SAR 18#6

graciewingert
from graciewingert More from this publisher
21.09.2015 Views

a rectangular shaped bolt group. The forward assist is permanently attached into the receiver and stationary. You have the appearance but it is non-functioning. The rail is the typical Mil-Std 1913. Another totally unique feature of this upper receiver is that the ejector is screwed into the left side of the inside of the receiver. The barrel on the AP4 tested is 16 inches in length with a 1 turn in 16 inch twist. The barrel is manufactured by DPMS and is manufactured from 4140 steel and Teflon coated. The barrel has the step-cut for mounting the M203 (not that you would) as well as a standard A2-style compensator. The front sight base was pinned to the barrel and has a bayonet lug. Standard large M4-type handguards came on it with a delta ring. The charging handle is proprietary on this design. There is a raised portion of material on top of the bolt that rides in a track in the charging handle. The bolt is also very unique compared to the rest of the uppers tested. It consists of two pieces and the recoil/action spring. The front part of the bolt is not so out of the ordinary other than the shape. The piece of metal on the rear is out of the norm. It is a rather large chunk of metal. It appears the reason for the large chunk of metal is not just to take up space but, due to the mass, will assist on more energy to drive the bolt forward. Try to picture bolt carrier bounce on a M4 but reverse the direction of the bounce. When two pieces of metal collide and one is heavier than the other, there will be rebound due to the physics of the thing. This would appear to be the logic behind it – or it could just be a sheer benefit of the design. The upper receiver was placed on the Aero Precision lower receiver. Only Black Dog Machine magazines were used. The upper was tested with CCI MiniMag, Remington Golden Bullet, Scorpion, Federal Match and CCI Stinger. This was the only rifle to cycle the standard velocity Federal match ammunition. The upper fired all 25 without a hitch. More than 200 rounds of the mentioned ammunition were fired without a single malfunction. The rifle grouped very well, although the range was 15 yards. The DPMS is certainly an excellent option for one looking for a .22 Long Rifle conversion kit. The AP4 is a great all-round upper. The bull barrel version is great for a competitor or for one who likes to put every bullet in the same hole. The quality of this upper receiver is excellent and with an MSRP $399 it is hard to beat. Chiappa M4-22, .22 Long Rifle Conversion Chiappa has been known mostly for blank firing weapons as well as reproduction firearms from way back – opening their doors in Italy in 1958. They opened a facility in Dayton, Ohio in 2007 to expand their North American market. Chiappa introduced both their M4-22 upper receiver conversion and their M4-22 complete rifle. They offer three different upper receivers. First is the M4-22 (CF500-059) upper, which is a 16 inch government profile barrel. This upper has standard M4-type handguards and a polymer upper receiver. The receiver has a forward assist (nonfunctional), fired cartridge case deflector and ejection port cover. The average selling price is around $350. This upper comes with a 28-round magazine. The next is the M4-22 Gen II Pro (CF500- 097), which differs from the standard by having a 7.8 inch free floating handguard. The third variation is the M4-22 Gen II Pro (CF500-095), which differs from the previous by having an 11.8 inch free floating barrel. There were three different uppers tested during this research. All were the same but with different handguards. The barrel was equipped with a standard A2- style compensator. The bolt is a modified Atchisson. The feed ramp is on the end of the barrel itself. There is a spacer SAR Vol. 18, No. 6 72 Nov., Dec. 2014

.22 Long Left: The Chiappa upper receivers were mounted on an American Tactical Imports OMNI Hybrid polymer lower receiver for testing. Note the Leupold optic that was used for accuracy testing. Above: The Chiappa bolt group (top). Notice this is black; the other two receivers had a chrome plated finish. The back of the bolt has a spacer to keep dirt from entering the receiver through the ejection port. The bottom shows both loaded and unloaded Chiappa polymer magazines. directly behind the bolt that seals up the ejection port protecting the inside of the rifle from debris. Both black and chrome plated carriers were seen. The upper receiver was placed on an American Tactical Gen 2 Hybrid polymer lower receiver. This was the most finicky of the lot. Quite accurate at 25 yards with 28 rounds in just over an inch with Scorpion ammunition but the uppers experienced some failures for the bolt to fully close. This was pretty much the only type of malfunction. Probably 5% of the rounds failed to cycle properly. If the round fired, it extracted, ejected and fed. At this point is where the hiccups began. This rifle did not like Stingers; the longer case was a contributor to failure of the bolt to close. The best performance came with Scorpion and CCI MiniMag ammunition. The magazine is proprietary to Chiappa but the Black Dog Machine magazines worked perfect as well. The Chiappa magazine was a little more difficult to load and you had to get the technique down. If the back end of the rim of the cartridge did not all stagger, that would interrupt the shot column from rising and cause a stoppage. All three of the uppers tested experienced this failure for the bolt to close. One of the uppers only had it happen a few times. This could have well been a chamber issue. The chamber and bore were scrubbed and clean to insure there was no lead fouling. The Chiappa receiver has the lowest MSRP and is not a bad unit to start off with. Chiappa has excellent customer service and were very helpful. Chiappa has some OEM contracts for these upper receivers. Finding the right ammunition is always the key to reliability. During testing, due to the sheer number of uppers tested there just was not enough time or ammunition to do any real ammo compatibility testing. Given more time and ammo this author is sure I could have found a winning ammo/rifle combination. There are many options out there for the purchaser of a .22 conversion kit. Certainly some are better than others. Based on this testing, price is not always a determining factor for quality. Mostly yes, but not always. The DPMS is the perfect example, with a low $399 MSRP it outperformed some of the ones in the $600 range. Then again the top performer has an MSRP of $625. The testing showed clearly that the .22 Long Rifle caliber is just not as reliable as a center fire cartridge. When the rifle malfunctioned it took some time to determine if the problem was with the rifle or the ammunition. Mostly, it came down to the inconsistencies of the ammunition. Good magazines make a difference and for best reliability result leave a standard trigger group with a rounded hammer. During testing two match grade triggers were tested with the notched hammer and the rifle would malfunction. Also, you do not want to change out your hammer spring for a lighter one. This may cause issues with detonation on the hard rim of the cartridge case. Stay with high velocity ammunition. The best result from this testing showed CCI MiniMag, CCI Stinger, Scorpion, Federal American Eagle, Winchester M-22 and Remington Thunder Bolt. Every rifle can be a little different; you may find a round that works better in your particular rifle. www.smallarmsreview.com 73 SAR Vol. 18, No. 6

