21.09.2015 Views

SAR 18#6

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Finally, 4th generation Glock models<br />

incorporated rectangular checkering<br />

throughout the grip surface, a<br />

smaller grip with back strap extensions,<br />

a reversible magazine release, and the<br />

slide/recoil spring assembly was updated<br />

to include a dual spring for all models.<br />

The new slide and guide rod assemblies<br />

are not back-compatible with<br />

earlier models.<br />

While these categories are useful,<br />

the details in some cases can muddy<br />

the waters. Several models of Glock<br />

firearms were made bearing the 3rd<br />

generation finger grooves but no associated<br />

accessory rail. Guns of this<br />

type are rare and typically described as<br />

transitional or “Generation 2.5.” For the<br />

collector or firearm examiner wishing<br />

to evaluate this firearm, it’s safe to say<br />

that guns of this type were produced in<br />

relatively low numbers and for a short<br />

period of time. The early versions of the<br />

subcompact Glock 26 and 27 pistols<br />

(9mm and .40 S&W) produced around<br />

the same time had finger grooves on<br />

the front strap of the pistol that were<br />

devoid of checkering that eventually<br />

Above: From the first generation to the<br />

fourth, Glock models have undergone subtle<br />

changes to the markings and textures<br />

replicated in the molded polymer frames.<br />

appeared on later 3rd generation versions<br />

of those models. The slightly<br />

larger subcompact models 29 and<br />

30 (10mm and .45 ACP) were always<br />

made with the checkered finger<br />

grooves but eventually produced with<br />

the previously omitted accessory rail.<br />

The earlier non-railed versions of the<br />

www.smallarmsreview.com 51 <strong>SAR</strong> Vol. 18, No. 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!