The Journal of Research ANGRAU

More documents

Recommendations

Info

INFLUENCE of INM on PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Table 6 . Influence of integrated nutrient management treatments on hydraulic conductivity (cm h -1 ) of soil in rice-rice cropping system at 0-15 cm Treatment 2005-06 2006-07 Trans Panicle Harvesting Trans Panicle Harvesting planting initiation planting initiation Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi T 1 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.22 0.30 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.28 0.28 T 2 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.29 0.28 0.23 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.27 0.27 T 3 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.29 0.28 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.27 0.26 T 4 0.26 0.25 0.27 0.22 0.30 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.28 0.28 T 5 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.23 0.31 0.30 0.25 0.25 0.23 0.23 0.29 0.29 T 6 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.33 0.32 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.31 0.30 T 7 0.31 0.30 0.29 0.27 0.34 0.34 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.33 0.33 T 8 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.27 0.32 0.31 0.26 0.26 0.24 0.24 0.30 0.30 T 9 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.33 0.32 0.27 0.27 0.25 0.25 0.31 0.31 T 10 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.33 0.32 0.28 0.27 0.25 0.25 0.32 0.31 T 11 0.30 0.29 0.28 0.26 0.33 0.33 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.32 0.32 T 12 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.22 0.30 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.28 0.28 SEm + 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.18 0.19 0.16 0.02 0.08 0.09 0.21 0.15 0.17 CD at 5 % 0.02 0.03 NS NS NS NS 0.021 0.015 0.16 NS NS NS Table 7 . Influence of integrated nutrient management treatments on hydraulic conductivity (cm h -1 ) of soil in rice-rice cropping system at 15-30 cm T re a tm e n t 2 0 0 5 -0 6 2 0 0 6 -0 7 T ra n s - P a n ic le H a rv e s tin g T ra n s - P a n ic le H a rv e s tin g p la n tin g in itia tio n p la n tin g in itia tio n K h a rif R a b i K h a rif R a b i K h a rif R a b i K h arif R a b i K h a rif R a b i K h a rif R a b i T 1 0 .2 1 0 .2 0 0 .1 9 0 .1 8 0 .2 5 0 .2 4 0 .2 0 0 .1 9 0 .1 8 0 .1 7 0.2 4 0.2 3 T 2 0 .2 0 0 .1 9 0 .1 8 0 .1 7 0 .2 4 0 .2 3 0 .1 9 0 .1 8 0 .1 8 0 .1 6 0.2 3 0.2 2 T 3 0 .2 0 0 .1 9 0 .1 8 0 .1 7 0 .2 4 0 .2 3 0 .1 9 0 .1 8 0 .1 7 0 .1 6 0.2 3 0.2 2 T 4 0 .2 1 0 .2 0 0 .1 9 0 .1 8 0 .2 5 0 .2 4 0 .2 1 0 .1 9 0 .1 9 0 .1 7 0.2 4 0.2 3 T 5 0 .2 2 0 .2 1 0 .2 0 0 .1 9 0 .2 6 0 .2 5 0 .2 1 0 .2 0 0 .1 9 0 .1 8 0.2 5 0.2 4 T 6 0 .2 4 0 .2 3 0 .2 2 0 .2 1 0 .2 8 0 .2 8 0 .2 3 0 .2 1 0 .2 1 0 .1 9 0.2 8 0.2 5 T 7 0 .2 6 0 .2 5 0 .2 4 0 .2 3 0 .3 0 0 .2 9 0 .2 5 0 .2 4 0 .2 3 0 .2 2 0.2 8 0.2 8 T 8 0 .2 3 0 .2 2 0 .2 1 0 .2 0 0 .2 7 0 .2 6 0 .2 2 0 .2 1 0 .2 0 0 .2 0 0.2 6 0.2 5 T 9 0 .2 4 0 .2 3 0 .2 2 0 .2 1 0 .2 8 0 .2 7 0 .2 3 0 .2 2 0 .2 1 0 .2 0 0.2 7 0.2 6 T 1 0 0 .2 4 0 .2 3 0 .2 2 0 .2 1 0 .2 8 0 .2 7 0 .2 3 0 .2 2 0 .2 1 0 .2 0 0.2 7 0.2 6 T 1 1 0 .2 5 0 .2 4 0 .2 3 0 .2 2 0 .2 9 0 .2 8 0 .2 4 0 .2 3 0 .2 2 0 .2 1 0.2 8 0.2 7 T 1 2 0 .2 1 0 .2 0 0 .1 9 0 .1 8 0 .2 5 0 .2 4 0 .2 0 0 .1 9 0 .1 8 0 .1 7 0.2 4 0.2 4 S E + 0 .0 1 0 .0 1 0 .0 2 0 .0 3 0 .0 5 0 .0 6 0 .0 2 0 .0 1 0 .0 4 0 .0 3 0.0 4 0.0 3 C D a t 5 % 0 .0 3 0 .0 3 N S N S N S N S 0 .0 4 0 .0 2 N S N S N S N S 32
PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 8. Influence of integrated nutrient management treatments on water holding capacity (%) of soil in rice-rice cropping system at 0-15 cm Treatment Transplanting 2005-06 2006-07 Panicle initiation Harvesting Transplanting Panicle initiation Harvesting Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi T 1 42.04 41.74 41.00 40.51 39.02 38.25 41.63 41.21 40.20 40.05 38.11 39.00 T 2 41.76 41.38 40.65 40.31 38.53 38.52 41.26 41.00 39.75 39.52 37.42 38.44 T 3 42.14 41.33 41.65 40.31 39.26 38.14 41.59 41.34 39.331 39.50 38.16 38.52 T 4 42.14 41.41 41.66 40.25 39.24 38.29 41.54 41.30 39.44 39.50 38.25 38.52 T 5 42.10 41.26 41.55 40.28 39.28 38.42 41.63 41.05 39.39 39.50 38.14 38.38 T 6 44.48 44.72 43.74 43.83 42.00 42.65 43.81 45.28 42.67 39.50 41.00 38.21 T 7 43.65 44.03 42.78 43.06 41.19 42.01 43.16 45.31 41.86 44.00 40.09 43.05 T 8 43.25 44.00 42.63 42.29 41.02 42.02 42.72 43.46 41.56 44.00 40.00 43.10 T 9 42.95 43.20 41.98 42.81 40.14 41.16 42.44 43.21 40.00 42.95 39.24 41.00 T 10 43.17 43.84 42.21 42.91 40.25 41.54 42.64 44.33 41.34 44.05 39.21 43.11 T 11 42.90 43.19 41.88 42.35 40.16 41.36 42.69 43.47 40.92 44.00 39.18 42.93 T 12 42.00 41.35 40.72 40.74 39.06 38.54 41.37 41.08 39.88 39.76 38.08 38.02 SEm + 0.53 0.90 0.47 0.59 0.72 0.77 0.57 1.04 0.65 0.89 1.01 1.05 CD at 5 % 1.10 1.87 0.98 1.22 1.50 1.86 1.18 2.15 1.36 1.85 2.11 2.18 Table 9. Influence of integrated nutrient management treatments on water holding capacity (%) of soil in rice-rice cropping system at 15-30 cm Treatment Transplanting 2005-06 2006-07 Panicle initiation Harvesting Transplanting 33 Panicle initiation Harvesting Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi T 1 40.73 40.18 39.29 39.19 38.26 37.33 40.12 39.74 38.84 38.15 37.19 36.09 T 2 40.26 39.83 39.08 40.00 38.16 38.14 39.83 39.19 38.49 37.92 36.67 36.57 T 3 40.79 39.80 39.17 40.02 38.21 38.21 39.80 39.45 38.46 37.92 37.15 36.00 T 4 40.72 39.81 39.23 40.10 38.34 38.19 39.85 39.48 38.51 37.81 37.18 36.54 T 5 40.10 39.85 39.20 40.15 38.19 38.16 39.81 39.45 39.39 37.84 37.20 36.50 T 6 42.68 43.64 39.18 42.05 38.05 41.46 43.72 43.42 42.81 42.95 40.44 40.30 T 7 42.34 42.86 42.29 42.18 41.05 40.75 42.61 42.67 41.72 42.06 39.86 41.00 T 8 42.48 42.85 41.51 42.14 40.44 40.71 42.64 42.47 41.46 42.06 39.79 40.29 T 9 41.65 42.05 41.64 41.19 40.26 40.11 41.96 42.21 41.40 42.00 39.81 40.25 T 10 42.06 42.56 40.25 41.21 39.08 40.28 42.21 41.20 41.51 41.46 39.25 40.25 T 11 41.84 43.10 40.36 41.20 39.17 40.19 42.36 41.20 41.59 41.46 39.18 40.30 T 12 40.69 39.43 39.24 40.00 38.30 38.22 39.55 39.19 38.73 38.37 37.10 37.00 SEm + 0.45 0.90 1.02 1.86 1.35 1.20 0.96 1.04 0.91 1.53 1.35 1.42 CD at 5 % 0.94 1.86 2.12 NS NS NS 2.00 2.16 1.87 3.18 NS NS
Page 1 and 2: 1
Page 3 and 4: CONTENTS PART I : PLANT SCIENCE Eff
Page 5 and 6: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 1-4, 2013 EFFEC
Page 7 and 8: EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NPK
Page 9 and 10: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 5-13, 2013 NUTR
Page 11 and 12: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
