21.09.2015 Views

physicochemical

Contents of 39(1 & 2) 2011 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

Contents of 39(1 & 2) 2011 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ASSESSMENT OF VARIABILITY AND CAUSE AND EFFECT RELATIONSHIP<br />

showed positive significant correlation with days to<br />

maturity in the cross Sb x Sl and test weight and<br />

fodder yield in both the crosses (Table 2). Days to<br />

50% flowering exhibited significant positive<br />

association with days to maturity in the cross Sb x<br />

Sl and plant height in the cross Sb x Su. Days to<br />

maturity recorded significant positive correlation with<br />

fodder yield in the cross Sb x Sl. Plant height<br />

recorded significant positive correlation with panicle<br />

length and test weight in the cross Sb x Sl. Test<br />

weight showed positive significant correlation with<br />

panicle length in Sb x Sl and fodder yield in Sb x Su.<br />

The present study revealed the desirable associations<br />

of seed yield with days to maturity in Sb x Sl and<br />

with fodder yield in both the crosses.<br />

The study on direct and indirect effects of<br />

yield and yield attributing traits on seed yield indicated<br />

that days to 50% flowering, plant height, panicle<br />

length, test weight and fodder yield had positive direct<br />

effects on seed yield (Table 3). These results were<br />

in agreement with the earlier findings of Patil and<br />

Parameshwarappa (1993). The negative direct effect<br />

of days to maturity with seed yield were manifested<br />

through negative indirect effects via days to flowering<br />

in both the crosses and panicle length and fodder<br />

yield in Sb x Sl and plant height in Sb x Su. Positive<br />

direct effect of plant height with seed yield was<br />

manifested through positive indirect effects of days<br />

to 50% flowering, days to maturity, panicle length<br />

and fodder yield in Sb x Su and through panicle length<br />

and test weight in Sb x Sl there by resulting in positive<br />

association with seed yield. Panicle length exhibited<br />

positive direct effect through days to 50% flowering,<br />

plant height and test weight and negative indirect<br />

effect through fodder yield in both the crosses.<br />

Indirect effects of test weight were positive through<br />

days to maturity, panicle length and fodder yield and<br />

negative through days to 50% flowering in both the<br />

crosses resulting in strong association with seed<br />

yield.<br />

The genotypic residual effects viz., 0.584 in<br />

Sb x Su and 0.686 in Sb x Sl were high in magnitude<br />

which shows that yield contributing characters which<br />

contributed to yield were highly influenced by the<br />

environment. The characters plant height, panicle<br />

length, test weight and fodder yield which showed<br />

positive correlation with seed yield should be given<br />

due importance in the selection for yield improvement.<br />

Hence, these characters can be used as selection<br />

indices and careful selection should be exercised for<br />

evolving high yielding genotypes.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Dewey, D.R and Lu, K.N. 1959. A correlation and<br />

path coefficient analysis of components of<br />

crested wheat grass and seed production.<br />

Agronomy Journal, 51: 515-518.<br />

Goulden, C.H. 1952. Methods of statistical analysis.<br />

John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.<br />

Narkhede, B.N., Akade, J.H and Awari, V.R. 2000.<br />

Variability studies of rabi sorghum local types<br />

(Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Journal of<br />

Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, 25: 300-<br />

302.<br />

Patil, H.D and Parameshwarappa, P. 1993.<br />

Intercharacter associations and path analysis<br />

of yield components and developmental traits<br />

in sorghum. Journal of Maharashtra<br />

Agricultural Universities, 18: 393-396.<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!