The effect <strong>of</strong> frequent subcultur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> B.bassiana on synthetic medium showed that the reduction <strong>in</strong><br />
radial growth, spore concentration, spore viability and pathogenicity were non significant upto seventh and<br />
tenth subcultur<strong>in</strong>g but there after the stra<strong>in</strong>s recorded low reduction <strong>in</strong> its biological properties compared to<br />
other stra<strong>in</strong>s and was stable.<br />
Sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> was the best substrate and Bb-5A as the effective stra<strong>in</strong> for mass production <strong>of</strong><br />
B.bassiana.<br />
B.bassiana stra<strong>in</strong>s and isolates were compatible with <strong>in</strong>secticides sp<strong>in</strong>osad, imidacloprid, <strong>in</strong>doxiacrab<br />
but not with chloropyriphos.<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> genetic variability <strong>of</strong> the six stra<strong>in</strong>s showed that the stra<strong>in</strong>s Bb-13, Bb-11 and Bb-N<br />
formed a s<strong>in</strong>gle cluster with 100 per cent similarity and local isolates Bb-L-1 and Bb-L-2 formed <strong>in</strong>to a separate<br />
group with no variability. The stra<strong>in</strong> Bb-5A exhibited maximum variability, which further confirmed its phenotypic<br />
superiority over others. Ph.D(2007).<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> transgenic chickpea for resistance to pod borer,<br />
Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera)<br />
Student: Rama Krishna Babu Ayyaluri<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. G. V. Subbaratnam<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> transgenic chickpea for resistance to pod borer H. armigera was carried out <strong>in</strong> Genetic<br />
Transformation and Insect Rear<strong>in</strong>g Laboratory at ICRISAT, Patancheru, Hyderabad.<br />
The transgenic chickpea plants were developed through Agrobacterium-mediated gene<br />
transformation method us<strong>in</strong>g a b<strong>in</strong>ary plasmid vector pBS 2310 carry<strong>in</strong>g Bt cry1Ac gene for <strong>in</strong>sect resistance<br />
and npt II genes a selectable marker constituted with dual enhancer CaMV 35S promoter harbor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
Agrobacterium stra<strong>in</strong> C 58. Axillary meristem explants <strong>of</strong> C 235 were <strong>in</strong>fected and co-cultivated with<br />
Agrobacterium.<br />
Molecular analysis <strong>of</strong> these plants through PCR, RT-PCR, and Southern blot <strong>in</strong>dicated the irrigation<br />
<strong>of</strong> transgene cry1Ac <strong>in</strong>to the genomic DNA <strong>of</strong> T 0<br />
, T 1<br />
and T 2<br />
putative transgenic chickpea plants. Variation <strong>in</strong> the<br />
segregation pattern <strong>of</strong> transgene was observed <strong>in</strong> the population <strong>of</strong> T 1<br />
and T 2<br />
generations. RT-PCR <strong>of</strong> cDNA<br />
from randomly selected T0 and T1 plants showed expression at Mrna levels. The ELISA studies <strong>of</strong> T 1,<br />
T 2<br />
and<br />
T 3<br />
generation putative transgenic chickpea plants revealed that accumulation <strong>of</strong> Bt cry1Ac prote<strong>in</strong> which<br />
varied from 0.035 to 1.86 ng/ 100mg <strong>of</strong> leaf tissue as aga<strong>in</strong>st 5-10 ng/ 100mg leaf <strong>in</strong> Bt cotton.<br />
Bioassay <strong>of</strong> putative transgenic cry1Ac and cry1Ac chickpea plants aga<strong>in</strong>st the 1 st <strong>in</strong>star larvae <strong>of</strong><br />
pod borer H. armigera showed considerable variation <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> larval survival, leaf damage, and larval weight<br />
ga<strong>in</strong>.<br />
The progeny <strong>of</strong> n<strong>in</strong>e events each <strong>of</strong> cry1Ac (T 2<br />
) and <strong>of</strong> cry1 Ab(T 3<br />
) plants grown <strong>in</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>ed field<br />
trial were evaluated and the entire plants showed variable results <strong>in</strong>terms <strong>of</strong> larval survival, leaf damage and<br />
larval weights at the vegetative and flower<strong>in</strong>g stages. The cry1Ac plants performed better compared with<br />
cry1AbT 3<br />
plants. Pod bioassays <strong>of</strong> cry1Ac transgenic chickpea with 3 rd <strong>in</strong>star larvae <strong>of</strong> H. armigera, the plants<br />
104
ABSTRACTS<br />
CPAC 5-7 and 7-7 <strong>of</strong> T 1<br />
generation and plants CPAC 20-7-7 <strong>of</strong> T 2<br />
generation showed significant reduction <strong>in</strong><br />
larval weight ga<strong>in</strong> compared with non-transformed plants. Some <strong>of</strong> the plants <strong>of</strong> T 1<br />
and T 2<br />
generation <strong>of</strong> cry1Ac<br />
showed resistance and moderately resistance.<br />
In the present study, some <strong>of</strong> the plants <strong>of</strong> the progeny <strong>of</strong> T 0<br />
CPAC 1, 5, 7, 8, 9, 19 and 20 affected the larval<br />
weight ga<strong>in</strong>, but consistency was not observed <strong>in</strong> the antibiosis performance aga<strong>in</strong>st H. armigera larvae <strong>in</strong><br />
subsequent generations. It is presumed that, the physiology <strong>of</strong> the plant, <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>of</strong> toxic prote<strong>in</strong> with acid<br />
metabolic cycle with <strong>in</strong> the plant and <strong>in</strong>ternal gut environment <strong>of</strong> the larva due to consumption <strong>of</strong> the acid<br />
exudates <strong>of</strong> the plant may <strong>in</strong>fluence the potency <strong>of</strong> the Bt tox<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the chickpea. Hence, to produce transgenics<br />
with higher level <strong>of</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> Bt tox<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> chickpea plants, the research need to be oriented with due<br />
consideration to all the above factors. Ph.D(2007).<br />
Studies on <strong>in</strong>sects pests <strong>of</strong> important medic<strong>in</strong>al plants<br />
Student: K. Vijaya Lakshmi<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. J. Satyanarayana<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology<br />
Studies on <strong>in</strong>sect pests <strong>of</strong> important medic<strong>in</strong>al plants viz., coleus (Coleus forskohli) (Wiild) Briq,<br />
W<strong>in</strong>tercherry (Withanai Somnifera) (L) Dunal, Senna (Cassia angustifolia) Vehl, Kalmegh (Andrographis<br />
paniculata) (Burm.F) Nees and Muskmallow (Abelmoschus moschatus) Medic were carried out at Herbal<br />
garden, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Rajendranagar dur<strong>in</strong>g July 2005-06.<br />
Two peaks <strong>of</strong> spike borer (Helicoverpa armigera) population were seen on Coleus (C.forskohli) and<br />
recorded as major pest due to highest spike damage caused by it dur<strong>in</strong>g the crop growth period.<br />
Nearly five <strong>in</strong>sect pests viz., hadda beetle (Henosepilachna vig<strong>in</strong>tioctopunctata), Fruit borer<br />
(Helicoverpa armigera), red cotton bug (Dysdercus c<strong>in</strong>gulatus), st<strong>in</strong>k bug (Nezara viridula) and cow bug<br />
(Ot<strong>in</strong>otus oneratus) were recorded on W<strong>in</strong>ter cherry. Among them hadda beetle and fruit borer occupied<br />
major pest status as they caused severe leaf and fruit damage, respectively.<br />