Page 19 and 20: LAKSHMI et al Fig 1. Changes in C/N
Page 21 and 22: LAKSHMI et al Changes in C/N ratio
Page 23 and 24: LAKSHMI et al Table 3. Changes in h
Page 25 and 26: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 20-29, 2013 INF
Page 27 and 28: PRASAD and PRASADINI of bulk densit
Page 29 and 30: PRASAD and PRASADINI to as high as
Page 31: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 4 . Infl
Page 35 and 36: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 30-38, 2013 GEN
Page 37 and 38: VEMANNA et al The range in mean val
Page 39 and 40: VEMANNA et al grain yield per plant
Page 41 and 42: VEMANNA et al 41
Page 43 and 44: VEMANNA et al Singh, S. P and Khan,
Page 45 and 46: RAMANA et al RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Page 47 and 48: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 42-46, 2013 A S
Page 49 and 50: RAJANNA et. al. Table 2. Reasons fo
Page 51 and 52: RAJANNA et al the present findings
Page 53 and 54: NARASIMHA et al Table 1. Proximate
Page 55 and 56: NARASIMHA et al Maynard, L., Lossli
Page 57 and 58: RAMANA et al with small follicles m
Page 59 and 60: RAMANA et al Characteristics of fol
Page 61 and 62: Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 63 and 64: KIRTHY et al Akhtar et al., 2008; S
Page 65 and 66: KIRTHY et al El Gharras H. 2009. Po
Page 67 and 68: SANDYARANI et al Weed parameters li
Page 69 and 70: SANDYARANI et al Table 2. Influence
Page 73 and 74: KUMAR et al Table 2. Effect of seed
Page 77 and 78: DEEPAK et al Table 2 Price spread a
Page 81 and 82: YAMINI et al Table 3. Estimates of
Page 83 and 84:
YAMINI et al coupled with high per
Page 85 and 86:
LOKESH et al Table 1. Clustering pa
Page 87 and 88:
LOKESH et al Table 4. Mean values o
Page 89 and 90:
ABIRAMI et al Socio-economic Impact
Page 91 and 92:
ABIRAMI et al socio-economic impact
Page 93 and 94:
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 95 and 96:
VEMANNA et al Table 1. Discriminant
Page 97 and 98:
VEMANNA et al total biomass, fresh
Page 99 and 100:
RAO et al Table 1. Plant height, nu
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
DEVI et al S.No Category Frequency
Page 105 and 106:
DEVI et al extension contact and ma
Page 107 and 108:
NIRMALA and VASANTHA earliness in a
Page 109 and 110:
NIRMALA and VASANTHA adopted this t
Page 111 and 112:
SUDHARANI et al Table 1. Genotypic
Page 113 and 114:
SUDHARANI et al At genotypic level,
Page 115 and 116:
NIRMALA et al weight of pods per pl
Page 117 and 118:
NIRMALA et al Table 3. Cluster mean
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI 6.5 6.
Page 125 and 126:
PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI REFERE
Page 127 and 128:
KATTEL et al Table 1. Item Analysis
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
RADHIKA et al Thus, the results of
Page 133 and 134:
RAJU et al estimated daily dietary
Page 135 and 136:
RAJU et al Table 3. Physico-chemica
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
MINNIE et al Table 2. Estimates of
Page 141 and 142:
Statement about ownership and other
Page 143 and 144:
GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF M
Page 145:
ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSIDER
show all

The Journal of Research ANGRAU

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?