The Journal of Research ANGRAU

Contents of 41(1) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university Contents of 41(1) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

21.09.2015 Views

AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF VALUE ADDITION TO COTTON The processing of one quintal of kapas resulted in 33 kg of lint, 65 kg of seed and 2 kg of waste. The gross returns obtained from ginning one quintal of kapas were Rs. 4970.41 of which the returns from main product (lint) were Rs. 3978.81 and that from byproduct (seed) were Rs. 991.6. Cost of raw material (kapas) was Rs. 4238 with a value addition to the product in the process being Rs. 732.41 and cost of processing accounting Rs. 392.87. The net value added as a result of processing of kapas to lint was Rs. 339.54 per quintal of kapas processed. The benefit cost ratio worked out to 0.86 in kapas processing. Similar results were observed with Mundinamani (2000) and Dodamani (2007). Among all the costs incurred in marketing of ginned cotton, the maximum cost was incurred on packing material Rs.30.36 per quintal, accounting for 37.47 per cent of the total cost of marketing. As the packing material was very important in case of lint marketing, it constituted the maximum percent. This was followed by sales tax, miscellaneous costs and selling expenditure, which accounted for 25.02 per cent, 20.33 per cent and 17.18 per cent of the total cost of marketing of one quintal lint, respectively. These results are on par with the results of Shivakumar et al. (2001). The average total cost incurred in the processing of lint to yarn was Rs.17201.64 per quintal, of which the total variable cost was Rs.15497.16 forming the major component (90.09%) of the total cost of processing of lint. The total fixed cost being Rs.1704.48 per quintal accounted for 9.91 per cent of the total cost of processing. Of the variable cost the cost of raw material (Rs.12000/quintal) accounted for 69.76 per cent followed by electricity charges (9.82%) and interest rate on working capital (5.72%). The cost on wages to casual labour, repair and maintenance, office maintenance, telephone charges together accounted for 4.76 per cent of the total cost of processing. In the total fixed cost (Rs.1704.48), depreciation amounts Rs.1427.06 (8.27%), which was found to be major component. This was followed by salary to permanent staff i.e., Rs.176.9 (1.02%) and interest on fixed capital, insurance, taxes, license fee, together accounting 0.58 per cent of the total cost of lint to yarn. These results are in line with Mundinamani (2000) and Shivakumar et.al (2001). The processing of one quintal of lint on an average yielded 73 kg of yarn and 27 kg of waste material. The gross returns obtained from processing (spinning) of one quintal of lint were Rs.20435, which comprised of mainly returns from yarn (Rs.18250) and wastage (Rs.2185). The value addition in the process was Rs.8435. The net value added as a result of processing of lint to yarn was Rs.5933.36 per quintal of lint processed. The resultant benefit-cost ratio was 1.62. Table 2. Returns in processing of lint to yarn (for one quintal of lint spinned) S.No Particulars Amount (Rs) 1 Returns from main product(yarn) 18250 2 Returns from wastage 2185 3 Gross returns 20435 4 Raw material cost (kapas) 12000 5 Value addition 8435 6 Processing cost 5201.64 7 Net value addition 5933.36 8 Benefit-cost ratio 1.62 Among all the costs incurred in marketing of spinned cotton, the maximum cost was incurred on packing material, Rs.275.48 per quintal, accounting for 47.9 per cent of the total cost of marketing. This was followed by commission charges Rs.246.45 (42.85%) and export expenses, yarn sale expenses, yarn freight together accounting for 9.22 per cent of the total cost of marketing of one quintal yarn. These results are in line with the results of Shivakumar et al. (2001). 130

RADHIKA et al Thus, the results of analysis indicated that an additional value to the extent of Rs.2297.54 was created in the course of processing cotton kapas in to yarn. The breakup of the same at different levels of processing i.e., at ginning was Rs.339.54 (14.78%) and spinning Rs.1958 (85.22%). Table 3. Total net value addition to one quintal of cotton by processing S.No Stage of processing Net value addition (Rs) Per cent 1 Ginning 339.54 14.78 2 Spinning 1958 85.22 Total net value addition to cotton 2297.54 100 REFERENCES Dodamani, M.T and Kunnal L.B. 2007. Value addition to organically produced naturally- coloured cotton under contract farming. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 20:521-528. Mundinamani, R.M. 2000. An economic analysis of value addition to Cotton in Gadag district. M.Sc. (Ag) Thesis submitted to University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. Shivakumar, S., Sonnad, J.S and Basavaraj, H. 2001. Economics of cotton ginning and pressing in Bellary District. Agricultural marketing. 43(4): 9-12. 131

AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF VALUE ADDITION TO COTTON<br />