Mottled emigrant (Catopsilia pyraanthe) <strong>in</strong>cidence was seen on Senna dur<strong>in</strong>g active vegetative<br />
stage and designated as major pest due to highest damage potential caused by it, and reached its peak<br />
damage 9.52% dur<strong>in</strong>g 38 th std week.<br />
Nearly eleven <strong>in</strong>sect pests recorded on Muskmallow viz., Shoot and fruit borer (Earias vitella), fruit<br />
borer (Helicoverpa armigera), leaf roller (sylepta derogate), semilooper (Anomis flava) red cotton bug<br />
(Dysdercus c<strong>in</strong>gulatus), st<strong>in</strong>k bug (Nezara viridula), leaf hoppers (Amrasca biguttula biguttula), aphids<br />
(Aphisgossypii), dusky cotton bug (Oxycarentus hyal<strong>in</strong>ipenis), grass hopper (Cyrtacanthacris ranaceae)<br />
and blister beetle (Mylabris pustulata). Among them shoot and fruit borer and fruit borer were recorded as<br />
major pests due to highest damage caused by the pest.<br />
Biology experiments on shoot and fruit borer under laboratory conditions revealed the average<br />
fecundity <strong>of</strong> moth was 391.5±0.54 eggs with oviposition period <strong>of</strong> 7.25±0.53 days. The mean duration <strong>of</strong> larval<br />
and pupal periods was 11.6±0.85 days and 6.5±0.74 days. Total developmental period was 21.4±0.46 days.<br />
The female moth lived for 16.6±0.65 days and males for 14.53±0.87 days respectively.<br />
105
ABSTRACTS<br />
The efficacy <strong>of</strong> NSKE, neem oil. Neem aza, Delf<strong>in</strong>, leaf extracts <strong>of</strong> Acorus calamus and Jatropha<br />
gossyfolia and DDVP were tested aga<strong>in</strong>st Sp<strong>in</strong>ghip caterpillar (Deiliphia neiirii) on Serpent<strong>in</strong>e root and leaf<br />
roll<strong>in</strong>g caterpillar (Garcillaria acidula) on Aonla.<br />
Per cent <strong>of</strong> leaf damage due to leaf roll<strong>in</strong>g caterpillar (G.acidula) on Aonla was low (47.49 %) <strong>in</strong> DDVP<br />
treated plot compared to other treatments after one day <strong>of</strong> spray<strong>in</strong>g. The best treatment recorded three days<br />
after spray<strong>in</strong>g was DDVP (45.86%). From five days after spray<strong>in</strong>g up to tenth day <strong>of</strong> spray<strong>in</strong>g DDVP (42.91%)<br />
was found to be the best treatment and Fortune aza (44.73%) recorded as next best treatment <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
per cent leaf damage. M.Sc (Ag). (2007).<br />
Heavy Metal Status <strong>of</strong> Peri-Urban Agricultural Soils and Crops – An<br />
Ecological Risk Assessment<br />
Student: Mr. V. Chanakya<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. K. Jeevan Rao<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry<br />
A survey entitled “Heavy metal status <strong>of</strong> peri-urban agricultural soils and crops – An ecological risk<br />
assessment” was conducted to assess the long-term effect <strong>of</strong> sewage and <strong>in</strong>dustrial effluents affected water<br />
for irrigation on heavy metal content <strong>in</strong> soils, plants and ground water, and an ecological risk assessment<br />
process was also carried out as a part <strong>of</strong> this survey.<br />
Results <strong>in</strong>dicated that the, concentrations <strong>of</strong> all parameters were higher <strong>in</strong> water samples <strong>of</strong> Musi<br />
river bed area than that <strong>of</strong> Kattedan <strong>in</strong>dustrial area and they were found more <strong>in</strong> water samples collected<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the month <strong>of</strong> Feb-06 than those collected dur<strong>in</strong>g Oct-05.<br />
Results from the soils <strong>of</strong> Musi river bed and Kattedan <strong>in</strong>dustrial areas <strong>in</strong>dicated that the values <strong>of</strong> all<br />
soil parameters except sand were found higher than the control soil. Except clay, pH, CEC and BSP, the<br />
values <strong>of</strong> all other parameters decreased with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g depth <strong>in</strong> both Musi river bed and Kattedan <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />
area soils.<br />
Results obta<strong>in</strong>ed by analyz<strong>in</strong>g the plant samples <strong>in</strong>dicated that the concentrations <strong>of</strong> N, P and K<br />
were found with<strong>in</strong> the optimum range <strong>in</strong> plants <strong>of</strong> both Musi river bed and Kattedan <strong>in</strong>dustrial areas. While, the<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> micronutrients and heavy metals were found with<strong>in</strong> the permissible limits <strong>in</strong> edible parts <strong>of</strong><br />
the plants <strong>of</strong> both Musi river bed and Kattedan <strong>in</strong>dustrial areas except Pb, which was found to be exceed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the permissible limits <strong>in</strong> plants <strong>of</strong> Musi river bed area <strong>in</strong> their edible parts. The concentration <strong>of</strong> major nutrients,<br />
micronutrients and heavy metals were found to be accumulated least <strong>in</strong> edible parts <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the plants <strong>of</strong><br />
both Musi river bed and Kattedan <strong>in</strong>dustrial areas while highest accumulation was found <strong>in</strong> their roots.<br />
Risk assessment <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> heavy metal contents <strong>in</strong> crops grown on these waste waters irrigated<br />
peri-urban agricultural soils <strong>of</strong> Musi river bed and Kattedan <strong>in</strong>dustrial areas <strong>in</strong>dicated that, the consumption <strong>of</strong><br />
the produce <strong>of</strong> these crops by human be<strong>in</strong>gs and animals can be safe to present but if consumed cont<strong>in</strong>uously<br />
for longer periods may cause health hazards. M.Sc (Ag). (2007).<br />
106
ABSTRACTS<br />
Integrated Nutrient Management Options for Ra<strong>in</strong>fed Castor<br />
Student: A. Shirisha<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. A. Pratap Kumar Reddy<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />
The present study entitled “Integrated nutrient management options for ra<strong>in</strong>fed castor” was conducted<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g kharif 2005 on sandy clay loam soil <strong>of</strong> College Farm, College <strong>of</strong> Agricultural University.<br />
Primary and secondary spike length was highest with application <strong>of</strong> 75% RDN + 25% N through<br />
poultry manure (T 5<br />
). Whereas tertiary spike length did not vary due to INM practices. Seed yield obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />
primary, secondary and tertiary spikes was highest with 75% RDN + 25% N through poultry manure (T 5<br />
) and<br />
this was on par with all other treatments except with control (T 1<br />
).<br />
Stalk yield obta<strong>in</strong>ed with 100% RDN (T 2<br />
) was the highest and this was comparable with 75% RDN +<br />
25% N through poultry manure (T 5<br />
), 50% RDN + N through poultry manure (T 6<br />
) and 75% RDN + 25% N<br />
through castor (T 7<br />
). Harvest <strong>in</strong>dex was not significant due to INM practices. Oil content did not vary significant<br />
due to INM practices. Oil yield was highest with application <strong>of</strong> 75% RDN + 25% N through poultry manure (T 5<br />
).<br />
Nitrogen and phosphorus contents <strong>in</strong> whole plant at maturity was highest with application <strong>of</strong> 75%<br />
RDN _ 25% N through poultry manure (T5). Total potassium content was not significant with the different INM<br />
