The Journal of Research ANGRAU

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 7. Influence of integrated nutrient management practices on uptake of Fe (g ha -1 ) in rice-rice cropping system Treatments Tillering 2005-06 2006-07 Panicle initiation Harvesting Tillering Panicle initiation Harvesting Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi T 1 156.9 251.3 308.9 302.9 399.2 318.1 136.0 185.1 293.2 292.1 543.1 262.4 T 2 239.4 277.8 578.2 510.6 658.2 671.0 152.2 223.4 314.2 461.1 984.3 769.5 T 3 193.5 308.7 530.9 603.7 765.2 972.9 159.5 260.8 314.2 630.5 1240.3 893.3 T 4 251.5 309.9 606.2 606.7 933.8 975.2 178.6 241.8 440.6 566.9 1274.9 746.7 T 5 280.0 322.2 690.3 631.6 1152.6 1168.1 202.2 262.9 488.6 599.4 1479.5 977.4 T 6 314.4 447.5 738.7 751.0 1055.9 1478.8 260.3 319.9 608.4 728.3 1665.0 1110.6 T 7 349.9 393.8 781.5 711.3 1105.3 1297.5 251.1 290.5 593.0 623.5 1577.9 1073.2 T 8 231.9 365.5 489.5 666.3 719.0 1193.9 208.3 287.0 412.0 667.9 1125.0 991.3 T 9 287.3 330.3 597.8 566.2 707.4 1068.9 209.8 262.8 400.0 590.2 1107.6 908.2 T 10 362.4 448.5 773.2 754.8 1099.0 1391.7 275.7 315.2 630.6 770.6 1721.6 1057.2 T 11 355.7 457.1 756.0 704.9 1183.0 1382.3 306.5 303.6 618.2 656.8 1598.7 886.0 T 12 274.8 320.8 569.5 546.7 798.0 870.5 199.4 241.1 390.8 534.0 1109.2 694.4 SEM + 1.1 8.1 35.0 39.1 46.3 68.7 6.2 12.3 11.0 41.1 120.5 7.7 CD at 5 % 22.6 18.8 72.6 81.2 96.0 142.6 12.8 25.4 22.8 85.2 250.0 160.8 Table 8. Influence of integrated nutrient management practices on uptake of Mn (g ha -1 ) in rice-rice cropping system Treat ments Tillering 2005-06 2006-07 Panicle initiation Harvesting Tillering Panicle initiation Harvesting Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi Kharif Rabi T 1 187.4 269.8 384.9 328.5 137.0 324.6 154.9 192.1 351.9 313.6 474.7 215.7 T 2 276.0 287.4 629.9 525.1 574.9 676.8 183.1 232.3 374.7 483.3 784.5 643.7 T 3 222.8 312.9 618.8 616.2 767.5 940.5 191.7 270.3 381.9 660.8 993.9 746.9 T 4 286.9 322.2 695.5 618.7 935.2 964.8 211.2 251.0 536.4 626.6 1099.3 647.2 T 5 300.2 346.0 811.4 682.7 1222.4 1170.1 243.3 273.7 584.4 673.3 1343.0 845.1 T 6 332.6 438.5 802.5 751.2 1009.2 1432.9 267.7 338.8 608.4 807.4 1516.4 965.6 T 7 371.5 400.0 812.0 711.3 961.5 1270.3 261.7 290.3 576.1 713.8 1349.3 914.44 T 8 225.7 373.9 519.5 670.3 729.0 1146.9 204.6 311.1 412.0 730.2 1011.6 867.4 T 9 276.3 334.3 653.2 614.6 771.12 1060.3 208.7 273.5 399.6 656.2 1017.3 862.6 T 10 354.5 436.7 859.7 780.8 1215 1423.6 274.1 334.7 630.6 843.6 1576.6 988.1 T 11 355.7 449.6 802.1 736.2 1285.8 1347.4 293.8 322.8 613.9 756.9 1454.1 883.3 T 12 266.9 318.8 628.4 572.11 791.1 894.2 202.1 249.4 421.8 545.0 928.4 807.1 SEM + 13.6 7.7 61.0 45.8 90.3 106.5 12.7 29.8 35.7 58.0 66.2 112.8 CD at 5 % 28.3 16.0 126.6 95.0 166.5 220.8 26.4 61.8 74.0 120.4 116.5 234.0 16
NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER LONG TERM INM REFERENCES Rajeev Kumar, Singh, K.P and Sarkar, A K 1993. Cumulative effects of cropping and fertilizer use on the status of micronutrients in soil and crop. Fertilizer News. 38(11): 13-17. Santhy, P., Jayashree Sankar, S., Muthuvel, P and Selvi, D. 1998. Long term fertilizer experiments – status of N, P and K fractions in soil, Journal of Indian Society Soil Science 46(3): 395-398. Singh, N.P., Sachan, R.S., Pandey, P.Cand Bisht, P.S. 1999. Effect of decade long fertilizer and manure application on soil fertility and productivity of rice – wheat system in a Mollisol. Journal of Indian Society of soil Science 48(1):72-79. Tandon, H.L.S. 1995, Methods of analysis of soils, plants, water and fertilizers FDCO, New Delhi, pp.143. 17
Page 1 and 2: 1
Page 3 and 4: CONTENTS PART I : PLANT SCIENCE Eff
Page 5 and 6: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 1-4, 2013 EFFEC
Page 7 and 8: EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NPK
