The Journal of Research ANGRAU

More documents

Recommendations

Info

GENETIC VARIABILITY, HERITABILITY AND CHARACTER ASSOCIATION STUDIES REFERENCES Ganesh, S., Khan, A. K. F., Suresh, M and Senthil, N., 1995. Character association for alcohol yield in sweet sorghum. The Madras Agricultural Journal. 82: 361-363. Hapase, R. S and Repale, J. M., 1999. Variability, correlation and path analysis in sugarcane. In: Proceedings of the 61 st Annual Convention of the Sugar Technologists Association of India, New Delhi, India, 7-9 September: pp. 130-141. Johnson, H. W, Robinson, H. F and Comstock, R. E., 1955. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agronomy Journal. 47: 314- 318. Kachapur, R. M and Salimath, P. M., 2009. Genetic studies on correlation and character association in sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Green Farming. 2: 343- 346. Kadian, S. P and Mehta, A. S., 2006. Correlation and path analysis in sugarcane. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 40: 47-51. Kimbeng, C. A and Bingham, E. T., 1998. Population improvement in Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) components of inbreeding depression are different in original and improved populations. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 38: 831-836. Krishnakumar, Singh, P. K and Singh, J. R. P., 2004. Genetic variability and character association in subtropical clones of Sugarcane (Saccharum complex hybrid). Indian Sugar. 54: 189-198. Mallikarjun, H., Khanure, S. K and Kachapur, M. D., 1998. Correlation and path analysis for juice quality parameters in sweet sorghum genotypes. The Madras Agricultural Journal. 85: 207-208. Manickam, S and Das, L. D. V., 1994. Character association and path analysis in forage sorghum. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 28: 116-119. Nahar, S. M. N., Khaleque, M. A and Miah, M. A., 2002. Correlation, path co-efficient and construction of selection index in sugarcane. Pakistan Sugar Journal. 17: 2-10. Patel, K. C., Patel, A. I., Mali, S. C., Patel, D. U and Vashi, R. D., 2006. Variability, correlation and path analysis in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Crop Research. 32: 213-218. Patil, F. B., Gadekar, D. A and Bhoite, A. G., 1996. Variability studies in forage sorghum. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities. Z21: 330-332. Rajappa, P. V., 2009. Morphological and AFLP marker based genetic diversity in sweet sorghum working germplasm. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis submitted to University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore. Roy, D., 2000. Analysis of skewness and kurtosis. In: Plant breeding – The Analysis and Exploitation of Variation. Narosa Publishing House. New Delhi. India. pp 300-304. Sandeep, R. G., Gururaja Rao, M. R., Chikkalingaiah and Shivanna, H., 2009a. Assessment of variability for grain yield, ethanol yield and their attributing characters in germplasm accessions of sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 43: 472-476. Sandeep, R. G., Gururaja Rao, M. R., Chikkalingaiah and Shivanna, H., 2010. Association and path analysis for ethanol yield in sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 44: 28-30. Sankarapandian, R., 2002. Variability studies in two groups of hybrid populations in forage sorghum. Forage Research. 28: 46-48. Sankarapandian, R., Rajarathinam, S and Muppidathi, N., 1996. Genetic variability, correlation and path co-efficient analysis of jaggery yield and related attributes in sweet sorghum. The Madras Agricultural Journal. 83: 628-631. 42
VEMANNA et al Singh, S. P and Khan, A. Q., 2004. Inter-relationship and path analysis in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Complex). Environment and Ecology. 22: 903-911. Umakanth, A. V., Madhududhana, R and Madhvilatha, K., 2004. Variability, character association and path analysis in rabi sorghum. The Andhra Agricultural Journal. 51: 333-336. Unche, P. B., Misal, M. B., Borgaonkar, S. B., Chavan, B. D and Sawant, D. R., 2008b. Correlation studies in sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 3: 69-72. Unche, P. B., Misal, M. B., Borgaonkar, S. B., Godhawale, G. V., Chavan, B. D and Sawant, D. R., 2008a. Genetic variability studies in sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 3: 16- 18. Verma, P. S., Shri Pal and Karma, N. K., 1999. Genetic variability and correlation studies in sugarcane. Indian Sugar. 49: 125-128. 43
