The Journal of Research ANGRAU

More documents

Recommendations

Info

GENE ACTION AND COMBINING ABILITY STUDIES IN CHICKPEA and also gave highly significant negative sca effects for days to 50 per cent flowering and days to maturity. A few crosses viz., JG-11 x ICCV 95333, JG-11 x KAK-2, ICCV 05106 x ICCV 95333 and ICCV 05106 x KAK-2 also recorded highly significant sca effects as well as low mean values for days to 50 per cent flowering, indicating early maturity and these crosses involved only one good combiner suggesting additive x dominance gene effects in these crosses. In these crosses, additive component present in good combiners and the complimentary epistatic effects in F 1 hybrid might work in the same direction to maximize the desirable effects of this trait in segregants. Promising crosses viz., NBeG-3 x ICCV 95333, JG-11 x ICCV 05106, JG-11 x KAK-2 and ICCV 05106 x Vihar exhibited significant sca effects Table 4. Specific combining ability effects, mean performance and general combining ability effects of parents and promising crosses for yield and yield attributes Character Days to 50 per cent flowering Crosses with high per se performance and significant sca effects JG-11 x ICCV 95333 JG-11 x KAK-2 JG-11 x Vihar ICCV 05106 x ICCV 95333 ICCV 05106 x KAK-2 sca effects -3.52* -3.41* -5.3** -5.96** -2.85* Per se performa nce 35.3 34.3 34.0 33.3 35.3 gca effects of parents G x P G x P G x P G x P G x P Days to maturity NBeG-3 x JG-11 -1.77* 88.3 G x G Plant height JG-11 x MNK-1 4.57** 47.7 P x G ICCV 05106 x ICCV 95333 2.87** 46.3 P x G Number of branches per plant Number of pods per plant Seed yield per plant NBeG-3 x JG-11 NBeG-3 x ICCV 95333 NBeG-3 x KAK-2 JG-11 x ICCV 05106 JG-11 x KAK-2 ICCV 05106 x Vihar NBeG-3 x ICCV 05106 NBeG-3 x ICCV 95333 JG-11 x ICCV 05106 JG-11 x KAK-2 JG-11 x Vihar ICCV 05106 x Vihar NBeG-3 x JG-11 NBeG-3 x ICCV 95333 NBeG-3 x Vihar JG-11 x ICCV 05106 JG-11 x MNK-1 JG-11 x KAK-2 ICCV 05106 x Vihar MNK-1 x KAK-2 ICCV 95333 x KAK-2 100 seed weight ICCV 05106 x ICCV 95333 MNK-1 x ICCV 95333 MNK-1 x Vihar KAK-2 x Vihar 1.81* 7.77** 2.05** 5.53** 2.02** 7.63** 7.15** 31.99** 23.63** 33.29** 30.05** 20.86** 3.42** 5.53** 7.51** 5.67** 4.66** 6.1** 8.78** 4.47** 4.61** 5.85** 4.77** 2.37* 4.38** 27.5 29.5 24.3 29.0 24.9 28.0 58.5 76.3 84.4 88.7 88.7 70.5 20.7 21.8 25.3 21.5 19.8 23.1 25.1 19.6 20.6 38.5 51.1 46.4 37.7 G x G G x P G x P G x P G x P P x P G x G G x P G x G G x P G x G G x G G x G G x P G x G G x P G x P G x G P x G P x G P x G P x G G x G G x G P x G 82
YAMINI et al coupled with high per se performance for seed yield and yield attributes like number of branches and number of pods per plant. For plant height and 100 seed weight ICCV 05106 x ICCV 95333 (poor x good) registered significant sca effect with high mean values. Hence this cross could be exploited for identifying tall and bold seeded genotypes in the segregating generations. The results of the present investigation revealed the preponderance of non additive gene action for yield and yield components and therefore heterosis breeding may be rewarding for improving chickpea. But the practical production of hybrid gram is not biologically feasible due to small size and cleistogamous nature of the flowers and strong hybridization barriers (Preethi Verma and Waldia, 2010). In view of such problems, Jensen’s (1970) selective diallel mating system and its modifications (Frey, 1975) would be utilized for the creation and isolation of recombinants to breed superior chickpea varieties. The crosses NBeG-3 x JG-11 for seed yield and number of branches, NBeG-3 x ICCV 05106, JG- 11 x ICCV 05106 and ICCV 05106 x Vihar for number of pods per plant and NBeG-3 x Vihar and JG-11 x KAK-2 for seed yield per plant exhibited significant sca effects coupled with high per se performance with good x good combiners. Due to additive x additive effects and their possibility of fixation, single plant selection could be practiced in segregating generations to isolate purelines from these crosses. REFERENCES Bhardwaj, R and Sandhu, J. S. 2009. Components of variance analysis in chickpea. Jounal of Food Legumes. 22(4): 254-255. Bharadwaj, R., Sandhu, J. S., and Gupta, S. K. 2009. Gene action and combining ability estimates for yield and other quantitative traits in chickpea. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 79: 895-900. Frey, K. J. 1975. Breeding concepts and techniques for self pollinated crops. Proceedings of International workshop on grain legumes, ICRSAT, Patancheru, India. 