GENETIC VARIABILITY, HERITABILITY AND CHARACTER ASSOCIATION STUDIES REFERENCES Ganesh, S., Khan, A. K. F., Suresh, M and Senthil, N., 1995. Character association for alcohol yield in sweet sorghum. <strong>The</strong> Madras Agricultural <strong>Journal</strong>. 82: 361-363. Hapase, R. S and Repale, J. M., 1999. Variability, correlation and path analysis in sugarcane. In: Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the 61 st Annual Convention <strong>of</strong> the Sugar Technologists Association <strong>of</strong> India, New Delhi, India, 7-9 September: pp. 130-141. Johnson, H. W, Robinson, H. F and Comstock, R. E., 1955. Estimates <strong>of</strong> genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agronomy <strong>Journal</strong>. 47: 314- 318. Kachapur, R. M and Salimath, P. M., 2009. Genetic studies on correlation and character association in sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Green Farming. 2: 343- 346. Kadian, S. P and Mehta, A. S., 2006. Correlation and path analysis in sugarcane. Indian <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>Research</strong>. 40: 47-51. Kimbeng, C. A and Bingham, E. T., 1998. Population improvement in Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) components <strong>of</strong> inbreeding depression are different in original and improved populations. Australian <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Experimental Agriculture. 38: 831-836. Krishnakumar, Singh, P. K and Singh, J. R. P., 2004. Genetic variability and character association in subtropical clones <strong>of</strong> Sugarcane (Saccharum complex hybrid). Indian Sugar. 54: 189-198. Mallikarjun, H., Khanure, S. K and Kachapur, M. D., 1998. Correlation and path analysis for juice quality parameters in sweet sorghum genotypes. <strong>The</strong> Madras Agricultural <strong>Journal</strong>. 85: 207-208. Manickam, S and Das, L. D. V., 1994. Character association and path analysis in forage sorghum. Mysore <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences. 28: 116-119. Nahar, S. M. N., Khaleque, M. A and Miah, M. A., 2002. Correlation, path co-efficient and construction <strong>of</strong> selection index in sugarcane. Pakistan Sugar <strong>Journal</strong>. 17: 2-10. Patel, K. C., Patel, A. I., Mali, S. C., Patel, D. U and Vashi, R. D., 2006. Variability, correlation and path analysis in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Crop <strong>Research</strong>. 32: 213-218. Patil, F. B., Gadekar, D. A and Bhoite, A. G., 1996. Variability studies in forage sorghum. <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra Agricultural Universities. Z21: 330-332. Rajappa, P. V., 2009. Morphological and AFLP marker based genetic diversity in sweet sorghum working germplasm. M. Sc. (Agri.) <strong>The</strong>sis submitted to University <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore. Roy, D., 2000. Analysis <strong>of</strong> skewness and kurtosis. In: Plant breeding – <strong>The</strong> Analysis and Exploitation <strong>of</strong> Variation. Narosa Publishing House. New Delhi. India. pp 300-304. Sandeep, R. G., Gururaja Rao, M. R., Chikkalingaiah and Shivanna, H., 2009a. Assessment <strong>of</strong> variability for grain yield, ethanol yield and their attributing characters in germplasm accessions <strong>of</strong> sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Mysore <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences. 43: 472-476. Sandeep, R. G., Gururaja Rao, M. R., Chikkalingaiah and Shivanna, H., 2010. Association and path analysis for ethanol yield in sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Mysore <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences. 44: 28-30. Sankarapandian, R., 2002. Variability studies in two groups <strong>of</strong> hybrid populations in forage sorghum. Forage <strong>Research</strong>. 28: 46-48. Sankarapandian, R., Rajarathinam, S and Muppidathi, N., 1996. Genetic variability, correlation and path co-efficient analysis <strong>of</strong> jaggery yield and related attributes in sweet sorghum. <strong>The</strong> Madras Agricultural <strong>Journal</strong>. 83: 628-631. 42
VEMANNA et al Singh, S. P and Khan, A. Q., 2004. Inter-relationship and path analysis in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Complex). Environment and Ecology. 22: 903-911. Umakanth, A. V., Madhududhana, R and Madhvilatha, K., 2004. Variability, character association and path analysis in rabi sorghum. <strong>The</strong> Andhra Agricultural <strong>Journal</strong>. 51: 333-336. Unche, P. B., Misal, M. B., Borgaonkar, S. B., Chavan, B. D and Sawant, D. R., 2008b. Correlation studies in sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. International <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Plant Sciences. 3: 69-72. Unche, P. B., Misal, M. B., Borgaonkar, S. B., Godhawale, G. V., Chavan, B. D and Sawant, D. R., 2008a. Genetic variability studies in sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. International <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Plant Sciences. 3: 16- 18. Verma, P. S., Shri Pal and Karma, N. K., 1999. Genetic variability and correlation studies in sugarcane. Indian Sugar. 49: 125-128. 43