Page 9 and 10: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 5-13, 2013 NUTR
Page 11 and 12: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
Page 13 and 14: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
Page 15: NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
Page 19 and 20: LAKSHMI et al Fig 1. Changes in C/N
Page 21 and 22: LAKSHMI et al Changes in C/N ratio
Page 23 and 24: LAKSHMI et al Table 3. Changes in h
Page 25 and 26: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 20-29, 2013 INF
Page 27 and 28: PRASAD and PRASADINI of bulk densit
Page 29 and 30: PRASAD and PRASADINI to as high as
Page 31 and 32: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 4 . Infl
Page 33 and 34: PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 8. Influ
Page 35 and 36: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 30-38, 2013 GEN
Page 37 and 38: VEMANNA et al The range in mean val
Page 39 and 40: VEMANNA et al grain yield per plant
Page 41 and 42: VEMANNA et al 41
Page 43 and 44: VEMANNA et al Singh, S. P and Khan,
Page 45 and 46: RAMANA et al RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Page 47 and 48: J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 42-46, 2013 A S
Page 49 and 50: RAJANNA et. al. Table 2. Reasons fo
Page 51 and 52: RAJANNA et al the present findings
Page 53 and 54: NARASIMHA et al Table 1. Proximate
Page 55 and 56: NARASIMHA et al Maynard, L., Lossli
Page 57 and 58: RAMANA et al with small follicles m
Page 59 and 60: RAMANA et al Characteristics of fol
Page 61 and 62: Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 63 and 64: KIRTHY et al Akhtar et al., 2008; S
Page 65 and 66: KIRTHY et al El Gharras H. 2009. Po
Page 67 and 68:
SANDYARANI et al Weed parameters li
Page 69 and 70:
SANDYARANI et al Table 2. Influence
Page 71 and 72:
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 73 and 74:
KUMAR et al Table 2. Effect of seed
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
DEEPAK et al Table 2 Price spread a
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
YAMINI et al Table 3. Estimates of
Page 83 and 84:
YAMINI et al coupled with high per
Page 85 and 86:
LOKESH et al Table 1. Clustering pa
Page 87 and 88:
LOKESH et al Table 4. Mean values o
Page 89 and 90:
ABIRAMI et al Socio-economic Impact
Page 91 and 92:
ABIRAMI et al socio-economic impact
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
VEMANNA et al Table 1. Discriminant
Page 97 and 98:
VEMANNA et al total biomass, fresh
Page 99 and 100:
RAO et al Table 1. Plant height, nu
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
DEVI et al S.No Category Frequency
Page 105 and 106:
DEVI et al extension contact and ma
Page 107 and 108:
NIRMALA and VASANTHA earliness in a
Page 109 and 110:
NIRMALA and VASANTHA adopted this t
Page 111 and 112:
SUDHARANI et al Table 1. Genotypic
Page 113 and 114:
SUDHARANI et al At genotypic level,
Page 115 and 116:
NIRMALA et al weight of pods per pl
Page 117 and 118:
NIRMALA et al Table 3. Cluster mean
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI 6.5 6.
Page 125 and 126:
PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI REFERE
Page 127 and 128:
KATTEL et al Table 1. Item Analysis
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
RADHIKA et al Thus, the results of
Page 133 and 134:
RAJU et al estimated daily dietary
Page 135 and 136:
RAJU et al Table 3. Physico-chemica
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
MINNIE et al Table 2. Estimates of
Page 141 and 142:
Statement about ownership and other
Page 143 and 144:
GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF M
Page 145:
ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSIDER
show all

The Journal of Research ANGRAU

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?