a rectangular shaped bolt group. The<br />

forward assist is permanently attached<br />

into the receiver and stationary. You<br />

have the appearance but it is non-functioning.<br />

The rail is the typical Mil-Std<br />

1913. Another totally unique feature of<br />

this upper receiver is that the ejector is<br />

screwed into the left side of the inside of<br />

the receiver.<br />

The barrel on the AP4 tested is 16<br />

inches in length with a 1 turn in 16 inch<br />

twist. The barrel is manufactured by<br />

DPMS and is manufactured from 4140<br />

steel and Teflon coated. The barrel has<br />

the step-cut for mounting the M203 (not<br />

that you would) as well as a standard<br />

A2-style compensator. The front sight<br />

base was pinned to the barrel and has<br />

a bayonet lug. Standard large M4-type<br />

handguards came on it with a delta ring.<br />

The charging handle is proprietary<br />

on this design. There is a raised portion<br />

of material on top of the bolt that rides<br />

in a track in the charging handle. The<br />

bolt is also very unique compared to the<br />

rest of the uppers tested. It consists of<br />

two pieces and the recoil/action spring.<br />

The front part of the bolt is not so out of<br />

the ordinary other than the shape. The<br />

piece of metal on the rear is out of the<br />

norm. It is a rather large chunk of metal.<br />

It appears the reason for the large chunk<br />

of metal is not just to take up space but,<br />

due to the mass, will assist on more energy<br />

to drive the bolt forward. Try to picture<br />

bolt carrier bounce on a M4 but reverse<br />

the direction of the bounce. When<br />

two pieces of metal collide and one is<br />

heavier than the other, there will be rebound<br />

due to the physics of the thing.<br />

This would appear to be the logic behind<br />

it – or it could just be a sheer benefit of<br />

the design.<br />

The upper receiver was placed<br />

on the Aero Precision lower receiver.<br />

Only Black Dog Machine magazines<br />

were used. The upper was tested with<br />

CCI MiniMag, Remington Golden Bullet,<br />

Scorpion, Federal Match and CCI<br />

Stinger. This was the only rifle to cycle<br />

the standard velocity Federal match<br />

ammunition. The upper fired all 25 without<br />

a hitch. More than 200 rounds of<br />

the mentioned ammunition were fired<br />

without a single malfunction. The rifle<br />

grouped very well, although the range<br />

was 15 yards.<br />

The DPMS is certainly an excellent<br />

option for one looking for a .22 Long<br />

Rifle conversion kit. The AP4 is a great<br />

all-round upper. The bull barrel version<br />

is great for a competitor or for one who<br />

likes to put every bullet in the same hole.<br />

The quality of this upper receiver is excellent<br />

and with an MSRP $399 it is hard<br />

to beat.<br />

Chiappa M4-22, .22 Long<br />

Rifle Conversion<br />

Chiappa has been known mostly<br />

for blank firing weapons as well as<br />

reproduction firearms from way back<br />

– opening their doors in Italy in 1958.<br />

They opened a facility in Dayton, Ohio<br />

in 2007 to expand their North American<br />

market. Chiappa introduced both their<br />

M4-22 upper receiver conversion and<br />

their M4-22 complete rifle. They offer<br />

three different upper receivers. First is<br />

the M4-22 (CF500-059) upper, which<br />

is a 16 inch government profile barrel.<br />

This upper has standard M4-type handguards<br />

and a polymer upper receiver.<br />

The receiver has a forward assist (nonfunctional),<br />

fired cartridge case deflector<br />

and ejection port cover. The average<br />

selling price is around $350. This upper<br />

comes with a 28-round magazine. The<br />

next is the M4-22 Gen II Pro (CF500-<br />

097), which differs from the standard<br />

by having a 7.8 inch free floating handguard.<br />

The third variation is the M4-22<br />

Gen II Pro (CF500-095), which differs<br />

from the previous by having an 11.8 inch<br />

free floating barrel.<br />

There were three different uppers<br />

tested during this research. All were the<br />

same but with different handguards. The<br />

barrel was equipped with a standard A2-<br />

style compensator. The bolt is a modified<br />

Atchisson. The feed ramp is on the<br />

end of the barrel itself. There is a spacer<br />

<strong>SAR</strong> Vol. 18, No. 6 72 Nov., Dec. 2014

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!