physicochemical

More documents

Recommendations

Info

MALLA REDDY et. al. Table 3. Yield and Economics of rice as influenced by zinc nutrition Treatments Grain yield (kg/ha) Straw yield (kg/ha) Net returns (Rs./ha) 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 T 1 : Control 5889 5429 8000 7029 39,179 45,348 T 2 : 50 kg ZnS0 4 /ha as basal application T 3 : 50 kg ZnS0 4 /ha as basal application + foliar spray @ 3g/l at 30 DAT T 4 : 50 kg Biozinc/ha as basal application T 5 : 50 kg Biozinc/ha as basal application + foliar spray @ 3 g/l at 30 DAT T 6: Foliar spray of ZnS0 4 @ 3 g/l at 30 and 45 DAT T 7 : Foliar spray of Biozinc @ 3 g/l at 30 and 45 DAT 6725 6601 9150 8185 46,470 57,830 7003 6696 9753 8281 49,584 58,925 6986 6943 8940 8530 47,961 61,240 7312 7042 9260 8621 51,212 62,344 6295 6202 9820 7794 44,641 54,515 6481 6113 9060 7682 45,550 53,359 SE+ 155 129 755 259 - - CD at 5% 336 282 NS 565 - - Cost (Rs./kg): Zn So 4 : 31 ,Biozinc: 45 Cost of cultivation (Rs./ha): T 1 : 23,000; T 2 : 24,550, T 3 : 24,597; T 4 : 25,250: T 5 : 25,318; T 6 : 23,093 T 7 :23,135 Price (Rs./kg): Grain :9.2 (2008), 10.0 (2009); Straw (Rs./kg): 1.0 (2008), 2.0 (2009) Table 4. Influence of Zn nutrition on DTPA-Zn content in soil after harvest of rice Treatments DTPA-Zn in the post harvest soil (ppm) 2008 2009 T 1 : Control 0.7 0.6 T 2 : 50 kg ZnS0 4 /ha as basal application 0.8 1.0 T 3 : 50 kg ZnS0 4 /ha as basal application + foliar spray @ 3g/l at 30 DAT 0.8 1.0 T 4 : 50 kg Biozinc/ha as basal application 0.9 1.1 T 5 : 50 kg Biozinc/ha as basal application + foliar spray @ 3 g/l at 30 DAT T 6: Foliar spray of ZnS0 4 @ 3 g/l at 30 and 45 DAT T 7 : Foliar spray of Biozinc @ 3 g/l at 30 and 45 DAT Initial value 1.0 1.1 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 ppm 18
RESPONSE OF LOW LAND RICE TO SOURCE, TIME AND METHOD OF ZINC APPLICATION REFERENCES Cengiz Kaya and David Haggs. 2002. Response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cultivars to foliar application of Zinc when grown in sand culture at low zinc. Scientia Horticulture 93(1): 53-64. Fenster, W. E,, Rehm, G .W and Grava, J. 1984. Zinc for Minnesota Soils. Minnesota Agricultural Experimental Services A G – FS- 0720 Lindsay, W. L and Norvell, W. A. 1978. Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42: 421-428. Sharma, B D., Takkar, P.N and Sadava, U. S. 1982. Evaluation of levels and methods of Zinc application to rice in sodic soils. Fertilizer Research 3:161-167. Sharma, M. L., Kushwaha, H. S and Bhadoria, R.B. S. 2004. Effect of zinc and iron on yield and economics of cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba). In proceedings of Natural Symposium on Resource conservation and Agricultural productivity, November 22-25, Ludhiana, Punjab, Pp: 87 Srivastava, P. C., Ghosh, D and Singh, V.P. 1999. Evaluation of different Zinc sources for lowland rice production. Biology and Fertility of Soils 30 (1-2): 168-172. Uddin M, J., Bhuiyan, Z. H.,Haque, M. S and Rahaman L.1981. Effect of rates and methods of zinc application on rice. Madras Agricultural Journal 68(4):211-216. 19