practices. Among INM practices, gross returns, net returns and benefits: cost ration were highest with 75%<br />
RDN + 25% N through poultry manure (T 5<br />
). M.Sc (Ag). (2007).<br />
Nitrogen and potassium requirement and their effect on flower yield<br />
and quality <strong>of</strong> marigold (Tagetes Erecta L.)<br />
Student: A. Krishna Mohan Major Advisor: Dr. G.09 Padmaja<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry<br />
With a view to study the “Nitrogen and potassium requirement and their effect on flower yield and<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)”. A field experiment was conducted on an Alfisol at Students’ Farm,<br />
College <strong>of</strong> agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad dur<strong>in</strong>g Kharif 2005-06. Nitrogen and potassium were<br />
applied as per treatment comb<strong>in</strong>ations, each treatment along with recommenced dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus (80 kg<br />
P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 ) . Entire quantity <strong>of</strong> phosphorus and half <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and potassium were applied as basal <strong>in</strong> the form<br />
<strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle super phosphate, urea and murate <strong>of</strong> potash, respectively. Rest <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and potassium was<br />
applied <strong>in</strong> two equal splits at 30 and 60 DAT.<br />
The results <strong>in</strong>dicated that with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g levels <strong>of</strong> nitrogen and potassium application, there was<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> dry matter production, concentrations <strong>of</strong> N, P and K and their uptake at both 60 DAT and at<br />
harvest. Higher quantity <strong>of</strong> dry matter production (9438.6 kg ha -1 ) Concentration <strong>of</strong> N(2.16%), P(0.90%),<br />
K(1.51 %) and their uptake (200.4, 85.32 and 143.6 kg ha -1 ) were recorded at harvest where N was applied at<br />
120 kg ha -1 (N 3<br />
). Similarly, higher dry matter production (5105.5 kg ha -1 ), concentration <strong>of</strong> P and K (0.88 and<br />
107
ABSTRACTS<br />
1.81 %) and their uptake (46.78 and 92.83 kg ha -1 ) was recorded at K 3<br />
level, while the concentration and uptake<br />
<strong>of</strong> N were not found effected by K levels at harvest stage <strong>of</strong> marigold crop.<br />
The changes <strong>in</strong> forms <strong>of</strong> potassium <strong>in</strong> soil at different stages <strong>of</strong> crop growth period clearly <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
that easily available forms <strong>of</strong> K viz., water soluble NH 4<br />
OAc extractable and exchangeable K were utilized by<br />
the crop, which reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> K concentration and uptake from <strong>in</strong>itial to 60 DAT. The slowly available<br />
forms were found depleted at later stages (60-100 DAT), <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the existence <strong>of</strong> dynamic equilibrium<br />
among these forms <strong>of</strong> K. With regard to nitrogen, NO 3<br />
N was more utilized by the crop than NH 4<br />
+ N to result<br />
<strong>in</strong> highest DMP, N-Concentration, uptake and <strong>in</strong> turn the flower yield.<br />
Based on the results <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation, it was concluded that application <strong>of</strong> 120 kg N and 80 kg K 2<br />
O ha -<br />
1<br />
along with 80 kg P 2<br />
O 5<br />
ha -1 is optimum for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g highest flower yield with quality improvement <strong>in</strong> marigold<br />
when grown on light textured Alfisols. M.Sc (Ag). (2007).<br />
Evaluation and standardization <strong>of</strong> shelf life determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g parameters<br />
for Bio pesticide formulation <strong>of</strong> Metarhizium anisopliac (Metchnik<strong>of</strong>f)<br />
Sorok<strong>in</strong><br />
Student: G. J. Jayakumari<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. S. J. Rahman<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology<br />
Investigations were carried out to evaluate certa<strong>in</strong> shelf life determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and other related parameters<br />
<strong>of</strong> the formulation <strong>of</strong> Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch<strong>in</strong>k<strong>of</strong>f) Sorok<strong>in</strong>. The <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> different carrier materials<br />
viz., Bentonite, Attapulgite, Talc and Kaolonite was tested for the shelf life <strong>of</strong> Metarhizium anisopliae formulation.<br />
Similarly, to f<strong>in</strong>d out an optimum temperature for an effective storage, four different temperatures viz., refrigerated<br />
(5 0 C), room temperature (22 0 C) and high temperature (40 0 C) were evaluated. The output come <strong>of</strong> the studies<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated that among the carrier material, talc based formulations were found to be more suitable with promis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
conidial concentration/gm and prolonged viability and pathogenicity.<br />
As the Days After Formulation (DAF) were <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g there was a general trend <strong>of</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> all the<br />
above shelf life determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g parameters. As far as storage temperature is concentrated, refrigerated temperature<br />
(5 0 C) found to be more suitable than the other temperature ranges tested with high conidial concentration/gm,<br />
maximum conidial viability and highest pathogenicity towards target pest. Overall results suggested that M<br />
.anisopliae formulation made up <strong>of</strong> talc based powder and packed <strong>in</strong> milky white polythene material is proved<br />
to have better shelf life with quality <strong>of</strong> the product ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed especially when stored <strong>in</strong> refrigerator temperature<br />
(5 0 C) or cool temperature (15 0 C). M.sc (Ag).<br />
108
ABSTRACTS<br />
Nitrogen management <strong>in</strong> Bt Cotton hybrids under ra<strong>in</strong>fed conditions<br />
Student: Dandu Mohan Das<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. M. Gov<strong>in</strong>d Reddy<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy<br />
Afield experiment entitled “Nitrogen management <strong>in</strong> Bt Cotton hybrids under ra<strong>in</strong>fed condition” was<br />
conducted <strong>in</strong> the Kharif season dur<strong>in</strong>g 2006 on clay loam soil at the Agricultural Research Station Adilabad.<br />
The experiment was laid out <strong>in</strong> a split plot design. The ma<strong>in</strong> plots were <strong>of</strong> 2 Bt cotton hybrids viz., Bunny and<br />
RCH 2 factorially comb<strong>in</strong>ed with 3 levels <strong>of</strong> N @ 90, 120 and 150 kg N/ha. The sub plot treatments were the<br />
schedule <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> N <strong>in</strong> 4 splits at three different time schedules viz., 15-45-75-105, 20-50-80-110 and<br />
25-55-85-115 days after sow<strong>in</strong>g. The results showed that Bunny grew significantly taller than RCH 2 from 45<br />
days after sow<strong>in</strong>g until maturity. It produced significantly more number <strong>of</strong> sympodial branches (23.97) than<br />
2068 branches per plant by RCH 2. The two hybrids reached the time <strong>of</strong> square formation and full bloom at the<br />
same time.<br />
The plant height <strong>in</strong>creased significantly from 45 days after sow<strong>in</strong>g until maturity with <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> N from 90 to 150 kg/ha. The number <strong>of</strong> sympodial branches per plant, bolls per plant and boll weight<br />
also <strong>in</strong>creased significantly. The days to square formation and full bloom extended significantly by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the level <strong>of</strong> N from 90 to 150 kg/ha at all the growth stages. The uptake <strong>of</strong> P and K was also significantly more.<br />
Maximum yield <strong>of</strong> 2818 kg kapas and 10097 kg stalk was realized by the application <strong>of</strong> 150 kgN/ha. The<br />
uptake <strong>of</strong> N <strong>in</strong>creased significantly by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the level <strong>of</strong> N from 90 to 150 kg/ha at all the growth stages.<br />
The uptake <strong>of</strong> P and K was also significantly more. Maximum yield <strong>of</strong> 2818 kg kapas and 10097 kg stalk was<br />
realized by the application <strong>of</strong> 150 kg N/ha. The quality <strong>of</strong> fibre <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g percentage and halo length<br />
also improved significantly at this level <strong>of</strong> fertilization. The crop fertilized with 150 kg N/ha fetched maximum<br />
net returns <strong>of</strong> Rs. 48714/ha. But maximum net pr<strong>of</strong>it per Re. <strong>in</strong>vestment was realized at 120 kg N/ha.<br />
Spilt application <strong>of</strong> N <strong>in</strong> four splits at 25-55-115 DAS <strong>in</strong>creased the plant height from 45 DAS until<br />
maturity. Also its <strong>in</strong>creased the number <strong>of</strong> sympodial branches per plant, bolls per plant and boll weight. This<br />
schedule also <strong>in</strong>creased the uptake <strong>of</strong> NPK with additional 118 kg yield <strong>of</strong> kapas than that obta<strong>in</strong>ed by the spilt<br />
application <strong>of</strong> N at 15-45-75-105 DAS. The g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g percent and halo length also improved by this spilt application.<br />
The result <strong>in</strong> a ut shell <strong>in</strong>dicated that the two Bt cotton hybrids Bunny and RCH-2 require 150 kg N/ha to be<br />
applied <strong>in</strong> four splits at 25-55-85-115 DAS to <strong>in</strong>crease the kapas yield per hectare and improved the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
fibre. But it is more pr<strong>of</strong>itable with the application <strong>of</strong> 120 kg N/ha. M.sc (Ag) 2007.<br />
Heterosis and comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability for yield, yield components and<br />
post – flower<strong>in</strong>g stalk Rot resistance <strong>in</strong> maize (zea mays L.)<br />
Student: Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy. S<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. (Mrs.) Farzana Jabeen<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Genetics and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The present <strong>in</strong>vestigation on “Heterosis and comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability for yield, yield components and Post<br />
– Flower<strong>in</strong>g Stalk Rot resistance <strong>in</strong> maize (Zea mays L.)” was under taken with n<strong>in</strong>e l<strong>in</strong>es (BPPTI-28, BPPTI-<br />
36, BPPTI-38, BPPTI-44, CM-211, CM-210, CM-207, BPPTI-33 and ACM-120) and four testers (BPPTI-29,<br />
109
ABSTRACTS<br />
BPPTI-34, BPPTI-35, and BPPTI-43). The analysis <strong>of</strong> variance revealed significant differences among the<br />
genotypes for all the traits studied. Further, non-additive gene action was found to be preponderant for gra<strong>in</strong><br />
yield, yield components and PFSR disease resistance <strong>in</strong> the present <strong>in</strong>vestigation, favor<strong>in</strong>g a hybrid breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
programme.<br />
The comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis revealed importance <strong>of</strong> non-additive gene action <strong>in</strong> govern<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
characters studied. Among the parental l<strong>in</strong>es, BPPTI-44 and BPPTI-33 were good general comb<strong>in</strong>ers for<br />
earl<strong>in</strong>ess viz., days to 50 per cent tassel<strong>in</strong>g, days to 50 per cent silk<strong>in</strong>g and days to maturity. The parents<br />
BPPTI-33 and BPPTI-38 for PFSR disease resistance, CM-211 and BPPTI-33 for gra<strong>in</strong> yield contributed<br />
maximum favorable genes. The parents BPPTI-33, CM-211 and BPPTI-38 were good general comb<strong>in</strong>ers for<br />
both yield and PFSR disease resistance.<br />
Estimates <strong>of</strong> heterosis, heterobeltiosis and standard heterosis were variable among crosses <strong>in</strong><br />
desirable direction and some <strong>of</strong> them turned out to be best specific crosses. The cross comb<strong>in</strong>ations BPPTI-<br />
44 x BPPTI-35 and BPPTI-44 x BPPTI-29 for earl<strong>in</strong>ess, BPPTI-33 x BPPTI-34 and BPPTI-28 x BPPTI-43 for<br />
PFSR disease resistance, CM-211 x BPPTI-29 and CM-211 x BPPTI-43 for yield. Further, the best selected<br />
crosses viz., CM-211 x BPPTI-29, CM-211 x BPPTI-43, CM-120 x BPPTI-29 and BPPTI-33 x BPPTI-43 for<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield and PFSR disease resistance may be further exploited <strong>in</strong> multilocation evaluation before releas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
them for commercial cultivation to the farmer.<br />
Studies on heritability, correlation and path analysis emphasized the need for selection, based on<br />
plant type with greater 100 kernal weight, number <strong>of</strong> kernals per row, plant height, ear length, number <strong>of</strong> kernel<br />
rows per ear, ear girth and less disease score s<strong>in</strong>ce these were found to be the important direct contribution<br />
for gra<strong>in</strong> yield. M.sc (Ag) 2007.<br />
Heterosis and comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability studies us<strong>in</strong>g Pet-1 and ARG<br />
Cytoplasmic sources <strong>in</strong> sunflower (Helianthus annus L.)<br />
Student: A. Sateesh<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. K. Hussa<strong>in</strong> Sahib<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Genetic and Plant Breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The present <strong>in</strong>vestigation was conducted to develop and evaluate hybrids with one <strong>of</strong> the alternate<br />
cyptoplasm i.e., ARG-6 by conduct<strong>in</strong>g appropriate studies <strong>in</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> heterosis and comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>of</strong><br />
the parental l<strong>in</strong>es and the resultant F 1<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ations and also to study the character association and direct and<br />
<strong>in</strong>direct effects <strong>of</strong> yield attributes on seed yield <strong>in</strong> sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) at the Directorate <strong>of</strong> Oil<br />
seeds Research, Rajndranagar, Hyderabad dur<strong>in</strong>g Rabi, 2006-07. The estimates <strong>of</strong> heterosis, heterobeltiosis<br />
and standard heterosis were found to be significant among the hybrids for different traits. The general<br />
comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability studies <strong>in</strong>dicated that the CMS l<strong>in</strong>e, CMS 234A recorded highest positive gca effects for seed<br />
yield/ plant, head diameter, oil content, number <strong>of</strong> filled seeds/head, total number <strong>of</strong> seeds/head and oil yield/<br />
plant. The hybrids, CMS 234A x DRS-45 among PET-1 and DCMS-41 x registered highest positive sca effects<br />
for oil content and CMS 234A c 6D-1 among PET-1 and DCMS-41 x RHA 348 among ARG-6 cytoplasmic<br />
source hybrids registered highest positive sca effects for oil yield/plant. The result <strong>in</strong>dicated the preponderance<br />
<strong>of</strong> non-additive gene action for the seed yield and yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g trait. The magnitude <strong>of</strong> average degree <strong>of</strong><br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ance revealed over dom<strong>in</strong>ance is the cause <strong>of</strong> heterosis for all the traits studied.<br />
110
ABSTRACTS<br />
The present <strong>in</strong>vestigation revealed significant correlation among seed yield and yield components<br />
and direct and <strong>in</strong>direct effects <strong>of</strong> yield attributes on seed yield. The traits, number <strong>of</strong> filled seeds/head, total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> seeds/head, head diameter, 100-seed weight, oil content, oil yield/plant and plant height registered<br />
positive correlation with seed yield. The highest direct effects on seed yield were observed for the traits,<br />
number <strong>of</strong> filled seeds/head, total number <strong>of</strong> seeds/head, 100-seed weight and head head diameter. M.sc (Ag)<br />
2007.<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> contract farm<strong>in</strong>g poultry enterprises <strong>in</strong> RangaReddy and<br />
Mahaboobnagar District <strong>of</strong> A.P<br />
Student: Praveen Vulkundkar<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. K. Suhas<strong>in</strong>i<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Economics<br />
Ranga Reddy and Mahaboobnagar districts were purposively selected for the study. An ultimate<br />
sample <strong>of</strong> 30 contract broiler farms, 30 non-contract broiler layer farms were selected randomly. Returns per<br />
rupee <strong>in</strong>vestment were more on contract farms i.e., 1: 0.48 as aga<strong>in</strong>st non-contract farms 1: 0.009. The gross<br />
<strong>in</strong>come per 1000 birds was found to be less on contract farms, as these farms were paid a given a sum <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs.2.07 on an average per kg <strong>of</strong> bird as major items <strong>of</strong> expenditure like chicks, feed and medic<strong>in</strong>es were borne<br />
by hatcheries.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>puts-puts ration <strong>in</strong>dicates that the returns are more <strong>in</strong> contract farms aga<strong>in</strong>st non-contract<br />
farms. The feed conversion ration <strong>in</strong>dicates that feed efficiency <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> contract farms than non-contract<br />
farms. The total costs for 1000 birds were phenomenally higher on non-contract farms over contract farms.<br />
The feed efficiency and performance <strong>of</strong> the flock was appreciable <strong>in</strong> broiler contract farms compared to noncontract<br />
farms. Gross <strong>in</strong>come per 100 birds was dist<strong>in</strong>ctly higher on non-contract farms over contract farm.<br />
But the returns per rupee <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment on contract broiler farms were substantially more over non-contract<br />
farms. There is a need that the small and medium farmers should be encouraged to produce more cycles per<br />
year, so that they can make efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> available resources to earn a reasonably good <strong>in</strong>come.<br />
Integration <strong>of</strong> broiler <strong>in</strong>dustry with greater government <strong>in</strong>tervention by provid<strong>in</strong>g legal status to the farmers will<br />
help farmers to adopt contracts and produce quality output. Further, <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> sudden out break <strong>of</strong> diseases<br />
<strong>in</strong> large scale farmer as well as <strong>in</strong>tegrators are probe to risk, therefore <strong>in</strong>surance can be <strong>in</strong>troduced for poultry<br />
farmers.M.Sc (Ag) 2007.<br />
Crop yield-Weather Relationship for Certa<strong>in</strong> Ra<strong>in</strong>fed Districts <strong>of</strong><br />
Telangana Region<br />
Student: Rup Narayan Rano<br />
Major Advisor: Dr. K. Subramanyam Reddy<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Statistics and Mathematics<br />
In fitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> crop yield-weather relationship, estimation <strong>of</strong> time effect or the technology effect is the<br />
basic step. The technology effect is taken as the trend value. The assumption <strong>of</strong> a cont<strong>in</strong>uous time trend yields<br />
was <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> quantum jumps over time. There may not be cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the crop yields over the<br />
years; <strong>in</strong>stead, the yields fluctuate around the jumps. In such situations, the trend value was fixed and it was<br />
111
ABSTRACTS<br />
same for the yields belong<strong>in</strong>g to the sub-periods. These sub-periods were formed with the year <strong>of</strong> quantum<br />
jump as the cut-<strong>of</strong>f po<strong>in</strong>t. The trend value was then taken as the sub-period average for elim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><br />
technology effect. The time effect which assumed fixed values <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> a cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>crease, was analogous<br />
to the behavior <strong>of</strong> a discrete variable and hence it was termed as the discrete time effect.<br />
Qunatum jumps were observed <strong>in</strong> the crop yields, where there was sufficient evidence <strong>of</strong> technological<br />
improvement. These jumps occurred for all the selected crops <strong>in</strong> all the three districts and co<strong>in</strong>cided with the<br />
subjective/collateral evidence about the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> new technology. Hence for these crops, relationships<br />
were obta<strong>in</strong>ed with the assumption <strong>of</strong> a discrete time trend. I t was observed that an overall relationship has<br />
not appropriate to expla<strong>in</strong> the yield variations as it consisted <strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> irrelevant repressors. Consider<strong>in</strong>g this<br />
behavior, separate relationship were fitted to the different sub-periods exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the crop yield data and the<br />
analysis revealed the existence <strong>of</strong> a differential response <strong>of</strong> the yields to weather. The variables identified <strong>in</strong><br />
these relations suitably expla<strong>in</strong> the weather response with respect to the crop growth stages. Hence, it was<br />
concluded that yields under a given technology only could be forecasted (based on weather variables) on the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> the correspond<strong>in</strong>g sub-periods relationship (equation).M.Sc (Ag) 2007.
