The Journal of Research ANGRAU

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF DENDROBIUM ORCHID HYBRIDS Fig 1. Spike quality and vase life (in tap water) of different Dendrobium hybrids grown under shade net. REFERENCES Betonio, G.I. 1966. Germplasm collection and evaluation of different Anthurium cultivars. Journal of crop science. 20: 12. and flowering in Anthurium. Ph.D. Thesis submitted to University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore. Chandrappa. 2003. Evaluation and effect of media, biofertilizer and growth regulators on growth 100
Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 96-100, 2013 PROFILE CHARACTERISTICS OF SUGARCANE FARMERS IN CHITTOOR DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH S. RAMALAKSHMI DEVI, P. V. SATYA GOPAL, V.SAILAJA and S.V. PRASAD Department of Extension Education, S.V. Agricultural college, Tirupati-517502 Date of Receipt : 26.09.2012 Date of Acceptance : 11.01.2013 Sugarcane is the world’s largest crop and is grown in over 110 countries. In 2009, an estimated 1,683 million metric tons were produced worldwide which amounts to 22.4% of the total world agricultural production by weight (FAO, 2009). India ranks second in cane area and sugar production after Brazil. The states of Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Naidu and Andhra Pradesh together produce nearly 90 per cent of the cane and sugar in the country. Andhra Pradesh ranks fifth in sugar cone area of the country with a share of 4.83 per cent. The average production of Andhra Pradesh is about 20.30 million tons contributing to 5.83 per cent of the total production of the country. In Andhra Pradesh, the major sugarcane growing districts in Telangana, coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema regions are Nizamabad, Visakhapatnam and Chittoor districts respectively. The significant contribution of researchers, extension functionaries and farming community plays pivotal role in achieving the above success. On one side, the researchers developed sustainable technologies to meet the production requirements of the farmers followed by effective dissemination of technologies by the extension functionaries so as to bring the technologies to the farmers for adoption. On the other side, the farming community is successfully adopting those technologies so as to increase the productivity levels of sugarcane. As the farmers are the key contributors of production, the present study was taken up to study the profile characteristics of sugarcane farmers. Ex-post-facto research design was adopted for the study. The investigation was carried out in Chittoor district of Rayalaseema region. Four mandals were selected in Chittoor district purposively that have highest area under sugarcane. From each mandal 3 villages were selected purposively. From each village 10 sugarcane farmers were selected randomly thus making a total of 120 respondents . The data were collected by personal interview method through structured interview schedule. The sugarcane farmers were distributed into different categories based on their selected profile characteristics and were presented in the Table 1 and interpreted through frequencies, percentages, mean and standard deviation. Age Majority (57.50%) of the sugarcane farmers belonged to middle age category followed by young (31.66%) and old age (10.83%) categories. The probable reason for distribution might be that the agriculture in the present situation has been perceived as a profitable enterprise in particular as sugarcane is one of the remunerative crops for the farmers. Middle age and young age farmers were motivated to cultivate sugarcane by adopting latest production technologies and obtaining good returns.. Hence the above trend was observed. It is in conformity with Reddy (1997) and Gowda et al., (2011). Education Majority (90.00%) of the respondents were educated, 4.17 per cent were under can read and write only category and only 5.00 per cent were illiterates. The probable reason for the above distribution might be that, as education was gaining importance for the past three decades and brought out awareness among the farming community about the functional literacy. Majority of the sugarcane farmers were under middle and young age lead to the proper educational status among the farming community. It is in conformity with Latha (2002) and Gowda (2011). email: shilpamohan5050@gmail.com 101
Page 1 and 2:
1
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS PART I : PLANT SCIENCE Eff
Page 5 and 6:
J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 1-4, 2013 EFFEC
Page 7 and 8:
EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NPK
Page 9 and 10:
J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 5-13, 2013 NUTR
Page 11 and 12:
NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY RICE CROP UNDER
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
LAKSHMI et al Fig 1. Changes in C/N
Page 21 and 22:
LAKSHMI et al Changes in C/N ratio
Page 23 and 24:
LAKSHMI et al Table 3. Changes in h
Page 25 and 26:
J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 20-29, 2013 INF
Page 27 and 28:
PRASAD and PRASADINI of bulk densit
Page 29 and 30:
PRASAD and PRASADINI to as high as
Page 31 and 32:
PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 4 . Infl
Page 33 and 34:
PRASAD and PRASADINI Table 8. Influ
Page 35 and 36:
J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 30-38, 2013 GEN
Page 37 and 38:
VEMANNA et al The range in mean val
Page 39 and 40:
VEMANNA et al grain yield per plant
Page 41 and 42:
VEMANNA et al 41
Page 43 and 44:
VEMANNA et al Singh, S. P and Khan,
Page 45 and 46:
RAMANA et al RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Page 47 and 48:
J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1) 42-46, 2013 A S
Page 49 and 50: RAJANNA et. al. Table 2. Reasons fo
Page 51 and 52: RAJANNA et al the present findings
Page 53 and 54: NARASIMHA et al Table 1. Proximate
Page 55 and 56: NARASIMHA et al Maynard, L., Lossli
Page 57 and 58: RAMANA et al with small follicles m
Page 59 and 60: RAMANA et al Characteristics of fol
Page 61 and 62: Research Notes J.Res. ANGRAU 41(1)
Page 63 and 64: KIRTHY et al Akhtar et al., 2008; S
Page 65 and 66: KIRTHY et al El Gharras H. 2009. Po
Page 67 and 68: SANDYARANI et al Weed parameters li
Page 69 and 70: SANDYARANI et al Table 2. Influence
Page 73 and 74: KUMAR et al Table 2. Effect of seed
Page 77 and 78: DEEPAK et al Table 2 Price spread a
Page 81 and 82: YAMINI et al Table 3. Estimates of
Page 83 and 84: YAMINI et al coupled with high per
Page 85 and 86: LOKESH et al Table 1. Clustering pa
Page 87 and 88: LOKESH et al Table 4. Mean values o
Page 89 and 90: ABIRAMI et al Socio-economic Impact
Page 91 and 92: ABIRAMI et al socio-economic impact
Page 95 and 96: VEMANNA et al Table 1. Discriminant
Page 97 and 98: VEMANNA et al total biomass, fresh
Page 99: RAO et al Table 1. Plant height, nu
Page 103 and 104: DEVI et al S.No Category Frequency
Page 105 and 106: DEVI et al extension contact and ma
Page 107 and 108: NIRMALA and VASANTHA earliness in a
Page 109 and 110: NIRMALA and VASANTHA adopted this t
Page 111 and 112: SUDHARANI et al Table 1. Genotypic
Page 113 and 114: SUDHARANI et al At genotypic level,
Page 115 and 116: NIRMALA et al weight of pods per pl
Page 117 and 118: NIRMALA et al Table 3. Cluster mean
Page 123 and 124: PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI 6.5 6.
Page 125 and 126: PUNYAVATHI and VIJAYALAKSHMI REFERE
Page 127 and 128: KATTEL et al Table 1. Item Analysis
Page 131 and 132: RADHIKA et al Thus, the results of
Page 133 and 134: RAJU et al estimated daily dietary
Page 135 and 136: RAJU et al Table 3. Physico-chemica
Page 139 and 140: MINNIE et al Table 2. Estimates of
Page 141 and 142: Statement about ownership and other
Page 143 and 144: GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF M
Page 145: ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSIDER
show all

The Journal of Research ANGRAU

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?