257-278. Griffing, B. 1956. A generalized treatment of the use of diallel cross in quantitative inheritance. Heredity. 10:31-34. Jensen, N. F. 1970. A diallel selective mating system for cereal breeding. Crop Science. 10:629-635. Patil. J. V. Kulkarni, S. S and Gawande, V. L. 2006. Genetics of quantitative characters in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). New Botanist- International Journal of Plant Science Research. 33:1-4. Preethi Verma and Waldia, R. S. 2010. Diallel analysis for nodulation and yield contributing traits in chickpea. Journal of Food Legumes. 23 (2): 117-120. Sarode, N. D. Deshmukh, R. B. Kute, N. S. Kanawade, D. G and Dhonde, S. R. 2001. Genetic analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research. 24:3, 159-163. Gupta, S. K. Kaur Ajinder and Sandu, J. S. 2007. Combining ability in desi chickpea. Indian Journal of Pulses Research. 20(1):22-24. 83
Page 1 and 2:
1
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS PART I : PLANT SCIENCE Eff
Page 5 and 6:
J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 1-4, 2013 EFFEC
Page 7 and 8:
EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NPK
Page 9 and 10:
J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 5-13, 2013 NUTR
Page 11 and 12:
NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
LAKSHMI et al Fig 1. Changes in C/N
Page 21 and 22:
LAKSHMI et al Changes in C/N ratio
Page 23 and 24:
LAKSHMI et al Table 3. Changes in h
Page 25 and 26:
J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 20-29, 2013 INF
Page 27 and 28:
PRASAD and PRASADINI of bulk densit
Page 29 and 30:
PRASAD and PRASADINI to as high as
Page 31 and 32: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 4 . Infl
Page 33 and 34: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 8. Influ
Page 35 and 36: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 30-38, 2013 GEN
Page 37 and 38: VEMANNA et al The range in mean val
Page 39 and 40: VEMANNA et al grain yield per plant
Page 41 and 42: VEMANNA et al 41
Page 43 and 44: VEMANNA et al Singh, S. P and Khan,
Page 45 and 46: RAMANA et al RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Page 47 and 48: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 42-46, 2013 A S
Page 49 and 50: RAJANNA et. al. Table 2. Reasons fo
Page 51 and 52: RAJANNA et al the present findings
Page 53 and 54: NARASIMHA et al Table 1. Proximate
Page 55 and 56: NARASIMHA et al Maynard, L., Lossli
Page 57 and 58: RAMANA et al with small follicles m
Page 59 and 60: RAMANA et al Characteristics of fol
Page 61 and 62: Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 63 and 64: KIRTHY et al Akhtar et al., 2008; S
Page 65 and 66: KIRTHY et al El Gharras H. 2009. Po
Page 67 and 68: SANDYARANI et al Weed parameters li
Page 69 and 70: SANDYARANI et al Table 2. Influence
Page 73 and 74: KUMAR et al Table 2. Effect of seed
Page 77 and 78: DEEPAK et al Table 2 Price spread a
Page 81: YAMINI et al Table 3. Estimates of
Page 85 and 86: LOKESH et al Table 1. Clustering pa
Page 87 and 88: LOKESH et al Table 4. Mean values o
Page 89 and 90: ABIRAMI et al Socio-economic Impact
Page 91 and 92: ABIRAMI et al socio-economic impact
Page 95 and 96: VEMANNA et al Table 1. Discriminant
Page 97 and 98: VEMANNA et al total biomass, fresh
Page 99 and 100: RAO et al Table 1. Plant height, nu
Page 103 and 104: DEVI et al S.No Category Frequency
Page 105 and 106: DEVI et al extension contact and ma
Page 107 and 108: NIRMALA and VASANTHA earliness in a
Page 109 and 110: NIRMALA and VASANTHA adopted this t
Page 111 and 112: SUDHARANI et al Table 1. Genotypic
Page 113 and 114: SUDHARANI et al At genotypic level,
Page 115 and 116: NIRMALA et al weight of pods per pl
Page 117 and 118: NIRMALA et al Table 3. Cluster mean
Page 123 and 124: PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI 6.5 6.
Page 125 and 126: PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI REFERE
Page 127 and 128: KATTEL et al Table 1. Item Analysis
Page 131 and 132: RADHIKA et al Thus, the results of
Page 133 and 134:
RAJU et al estimated daily dietary
Page 135 and 136:
RAJU et al Table 3. Physico-chemica
Page 137 and 138:
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 139 and 140:
MINNIE et al Table 2. Estimates of
Page 141 and 142:
Statement about ownership and other
Page 143 and 144:
GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF M
Page 145:
ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSIDER
show all

The Journal of Research ANGRAU

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?