CONTENTS<br />
PART I : PLANT SCIENCES<br />
Isolation and characterization <strong>of</strong> microsatellites <strong>in</strong> oil palm (Elaeis gu<strong>in</strong>eensis) 1<br />
P CHERUKU, K MANORAMA and S. SIVARAMAKRISHNAN<br />
Comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ability analysis for productivity and fibre quality traits <strong>in</strong> 13<br />
<strong>in</strong>tra-herbaceum and <strong>in</strong>terspecific (G. herbaceum L. and G. arboreum L.)<br />
crosses <strong>of</strong> diploid cotton<br />
VEMANNA IRADDI and S. T. KAJJIDONI<br />
Weed and crop resistance to herbicides 22<br />
A. S. RAO<br />
A comparative study on heterosis for productivity and fibre quality traits 35<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tra-herbaceum and <strong>in</strong>terspecific(G. herbaceum L. and G. arboreum L.)<br />
crosses <strong>of</strong> diploid cotton<br />
VEMANNA IRADDI and S. T. KAJJIDONI<br />
<strong>Diversity</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>weeds</strong> <strong>in</strong> the <strong>sorghum</strong> (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.) fields <strong>of</strong> 44<br />
Andhra Pradesh<br />
P. KIRAN BABU, M. ELANGOVAN and J. S. MISHRA<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>cremental dose <strong>of</strong> phosphorus <strong>in</strong> rice on the yield <strong>of</strong> blackgram 52<br />
<strong>in</strong> rice (Oryza sativa) – blackgram (Phaseolus mungo) cropp<strong>in</strong>g sequence<br />
I. USHA RANI and V. SANKAR RAO<br />
Probability <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> wet and dry spells by Markov Cha<strong>in</strong> Model 59<br />
and its application to castor (Ric<strong>in</strong>us communis L.) cultivation <strong>in</strong> Ranga Reddy District<br />
M.A.BASITH and SHAIK MOHAMMAD<br />
Identification <strong>of</strong> parents and hybrids for yield and its components us<strong>in</strong>g 65<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e x tester analysis <strong>in</strong> pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp)<br />
C.V.SAMEER KUMAR, CH.SREELAKSHMI, D.SHIVANI and M.SURESH<br />
Gene effects for yield contribut<strong>in</strong>g characters <strong>in</strong> pigeonpea (Cajanus Cajan L.) 71<br />
by generation mean analysis<br />
C.V.SAMEER KUMAR, CH.SREELAKSHMI, D.SHIVANI and M.SURESH<br />
PART II : RESEARCH NOTES<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> F 1<br />
hybrids <strong>of</strong> tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) 77<br />
P.S.SUDHAKAR and K. PURUSHOTHAM<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> growth hormonal treatments on seed germ<strong>in</strong>ation and seedl<strong>in</strong>g 82<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> simarouba (Simarouba glauca L.)<br />
L. PRASANTHI, P. MAHESWARA REDDY, P. S. SUDHAKAR,<br />
B. BALAKRISHNA BABU and K.RAJA REDDY<br />
Study <strong>of</strong> heterosis for yield and its component traits <strong>in</strong> pigeonpea 86<br />
(Cajanus cajan. L. Millsp)<br />
C.V.SAMEER KUMAR, CH.SREELAKSHMI, D.SHIVANI and M.SURESH<br />
Abstracts 92
The Journal <strong>of</strong> Research ANGRAU<br />
(Published quarterly <strong>in</strong> March, June, September and December)<br />
EDITORIAL BOARD<br />
Dr. L.G. Giri Rao<br />
Director <strong>of</strong> Extension<br />
ANGRAU - Rajendranagar<br />
Hyderabad<br />
Dr. G. Laxmikanta Reddy<br />
Director <strong>of</strong> Research<br />
ANGRAU - Rajendranagar<br />
Hyderabad<br />
Dr. Shaik Mohammad<br />
Dean <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Studies<br />
ANGRAU - Rajendranagar - Hyderabad<br />
EDITORIAL COMMITTEE<br />
Dr. G. Bhupal Raju<br />
Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Scientist<br />
ARCRP Micro Nutrients<br />
Agricultural Research Institute<br />
Rajendranagar - Hyderabad<br />
Dr. T. Narsi Reddy<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and Head<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Pathology<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture - Rajendranagar<br />
Hyderabad<br />
Dr. A. Sharada Devi<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor & University Head<br />
Dept. <strong>of</strong> Apparel & Textiles,<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Home Science<br />
Hyderabad<br />
EDITOR<br />
Dr. Shaik Mohammad<br />
Dean <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Studies<br />
ANGRAU - Rajendranagar - Hyderabad<br />
MANAGING EDITOR<br />
Dr. P. Gidda Reddy<br />
Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Agricultural Information Officer<br />
Agricultural Information & Communication Centre and Press,<br />
Rajendranagar - Hyderabad - 500 030<br />
Annual<br />
Individual : Rs. 250/- author<br />
Institution : Rs. 1000/-<br />
RESEARCH EDITOR<br />
Dr. K.B. Eswari<br />
AI&CC and Press, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500 030<br />
SUBSCRIPTION TARIFF<br />
Dr. G. Sravan Kumar<br />
Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> English<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture - Rajendranagar<br />
Hyderabad<br />
Life<br />
Individual : Rs. 1000/-<br />
(till Retirement)<br />
Repr<strong>in</strong>ts Charges : Rs. 50/-<br />
DDs may be sent to Manag<strong>in</strong>g Editor - Journal <strong>of</strong> Research ANGRAU - Agricultural Information &<br />
Communication Centre and Press - Agricultural Research Institute -Rajendranagar - Hyderabad - 500 030
J. Res. ANGRAU Vol. XXXVII No. 3&4 pp 1- 112, July-Dec., 2009<br />
ANGRAU-Press/722/500/091<br />
Regd. No. 25487/73<br />
Pr<strong>in</strong>ted at ANGRAU Press, Hyderabad and Published by Dr. Shaik Mohammad, Dean <strong>of</strong> Post<br />
Graduate Studies and Editor <strong>of</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Research ANGRAU, Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Office,<br />
Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500 030<br />
AI&CC e-mail: aicc_press@yahoo.co.<strong>in</strong><br />
J. Res. ANGRAU Vol. XXXVII No. 3&4 pp 1- 112, July-Dec., 2009
THE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ANGRAU<br />
DECLARATION CERTIFICATE TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE AUTHOR(S)<br />
Certified that the article entitled —————————————————— —— — ———<br />
————————————————————————————————————————<br />
1. is based on my / our orig<strong>in</strong>al research work / M.Sc / Ph.D thesis (strike <strong>of</strong>f<br />
whichever is not applicable)<br />
2. The article has been seen by all the authors and the order <strong>of</strong> authorship is agreed.<br />
3. The results presented have not been published or submitted for publication else<br />
where <strong>in</strong> part or full under the same or other title<br />
4. The names <strong>of</strong> the authors are those who made a notable contribution.<br />
5. No authorship is given to anyone who did not make a notable contribution.<br />
S.No. Name/s Present address Permanent address Signature<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
CERTIFICATE BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY<br />
( Pr<strong>of</strong>essor & Head <strong>of</strong> the Department/ Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Scientist <strong>of</strong> the station/ Associate<br />
Director <strong>of</strong> Research).<br />
Certified that the article —————————————————————————<br />
————————————————————————————————————————<br />
———————————————authored by ———————————————————<br />
—————————————————————————— is fit for publication. It fulfills<br />
all the requirements for publication <strong>in</strong> the Journal <strong>of</strong> Research ANGRAU.<br />
Name :<br />
Signature :<br />
Office seal :<br />
Note: In case it is not possible to obta<strong>in</strong> the signature <strong>of</strong> a particular author for reasons<br />
beyond his/her reach, the reasons there<strong>of</strong> should be expla<strong>in</strong>ed.
Statement about ownership and other particulars about<br />
THE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ANGRAU<br />
Form IV (See Rule 8)<br />
1. Place <strong>of</strong> Publication : The Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,<br />
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500 030<br />
2. Periodicity <strong>of</strong> Publication : Quarterly<br />
3. Pr<strong>in</strong>ter’s Name : Dr. Shaik Mohammad<br />
Nationality : Indian<br />
Address : Dean <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Studies and Editor <strong>of</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Research, ANGRAU<br />
Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University<br />
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.<br />
4. Publisher’s Name : Dr. Shaik Mohammad<br />
Nationality : Indian<br />
Address : Dean <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Studies and Editor <strong>of</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Research, ANGRAU<br />
Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University<br />
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.<br />
5. Editor’s Name : Dr. Shaik Mohammad<br />
Nationality : Indian<br />
Address : Dean <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Studies and Editor <strong>of</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Research, ANGRAU<br />
Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University<br />
Rajendranagar, Hyderabad.<br />
6. Name and address <strong>of</strong> the : The Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals who own the Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500 030 (A.P.)<br />
newspaper & partners or<br />
share holders hold<strong>in</strong>g more<br />
than one per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total capital<br />
I, Dr. Shaik Mohammad hereby declare that the particulars given above are true to<br />
the best <strong>of</strong> my knowledge and belief.<br />
Dated :<br />
Signature <strong>of</strong> Publisher
SUBSCRIPTION ENROLLING FORM<br />
I/we, herewith enclose D.D. No............................................<br />
.......................................dated..................................<br />
for Rs. ............................... drawn <strong>in</strong> favour <strong>of</strong> Manag<strong>in</strong>g Editor, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Research ANGRAU, Agricultural Information & Communication Centre, ARI Campus,<br />
Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500 030<br />
as <strong>in</strong>dividual annual/<strong>in</strong>dividual life/Institutional annual Membership for Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Research ANGRAU for the calendar year (January - December) ..................<br />
S.No. Name <strong>of</strong> the Address for Name <strong>of</strong> the article Signature<br />
authors Correspondence contributed<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
Note : The receipt <strong>of</strong> payment will be sent only if a self addressed and stamped envelope<br />
is enclosed along with your DD.
GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF MANUSCRIPT<br />
1. Title <strong>of</strong> the article should be short, specific, phrased to identify the content and <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />
the nature <strong>of</strong> study.<br />
2. Names should be <strong>in</strong> capitals prefixed with <strong>in</strong>itials and separated by commas. For more<br />
than two authors the names should be followed by ‘and’ <strong>in</strong> small letters before the end<br />
<strong>of</strong> last name. Full address <strong>of</strong> the place <strong>of</strong> research <strong>in</strong> small letters should be typed<br />
below the names. Present address and E-mail ID <strong>of</strong> the author may be given as foot<br />
note.<br />
3. The full length paper should have the titles ABSTRACT, MATERIALS AND METHODS,<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION, REFERENCES-all typed <strong>in</strong> capitals and bold font - 12.<br />
The research note will have only one title REFERENCES.<br />
4. ABSTRACT: The content should <strong>in</strong>clude the year, purpose, methodology and salient<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the experiment <strong>in</strong> brief not exceed<strong>in</strong>g 200 words. It should be so framed<br />
that the reader need not refer to the article except for details.<br />
5. INTRODUCTION : Should be without title and <strong>in</strong>dicate the reasons which prompted the<br />
research, objectives and the likely implication. The review <strong>of</strong> recent literature should<br />
be pert<strong>in</strong>ent to the problem. The content must be brief and precise.<br />
6. MATERIALS AND METHODS : Should <strong>in</strong>clude very clearly the experimental techniques<br />
and the statistical methods adopted. Citation <strong>of</strong> standard work is sufficient for the well<br />
known methods.<br />
7. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION : Great care should be taken to highlight the important<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs with support <strong>of</strong> the data well dist<strong>in</strong>guished by statistical measures like CD, r,<br />
Z test etc. Too descriptive explanation for the whole data is not desirable. The treatments<br />
should be briefly expressed <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> abbreviations like T 1<br />
, T 2<br />
etc. The discussion<br />
should be crisp and relate to the limitations or advantages <strong>of</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> comparison<br />
with the work <strong>of</strong> others.<br />
8. REFERENCES : Literature cited should be latest. References dat<strong>in</strong>g back to more<br />
than 10 years are not desirable. Names <strong>of</strong> authors, their spell<strong>in</strong>g and year <strong>of</strong><br />
publication should co<strong>in</strong>cide both <strong>in</strong> the text and references. The follow<strong>in</strong>g examples<br />
should be followed while list<strong>in</strong>g the references from different sources.<br />
Journals and Bullet<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Abdul Salam, M and Mazrooe, S.A. 2007. Water requirement <strong>of</strong> maize (Zea mays L.) as<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluenced by plant<strong>in</strong>g dates <strong>in</strong> Kuwait. Journal <strong>of</strong> Agrometeorology. 9 (1) : 34-41