Page 1 and 2: J.Res. ANGRAU 39(1&2)1-5, 2011 CHAR
Page 3 and 4: CHARACTERIZATION AND CLASSIFICATION
Page 5 and 6: CHARACTERIZATION AND CLASSIFICATION
Page 7 and 8: SCREENING OF YEAST ISOLATES AND PRO
Page 9 and 10: SCREENING OF YEAST ISOLATES AND PRO
Page 11 and 12: EFFECT OF WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Page 13 and 14: EFFECT OF WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Page 15 and 16: RESPONSE OF LOW LAND RICE TO SOURCE
Page 17: RESPONSE OF LOW LAND RICE TO SOURCE
Page 21 and 22: HETEROSIS FOR YIELD AND YIELD ATTRI
Page 23 and 24: HETEROSIS FOR YIELD AND YIELD ATTRI
Page 25 and 26: J.Res. ANGRAU 39(1&2)25-27, 2011 IN
Page 27 and 28: INHERITANCE OF RESISTANCE TO FUSARI
Page 29 and 30: COMBINING ABILITY ANALYSIS FOR YIEL
Page 35 and 36: SURVEY ON LEVEL OF AFLATOXIN CONTAM
Page 37 and 38: J.Res. ANGRAU 39(1&2)37-42, 2011 CO
Page 39 and 40: COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DIALLEL MAT
Page 41 and 42: COMPARISION OF DIFFERENT DIALLEL MA
Page 43 and 44: J.Res. ANGRAU 39(1&2)43-47, 2011 GL
Page 45 and 46: GLYCAEMIC INDEX AND GLYCAEMIC LOAD
Page 47 and 48: GLYCAEMIC INDEX AND GLYCAEMIC LOAD
Page 49 and 50: ASSESSMENT OF VARIABILITY AND CAUSE
Page 51 and 52: ASSESSMENT OF VARIABILITY AND CAUSE
Page 53 and 54: Research Note J.Res. ANGRAU 39(1&2)
Page 55 and 56: FARMERS PERCEPTION TOWARDS UNDERSTA
Page 57 and 58: FARMERS PERCEPTION TOWARDS UNDERSTA
Page 59 and 60: KASTHURI et. al. REFERENCES Arbad,
Page 61 and 62: INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR WEED CONTRO
Page 63 and 64: INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR WEED CONTRO
Page 65 and 66: STUDIES ON EFFECT OF ORGANIC AGRICU
Page 67 and 68: STUDIES ON EFFECT OF ORGANIC AGRICU
Page 69 and 70:
Research Note J.Res. ANGRAU 39(1&2)
Page 71 and 72:
INTEGRATED NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IN A
Page 73 and 74:
S.No. Profile Frequency Percentage
Page 75 and 76:
ENTERPRISES TAKEN UP BY THE WOMEN E
Page 77 and 78:
ENTERPRISES TAKEN UP BY THE WOMEN E
Page 79 and 80:
Research Note J.Res. ANGRAU 39(1&2)
Page 81 and 82:
STRESS OF ASSISTANT PROFESSORS IN A
Page 83 and 84:
MANAGEMENT OF CHROZOPHORA ROTTLERI
Page 85 and 86:
ABSTRACTS inoculated wit 10 8 spore
Page 87 and 88:
ABSTRACTS Genetic divergence in Ses
Page 89 and 90:
ABSTRACTS The path analysis indicat
Page 91 and 92:
ABSTRACTS variability, heritability
Page 93 and 94:
ABSTRACTS “Reaction of Urdbean [V
Page 95 and 96:
ABSTRACTS The pupal period varied f
Page 97 and 98:
CONTENTS PART 1 : PLANT SCIENCE Cha
Page 99 and 100:
The Journal of Research ANGRAU (Pub
Page 101 and 102:
Statement about ownership and other
Page 103 and 104:
GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF M
Page 105:
2 2 2 N The original research artic
show all

physicochemical

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?