The Journal of Research ANGRAU

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF BLACKGRAM IN GULBARGA The total costs (Rs. 798) and margins (Rs. 633) were more in channel-II than channel-I, because of which the price spread was more and producers share in consumer’s price was less in channel II. Price spread was Rs. 1093 and Rs. 881 in channel I and II respectively. Multiple regression model was employed to study determinants of profit margin per quintal of pulses. Out of five variables included in the model three variables significantly explained the variation in profit margin per quintal of pulses (R 2 = 0.92). Operating cost of production, marketing cost and gross price received by the producer were found significantly influencing profit margin (Table 3). The coefficient of determination (R 2 = 0.92) showed that about 92 percent of the variation in profit was explained by the variables included in the model. The result showed that, one rupee increase in operating cost decreases the profit margin per quintal by Rs.0.72. Reduction in the marketing cost increases the profit margin per quintal of blackgram. If the marketing cost is increased by one rupee, farmer experiences less profit margin (Rs.5.66). If the market price received by the producer is increased by one rupee, the profit margin of blackgram will be increased by Rs.0.74. Education level and fixed cost of production were found to be non-significant. Table 1. Cost of cultivation of Blackgram (per hectare) Sl.No Particulars Farmers Small farmer Large farmer Pooled 1.Operational cost (Rs.) a Human Labour i. Owned labours ii. Hired labours b. Bullock labour i. Owned labours 7995 8162 8104 5914 2471 5077 2080 5692 3027 5167 5016 5059 3468 3229 3304 ii. Hired labours 1699 1787 1754 c Tractor Power 608 1220 819 d. Seed e. FYM f. Fertilizers g. Plant protection chemicals h. Interest on working capital Total operational cost (Rs.) a. Land Revenue 752 783 773 1750 1560 1643 2998 3082 3052 2200 2660 2507 1503 1574 1537 22972 24057 23493 100 100 100 76
DEEPAK et al Table 2 Price spread and marketing margin for blackgram (Rs/qtl) S.No Particulars Channel I (Rs/qtl) Blackgram Channel II (Rs/qtl) 1 Producer a) Gross price received 3371 3198 b) Marketing cost 159 199 Net price received 3211 2999 2 Commission Agent a) Marketing cost 90 -- b) Margin 69 3 Trader a) Purchase price 3198 b) Marketing cost -- 135 c) Selling price 3450 d) Margin 117 4 Processor a) Purchase price 3529 3450 b) Marketing cost 126 126 c) Processing cost 199 199 d) Selling price per quintal of dal Dall 5790 5790 e) Selling price of per quintal of dal multiplied with conversion factor (CF) 3821 3821 f) Margin 166 245 5 5 Wholesaler Wholesaler a) a) Purchase Purchase price price 3821 3821 3821 3821 b) b) Marketing Marketing cost cost 62 62 62 62 c) c) Selling price per quintal of dall Selling price per quintal of dall 5950 5950 5950 5950 d) d) Selling price of per quintal of dal Selling price of per quintal of dal multiplied with CF multiplied with CF 3927 3927 3927 3927 e) e) Margin Margin 106 106 106 106 6 6 Retailer Retailer a) a) Purchase price Purchase price 3927 3927 3927 3927 b) b) Marketing cost Marketing cost 76 76 77 77 c) c) Selling price per quintal of dall Selling price per quintal of dall 6200 6200 6200 6200 77
Page 1 and 2:
1
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS PART I : PLANT SCIENCE Eff
Page 5 and 6:
J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 1-4, 2013 EFFEC
Page 7 and 8:
EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NPK
Page 9 and 10:
J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 5-13, 2013 NUTR
Page 11 and 12:
NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
LAKSHMI et al Fig 1. Changes in C/N
Page 21 and 22:
LAKSHMI et al Changes in C/N ratio
Page 23 and 24:
LAKSHMI et al Table 3. Changes in h
Page 25 and 26: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 20-29, 2013 INF
Page 27 and 28: PRASAD and PRASADINI of bulk densit
Page 29 and 30: PRASAD and PRASADINI to as high as
Page 31 and 32: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 4 . Infl
Page 33 and 34: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 8. Influ
Page 35 and 36: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 30-38, 2013 GEN
Page 37 and 38: VEMANNA et al The range in mean val
Page 39 and 40: VEMANNA et al grain yield per plant
Page 41 and 42: VEMANNA et al 41
Page 43 and 44: VEMANNA et al Singh, S. P and Khan,
Page 45 and 46: RAMANA et al RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Page 47 and 48: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 42-46, 2013 A S
Page 49 and 50: RAJANNA et. al. Table 2. Reasons fo
Page 51 and 52: RAJANNA et al the present findings
Page 53 and 54: NARASIMHA et al Table 1. Proximate
Page 55 and 56: NARASIMHA et al Maynard, L., Lossli
Page 57 and 58: RAMANA et al with small follicles m
Page 59 and 60: RAMANA et al Characteristics of fol
Page 61 and 62: Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 63 and 64: KIRTHY et al Akhtar et al., 2008; S
Page 65 and 66: KIRTHY et al El Gharras H. 2009. Po
Page 67 and 68: SANDYARANI et al Weed parameters li
Page 69 and 70: SANDYARANI et al Table 2. Influence
Page 73 and 74: KUMAR et al Table 2. Effect of seed
Page 75: Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 81 and 82: YAMINI et al Table 3. Estimates of
Page 83 and 84: YAMINI et al coupled with high per
Page 85 and 86: LOKESH et al Table 1. Clustering pa
Page 87 and 88: LOKESH et al Table 4. Mean values o
Page 89 and 90: ABIRAMI et al Socio-economic Impact
Page 91 and 92: ABIRAMI et al socio-economic impact
Page 95 and 96: VEMANNA et al Table 1. Discriminant
Page 97 and 98: VEMANNA et al total biomass, fresh
Page 99 and 100: RAO et al Table 1. Plant height, nu
Page 103 and 104: DEVI et al S.No Category Frequency
Page 105 and 106: DEVI et al extension contact and ma
Page 107 and 108: NIRMALA and VASANTHA earliness in a
Page 109 and 110: NIRMALA and VASANTHA adopted this t
Page 111 and 112: SUDHARANI et al Table 1. Genotypic
Page 113 and 114: SUDHARANI et al At genotypic level,
Page 115 and 116: NIRMALA et al weight of pods per pl
Page 117 and 118: NIRMALA et al Table 3. Cluster mean
Page 123 and 124: PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI 6.5 6.
Page 125 and 126: PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI REFERE
Page 127 and 128:
KATTEL et al Table 1. Item Analysis
Page 129 and 130:
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 131 and 132:
RADHIKA et al Thus, the results of
Page 133 and 134:
RAJU et al estimated daily dietary
Page 135 and 136:
RAJU et al Table 3. Physico-chemica
Page 137 and 138:
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 139 and 140:
MINNIE et al Table 2. Estimates of
Page 141 and 142:
Statement about ownership and other
Page 143 and 144:
GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF M
Page 145:
ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSIDER
show all

The Journal of Research ANGRAU

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?