Page 1 and 2: 1
Page 3 and 4: CONTENTS PART I : PLANT SCIENCE Eff
Page 5 and 6: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 1-4, 2013 EFFEC
Page 7 and 8: EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NPK
Page 9 and 10: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 5-13, 2013 NUTR
Page 11 and 12: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
Page 19 and 20: LAKSHMI et al Fig 1. Changes in C/N
Page 21 and 22: LAKSHMI et al Changes in C/N ratio
Page 23 and 24: LAKSHMI et al Table 3. Changes in h
Page 25 and 26: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 20-29, 2013 INF
Page 27 and 28: PRASAD and PRASADINI of bulk densit
Page 29 and 30: PRASAD and PRASADINI to as high as
Page 31 and 32: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 4 . Infl
Page 33 and 34: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 8. Influ
Page 35 and 36: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 30-38, 2013 GEN
Page 37 and 38: VEMANNA et al The range in mean val
Page 39 and 40: VEMANNA et al grain yield per plant
Page 41: VEMANNA et al 41
Page 45 and 46: RAMANA et al RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Page 47 and 48: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 42-46, 2013 A S
Page 49 and 50: RAJANNA et. al. Table 2. Reasons fo
Page 51 and 52: RAJANNA et al the present findings
Page 53 and 54: NARASIMHA et al Table 1. Proximate
Page 55 and 56: NARASIMHA et al Maynard, L., Lossli
Page 57 and 58: RAMANA et al with small follicles m
Page 59 and 60: RAMANA et al Characteristics of fol
Page 61 and 62: Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 63 and 64: KIRTHY et al Akhtar et al., 2008; S
Page 65 and 66: KIRTHY et al El Gharras H. 2009. Po
Page 67 and 68: SANDYARANI et al Weed parameters li
Page 69 and 70: SANDYARANI et al Table 2. Influence
Page 73 and 74: KUMAR et al Table 2. Effect of seed
Page 77 and 78: DEEPAK et al Table 2 Price spread a
Page 81 and 82: YAMINI et al Table 3. Estimates of
Page 83 and 84: YAMINI et al coupled with high per
Page 85 and 86: LOKESH et al Table 1. Clustering pa
Page 87 and 88: LOKESH et al Table 4. Mean values o
Page 89 and 90: ABIRAMI et al Socio-economic Impact
Page 91 and 92: ABIRAMI et al socio-economic impact
Page 93 and 94:
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 95 and 96:
VEMANNA et al Table 1. Discriminant
Page 97 and 98:
VEMANNA et al total biomass, fresh
Page 99 and 100:
RAO et al Table 1. Plant height, nu
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
DEVI et al S.No Category Frequency
Page 105 and 106:
DEVI et al extension contact and ma
Page 107 and 108:
NIRMALA and VASANTHA earliness in a
Page 109 and 110:
NIRMALA and VASANTHA adopted this t
Page 111 and 112:
SUDHARANI et al Table 1. Genotypic
Page 113 and 114:
SUDHARANI et al At genotypic level,
Page 115 and 116:
NIRMALA et al weight of pods per pl
Page 117 and 118:
NIRMALA et al Table 3. Cluster mean
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI 6.5 6.
Page 125 and 126:
PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI REFERE
Page 127 and 128:
KATTEL et al Table 1. Item Analysis
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
RADHIKA et al Thus, the results of
Page 133 and 134:
RAJU et al estimated daily dietary
Page 135 and 136:
RAJU et al Table 3. Physico-chemica
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
MINNIE et al Table 2. Estimates of
Page 141 and 142:
Statement about ownership and other
Page 143 and 144:
GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF M
Page 145:
ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSIDER
show all

The Journal of Research ANGRAU

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?