19.09.2015 Views

TABLE CONTENTS

How different or similar are nematode communities - International ...

How different or similar are nematode communities - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In further glasshouse experiments, the suppression of R. similis in soil with additional high<br />

carbon amendments was confirmed. Additional nitrogen fertiliser had no significant effect<br />

on nematode suppression. However, the type of organic matter added to the soil significantly<br />

altered the level of suppression. With the addition of cellulose, suppression was significantly<br />

higher than in untreated soil or soil amended with lignin.<br />

In a 2-year field experiment, mill-ash, compost, grass hay and mill-mud were compared to<br />

untreated soil. The grass hay treatment was able to decrease the number and proportion of<br />

plant-parasitic nematodes in the soil relative to untreated soil. Amendments high in carbon<br />

appear to be well suited to suppression of R. similis in bananas.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Horticulture Australia Limited and Growcom provided funding for this work under project FR02025<br />

Study of the Biofumigant and Suppressive Actions of Biocidal Plants,<br />

Defatted Seed Meals and Natural Compounds towards Root-knot and Cyst<br />

Nematodes, in Organic Farming<br />

Curto, G. (1) & L. Lazzeri (2)<br />

(1) Plant Protection Service, Regione Emilia-Romagna, via di Saliceto n.81, 40128 Bologna (Italy); (2) CRA -<br />

Research Institute for Industrial Crop, via di Corticella n.133, 40129 Bologna (Italy)<br />

In the last four years (2004-2007) a set of studies concerning the suppressive and/or<br />

biofumigant activity of plant selections towards Meloidogyne incognita and Heterodera<br />

schachtii, were carried out in Emilia-Romagna, Po Valley, Northern Italy. The<br />

immobilization and nematicidal effects caused by the hydrolysis products of several<br />

glucosinolates were checked in in vitro bioassays towards second stage juveniles,<br />

determining the LD 50 after 24 and 48 hrs. The life cycle of either M. incognita or H. schachtii<br />

was studied successively in the roots of accessions belonging to Brassicaceae, Leguminosae<br />

and Graminaceae, in pot experiments in the greenhouse, with the aim of defining the best<br />

new varieties able to effectively interrupt or significantly slow the nematode life cycle. In an<br />

open field, some rotation schemes with either E. sativa cv. Nemat, or R. sativus cv. Boss or B.<br />

juncea sel. ISCI, as green manure intercrops, were evaluated in decreasing the M. incognita<br />

population in the soil, before either tomato (cv. Perfect Peel) or carrot (cv. Maestro F1) main<br />

crops.<br />

In the same years, liquid formulations of natural compounds and pellet and liquid products<br />

based on Brassica carinata defatted seed meals, were both checked as amendment, fertilizing<br />

and biofumigant treatments. At the beginning, some semi-field trials were carried out, testing<br />

different doses of meal and pellet against M. incognita. Other trials were carried out on<br />

tomato crops in plastic greenhouse on sandy soil, with the aim of evaluating the M. incognita<br />

control by periodic drip applications of liquid plant extracts associated with either an<br />

intercrop, E. sativa cv. Nemat, or a pellet based on defatted seed meals of B. carinata applied<br />

in pre-transplant. Finally, the effectiveness of different cropping systems in organic farming<br />

were tested, from 2005 to 2007, in open fields infested by M. incognita. Eight combinations<br />

of crop rotation, biocidal intercropping and biofumigant treatment, were compared with the<br />

aim of verifying the level of nematode control.<br />

5 th International Congress of Nematology, 2008 39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!