- Page 1 and 2: 1
- Page 3 and 4: CONTENTS PART I : PLANT SCIENCE Eff
- Page 5 and 6: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 1-4, 2013 EFFEC
- Page 7 and 8: EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NPK
- Page 9 and 10: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 5-13, 2013 NUTR
- Page 11 and 12: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
- Page 13 and 14: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
- Page 15 and 16: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
- Page 17 and 18: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
- Page 19 and 20: LAKSHMI et al Fig 1. Changes in C/N
- Page 21 and 22: LAKSHMI et al Changes in C/N ratio
- Page 23 and 24: LAKSHMI et al Table 3. Changes in h
- Page 25 and 26: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 20-29, 2013 INF
- Page 27 and 28: PRASAD and PRASADINI of bulk densit
- Page 29 and 30: PRASAD and PRASADINI to as high as
- Page 31 and 32: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 4 . Infl
- Page 33 and 34: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 8. Influ
- Page 35 and 36: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 30-38, 2013 GEN
- Page 37 and 38: VEMANNA et al The range in mean val
- Page 39 and 40: VEMANNA et al grain yield per plant
- Page 41: VEMANNA et al 41
- Page 45 and 46: RAMANA et al RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
- Page 47 and 48: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 42-46, 2013 A S
- Page 49 and 50: RAJANNA et. al. Table 2. Reasons fo
- Page 51 and 52: RAJANNA et al the present findings
- Page 53 and 54: NARASIMHA et al Table 1. Proximate
- Page 55 and 56: NARASIMHA et al Maynard, L., Lossli
- Page 57 and 58: RAMANA et al with small follicles m
- Page 59 and 60: RAMANA et al Characteristics of fol
- Page 61 and 62: Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
- Page 63 and 64: KIRTHY et al Akhtar et al., 2008; S
- Page 65 and 66: KIRTHY et al El Gharras H. 2009. Po
- Page 67 and 68: SANDYARANI et al Weed parameters li
- Page 69 and 70: SANDYARANI et al Table 2. Influence
- Page 71 and 72: Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
- Page 73 and 74: KUMAR et al Table 2. Effect of seed
- Page 75 and 76: Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
- Page 77 and 78: DEEPAK et al Table 2 Price spread a
- Page 79 and 80: Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
- Page 81 and 82: YAMINI et al Table 3. Estimates of
- Page 83 and 84: YAMINI et al coupled with high per
- Page 85 and 86: LOKESH et al Table 1. Clustering pa
- Page 87 and 88: LOKESH et al Table 4. Mean values o
- Page 89 and 90: ABIRAMI et al Socio-economic Impact
- Page 91 and 92: ABIRAMI et al socio-economic impact
- Page 93 and 94:
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
- Page 95 and 96:
VEMANNA et al Table 1. Discriminant
- Page 97 and 98:
VEMANNA et al total biomass, fresh
- Page 99 and 100:
RAO et al Table 1. Plant height, nu
- Page 101 and 102:
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
- Page 103 and 104:
DEVI et al S.No Category Frequency
- Page 105 and 106:
DEVI et al extension contact and ma
- Page 107 and 108:
NIRMALA and VASANTHA earliness in a
- Page 109 and 110:
NIRMALA and VASANTHA adopted this t
- Page 111 and 112:
SUDHARANI et al Table 1. Genotypic
- Page 113 and 114:
SUDHARANI et al At genotypic level,
- Page 115 and 116:
NIRMALA et al weight of pods per pl
- Page 117 and 118:
NIRMALA et al Table 3. Cluster mean
- Page 119 and 120:
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
- Page 121 and 122:
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
- Page 123 and 124:
PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI 6.5 6.
- Page 125 and 126:
PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI REFERE
- Page 127 and 128:
KATTEL et al Table 1. Item Analysis
- Page 129 and 130:
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
- Page 131 and 132:
RADHIKA et al Thus, the results of
- Page 133 and 134:
RAJU et al estimated daily dietary
- Page 135 and 136:
RAJU et al Table 3. Physico-chemica
- Page 137 and 138:
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
- Page 139 and 140:
MINNIE et al Table 2. Estimates of
- Page 141 and 142:
Statement about ownership and other
- Page 143 and 144:
GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF M
- Page 145:
ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSIDER