The Journal of Research ANGRAU
Contents of 41(1) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university Contents of 41(1) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university
KIRAN KUMAR Table 1. Pooled analysis data for growth components of chilli as influenced by foliar spray Plant Plant Plant Treatments Height (cm) Spread E-W(cm) Spread N-S(cm) T 1-19:19:19 NPK @ 2.5 g l -1 90.3 57.7 55.1 T 2 -19:19:19 NPK @ 5.0 g l -1 93.8 56.4 54.6 T 3-19:19:19 NPK @ 7.5 g l -1 96.8 56.0 54.9 T 4 -19:19:19 NPK @ 10.0 g l -1 96.2 56.7 54.4 T 5 -19:19:19 NPK @ 2.5 g l -1 + KNO 3 @5 g l -1 92.7 54.5 53.5 T 6 -19:19:19 NPK @ 5g/l + KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 89.9 54.2 55.0 T7-19:19:19 NPK @ 7.5 g/l + KNO3 @ 5 g l -1 98.4 57.4 55.2 T 8 -19:19:19NPK @ 10 g/l + KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 91.1 56.7 55.9 T 9 -KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 from one month after transplanting 94.4 57.5 56.3 T 10 -KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 at the time of flowering 91.6 54.4 52.7 T 11-Control 89.9 53.9 52.8 CD @ 5% NS NS NS SEm ± 2.72 1.39 1.25 application of 19:19:19 NPK and KNO 3. combination with KNO 3 @ 5g l -1 (T 5 to T 8 ) and KNO 3 @ 5g l -1 (T 9 ) were scheduled at monthly intervals starting one month after transplanting. At the time of flower initiation two sprays of KNO 3 @ 5g l -1 (T 10 ) was scheduled at monthly intervals and unsprayed control (T 11 ). Intercultural operations and Plant protection measures were uniform in all the experimental plots. For recording observations on plant height, plant spread, fresh weight, dry weight, fruit length and fruit girth, five plants in each bed were selected at random and labelled. The data thus recorded for three years was pooled and subjected to statistical analysis (Panse and Sukhatme, 1985). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION There was no significant difference in the plant height and plant spread (Table 1), fruit girth and percentage of dry pod recovery (Table 2). Fresh pod yield (9820 kg ha -1 ) and dry pod yield (3320 kg ha -1 ) were significantly maximum with four foliar 6
EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NPK NUTRIENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF CHILLI Table 2. Pooled analysis data for yield components of chilli as influenced by foliar spray Treatments Fruit Length (cm) Fruit Girth (cm) Fresh pod yield (kg ha -1 ) Dry pod yield (kg ha -1 ) Recovery (%) T 1 -19:19:19 NPK @ 2.5 g l -1 7.3 0.9 8380 2650 31.6 T 2 -19:19:19 NPK @ 5.0 g l -1 7.4 1.0 8380 2800 32.8 T 3 -19:19:19 NPK @ 7.5 g l -1 7.6 1.0 8870 2910 33.4 T 4 -19:19:19 NPK @ 10.0 g l -1 7.4 1.0 8330 2850 33.5 T 5 -19:19:19 NPK @ 2.5 g l -1 + KNO 3 @5 g l -1 7.2 1.0 7970 2670 34.2 T 6 -19:19:19 NPK @ 5g/l + KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 7.5 1.0 8590 2730 31.8 T 7 -19:19:19 NPK @ 7.5 g/l + KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 7.6 1.0 9820 3320 33.8 T 8 -19:19:19NPK @ 10 g/l + KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 7.5 1.0 8490 2720 32.0 T 9 -KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 from one month after transplanting T 10 -KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 at the time of flowering 7.5 0.9 8070 2730 33.8 7.5 1.0 8310 2690 32.3 T 11 -Control 7.1 0.9 6450 2240 34.7 CD @ 5% 0.3 NS 1444 480 NS SEm ± 0.1 0.02 489 160 0.82 application of 19:19:19 NPK and KNO 3. sprays of 19:19:19 NPK @ 7.5g l -1 + KNO 3 @ 5g l -1 scheduled at monthly intervals starting from one month after transplanting (Table 2). These results were supported by Lovatt (2005), who reported that foliar spray of 1% either 19:19:19 or KNO 3 at 45, 60 and 75 days after planting increased the crop yield by about 10% over unsprayed control. These results are in line with those of Patil and Biradar (2001), who applied NPK 19:19:19 as foliar application and found significant effect on fruit weight of chilli. Singh et al. (2002) reported that gross and marketable yield of Onion was highest with basal application of NPK and foliar application of 1% KNO 3 at 30, 45 and 60 days after transplanting. Foliar application of 19:19:19 NPK@7.5 g l -1 + KNO 3 @ 5g l -1 resulted significantly longer fruits (7.6 cm) (Table 2). Similarly, Baloch (2008) reported significant increase in fruit length by foliar application 7
- Page 1 and 2: 1
- Page 3 and 4: CONTENTS PART I : PLANT SCIENCE Eff
- Page 5: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 1-4, 2013 EFFEC
- Page 9 and 10: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 5-13, 2013 NUTR
- Page 11 and 12: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
- Page 13 and 14: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
- Page 15 and 16: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
- Page 17 and 18: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
- Page 19 and 20: LAKSHMI et al Fig 1. Changes in C/N
- Page 21 and 22: LAKSHMI et al Changes in C/N ratio
- Page 23 and 24: LAKSHMI et al Table 3. Changes in h
- Page 25 and 26: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 20-29, 2013 INF
- Page 27 and 28: PRASAD and PRASADINI of bulk densit
- Page 29 and 30: PRASAD and PRASADINI to as high as
- Page 31 and 32: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 4 . Infl
- Page 33 and 34: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 8. Influ
- Page 35 and 36: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 30-38, 2013 GEN
- Page 37 and 38: VEMANNA et al The range in mean val
- Page 39 and 40: VEMANNA et al grain yield per plant
- Page 41 and 42: VEMANNA et al 41
- Page 43 and 44: VEMANNA et al Singh, S. P and Khan,
- Page 45 and 46: RAMANA et al RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
- Page 47 and 48: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 42-46, 2013 A S
- Page 49 and 50: RAJANNA et. al. Table 2. Reasons fo
- Page 51 and 52: RAJANNA et al the present findings
- Page 53 and 54: NARASIMHA et al Table 1. Proximate
- Page 55 and 56: NARASIMHA et al Maynard, L., Lossli
KIRAN KUMAR<br />
Table 1. Pooled analysis data for growth components <strong>of</strong> chilli as influenced by foliar spray<br />
Plant<br />
Plant<br />
Plant<br />
Treatments<br />
Height<br />
(cm)<br />
Spread<br />
E-W(cm)<br />
Spread<br />
N-S(cm)<br />
T 1-19:19:19 NPK @ 2.5 g l -1 90.3 57.7 55.1<br />
T 2 -19:19:19 NPK @ 5.0 g l -1 93.8 56.4 54.6<br />
T 3-19:19:19 NPK @ 7.5 g l -1 96.8 56.0 54.9<br />
T 4 -19:19:19 NPK @ 10.0 g l -1 96.2 56.7 54.4<br />
T 5 -19:19:19 NPK @ 2.5 g l -1 + KNO 3 @5 g l -1 92.7 54.5 53.5<br />
T 6 -19:19:19 NPK @ 5g/l + KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 89.9 54.2 55.0<br />
T7-19:19:19 NPK @ 7.5 g/l + KNO3 @ 5 g l -1 98.4 57.4 55.2<br />
T 8 -19:19:19NPK @ 10 g/l + KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 91.1 56.7 55.9<br />
T 9 -KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 from one month after transplanting 94.4 57.5 56.3<br />
T 10 -KNO 3 @ 5 g l -1 at the time <strong>of</strong> flowering 91.6 54.4 52.7<br />
T 11-Control 89.9 53.9 52.8<br />
CD @ 5% NS NS NS<br />
SEm ±<br />
2.72 1.39 1.25<br />
application <strong>of</strong> 19:19:19 NPK and KNO 3.<br />
combination with KNO 3<br />
@ 5g l -1 (T 5<br />
to T 8<br />
) and KNO 3<br />
@ 5g l -1 (T 9<br />
) were scheduled at monthly intervals<br />
starting one month after transplanting. At the time <strong>of</strong><br />
flower initiation two sprays <strong>of</strong> KNO 3<br />
@ 5g l -1 (T 10<br />
)<br />
was scheduled at monthly intervals and unsprayed<br />
control (T 11<br />
). Intercultural operations and Plant<br />
protection measures were uniform in all the<br />
experimental plots. For recording observations on<br />
plant height, plant spread, fresh weight, dry weight,<br />
fruit length and fruit girth, five plants in each bed<br />
were selected at random and labelled. <strong>The</strong> data thus<br />
recorded for three years was pooled and subjected<br />
to statistical analysis (Panse and Sukhatme, 1985).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was no significant difference in the<br />
plant height and plant spread (Table 1), fruit girth<br />
and percentage <strong>of</strong> dry pod recovery (Table 2). Fresh<br />
pod yield (9820 kg ha -1 ) and dry pod yield (3320 kg<br />
ha -1 ) were significantly maximum with four foliar<br />
6