<strong>The</strong> processing <strong>of</strong> one quintal <strong>of</strong> kapas<br />

resulted in 33 kg <strong>of</strong> lint, 65 kg <strong>of</strong> seed and 2 kg <strong>of</strong><br />

waste. <strong>The</strong> gross returns obtained from ginning one<br />

quintal <strong>of</strong> kapas were Rs. 4970.41 <strong>of</strong> which the returns<br />

from main product (lint) were Rs. 3978.81 and that<br />

from byproduct (seed) were Rs. 991.6. Cost <strong>of</strong> raw<br />

material (kapas) was Rs. 4238 with a value addition<br />

to the product in the process being Rs. 732.41 and<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> processing accounting Rs. 392.87. <strong>The</strong> net<br />

value added as a result <strong>of</strong> processing <strong>of</strong> kapas to lint<br />

was Rs. 339.54 per quintal <strong>of</strong> kapas processed. <strong>The</strong><br />

benefit cost ratio worked out to 0.86 in kapas<br />

processing. Similar results were observed with<br />

Mundinamani (2000) and Dodamani (2007).<br />

Among all the costs incurred in marketing <strong>of</strong><br />

ginned cotton, the maximum cost was incurred on<br />

packing material Rs.30.36 per quintal, accounting for<br />

37.47 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total cost <strong>of</strong> marketing. As the<br />

packing material was very important in case <strong>of</strong> lint<br />

marketing, it constituted the maximum percent. This<br />

was followed by sales tax, miscellaneous costs and<br />

selling expenditure, which accounted for 25.02 per<br />

cent, 20.33 per cent and 17.18 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> marketing <strong>of</strong> one quintal lint, respectively.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se results are on par with the results <strong>of</strong><br />

Shivakumar et al. (2001).<br />

<strong>The</strong> average total cost incurred in the<br />

processing <strong>of</strong> lint to yarn was Rs.17201.64 per quintal,<br />

<strong>of</strong> which the total variable cost was Rs.15497.16<br />

forming the major component (90.09%) <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> processing <strong>of</strong> lint. <strong>The</strong> total fixed cost being<br />

Rs.1704.48 per quintal accounted for 9.91 per cent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the total cost <strong>of</strong> processing. Of the variable cost<br />

the cost <strong>of</strong> raw material (Rs.12000/quintal) accounted<br />

for 69.76 per cent followed by electricity charges<br />

(9.82%) and interest rate on working capital (5.72%).<br />

<strong>The</strong> cost on wages to casual labour, repair and<br />

maintenance, <strong>of</strong>fice maintenance, telephone charges<br />

together accounted for 4.76 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> processing.<br />

In the total fixed cost (Rs.1704.48),<br />

depreciation amounts Rs.1427.06 (8.27%), which was<br />

found to be major component. This was followed by<br />

salary to permanent staff i.e., Rs.176.9 (1.02%) and<br />

interest on fixed capital, insurance, taxes, license<br />

fee, together accounting 0.58 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> lint to yarn. <strong>The</strong>se results are in line with<br />

Mundinamani (2000) and Shivakumar et.al (2001).<br />

<strong>The</strong> processing <strong>of</strong> one quintal <strong>of</strong> lint on an average<br />

yielded 73 kg <strong>of</strong> yarn and 27 kg <strong>of</strong> waste material.<br />

<strong>The</strong> gross returns obtained from processing (spinning)<br />

<strong>of</strong> one quintal <strong>of</strong> lint were Rs.20435, which comprised<br />

<strong>of</strong> mainly returns from yarn (Rs.18250) and wastage<br />

(Rs.2185). <strong>The</strong> value addition in the process was<br />

Rs.8435. <strong>The</strong> net value added as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

processing <strong>of</strong> lint to yarn was Rs.5933.36 per quintal<br />

<strong>of</strong> lint processed. <strong>The</strong> resultant benefit-cost ratio was<br />

1.62.<br />

Table 2. Returns in processing <strong>of</strong> lint to yarn (for one quintal <strong>of</strong> lint spinned)<br />

S.No Particulars Amount (Rs)<br />

1 Returns from main product(yarn) 18250<br />

2 Returns from wastage 2185<br />

3 Gross returns 20435<br />

4 Raw material cost (kapas) 12000<br />

5 Value addition 8435<br />

6 Processing cost 5201.64<br />

7 Net value addition 5933.36<br />

8 Benefit-cost ratio 1.62<br />

Among all the costs incurred in marketing <strong>of</strong><br />

spinned cotton, the maximum cost was incurred on<br />

packing material, Rs.275.48 per quintal, accounting<br />

for 47.9 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total cost <strong>of</strong> marketing. This<br />

was followed by commission charges Rs.246.45<br />

(42.85%) and export expenses, yarn sale expenses,<br />

yarn freight together accounting for 9.22 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

the total cost <strong>of</strong> marketing <strong>of</strong> one quintal yarn. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

results are in line with the results <strong>of</strong> Shivakumar et<br />

al. (2001).<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!