Hu, J., Yue, B and Vick, B.A. 2007. Integration <strong>of</strong> trap makers onto a sunflower SSR<br />
marker l<strong>in</strong>kage map constructed from 92 recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>es. Helia.<br />
30 (46) :25-36.<br />
Books<br />
AOAC. 1990. Official methods <strong>of</strong> analysis. Association <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial analytical chemists.<br />
15 th Ed. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton DC. USA. pp. 256<br />
Federer, W.T. 1993. Statistical design and analysis for <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g experiments. Volume<br />
I: two crops. Spr<strong>in</strong>ger – Verlag, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.<br />
pp. 298-305<br />
Thesis<br />
Ibrahim, F. 2007. Genetic variability for resistance to <strong>sorghum</strong> aphid (Melanaphis sacchari,<br />
Zentner) <strong>in</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong>. Ph.D. Thesis submitted to Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural<br />
University, Hyderabad.<br />
Sem<strong>in</strong>ars / Symposia / Workshops<br />
Naveen Kumar, P.G and Shaik Mohammad 2007. Farm<strong>in</strong>g Systems approach – A way<br />
towards organic farm<strong>in</strong>g. Paper presented at the National symposium on <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />
farm<strong>in</strong>g systems and its role towards livelihood improvement. Jaipur, 26 – 28<br />
October 2007. pp.43-46<br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Sem<strong>in</strong>ars / Symposia<br />
B<strong>in</strong>d, M and Howden, M. 2004. Challenges and opportunities for cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems <strong>in</strong> a<br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g climate. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> International crop science congress. Brisbane –<br />
Australia. 26 September – 1 October 2004. pp. 52-54<br />
(www.cropscience 2004.com 03-11-2004)<br />
Tables and Graphs : The data <strong>in</strong> tables should not be duplicated <strong>in</strong> graphs and vice versa.<br />
Mean data for ma<strong>in</strong> treatment effects should be presented with appropriate SE± and<br />
CD values wherever necessary. The 2 or 3 way tables should be furnished only if<br />
the results are consistent over years and are dist<strong>in</strong>guished to have consideration <strong>of</strong><br />
significant practical value. SE± and CD values however, should be furnished <strong>in</strong> the<br />
tables for all <strong>in</strong>teractions and should be expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the results and discussion. The<br />
treatments should be mentioned atleast <strong>in</strong> short forms if they are lengthy, but not<br />
abbreviated as T 1<br />
, T 2<br />
and T 3<br />
etc. The weights and measures should be given <strong>in</strong> the<br />
metric system follow<strong>in</strong>g the latest units eg. kg ha -1 , kg ha –1 cm, mg g -1 , ds m -1 ,<br />
g m -3 , C mol kg -1 etc.
Typ<strong>in</strong>g : The article should be typed <strong>in</strong> 12 pt font on A 4<br />
size paper leav<strong>in</strong>g a marg<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> 5 cm<br />
on all sides. There should be a s<strong>in</strong>gle l<strong>in</strong>e space between the rows <strong>in</strong> abstract and<br />
double l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> rest. Check up the manuscript thoroughly for errors before submitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
it for publication.<br />
Note : Latest issue <strong>of</strong> the Journal may be consulted. Further details can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />
the book “Editors style Manual, edn 4. American Institute <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences,<br />
Wash<strong>in</strong>gton DC”.<br />
Website : www.angrau.net<br />
ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSIDERATION OF PUBLICATION OF ARTICLES<br />
1. Research <strong>of</strong> not less than 2 years and <strong>of</strong> high standard will be considered as full<br />
length paper. If necessary, it will be considered for short communication.<br />
2. Research <strong>of</strong> one year should be submitted <strong>in</strong> the style and format <strong>of</strong> short<br />
communication.<br />
3. The total number <strong>of</strong> pages should not exceed 10 for full paper and 5 pages for short<br />
communication <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g tables and figures. The figures should be legible.<br />
4. Old research which term<strong>in</strong>ated 5 years before the date <strong>of</strong> submission will not be<br />
considered.<br />
5. All the authors should subscribe for the Journal<br />
6. The manuscript should be submitted <strong>in</strong> triplicate as per the guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> the Journal<br />
to The Dean <strong>of</strong> Post Graduate Studies and Editor, The Journal <strong>of</strong> Research ANGRAU,<br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Office, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad – 500 030.<br />
7. The manuscript should accompany the declaration certificate and subscription<br />
enrolment form.<br />
8. The authors should accept the editorial / referees comments until the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
the paper is improved.<br />
9. The revised manuscript should be submitted <strong>in</strong> duplicate along with a compact disk.<br />
REVIEW PROCESS<br />
The articles will be <strong>in</strong>itially screened by the editors. It will be sent to an expert<br />
for peer review only if it conta<strong>in</strong>s adequate orig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>formation and is prepared as per<br />
the guidel<strong>in</strong>es. The author, then, may also be asked to revise it if the expert desires.<br />
After gett<strong>in</strong>g the article suitably revised and edited, it will be placed before the editor for<br />
a f<strong>in</strong>al decision. The accepted article will be f<strong>in</strong>ally checked for language and grammar<br />
by the English editor before be<strong>in</strong>g sent to the press. The decision however to publish<br />
the paper lies with the editor even if the article is approved by the expert. Any article<br />
which is not able to meet the expected standard or is not prepared <strong>in</strong> conformity with<br />
guidel<strong>in</strong>es will be rejected without assign<strong>in</strong>g any reason.
2<br />
2<br />
2<br />
N<br />
The orig<strong>in</strong>al research articles are<br />
<strong>in</strong>vited from all over the globe<br />
The Global users can now retrieve<br />
the articles from Journal on the<br />
repository <strong>of</strong> Commonwealth<br />
Agricultural Bureaux<br />
International(CABI) on<br />
www.cabi.org<br />
and<br />
our website<br />
www.angrau.net<br />
REMEMBER<br />
A FOOL COLLECTS THE DATA<br />
A WISE MAN SELECTS THE DATA<br />
2