21.09.2015 Views

The Journal of Research ANGRAU

Contents of 41(1) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

Contents of 41(1) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RAMANA et al<br />

with small follicles measuring > 6 mm diameter. In<br />

the ultrasound monitoring follicles measuring above<br />

6 mm diameter and corpus luteum measuring 8-10<br />

mm were detected by day 20-25 postpartum period.<br />

<strong>The</strong> resumption <strong>of</strong> ovarian activity observed in this<br />

investigation is close to the findings <strong>of</strong> Roche et al.<br />

(1992) Henao et al. (2000). <strong>The</strong> follicular size > 6<br />

mm reported in this study is in concurrence with the<br />

observations <strong>of</strong> Krishna mohan et al (2010) and<br />

Satheesh kumar et al (2008). However,<br />

Rajamahendran et al. (1990) reported first postpartum<br />

ovulation as early as 10-15 days postpartum in Bos<br />

indicus cows.<br />

<strong>The</strong> follicular growth pattern monitored using<br />

an ultrasound scanner during the standing estrus in<br />

ten estrus cycles revealed the occurrence <strong>of</strong> seven<br />

two wave and the other three shown three wave<br />

cycles with wave emergence on day 1.80 + 0.80 and<br />

12.46+0.50 for two wave cycles, day 1.52 +0.03, 9.60<br />

+0.40 and 15.20 + 0.37 for three wave cycles,<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong> two wave pattern (7/10) <strong>of</strong> follicular<br />

growth observed in the present investigation is in<br />

close agreement with the findings <strong>of</strong> Figueiredo et<br />

al. (1997), Mayra et al. 1999), Alan et al. (2003),<br />

Borges et al. (2004), Gaur and Purohit (2007) and<br />

Akter et al. (2010) who have reported predominantly<br />

two wave pattern in the estrus cycle in Nelore or Zebu<br />

cows. On the contrary much shorter intervals were<br />

reported by Borges et al.(2001) in zebu crosses,<br />

Rhodes et al.(1995) in cross breed heifers and Malhi<br />

et al. (2005) in Hereford cows.<br />

<strong>The</strong> mean diameter <strong>of</strong> the first and second<br />

dominant follicles (10.23 +0.40 and 12.30+ 0.36 mm)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the two wave recorded in this study were in close<br />

agreement with the findings <strong>of</strong> Figueiredo et al. (1997)<br />

Mayra et al. (1997) Akter et al. (2010) in Nelore cows.<br />

Contrary to these findings Gaur and Purohit (2007)<br />

observed the lesser average diameter <strong>of</strong> dominant<br />

follicle size <strong>of</strong> 8.02 + 0.38 and 9.10 + 0.24 mm in<br />

Nelore cows for the first and second waves,<br />

respectively. However Krishna Mohan et al. (2010)<br />

also recorded higher diameter <strong>of</strong> (14.6 + 0.12 mm)<br />

than the present study in normal cyclic Sahiwal cows.<br />

It was observed that the first wave dominant follicle<br />

<strong>of</strong> three wave cycles attained a maximum size <strong>of</strong><br />

10.70+0.20 mm with a mean growth rate <strong>of</strong> 0.87+0.03<br />

mm per day and in the second wave <strong>of</strong> the dominant<br />

follicle maximum size was 9.80+0.37 mm with growth<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> 0.77+0.06 per day. <strong>The</strong> third wave maximum<br />

diameter was 12.80+0.37 mm with a mean growth<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> 1.46+0.90 mm per day, which is significantly<br />

bigger and faster in growth rate than the first and<br />

second waves in the same estrous cycle. However,<br />

the growth rate <strong>of</strong> second and third waves were not<br />

significant. This could be due to larger duration <strong>of</strong><br />

dominant higher progesterone and low pulsatile<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> LH secretion (Wolfenson et al. 2004)<br />

<strong>The</strong> growth rate <strong>of</strong> the dominant follicle recorded in<br />

the present study were in agreement with the findings<br />

<strong>of</strong> Figueiredo et al. (1997). <strong>The</strong> variation in the<br />

diameter and growth rate <strong>of</strong> the dominant follicle<br />

reported could be due to inherent characters <strong>of</strong> the<br />

breeds.<br />

Body score condition (Rhodes et al.1995),<br />

negative energy balance, Insulin like Growth factor,<br />

inhibin and gonadotrophin hormones systemic levels<br />

Rhodes et al. 1997) altered LH pulse frequency and<br />

follicular growth.<br />

In normal two wave cycles, the first wave dominant<br />

follicle did not differ significantly in their size with<br />

ovulatory dominant follicle but it was small in size.<br />

<strong>The</strong> smaller diameter <strong>of</strong> first wave dominant follicle<br />

might be due to the fact that the first wave emerged<br />

during the period <strong>of</strong> higher progesterone production<br />

by the corpus luteum. <strong>The</strong>se findings are in close<br />

agreement with the observations <strong>of</strong> Figueiredo et al.<br />

(1997), Mayra et al. (1999) and Viana et al. (2000) in<br />

Nelore cows.<br />

In the present study the progesterone<br />

concentration observed during the development <strong>of</strong><br />

first follicular wave was between 1.48 to 2.98 ng/ml<br />

which could be a contributing factor for the smaller<br />

size <strong>of</strong> the dominant follicle <strong>of</strong> this first wave (Vinoles<br />

et al. 1999).<br />

Perusal <strong>of</strong> data revealed that, the mean<br />

maximum diameter <strong>of</strong> the ovulatory follicle was larger<br />

than the diameter <strong>of</strong> the dominant follicles <strong>of</strong> previous<br />

waves, which was in agreement with the findings <strong>of</strong><br />

Figueiredo et al. (1997) and Mihm et al. (2006). <strong>The</strong><br />

growth rate <strong>of</strong> ovulatory follicle in two wave cycles<br />

was 0.91+0.88 mm per day, was less than first wave<br />

follicle (0.94+0.80 mm per day), which could be due<br />

to lower plasma concentrations <strong>of</strong> progesterone and<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!